Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium separation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Lithium isotopic analysis in depleted lithium salts

Lithium isotope separation processes require characterization of the isotopic compositions of the different output phases of the process. While considerable effort to develop isotope separation methods has been ongoing for decades, the analytical methods associated with these analyses are rarely provided. Here, in this work three types of mass spectrometers (Q-ICP-MS, MC-ICP-MS, TIMS) were tested for the ability to measure depleted lithium salts that are relevant materials for isotopic separations. Results indicate that, once stabilized, the Q-ICP-MS can provide equal precision for Li isotopic samples compared to TIMS or MC-ICP-MS. However, MC-ICP-MS consistently provides the highest precision for salts across both depleted and natural isotopic abundances. These data demonstrate that Q-ICP-MS is an appropriate choice for analysis of depleted lithium salts, especially when rapid analyses are desired for online process monitoring.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2025

Engineering surface charges of nanofiltration membranes to maximize Li + /Mg 2+ separation properties

Polyamide-based nanofiltration (NF) membranes are attractive for Li + /Mg 2+ separation for lithium recovery from salt brine (containing mainly Mg 2+ ). However, Li + and Mg 2+ have similar hydration radii, resulting in a low separation factor (SF Li/Mg ). Herein, we demonstrate that SF Li/Mg can be significantly enhanced by optimizing the membrane surface positive charges. This results in an unexpected maximum SF Li/Mg at a solution pH slightly below its isoelectric point (IEP). Specifically, NF270 membrane was surface-grafted with 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyltrimethylammonium chloride (META) or polyethylenimine (PEI) using bio-adhesive dopamine, forming a thin, stable, charged layer (20–40 nm) on the surface. The effects of solution pH and surface modification on the surface zeta potential (ZP) and single- and mixed-salt Li + /Mg 2+ separation properties are thoroughly investigated. For example, the META grafting increases the ZP from 9.2 to 16 mV and SF Li/Mg by 130 % from 35 to 80 at pH 4, superior to the state-of-the-art commercial NF membranes. Furthermore, this surface modification occurs at ≈22 °C in aqueous solutions and can be utilized to enhance commercial modules for practical applications.

Li+/Mg2+ separation↗
NASA NTRS2013

New Class of Flow Batteries for Terrestrial and Aerospace Energy Storage Applications

Future sustainable energy generation technologies such as photovoltaic and wind farms require advanced energy storage systems on a massive scale to make the alternate (green) energy options practical. The daunting requirements of such large-scale energy systems such as long operating and cycle life, safety, and low cost are not adequately met by state-of-the-art energy storage technologies such as vanadium flow cells, lead-acid, and zinc-bromine batteries. Much attention is being paid to redox batteries specifically to the vanadium redox battery (VRB) due to their simplicity, low cost, and good life characteristics compared to other related battery technologies. NASA is currently seeking high-specific- energy and long-cycle-life rechargeable batteries in the 10-to-100-kW range to support future human exploration missions, such as planetary habitats, human rovers, etc. The flow batteries described above are excellent candidates for these applications, as well as other applications that propose to use regenerative fuel cells. A new flow cell technology is proposed based on coupling two novel electrodes in the form of solvated electron systems (SES) between an alkali (or alkaline earth) metal and poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), separated by an ionically conducting separator. The cell reaction involves the formation of such SES with a PAH of high voltage in the cathode, while the alkali (or alkaline earth metal) is reduced from such an MPAH complex in the anode half-cell. During recharge, the reactions are reversed in both electrodes. In other words, the alkali (alkaline earth) metal ion simply shuttles from one M-PAH complex (SES) to another, which are separated by a metal-ion conducting solid or polymer electrolyte separator. As an example, the concept was demonstrated with Li-naphthalene//Li DDQ (DDQ is 2,3-Dichloro-5,6-dicyano- 1,4-benzoquinone) separated by lithium super ion conductor, either ceramic or polymer (solid polymer or gel polymer) electrolytes. The reactants are Li-naphthalene dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF) with a lithium salt of 1M LiBF4 (lithium tetra fluoroborate) in the anode compartment, and DDQ again dissolved in THF and also containing 1M LiBF4 salt in the cathode half-cell. The solid electrolyte separator used in the first set of experiments is a ceramic solid electrolyte, available from a commercial source. The open circuit voltage of the cells is close to 3.0 V, as expected from the individual half-cell voltages of Li-naphthalene and Li-DDQ. Upon discharge, the cell shows steady discharge voltage of 2.7 V, which confirms that the electrochemical processes do involve lithium ion shuttling from the anodic compartment to the cathode half-cell. The reversibility or rechargeability is demonstrated by charging the partially discharged cells (i.e., with lithium present in the DDQ half). Once again, a steady voltage close to 3.0 V was observed during charge, indicating that the system is quite reversible. In the subsequent concept-demonstration studies, the ceramic electrolyte has been replaced with a gel polymer electrolyte, e.g., PVDF-HFP (poly vinylene difluoride hexafluoropropene) gel, which has several advantages such as high ionic conductivity (almost comparable to liquid electrolyte and about 2 orders of magnitude better than the ceramic equivalent), lower cost, and possibly higher chemical stability at the anode. In addition, it can be bonded to the electrode by thermal fusion to form membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs), as is done in fuel cells.

