DOE OSTI2020
The High-Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR) is a Generation IV concept designed to produce electricity and hydrogen at high efficiencies via high operating temperatures (700 °C or higher). Helium, the primary coolant for HTGRs, contains impurities (e.g., CO, H2O and CH4) that can induce corrosion reactions at high temperatures such as oxidation and (de)carburization, which in turn can affect the tribological behavior of components. Incoloy® 800HT (Ni-Fe-Cr austenitic solid-solution alloy) and Inconel® 617 (Ni-Cr-Co-Mo solid-solution alloy) are two high-temperature superalloys currently selected as candidate structural materials for the HTGR. The objective of this study is to evaluate the high-temperature tribological performance of these two candidate alloys after conditioning them in HTGR environments. Four regimes of corrosion were considered: a non-conditioned regime (Regime I), an oxidizing regime (Regime II), a carburizing and oxidizing regime (Regime III), and a carburizing regime (Regime IV). To simulate oxidation in HTGR, samples were conditioned for 22 days at elevated temperatures in a once-through helium loop with 4 ppmv H2O. Carburization of the samples was achieved by the commercial process, Kolsterising®. In addition, two surface treatments – shot peening and aluminization – were considered as potential routes of improving the alloys’ wear resistance. Surface-treated samples were tested both before and after conditioning in Regime II. Tribological testing of the samples was performed via a pin-on-disk tribometer at elevated temperatures in ambient environment – 650 and 750°C for 800HT; 850 and 900°C for 617 – with applied loads of 1N, 2N and 5N. The wear behavior of the alloys was assessed via wear volume and friction coefficient measurements, supported by morphological, structural and compositional analyses of the wear tracks. Conditioning the samples in Regime II led to the formation of a chromium oxide on both alloys. This protective scale increased the wear resistance compared to that of as-received samples (Regime I) due to the formation of a compacted ‘glaze’ oxide layer during sliding, rendering the wear track nearly undistinguishable from the unworn background and resulting in wear volumes below the detection limits of the measurement technique. The variability of the friction coefficients of the conditioned samples was also considerably reduced compared to that of the as-received samples due to the glaze layer. Additionally, the initial friction coefficients of the samples conditioned in Regime II were reduced by 45% and 54% compared to those of as-received samples for alloys 800HT and 617, respectively. Carburizing the samples (Regime IV) hardened the surfaces of both alloys and promoted the formation of an iron oxide on 800HT during tribological testing, thereby increasing the wear resistance and decreasing the initial friction coefficient by a factor of two compared to those of as-received 800HT. Alloy 617 exhibited an enhanced wear resistance but similar initial friction coefficient compared to those of as-received samples due to the increased surface hardness. The Mn-Cr oxide developed during Regime III conditioning of 800HT did not develop a glaze layer during tribotesting, even at lower loads. Thus, it was not as protective as the oxide produced during conditioning of Regime II samples, leading to lower wear resistance of 800HT in Regime III compared to that measured in the Regime II condition. 800HT benefited from the aluminization surface treatment, particularly before conditioning in Regime II, due to the promotion of a wear-resistant aluminum oxide layer during testing and the increase in surface hardness due to the presence of a FeAl intermetallic phase. The presence of this phase caused an order-of-magnitude reduction in wear volumes compared to those of as-received 800HT. Aluminization of 617 decreased its wear resistance, particularly after conditioning in Regime II, due to significant wear of the aluminum oxide via a ceramic wear mechanism. This aluminum oxide was removed during sliding, causing the wear volumes to increase by a factor of five compared to those of 617 conditioned in Regime II. Shot-peened 800HT exhibited a tribological behavior similar to that of as-received 800HT, despite an enhancement in the rate of chromium oxide formation. Shot-peened 800HT conditioned in Regime II showed lower wear resistance compared to that of 800HT conditioned in Regime II due to the poor adhesion between the oxide and the underlying metal, preventing the formation of the glaze layer during sliding. Shot peening of 617 increased its wear resistance at higher load, reducing worn volumes by 60% compared to that measured with as-received 617. Tribotesting of shot-peened 617 in Regime II revealed that the glaze-oxide layer was formed at every load, resulting in negligible wear, similar to what was observed from testing 617 after conditioning in Regime II. Overall, alloy 617 exhibited tribologically superior behavior compared to that of alloy 800HT, as demonstrated by its lower friction coefficients and its order-of-magnitude lower wear volumes when measurable.