Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “stochastic vectors”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

58 records · Page 4

Rodeo Algorithm for Quantum Computing

We present a stochastic quantum computing algorithm that can prepare any eigenvector of a quantum Hamiltonian within a selected energy interval $\ [E-\epsilon, E+\epsilon]$. In order to reduce the spectral weight of all other eigenvectors by a suppression factor δ, the required computational effort scales as $\ O[|\log \delta|/(p \epsilon)]$, where p s the squared overlap of the initial state with the target eigenvector. The method, which we call the rodeo algorithm, uses auxiliary qubits to control the time evolution of the Hamiltonian minus some tunable parameter E . In this manner, we converge to the target eigenvector with exponential accuracy in the number of measurements. In addition to preparing eigenvectors, the method can also compute the full spectrum of the Hamiltonian. We illustrate the performance with several examples. For energy eigenvalue determination with error $\epsilon$, the computational scaling is $\ O[(\log \epsilon)^2/(p \epsilon)]$. For eigenstate preparation, the computational scaling is $\ O(\log \Delta/p)$, where $\Delta$ is the magnitude of the orthogonal component of the residual vector. The speed for eigenstate preparation is exponentially faster than that for phase estimation or adiabatic evolution.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

Nuclear data uncertainty propagation and modeling uncertainty impact evaluation in neutronics core simulation

Uncertainty analysis is a critical requirement in reactor simulation as it is used to quantify the reliability of best-estimate calculation. A comprehensive uncertainty analysis should characterize all sources of uncertainties in a computationally-feasible and scientifically-defendable manner. Here we employ a well-established reduced order modeling (ROM) based uncertainty quantification methodology to propagate uncertainties throughout neutronic calculations. ROM relies on recent advances in randomized data mining techniques applied to large data streams. In our proposed implementation, the nuclear data uncertainties are first propagated from multi-group level through lattice physics calculation to generate few-group parameter uncertainties, described using a vector of mean values and a covariance matrix. Employing an ROM-based compression of the covariance matrix, the few-group uncertainties are then propagated through downstream core simulation in a computationally efficient manner. This straightforward approach, albeit efficient as compared to brute force forward and/or adjoint-based methods, often employs a number of assumptions that have been unquestioned in the literature of neutronic uncertainty analysis. This manuscript argues that these assumptions could introduce another source of uncertainty referred to as modeling uncertainties, whose magnitude needs to be quantified in tandem with nuclear data uncertainties. Thus, our primary goal is to explore the interactions between these two uncertainty sources in order to assess whether modeling uncertainties have an impact on parameter uncertainties. To explore this endeavor, the impact of a number of modeling assumptions on core attributes uncertainties is quantified. The study employs a CANDU reactor model, with Serpent and NEWT as lattice physics solvers and NESTLE-C as core simulator. The modeling assumptions investigated include those related with the uncertainty propagation method employed, e.g., deterministic vs. stochastic, the few-group energy structure employed to represent the cross-sections, the resonance treatment in lattice physics calculation, the reference values for the cross-section, and the number of samples employed to render ROM compression. Results indicate that some of the modeling assumptions could have a non-negligible impact on the core responses propagated uncertainties, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive approach to combine parameter and modeling uncertainties.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

On the formation of swelling and related flaws in laser powder bed fusion

Process monitoring in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing can provide insights into stochastic anomalies, melt pool and plume dynamics, and part quality. Swelling, a build anomaly where overbuilt material protrudes through the powder layer after recoating, is readily detectable in post-recoat visible light images of the powder bed. Here, this work identifies several of the underlying mechanisms driving swelling formation by analyzing the influence of processing parameters, laser scan paths, and build plate locations on the presence of swelling detected in situ. Swelling near the edge of the part and swelling in the internal region of the part are shown to correlate with different process conditions. Edge and internal swelling may be driven by different phenomena, with edge swelling predominately occurring on the edge of a part facing the laser module and correlated to clusters of near-surface voids (detected with X-ray computed tomography). A larger spot size, higher laser power, and lower scan velocity also increased the presence of edge swelling. Laser spot size and scan path influenced internal swelling, which occurred preferentially with a larger spot size and in regions with large melt pools, caused by localized heat accumulation due to non-optimal processing parameters or scan path strategies. For coupons processed with a slicer-defined maximum scan vector length, swelling seldom occurred at internal vector-stripe boundaries. These results provide a mechanistic understanding of how swelling can be linked to material flaws, insight into how some instances of swelling can be avoided, and evidence supporting the use of swelling as an in situ indicator for quality assurance and part qualification.

Anomaly↗

Solving the $k$-Sparse Eigenvalue Problem with Reinforcement Learning

We examine the possibility of using a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm to solve large-scale eigenvalue problems in which the desired the eigenvector can be approximated by a sparse vector with at most k nonzero elements, where k is relatively small compare to the dimension of the matrix to be partially diagonalized. Here, this type of problem arises in applications in which the desired eigenvector exhibits localization properties and in large-scale eigenvalue computations in which the amount of computational resource is limited. When the positions of these nonzero elements can be determined, we can obtain the k-sparse approximation to the original problem by computing eigenvalues of a k × k submatrix extracted from k rows and columns of the original matrix. We review a previously developed greedy algorithm for incrementally probing the positions of the nonzero elements in a k-sparse approximate eigenvector and show that the greedy algorithm can be improved by using an RL method to refine the selection of k rows and columns of the original matrix. We describe how to represent states, actions, rewards and policies in an RL algorithm designed to solve the k-sparse eigenvalue problem and demonstrate the effectiveness of the RL algorithm on two examples originating from quantum many-body physics.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