Bugga, Ratnakumar V.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Retrospective on Recent DOE-Funded Studies Concerning the Extraction of Rare Earth Elements & Lithium from Geothermal Brines (Final Report)

Rare earth elements (REE) and lithium are non-toxic metals that are considered critical materials due to their use in electronics, magnets, batteries, and a wide variety of industrial processes important for the economy and military preparedness. Demand for REE and lithium is increasing and these critical materials are imported, so identifying and exploiting domestic sources of REE and lithium is a national priority. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) has been in the forefront of sponsoring research investigating the potential recovery of REE, lithium, and other critical minerals from geothermal brines. It has been proposed that the future of geothermal energy should include “hybrid systems” that combine electricity generation with other revenue-generating activities, such as recovery of valuable and critical minerals, including REE and lithium. Two recent GTO funding opportunities have focused on the recovery of REE and other valuable minerals from geothermal brines. The research supported by the GTO’s mineral recovery program is focused on three areas: resource characterization, technology for the extraction of REE, and technology for the extraction of lithium (Tables 1 and 2). This report is a retrospective study examining the outcome of GTO’s two recent mineral recovery programs (DE-FOA-0001016 in FY 2014 and DE-FOA-0001376 in FY 2016). In this report, the knowledge, technology, and techniques that were developed by researchers funded by GTO are summarized and discussed. Four projects were funded to assess the concentrations and amounts of REE found in geothermal brines and oil field produced waters. The GTO-funded studies compiled publically available data on REE concentrations from brines and produced water from all over the USA. In addition, new samples were collected and characterized from major geothermal and hydrocarbon basins in the Western USA. The studies examined the relationship between lithology and REE concentrations and developed models examining the influence of geology on REE concentrations in produced brines. It was determined that REE are frequently found at higher concentrations in oil field produced water than geothermal brines, but that some geothermal areas had significant REE resources. Significant reservoirs of REE were identified in the Western USA. In some cases, concentrations of REE were more than 1000 times the concentrations found in seawater. Collectively, these studies represent a comprehensive picture of REE resources associated with geothermal and hydrocarbon systems in the USA. The studies did not examine lithium resources, but in some cases, lithium concentration data was collected. Data from these studies are housed in the Geothermal Data Repository (GDR) and represent a significant information resource and it is recommended that these data be further analyzed in a future study. Eight projects were funded to develop new technology for REE extraction from geothermal fluids. These projects investigated sorption as an approach for removal and recovery of REE from geothermal brines. The projects investigated cutting-edge technology for selective sorption of ions from complex solutions, including the application of metal-organic frameworks and biosorbent proteins. The REE sorption studies tested different combinations of metal-binding ligands and solid supports. The most promising metal-binding ligands for REE included phosphonic acid, thiol, and carboxylic acid functional groups. Ligands were attached or incorporated into a wide variety of solid supports. In most cases, attachment was via covalent bonding to organic resins, polymers, or silica-based supports. Most of the REE projects were conducted at a low technology readiness level (TRL) and showed promise, but direct comparison between technologies was not possible based on the available information. It is recommended that testing and reporting be standardized to the extent possible to facilitate comparisons between technologies. Two projects were directed at novel lithium extraction technology. Both projects investigated the use of inorganic sorbents, including manganese oxides. One study also examined the use of metal- ion imprinted polymers as selective ion-exchange resins for the separation of lithium and manganese from brines. Both approaches showed promise for the selective extraction of lithium from brines, including potentially geothermal brines. Results from these GTO studies indicated that selective REE and lithium extraction is possible, but interference from co-occurring solutes, such as calcium, magnesium, or heavy metals, will interfere with process efficiency and negatively impact process economics. Techno-economic analysis conducted as part of the resource and technology studies suggest extraction of REE from geothermal brines is unlikely to be economically viable, especially since non-geothermal produced waters frequently have higher REE concentrations. It is recommended that benchmarks for techno-economic analysis be established to the extent possible for future studies, to facilitate direct comparison of various technologies. Based on the collective results of this program, it appears that hybrid geothermal power would benefit more from recovery of lithium and other metals, rather than REE. It is recommended that future studies be conducted at a higher- TRL and that sorbents be tested against actual geothermal fluid samples. Prior higher-TRL efforts to extract metals from geothermal brines should be further evaluated for lessons learned.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Lithium-Ion Mobility in Layered Oxide Li 2 (La 0.75 Li 0.25 )(Ta 1.5 Ti 0.5 )O 7 Containing Lithium on both Intra and Inter‐Stack Positions

