Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “uranium”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 739 records · Page 41
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Progress towards waterproofing uranium nitride

Uranium mononitride (UN) is a promising, high-uranium-density fuel because of its good thermal properties and performance during irradiation and has been considered as a potential replacement for uranium(IV) oxide (UO 2 ) in commercial light water reactors. Despite these advantages, limitations are observed when the coolant comes in contact with the fuel, e.g. breach of cladding, resulting in degradation of the fuel. Research focused on continuing work from FY18 that examined the feasibility of UN-UO 2 composites for UN waterproofing purposes. Steam oxidation testing of candidate waterproofing additive materials was performed to evaluate the corrosion resistance of these materials. Composite pellets were also pressed and heated to examine chemical compatibility with UN.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

June 2019 Depleted Uranium Irradiation

Three different irradiations were performed at the Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) at Sandia National laboratory on June 4-6, 2019. Each target assembly included two or three depleted uranium targets, as well as a bismuth target and dosimetry packets. In July 2019, the target assemblies were received at TA-48 RC-1, unpackaged, and radiochemical analyses were performed. The analyses included autoradiography and gamma counting of the whole depleted uranium targets, gamma counting of the activation foils, and dissolution of six of the depleted uranium targets, followed by separated radiochemical analysis for a suite of fission products. This report describes the details of the radiochemical analysis and provides final results for the fission and activation product concentrations.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗
DOE OSTI2018

Unreviewed Disposal Question Evaluation: Disposal of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Spent Trap Media and Other Uranium Bearing Particulate Wastes at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada

This Unreviewed Disposal Question Evaluation assesses whether the Portsmouth (PORTS) Gaseous Diffusion Plant (GDP) Spent Trap Media and Other Uranium Bearing Particulate Wastes is suitable for shallow land burial at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site on the Nevada National Security Site. Disposal of the PORTS GDP Spent Trap Media and Other Uranium Bearing Particulate Wastes meets all performance objectives in DOE M 435.1-1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual, Chapter IV, Section P. The PORTS GDP Spent Trap Media and Other Uranium Bearing Particulate Wastes are recommended for acceptance with the condition that the total technetium-99 (99Tc) activity disposed under this waste profile shall not exceed 2.1E13 Bq.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Unreviewed Disposal Question Evaluation: Disposal of the Idaho National Laboratory Repackaged Uranium Metal and Oxide at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada

This Unreviewed Disposal Question Evaluation assesses whether the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Repackaged Uranium Metal and Oxide is suitable for shallow land burial at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site on the Nevada National Security Site. Disposal of the INL Repackaged Uranium Metal and Oxide meets all performance objectives in DOE M 435.1-1, “Radioactive Waste Management Manual,” Chapter IV, Section P. The INL Repackaged Uranium Metal and Oxide waste stream is recommended for acceptance without conditions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Unreviewed Disposal Question Evaluation: Disposal of the Idaho National Laboratory Repackaged Uranium Metal and Oxide with Polychlorinated Biphenyls at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada

This Unreviewed Disposal Question Evaluation assesses whether the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Repackaged Uranium Metal and Oxide with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) is suitable for shallow land burial at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site on the Nevada National Security Site. Disposal of the INL Repackaged Uranium Metal and Oxide with PCBs waste stream meets all the performance objectives contained in DOE M 435.1-1, “Radioactive Waste Management Manual,” Chapter IV, Section P. The INL Repackaged Uranium Metal and Oxide with PCBs waste stream is recommended for acceptance without conditions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Two Delayed Critical 7-Inch-Diameter Interacting Enriched (93.14) Uranium Metal Cylinders without Moderator and Reflector

