Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Nuclear chemistry”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 739 records · Page 41
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

M4SF-20LL010301042: Updated Thermodynamic Database for Use in Generic Disposal System Assessment

This progress report (Level 4 Milestone Number M4SF-20LL010301042) summarizes research conducted at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) within the Argillite Activity Number SF-20LL010301041. LLNL is leading efforts in the development of thermodynamic databases in support of the Spent Fuel and Waste Science Technology (SFWST) program. Thermodynamic models provide the basis for understanding the stability of solid phases and speciation of aqueous species and modeling the evolution of repository conditions. The LLNL effort is being performed in coordination with other US database development efforts. The effort includes a review of available thermochemical databases and a path forward for database integration. International coordination with the NEA-TDB is supported through crystalline international work package.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Fiscal Year 2020 Filtration of Hanford Tank Waste 241-AP-105

Bench-scale filtration testing of 15 liters of 241-AP-105 supernatant was conducted using a Mott inline filter Model 6610 (media grade 5) backpulsed dead-end filter (BDEF) in the hot cells of the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The as-received samples were diluted with raw water from the Hanford Site to assess the propensity for solids to form upon dilution and to assess the impact those solids have on filtration performance. The feed was split into two batches. The first batch was settled and decanted as planned in Tank Side Cesium Removal operations. The BDEF was used to filter this AP-105 feed at a targeted flux of 0.065 gpm/ft 2 and exhibited no measurable pressure increase during filtration. The second batch was fed to the BDEF with solids resuspended. This was also operated at the targeted flux of 0.065 gpm/ft 2 . In this case, the target pressure differential of 2 psid (resistance of 6.24 × 10 10 m -1 ) was reached in slightly more than 12 h. A backpulse restored the filter flux; however, the time to the next backpulse was slightly shorter. These tests indicate that after the addition of raw water, settle and decant effectively removed solids from the feed. It is not possible to assess the time required for these solids to settle based on the result from these tests. However, if sufficient time is allowed for the solids to settle, no measurable filter fouling was observed in current testing. In contrast, if insufficient time is allowed for solids to settle, filter fouling will occur relatively quickly and will likely require backpulses more frequently than every 12 hours (1.91 m 3 /m 2 volume filtered). Solids concentrated from backpulse solutions displayed large variability in composition with Al-silicates and mixed chromium-aluminum oxide phases. Amounts of Mg, Fe, and Ca were also found in the presence of Na and O. These solids could be grouped in three categories: (1) soluble Na-salts that formed large block-like particles but were made up of fibrous materials, (2) amorphous Al-phases, and (3) colloidal iron oxides with an average particle diameter of 4.2 µm.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Characterization of Tank 11H Samples from Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Batch 3 - Intermediate and Final Samples

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR unit processes dissolved salt from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. Four interim samples pulled from Tank 11H during and just after the completion of processing of Batch 3 through the TCCR process have been analyzed for 137 Cs activity and density. The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease with each subsequent sample, which is consistent with the addition of decontaminated solution to Tank 11H. When compared to the expected composition from mixing the Tank 10H Batch 3 feed with the material already present in Tank 11H, the bulk chemical composition was as expected. A corrosion control sample collected from Tank 11H in June 2020 showed changes in the chemical composition and 137 Cs activity when compared to the composition measured at the end of Batch 2 processing. As there were no additions made to the tank during this period, these changes were attributed to leaching of the solids present in Tank 11H. Additional analyses of the 4 th interim sample are pending and will be documented in a revision to this report.