With the aid of neutron diffraction and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, we have demonstrated the effect of the increase in lithium concentration and distribution on Li-ion conductivity. This has been done through the synthesis of a layered oxide Li 2 (La 0.75 Li 0.25 )(Ta 1.5 Ti 0.5 )O 7 , with the so-called Ruddlesden-Popper type structure, where bilayer stacks of (Ta/Ti)O 6 octahedra are separated by lithium ions, located in inter-stack spaces. There are also intra-stack spaces that are occupied by a mixture of La and Li, as confirmed by neutron diffraction. The distribution of lithium over both inter- and intra-stack positions leads to the enhancement of Li-ion conductivity in Li 2 (La 0.75 Li 0.25 )(Ta 1.5 Ti 0.5 )O 7 compared to Li 2 La(TaTi)O 7 , which has a lower concentration of lithium ions, located only in inter-stack spaces. Furthermore, the analyses of real and imaginary components of electrochemical impedance data confirm the enhanced mobility of ions in Li 2 (La 0.75 Li 0.25 )(Ta 1.5 Ti 0.5 )O 7 . While the Li-ion conductivity needs further improvement for practical applications, the success of the strategy implemented in this work offers a useful methodology for the design of layered ionic conductors.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

Thermodynamic Modeling of Aqueous LiCl, LiBr, LiI, and LiNO 3 Solutions

Thermodynamic models are essential to facilitate the advancement of process design, optimization, and operation of electrolyte systems. In this work, a comprehensive thermodynamic framework based on the Electrolyte Nonrandom Two-Liquid model is developed to calculate phase equilibria behavior and salt solubility of aqueous LiCl, LiBr, LiI, and LiNO 3 solutions. The model describes the non-ideality of the electrolyte solutions by using two binary interaction parameters for each electrolyte-molecule pair in the system. Each binary interaction parameter is further expressed with up to three temperature coefficients which are regressed from experimental data. To take into account the hydration of lithium ion, two separate chemistries for the dissociation of lithium salts are investigated. In the first case, the lithium ion is considered as a bare ion, Li + , while in the second case hydration of the lithium ion from Li + to Li(H 2 O) + is considered. Here, the calculated thermodynamic properties compare adequately with the experimental data for both sets of chemistries for concentrations up to saturation and temperatures from 273.15 K up to 623.15 K. Moderate to significant improvements are observed with the incorporation of the hydration chemistry for aqueous LiCl, LiBr, and LiI solutions when compared to the non-hydrated lithium ion model results.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