This report documents very accurately the configuration and the materials for experiments with two unmoderated, unreflected, interacting, coaxial, highly enriched, 7-in.-diameter, uranium metal cylinders performed at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) in April 1963 and described in logbook E-19 associated with experiments in the East cell of ORCEF. The information is sufficiently accurate that it can be used as the basis for preparation of benchmarks for International Criticality Safety Benchmark Program (ICSBEP) at Idaho National laboratory. The thickness of the cylinders was varied and the spacing between them was adjusted to achieve a delayed critical configuration. The average enrichment of the uranium metal was 94.15 wt. % 235 U. The heights of the 7-in.-diameter, equal-height cylinders varied from 2 5/8 to 3 1/4 inches. All interacting cylinders were assembled coaxially with their flat faces parallel and their combined masses varied between 62 and 76 kilograms of HEU metal. The data from these six experiments described are judged to be acceptable for use as criticality safety benchmark experiments for the ICSBEP and EURATOM’s Nuclear Energy Agency nuclear criticality safety benchmark program, once the uncertainty analysis is completed. Based on previous ICSBEP benchmarks with this enriched uranium metal at ORCEF, it is expected that the uncertainties in k eff could be as low as ± 0.0002.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Two Delayed Critical 15-Inch-Diameter Interacting Enriched (93.14) Uranium Metal Cylinders without Moderator and Reflector

This report documents very accurately the configuration and the materials for experiments with two unmoderated, unreflected, interacting, coaxial, highly enriched, 15-in.-diameter, uranium metal cylinders performed at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) in May to Aug 1963 and described in logbook E-19 and E -20 associated with experiments in the East cell of ORCEF. Measurements were also performed in April and May of 1965 and described in logbooks E-22 and E-23 The information is sufficiently accurate that it can be used as the basis for preparation of benchmarks for International Criticality Safety Benchmark Program (ICSBEP) at Idaho National laboratory. The thickness of the cylinders was varied and the spacing between them was adjusted to achieve a delayed critical configuration. The average enrichment of the uranium metal was 94.14 wt. % 235 U. The heights of the 15-in.-diameter, equal-height cylinders varied from 1-5/8 to 3.0-inches. All interacting cylinders were assembled coaxially with their flat faces parallel and their combined masses varied between 182 and 325 kilograms of HEU metal. The data from these 12 experiments described would be acceptable for use as criticality safety benchmark experiments for the ICSBEP and EURATOM’s Nuclear Energy Agency nuclear criticality safety benchmark program, once the uncertainty analysis is completed. Based on previous ICSBEP benchmarks with this enriched uranium metal at ORCEF, it is expected that the uncertainties in k eff could be as low as ± 0.0002.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Thermomechanical Processing of Uranium Alloys with 10 and 50 Weight Percent Zirconium

This work focuses on casting and thermomechanical processing for moderate sized (500-1000g) 10% by weight and 50% by weight uranium-zirconium alloys. Three castings of uranium – 10wt% zirconium and a fourth casting of uranium – 50wt% zirconium were completed using different castings processes. The first casting process relied on only induction mixing within the VIM system thereby eliminating the need for an arc-melting feedstock preparation step. The second casting process used the arc-melting process prior for feedstock to the same VIM system. In this study, the induction mixing process alone with a graphite crucible appears insufficient for the fabrication of UZr alloys. Graphite is suitable with the use of master alloy UZr feedstock produced by arc-melting. There was a moderate increase of approximately 100 ppm of carbon within the U10Zr alloys. However, there was a near 1000 ppm increase of carbon in the U50Zr alloy. This carbon content is considered too high for forming processes, and therefore, warrants the use of a ceramic crucible for UZr castings near 50wt% zirconium. Zirconia does not appear suitable for UZr castings near 50wt% zirconium. The use of Beryllia or Thoria may be a more suitable option. However, due to the significantly lower liquidus and lower zirconium content, Zirconia crucibles do appear viable for carbon reduction in the U10Zr system. Two thermomechanical processes are also studied in this work - hot extrusion of the U50Zr system and heat treatment in an argon atmosphere. This work demonstrated that extrusion of the U50Zr alloy near 680°C is a viable choice even with +1000 ppm carbon. Extrusion of the U50Zr system near 630°C was unsuccessful and does not appear viable unless significant force and tooling strength is available. There appears to be a moderate increase in extrudate hardness when compared to as-cast. Heat-treatment reduced the hardness of as-cast alloys in the U10Zr castings as well as resolve some variance in the microstructures. However, for the U50Zr billet that did not successfully extrude at 630°C, heat treatment at 900°C for 96 hours did not have a significant impact on hardness or microstructure.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Three Delayed Critical 15-Inch-Diameter Interacting Enriched (93.14) Uranium Metal Cylinders Without Moderator and Reflector