11H↗
DOE OSTI2020

Vadose Zone Model for SALDS for Composite Analysis

The objectives of the vadose modeling for the updated Hanford Site composite analysis (CA) are to simulate the flow and transport of water and radionuclide releases from the surface to the water table and to provide radionuclide transfer rates for the plateau to river (P2R) model, version 8.3 (CP-57037, Model Package Report: Plateau to River Groundwater Model, Version 8.3). Water additions include natural recharge and water discharged to the ground as a result of industrial processes associated with Hanford Site operations. Contaminant sources include radionuclides in water discharged to the ground during operations and radionuclides disposed “dry” in solid waste burial grounds or other means. The following 16 radionuclides were selected for this modeling effort: carbon-14 (C-14), chlorine-36 (Cl-36), tritium (H-3), iodine-129 (I-129), neptunium-237 (Np-237), rhenium-187 (Re-187), strontium-90 (Sr-90), technetium-99 (Tc-99), uranium-232 (U-232), uranium-233 (U-233), uranium-234 (U-234), uranium-235 (U-235), uranium-236 (U-236), uranium-238 (U-238), radium-226 (Ra-226), and thorium-230 (Th-230). The simulation time starts in 1943 and ends at 12070, which is 10,000 years after assumed Hanford Site closure in 2070. The parallel version of the Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases (STOMP1) simulator, officially named the exascale Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases (eSTOMP) is used to simulate flow and transport for the vadose models. The documentation for the STOMP code is comprehensive. The theoretical and numerical approaches applied in the STOMP code are documented in a published theory guide (PNNL-12030, STOMP Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases Version 2.0 Theory Guide). The code has undergone a rigorous verification procedure against analytical solutions, laboratory-scale experiments, and field-scale demonstrations. The application guide (PNNL-11216, STOMP Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases Application Guide) provides instructive examples in the application of the code to classical groundwater problems. The user’s guide (PNNL-15782, STOMP: Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases Version 4.0: User’s Guide) describes the general use, input file formatting, compilation, and execution of the code. The primary output of the vadose zone modeling is radionuclide transfer rates to the groundwater for input into the P2R model. The rates will be summed over the 100 by 100 m P2R grid cells that fall within the vadose zone model source domain. The Hanford Site Central Plateau was subdivided into 26 individual vadose zone models, with 13 in the 200 East Area and 13 in the 200 West Area. Waste sites that have a completed performance assessment (PA) or past-leak analysis were not included as sources of radionuclides. Instead the vadose zone to groundwater transfer rates of the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility, Integrated Disposal Facility, US Ecology, and Waste Management Area C (WMA C) PAs and the past-leak analysis for WMA C were used as direct input to the P2R model. Each of the vadose zone models is documented in separate environmental calculation files (ECFs). This ECF describes the State-Approved Land Disposal Site (SALDS) model. The scope of this ECF is to document the development and results of the SALDS vadose zone model. CP-63515, Model Package Report: Central Plateau Vadose Zone Models, describes the approach, assumptions, process of determining the number of models required and domain of each model, input data, and processing common to all the models.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Predictive Contaminant Transport Simulation with the P2R Model for the Composite Analysis Base Case

In order to meet the requirements of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in DOE O 435.1 Chg. 1, Radioactive Waste Management, a composite analysis (CA) must be completed for the Central Plateau at the Hanford Site. The updated Hanford Site CA requires estimates of fate and transport of radionuclides in the groundwater from multiple sources within and downgradient of the Central Plateau. Numerical simulations using the MT3D-MST computer code were conducted to evaluate the fate and transport of existing distributions of 16 radionuclides as identified in CP-62184, Hanford Site Composite Analysis: Radionuclide Selection for Groundwater Pathway Evaluation: tritium (H-3), carbon-14 (C-14), chloride- 36 (Cl-36), strontium-90 (Sr-90), technetium-99 (Tc-99), rhenium-187 (Re-187), radium-226 (Ra-226), thorium-230 (Th-230), uranium-232 (U-232), uranium-232 (U-232), uranium-233 (U-233), uranium-234 (U-234), uranium-235 (U-235), uranium-236 (U-236), neptunium-237 (Np-237), and uranium-238 (U- 238). This document details the application of the P2R Model version 8.3 to predict the fate and transport of contaminants in groundwater on the Central Plateau for the 10,052 year simulation to support the CA. The simulation of fate and transport of contaminants reported in this environmental calculation file (ECF) will support dose predictions as part of the updated Hanford Site CA.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

NNSA-IAEC Science Area V Environmental ISR: Waste Management and Subsurface Science (Final Report FY18-FY20)