Non-aqueous electrolytes for lithium batteries

An electrochemical cell includes a cathode active material, lithium metal, a separator, and an electrolyte comprising a lithium salt, an organic aprotic solvent and a fluorinated sulfone represented by Formula II:

Su, Chi Cheung↗
DOE OSTI2020

Electrolytes for lithium batteries

An electrochemical cell includes a cathode active material, lithium metal, a separator, and an electrolyte including a lithium salt and a fluorinated glycol ether.

Su, Chi Cheung↗
DOE OSTI2022

Low temperature lithium production

A method and electrolysis cell for producing lithium metal at a low temperature. The method includes combining (i) acetonitrile and (ii) a cation bis(trihaloalkylsulfonyl)imide, cation bis(trihalosulfonyl)imidic acid, a cation bis(trihaloalkylsulfonyl)amide, or cation bis(trihaloalkylsulfonyl)amidic acid in a weight ratio of (i) to (ii) about 100:1 to about 5:1 to provide a non-aqueous electrolyte composition. A lithium compound selected from the group consisting of LiOH, Li 2 O and Li 2 CO 3 is dissolved in the electrolyte composition to provide a lithium doped electrolyte composition. Power is applied to the electrolyte composition to form lithium metal on a cathode of an electrolysis cell. The lithium metal separated from the cathode has a purity of at least about 95 wt. %.

Freiderich, John W.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Low temperature lithium production

A method and electrolysis cell for producing lithium metal at a low temperature. The method includes combining (i) acetonitrile and (ii) a cation bis(trihaloalkylsulfonyl)imide, cation bis(trihalosulfonyl)imidic acid, a cation bis(trihaloalkylsulfonyl)amide, or cation bis(trihaloalkylsulfonyl)amidic acid in a weight ratio of (i) to (ii) about 100:1 to about 5:1 to provide a non-aqueous electrolyte composition. A lithium compound selected from the group consisting of LiOH, Li2O and Li2CO3 is dissolved in the electrolyte composition to provide a lithium doped electrolyte composition. Power is applied to the electrolyte composition to form lithium metal on a cathode of an electrolysis cell. The lithium metal separated from the cathode has a purity of at least about 95 wt. %.

Freiderich, John W.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Recovery of materials from electrode scraps and spent lithium-ion batteries via a green solvent-based separation process

A method for recycling lithium-ion battery materials is provided. The method includes isolating a composite electrode comprising an electrode material adhered to a current collector with a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) binder. The composite electrode is combined with triethyl phosphate (TEP) as a solvent to form a mixture. The electrode material is delaminated from the current collector in the mixture to give a free electrode material and a free current collector. Each of the free electrode material and the free current collector is recovered from the mixture. The free electrode material may be reused to prepare another composite electrode, as well as a lithium-ion battery comprising the same, which are also disclosed.

Belharouak, Ilias↗
DOE OSTI2020

Measurement of Three Transport Coefficients and the Thermodynamic Factor in Block Copolymer Electrolytes with Different Morphologies