This report documents very accurately the configuration and the materials for experiments with three unmoderated, unreflected, interacting, coaxial, highly enriched, 15-in.-diameter, uranium metal cylinders performed at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) in August and September 1963 and described in logbook E 20 associated with experiments in the East cell of ORCEF. The information is sufficiently accurate that it can be used as the basis for preparation of benchmarks for International Criticality Safety Benchmark Program (ICSBEP) at Idaho National laboratory. The thickness of the cylinders was varied and the spacing between them was adjusted to achieve a delayed critical configuration. The average enrichment of the uranium metal was 94.14 wt. % 235U. The heights of the 15-in.-diameter, equal-height cylinders varied from 1-1/8to 2.00 inches. All interacting cylinders were assembled coaxially with their flat faces parallel and their combined masses varied between 182 and 325 kilograms of HEU metal. The data from these six experiments described are judged to be acceptable for use as criticality safety benchmark experiments for the ICSBEP and EURATOM’s Nuclear Energy Agency nuclear criticality safety benchmark program, once the uncertainty analysis is completed. Based on previous ICSBEP benchmarks with this enriched uranium metal at ORCEF, it is expected that the uncertainties in measured keff could be as low as ± 0.0002.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Development and Optimization of a Purification Process to Recover 99 Mo from Low-enriched Uranium

Supported by the DOE-NNSA Office of Material Management & Minimization (M3), a number of domestic entities are pursuing non-highly enriched uranium (non-HEU) production of 99 Mo. As the production technologies of 99Mo pivot toward low-enriched uranium (LEU) or molybdenum targets, new reaction channels and accelerators are being evaluated. Superconducting electron linear accelerators (LINACs) with high-Z converter targets can generate bremsstrahlung photons and neutron fluxes that are capable of inducing photonuclear reactions and LEU fission. A particular advantage of a LINAC is that it does not rely on HEU-fueled reactor cores (which are currently slated for LEU conversion) and can operate on an almost continuous basis. Regarding the chemical purification of 99 Mo from irradiated uranium targets under acidic digestion, there exists a procedure known as Cintichem or modifications thereof with respect to LEU (LEU Modified Cintichem process, LMC). The process relies on a number of selective precipitation steps and column chromatography to purify Mo. It is important to note that LMC prescribes the addition of stable Mo to carry 99 Mo on alpha benzoin oxime, which reduces the specific activity of 99 Mo. This is especially important for processing 99 Mo batches with lower activities (~33 Ci of 99 Mo per batch).

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2015

Making Quality HPGe Gamma Ray Spectrum Measurements for Uranium: The Role of FRAM for Analysis, Quality Control and Enrichment Measurements, and Opportunities for Improved Quantification Documentation

Enrichment measurements are used in uranium safeguards verification and accountancy as both an attribute signature and in the interpretation of other nondestructive assay information, such as active interrogation for mass. Accurate and reliable assessments require quality information. The practices used to collect the raw data are therefore the crucial first step in managing the overall quality and uncertainty of the enrichment determination. This report discusses several topics associated with gamma-ray spectrum measurements of uranium using HPGe detectors. First a discussion of good data acquisition practices including physical setup, detector types and configurations, detector shielding and filtering, spectrum stabilization, and data acquisition protocols. Next is a discussion of analysis options to obtain isotopic composition and/or enrichment centered on the FRAM gamma ray isotopic analysis software. The report discusses the results of the development of a FRAM parameter file to perform classical Enrichment Meter Principle (EMP) analysis. Possible analysis and data acquisition issues (random summing, x-ray fluorescence peaks, peak interferences, shielding) that can affect FRAM analyses are also discussed. There is also a brief discussion of FRAM measurements in the field. Under the topic of uncertainty propagation and quantification in FRAM, uncertainty propagation verification methods and gaps in available uncertainty quantification data for uranium is covered. Suggestions are made for areas where ORNL can contribute to closing the identified uncertainty quantification gaps, and also to contributing nuclear data quality spectra to the research community.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Fundamental 235 Uranium Nuclear Resonance Spectroscopy (End of Year Report)