In August 2017, the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and the Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) launched a joint waste management program to evaluate the feasibility of siting a radioactive waste repository at intermediate depths in Israel. The bilateral collaboration involves three National Laboratories (LLNL, LANL, and Sandia), and the Nuclear Research Center, Negev, Geological Survey of Israel, and Ben Gurion University in Israel. This research is designed to assist with the evaluation of locations for an intermediate nuclear waste repository in Israel. This final report is a high-level summary of the results from the past three years by the team that worked on the WM-2: Radionuclide colloid-facilitated transport in fractured carbonate rock project for Science Area V, Environmental ISR: Subsurface Science and Waste Management. We have completed all of our tasks and met all of our milestones. MW-2 had three integrated tasks. Task 1 was laboratory experiments investigating colloid transport of radionuclides in natural fractured carbonate rocks from the Avdat formation, Israel. Task 2 was field experiments injecting radionuclide analogues pre-sorbed to clay colloids into fractured carbonate rock, and task 3 was numerical modeling of laboratory and field experimental results to assess the importance of colloids in the migration of relevant radionuclides. This task was incorporated into tasks 1 and 2. A 4 th task was initiated in FY20, to investigate the role of organics in facilitating radionuclide transport under the same conditions explored in task 1 due to the high organic content of the rocks being investigated for the immediate borehole locations. Preliminary results will be summarized here and the work will continue in FY21-23. The overall objective of this research is to evaluate the role of colloids (naturally occurring < 1 micron particles) in facilitating the transport of long-lived radionuclides from a nuclear waste repository situated in fractured carbonate rocks. Currently little data exists on radionuclide transport in carbonate rocks, but this is the main rock type available for siting a repository in Israel. Laboratory experiments were carried out in both Israel and the U.S., field experiments have taken place in Israel, and reactive transport modeling involved LLNL, LANL and Israel partner institutions. LLNL hosted a graduate student, Emily Tran, from Ben Gurion University in FY18 and FY19 and much of the work presented here was part of her PhD research.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Small to Full Height Scale Comparisons of Cesium Ion Exchange Performance with Crystalline Silicotitanate

The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Site houses 56 million gallons of high-level radioactive waste generated from plutonium production from 1944 to 1988. The supernatant waste, currently stored in underground tanks, is intended to be vitrified following filtration and 137 Cs removal at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Vitrification Facility. The WTP Pretreatment Facility will not be operational for several years. The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system is a technology demonstration that will remove cesium from tank waste supernate to support directly feeding LAW to the vitrification facility. The 137 Cs removal is important to meet the WTP LAW contract specification and ultimately for creating a contact-handled waste form. The waste acceptance criteria (WAC) limit for the WTP LAW Facility is <3.18E-5 Ci 137 Cs per mole Na. The TSCR system is skid mounted and employs two key technologies: dead end filtration for solids removal and ion exchange (IX) for cesium removal. Filtration is necessary to protect the functionality of the IX columns. The IX process utilizes sodium form crystalline silicotitanate (CST) IX media produced by UOP Honeywell, LLC (Des Plaines, IL) under the product name IONSIV R9140-B, 18 x 50 mesh, in a lead-lag-polish column configuration. Each column contains a CST bed height of 92 inches and a volume of approximately 157 gallons of CST IX media. The full-scale TSCR operation will run at a residence time of 1.9 bed volumes (BV)/h, which results in a superficial velocity of 7.3 cm/min and a flowrate of ~5 gal/min. Column testing at small (2.5% of the full bed height), medium (12% of the full bed height), and full-height scales has been previously conducted to evaluate process variables and scale up performance of Cs exchange onto the CST. Cesium load performances from various sieve cuts at the small scale indicated that a 30-mesh sieve cut be tested to determine if it better reflects the 12% and full-height column performances at the small scale. Two process flowrates were tested in the small-column configuration with <30-mesh CST and simulant solutions. These tests were compared to full-height column tests at the same residence times to assess CST particle size effect on column scaling. Table S.1 summarizes the observed column performance determined for the two flowrates juxtaposed to the previous work with 5.6 M Na simulant at higher scales (used as benchmarks). The WAC breakthroughs between the small and full-height tests at 1.3 BV/h differed by ~59 BVs. The WAC breakthroughs for small, medium, and full-height tests at 1.8 BV/h were consistent at 240 BVs. The 50% Cs breakthroughs were nominally equivalent for all column tests. The common transition zones and onsets of Cs breakthrough at the 1.8 BV/h tests indicated that the Cs mass transfers were equivalent and thus the <30-mesh CST Cs load performance at the small scale successfully modeled that of the full-height system. It is recommended that the <30-mesh CST be used in subsequent 10-mL CST bed tests.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Ion Exchange Processing of AP-105 Hanford Tank Waste through Crystalline Silicotitanate in a Staged 2- then 3-Column System