Uranium-235 is ubiquitous in the nuclear industry however, detailed characterization by magnetic resonance spectroscopy has remained largely elusive to-date. Conventional nuclear magnetic resonance techniques are ill-suited for characterizing 235 U due to the small gyromagnetic ratio and extremely large quadrupole moment of this spin$^{7}$ /2 isotope. Thus, we have designed and built a high-frequency nuclear quadrupole resonance spectrometer for measuring the quadrupole resonance of this important isotope. A successful nuclear quadrupole resonance measurement of 235 U would be a significant accomplishment and could yield valuable physical parameters such as chemical shifts, local electric field gradients, and through-bond and through-space internuclear couplings, all of which are directly related to local structure. These terms can be used to understand structural details of poorly characterized uranium materials and can improve computational models of uranium for which accurate reference data is lacking

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2021

Modifications to LEU-Modified Cintichem Process to Allow Processing of Fission-Produced 99 Mo from Up to 750 g of Irradiated Uranium Targets

Eden Radioisotopes, LLC is developing a TRIGA* -sized, 2 MW all-target reactor system licensed from Sandia National Laboratories. This all-target reactor uses up to 60 Argonne-designed annular LEU-foil targets to produce fission-produced 99 Mo. The Eden low-enriched uranium (LEU) target contains ~137 g of uranium and will be irradiated at up to 30 kW, with a target burnup determined by the number of targets processed each week. The annular target utilizes metallic uranium foils 400 mm long by 72 mm wide by 250±25 -µm-thick covered by a thin (10 µm on each face) nickel fission barrier. The foil is placed between two 35 mil aluminum tubes that form the outer and inner walls of the cladding cylinder, which is hydroformed to provide high thermal conductivity within the target. Eden expects to process between three and five targets per process batch, to maintain the process batch 99 Mo inventory at or below 5000 curies to maintain high 99 Mo recovery, within a few hours of discharge from the reactor. Eden expects to meet full U.S. demand by processing 30 targets per week, with each target operated for two weeks at 30 kW. To meet less than full U.S. demand, both the target power and the number of targets processed weekly will be adjusted. With increased 99 Mo production and given the size of U targets processed in a single batch (up to ~750g-U), it is important to identify whether any modifications are needed to the LEU-modified Cintichem process.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Intentional Uranium Tagging for Material Provenance and Pathway Forensics (LA19-Intentional-Forensics-NDD3Bb): Final Project Report

This report summarizes the outcomes of a 3-year NA-22 exploratory project to research the feasibility of tagging uranium materials, especially nuclear fuels, for nuclear nonproliferation purposes. The experimental focus was on metallic uranium forms under prospective surface and bulk tagging manufacturing and detection scenarios. This study showed that a large number of tags (drawn from an even larger menu of options) could be successfully imparted and detected in both as-built and degraded conditions. These results pave the way for additional R&D studies of surface and bulk tagging of metallic forms of uranium.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗
DOE OSTI2021

Gamma spectrometry uranium isotopic analysis rodeo: Summary of GADRAS results

This report summarizes GADRAS methods and gamma spectrometry rodeo uranium isotopic analysis results for high energy resolution H3D M400 cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) and ORTEC Micro Detective high-purity germanium (HPGe) spectra of uranium isotopic standards collected at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) over a two-year measurement campaign. During the campaign, measurements were performed with the detectors unshielded, side shielded, and collimated. In addition, measurements of the uranium isotopic standards were performed unshielded and shielded.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Radiation Shielding Analysis of Niowave’s Uranium Target Assembly 2 (UTA-2) Facility for Molybdenum-99 Production

Niowave is seeking to develop a commercial medical isotope production process using a low-enriched uranium accelerator-driven subcritical reactor (ADSR) system to produce molybdenum-99. As part of the US Department of Energy national laboratory support to develop low enriched uranium molybdenum-99 production technologies, Oak Ridge National Laboratory is providing research and development resources to assist Niowave in the design and licensing process of its technology. The goals of this work under the radiation shielding task are to assist Niowave in developing a methodology and framework for efficient radiation shielding simulations of their Uranium Target Assembly 2 facility and to provide preliminary radiation shielding calculations and design recommendations for the facility.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Delayed Critical Enriched Uranium Metal, 7-in.-diam. Cylinder with Thin Stainless Steel Top and Bottom Reflectors