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is working to expedite processing of Hanford tank waste supernate at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). To support this goal, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS, Richland, WA) is designing a system for suspended solids and cesium (Cs/ 137 Cs) removal from Hanford tank waste supernate. The effluent will then be sent to the WTP Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility for vitrification. The Cs removal is critical for eliminating the high dose rate associated with 137 Cs and facilitating a contact maintenance philosophy for the LAW Facility. The maximum 137 Cs concentration in the LAW sent to the WTP is targeted to be below the 3.18E-5 Ci 137 Cs/mole of Na waste acceptance criteria (WAC) limit. The filtration and ion exchange systems will be placed near the Hanford tanks and are collectively termed the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Crystalline Silicotitanate Batch Contact Testing with Ba, Ca, Pb, and Sr

Washington River Protection Solutions is working to support initial production of immobilized low-activity waste (LAW) by feeding Hanford tank supernate from tank farms to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) LAW Facility. This goal incorporates the design of a Tank Side Cesium Removal system, which filters tank waste supernate to remove suspended solids and then removes Cs by processing it through crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media manufactured by Honeywell UOP, LLC. The 137 Cs-depleted product is intended to be sent to the WTP for vitrification. Processing of actual tank waste supernate showed effectively complete uptake of Sr and Ba by CST and significant uptake of Ca. Further, Campbell et al. (2019) analyzed CST post-column testing and found significant (>1E-2 mmoles/g) uptake of Ca and Pb along with some Ba, Cd, Fe, Sr, and U. This led to concern that selected metals, particularly the +2 cations, Ca, Sr, Ba, and Pb may be consuming Cs exchange sites and possibly reducing CST capacity for Cs. Exchange of +2 cations was assumed to be associated with the M(OH) + species for the metal (M) ion in the caustic solution. A series of batch contact testing was conducted to evaluate the exchange behavior of Ba, Ca, Pb, and Sr onto CST. The Cs exchange behavior was also tested as a benchmark for direct comparisons. The CST was provided in the sodium form by Honeywell UOP, as IONSIV TM R9140-B, Lot 2002009604, 18 x 50 mesh. A <30-mesh aliquot was collected to match the sieve fraction expected for use in upcoming small column test configurations. Kinetic exchange rate and isotherms were measured at metal concentrations benchmarked from the AP-107 tank waste feed composition and as limited by the metal solubility in the alkaline solution. Two simplified matrices were tested: 1) 1.0 M NaOH/4.6 M NaNO 3 and 2) 0.1 M NaOH/5.5 M NaNO 3 ; these matrices represented the expected 5.6 M Na concentration of process feed and served to address the hydroxide concentration effect on exchange behavior.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Spent Crystalline Silicotitanate Storage Study—Post AP-105DF Processing

A Tank-Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system is under development by Washington River Protection Solutions to support initial production of immobilized low-activity waste (LAW) by feeding Hanford tank supernate from tank farms to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) LAW Facility. Tank waste supernate is filtered to remove suspended solids and then Cs is removed by processing it through crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media manufactured by Honeywell UOP, LLC. The Cs-loaded CST columns will be stored indefinitely, with a goal of eventual CST removal and treatment. Thus, the spent CST needs to be recoverable after undetermined storage time. Previous testing with AP-105 simulant showed that rinsing the CST bed with 3 bed volumes (1.4 apparatus volumes [AVs]) of 0.1 M NaOH resulted in a dried bed that maintained flow characteristics indicative of ease of recovery. This study explored the intermediate conditions (between feed dried in place and the 1.4 AVs of 0.1 M NaOH rinse) to evaluate CST bed properties.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Analysis and Testing of Parsons NGS Solvent Formulation

Three drums containing solvent used during the Next Generation Solvent Test (NGST) conducted by Parsons in 2014-2015 were received at SRNL. After homogenization, samples from each drum were removed, and a composite sample prepared. This composite was analyzed to determine current SRNL characterization method efficacy, and to determine if the 1,3-dicyclohexyl-2- (isotridecyl) guanidine (DCiTG) suppressor could be selectively removed. The results of this work indicate that the titration analytical method currently employed at SRNL is effective at quantitating the DCiTG. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method at SRNL can detect the DCiTG, as well its amine and urea decomposition products. However, further development work will be required to allow the 1 H NMR method to quantitate these species. A series of three washing tests were performed on composite samples of the solvent. The results show that up to 67% of the DCiTG was removed from the solvent by simple washing, at multiple ratios of solvent: aqueous phase. This may indicate that a simple pathway exists to wash out the DCiTG and reclaim the solvent (~150 gallons) for future use at the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Update on NEA-TDB Database Development and Database Formatting Tool

This progress report (Level 4 Milestone Number M4SF-21LL010302062) summarizes research conducted at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) within the Crystalline International Collaborations Activity Number SF-21LL01030206. The activity is focused on our long-term commitment of engaging our partners in international nuclear waste repository research. This includes participation in the Nuclear Energy Agency Thermochemical Database (NEA TDB) Project (Cindy Atkins-Duffin) and development of methodologies for integrating US and international thermodynamic databases for use in SFWST Generic Disposal System Assessment (GDSA) efforts. LLNL is supporting the overall objectives of the Disposal Research (DR) Crystalline International Collaborations Research and Development (R&D) control account. The objective of this control account is to advance our understanding of long-term disposal of spent fuel in crystalline rocks (including both granitic and metamorphic rocks) and to develop necessary experimental and computational capabilities to evaluate various disposal concepts in such media.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Steel Corrosion Impacts on Radionuclide Immobilization

This progress report (Level 4 Milestone Number M4SF-21LL010302052) summarizes research conducted at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) within the Crystalline Activity Number SF-21LL01030205. The research is focused on actinide and radionuclide sequestration in steel corrosion products. Fuel matrix degradation models suggest that the near field is likely to be reducing at the time of canister breaching, steel corrosion, and radionuclide release, but more oxidizing conditions may prevail in the far field. The incorporation of radionuclides into corrosion phases may limit the rate of radionuclide release by sequestering a portion of the radionuclide source term. For these reasons there is a need to evaluate the incorporation of Pu and other radionuclides into various Fe-oxide phases, and to understand the behavior of coprecipitated phases during mineral recrystallization processes and during re-oxidation events. Radionuclide coprecipitation with Fe minerals may impact long-term repository performance and is an ongoing research focus at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Non-Electrostatic Surface Complexation Database for GDSA

This progress report (Level 4 Milestone Number M4SF-21LL010301062) summarizes research conducted at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) within the Argillite International Collaborations Activity Number Activity SF-21LL010301061. The activity is focused on our long-term commitment to engaging our partners in international nuclear waste repository research. The focus of this milestone is surface complexation model international collaborations. Specifically, we are developing a database framework for Spent Fuel and Waste and Science Technology (SFWST) that is aligned with the Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf (HZDR) sorption database development group in support of the database needs of the SFWST program.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Laser-Based Means for Accelerating Nuclear Decay Rate