Three 7 in. diameter highly enriched uranium (HEU; 93.17 wt % 235 U) metal cylinders were assembled on the vertical assembly machine of the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) with thin stainless steel reflectors (0.5, 1, and 2 in. thick) on the top and bottom. These experiments were performed during January 13–25, 1965, and used seven operational days at ORCEF. Before these experiments, unreflected and unmoderated 7 in. diameter HEU metal cylinders had been assembled to delayed criticality at ORCEF, and the results were benchmarked in HEU-MET-FAST-051. In addition to the critical experiments, the prompt neutron decay constant was measured via the Rossi-α technique, and those results are also presented in this report. To achieve near-delayed-critical systems, 5 × 5 × 0.03125 in. rectangular uranium metal parts were used on top of 7 in. diameter cylinders inside the top reflector. The delayed critical configuration from the three experiments described herein are acceptable for use as criticality safety benchmark experiments for the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Program (ICSBEP), coordinated by the Nuclear Energy Agency, once the uncertainty analysis is completed. Based on previous ICSBEP benchmarks with this enriched uranium metal at ORCEF, the uncertainty in $k_{eff}$ is expected to be as low as ±0.0002. The prompt neutron time decay data could be the basis of an International Reactor Physics Evaluation Program benchmark.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Uranium–Molybdenum Alloy Critical Experiments for the Design of the Health Physics Research Reactor

Clean critical experiments with a uranium-molybdenum alloy (average of 10.1616 wt. % Mo with a density of 17.08 g/cm 3 ) were performed at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility in 1961 to support the design of the Health Physics Research Reactor (HPRR). The HPRR was similar to the Godiva burst reactor at Los Alamos National Laboratory and was designed to produce 50 microseconds burst of 10 17 fission pulses of radiation for dosimetry measurements, initially in support of the determination of the doses from the nuclear detonations in Japan during World War II. These experiments reported here were used to verify the calculational methods used to design the HPRR. These delayed critical measurements were:1) a solid unreflected and unmoderated 8-in.-dimeter U-Mo cylinder, 2) an unmoderated and unreflected annulus with 8-in.-outside diameter, 2-in.-inside diameter cylinder with a central void, 3) an unmoderated and unreflected annulus with 8-in.-outside diameter, 2-in.-inside diameter cylinder with a central void filled with stainless steel, 4) Same as 3) but with 3-in-thick Plexiglas reflector on top with and without cadmium between the reflector and the U-Mo alloy assembly with steel in the center, and 5) an unmoderated and unreflected annulus which was a modification of the second but with the lower 5 inches of the central hole enlarged to 3.5 in. with various reflector conditions. The reflector conditions were: 1-in.-thick Plexiglas on all outer surfaces-void in the center; 1-in.-thick Plexiglas on all outer surfaces-Plexiglas in the center; 2-in.- thick Plexiglas on radial surface-void in the center; 6-in.-thick Plexiglas on the bottom only-Plexiglas in the center; and 6-in.-thick Plexiglas on bottom, 1-in.-thick on top and on the lower 8.25-cm.-section of the radial surface-void in the center. For some of these reflector conditions 0.025-cm.thick cadmium was located between the reflector and the U-Mo alloy. The uranium contained 93.17 wt. % 235 U. Reflection was a safety concern for this unmoderated and unreflected reactor and reduction of reflection effects was also investigated by insertion of neutron absorber around the U-Mo alloy. The stainless steel 304 contained 18% nickel and 8% chromium and the rest iron. The reflector material was a methacrylate plastic (Plexiglas) containing 5.8 x 10 22 atoms/cm 3 of hydrogen and 3.6 x 10 22 atoms/cm 3 of carbon with a density of 1.20 g/cm 3 . The purpose of this report is to document the experimental information for the measurements performed so that at a later date researchers could perform the required uncertainty and calculational analyses and documentation to use these data for an International Nuclear Criticality Safety Benchmark Program (ICSBEP) or a EURATON Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) benchmark. The data from the experiments described should be acceptable for use as criticality safety benchmark experiments for the ICSBEP and the NEA nuclear criticality safety benchmark program, once the uncertainty analysis is completed. Based on previous ICSBEP benchmarks with this enriched uranium metal at ORCEF, the uncertainties in k eff could be as low as ±0.0002 for some configurations.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