This project aims to replicate and build upon a reported series of results whereby nuclear decay of unstable species has been accelerated under laser irradiation in the presence of resonantly excited plasmonic nanoparticles. Most theoretical investigations of this problem do not predict the enhancement to be significant. Further, alternate explanations for the observed decrease in signals associated with the supposedly destroyed species need to be examined. There are potentially substantial benefits from exploiting this effect to reduce the long-term radiological storage requirements of certain forms of nuclear waste. These benefits merit the confirmation or disproving of the effect.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Literature Review on Next Generation Solvent Isopar ® L Vapor Pressure Curve and the Partitioning of its Modifier and Extractant

The Next Generation Solvent (NGS) is set to replace the Original Caustic Side Solvent Extractant (CSSX) at the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC), formerly Savannah River Remediation (SRR), to perform a literature review on the following topics to address flammability concerns with the current solvent: Isopar ® L vapor pressure curve for NGS, partitioning ratio for the extractant MaxCalix and the modifier Cs-7SB, and high cesium concentration impacts on NGS radiolysis and potential solvent degradation rates in high cesium concentrations. The following conclusions and recommendations are made based on previous experimental work and literature: (1) Current SWPF flammable gas generation calculations use an Isopar ® L vapor pressure curve based on experimental testing with the Original CSSX solvent. No such testing to date has been performed with NGS. It is suggested that the decrease in Cs-7SB concentration for NGS compared to the Original CSSX solvent would lead to a slightly higher vapor pressure at all temperatures in SWPF vessels. A bounding NGS vapor pressure curve has been provided; it is recommended to see if these values would challenge current flammability controls and to perform testing if needed.(2) The partitioning ratio for Cs-7SB is known in the Original CSSX solvent with dilute nitric acid and caustic solutions. No tests could be found for the partitioning of Cs-7SB to dilute boric acid solutions; however, a similar partitioning ratio is expected. Due to the lipophilic alkyl chains on MaxCalix, it is expected to be even less soluble than BOBCalixC6 in the aqueous phase and should not be considered a significant contributor to the f organic term. Additionally, the reaction rate of N,N’,N’’-Tris(3,7-dimethyloctyl)guanidine (TiDG) or its degradation products with a hydrogen radical should be estimated/determined if they are found to be significant contributors to the f organic term. (3) NGS is expected to see much higher Cs concentrations at SWPF in comparison to its use at the Modular CSSX Unit (MCU). These higher Cs concentrations could influence radiolytic degradation rates of the solvent. NGS appears to be fairly stable to radiolytic degradation based on previous testing and its use at MCU. However, there has not been radiolytic flammable gas generation testing with NGS to date. There is a risk that the continued use of G-values obtained for flammable gases produced from the irradiation of the Original CSSX solvent is not bounding for NGS, but this is considered a very low risk due to the similarities in the composition of the solvents, as well as the conservatisms in the experimental design of the Original CSSX testing.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Infrequent Samples from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility: H-Area Diversion Box 1 (HDB-1) Sump Sample: January 25, 2022 Sample

Savannah River Remediation Engineering (SRR-E) requested that the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyze the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) samples from the following Tank Farm areas: the sump encasement, catch tank, drain cell, and waste tank annulus. In general, these CSTF samples will be analyzed on an infrequent basis and analyses will include detection for total beta/gamma, total alpha activities, density, free hydroxide, and pH measurements. This report presents characterization results for the H-Area diversion box 1 sump (HDB-1) January 2022 sample. The sample was slightly brown with a small amount of suspended fine particulates visually estimated to be less than 1% by volume. The results are measurements for total gamma, total alpha, total beta, density, free hydroxide, and pH.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Infrequent Samples from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility: Leak Detection Box (LDB) Drain Cell Sample: February 09, 2022 Sample

Savannah River Mission Completion Engineering (SRMC-E) requested that the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyze the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) samples from the following Tank Farm areas: the sump encasement, catch tank, drain cell, and waste tank annulus. In general, these CSTF samples will be analyzed on an infrequent basis and analyses will include detection for total beta/gamma activities, total alpha activity, density, free hydroxide, and pH measurements. This report presents characterization results for the leak detection box (LDB) February 09, 2022 drain cell sample. The sample was clear and colorless with no visible particulates. The results are measurements for total gamma, total alpha, total beta, density, free hydroxide, and pH.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