The design and engineering of composite materials is one strategy to satisfy the materials needs of systems with multiple orthogonal property requirements. In the case of rechargeable batteries with lithium metal anodes, the system requires a separator with fast lithium ion transport and good mechanical strength. In this work, we focus on the system polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (SEO) with bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide lithium salt (LiTFSI). Ion transport occurs in the salt-containing poly(ethylene oxide)-rich domains. Mechanical rigidity arises due to the glassy nature of polystyrene (PS). If we assume that the salt does not interact with the PS-rich domains, we can describe ion transport in the electrolyte by three transport parameters (ionic conductivity, κ, salt diffusion coefficient, D, and cation transference number, t + 0 ) and a thermodynamic factor, T f . By systematically varying the volume fraction of the conducting phase, Φ c between 0.29 and 1.0, and chain length, N between 80 and 8000, we elucidate the role of morphology on ion transport. We find that κ is the strongest function of morphology, varying by three full orders of magnitude, while D is a weaker function of morphology. To calculate t + 0 and T f , we measure the current fraction, ρ + , and the open circuit potential, U, of concentration cells. We find that ρ + and U follow universal trends as a function of salt concentration, regardless of chain length, morphology, or Φ c , allowing us to calculate t + 0 for any SEO/LiTFSI or PEO/LiTFSI mixture when κ and D are known. Finally, the framework developed in this paper enables predicting the performance of any block copolymer electrolyte in a rechargeable battery.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

Ion conductive inks and solutions for additive manufacturing of lithium microbatteries

A separator made of ion conductive ink is produced by additive manufacturing. A micro-battery is produced with the separator made of ion conductive ink located between the battery's anode and cathode. The separator functions to keep the anode and cathode apart and to facilitate the transport of ions to produce an operative micro-battery.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Toward Lithium Recovery Using Modular (and Membraneless) Phase Separation and Extraction (MPSE) Technology with Ionic Liquid (IL) Solvents: Effect of Coatings

In this work, a single-channel slope-plate Modular and Membrane-less Phase Separation and Extraction (MPSE) device was fabricated using 3D printing. The slope-plate was designed with an insertable glass slide to enable surface modification with coatings. Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) and perfluoropolyether (Zdol) coatings were applied to tailor surface wettability and enhance phase separation. Using a model biphasic system of water and hexadecane, both coatings significantly improved the separation efficiency compared to the uncoated device by promoting selective wetting. Building on these results, lithium extraction from a simulated saline solution was investigated using 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([EMIM][NTf₂]) as the ionic liquid (IL) extractant. The IL effectively extracted Li⁺ from the aqueous phase in bulk extraction, demonstrating its potential for lithium recovery. However, the low interfacial tension between the IL and aqueous phases posed challenges for phase separation. The application of SAM and Zdol coatings effectively mitigated this issue. Overall, integrating tailored surface chemistry with the slope-plate MPSE design shows great promise as an efficient and scalable platform for studying liquid–liquid separation and optimizing ionic liquid–based extraction processes for lithium recovery from saline sources.

3D printing↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Mineral Separations with Novel Simulated Moving Beds

Lithium is a critical mineral that is widely used in batteries and energy storage applications, making it increasingly important in the next few decades. To meet the growing demand for lithium and secure domestic supply chains, there is a need to exploit unconventional lithium resources. However, utilizing current lithium extraction processes is challenging due to the high salinity in those resources. Thus, it is essential to develop energy-efficient, and less chemical-intensive separation processes that can exploit high-salinity lithium resources. Accordingly, this project aims to design a novel zwitterionic stationary phase and use it to develop a continuous chromatography process to recover LiCl minerals from traditionally unexploited domestic saline resources. The developed zwitterionic stationary phase allows fractionating minerals based on their different sorbent affinities under water elution. A systematically designed continuous process can separate lithium from other minerals, reducing the risk of material fouling and the overall chemical consumption to produce battery-grade lithium. This approach is expected to significantly enhance the efficiency and sustainability of the lithium extraction process while also reducing the environmental impact associated with traditional processes. At the end of the project, the technology will be demonstrated in continuous mode using a simulated moving bed (SMB) to recover >100 g of LiCl from real resource waters. The U.S.-based resources that this project targets for LiCl recovery are formation water, oil-produced water, and geothermal brines, supplied by Standard Lithium Ltd. and Shell Inc, respectively.

critical minerals↗
DOE OSTI2024

Partial Solvation of Lithium Ions Enhances Conductivity in a Nanophase-Separated Polymer Electrolyte

In this study, we demonstrate that a multiblock lithium-ion-conducting polymer can be swollen with ethylene carbonate solvent to increase the conductivity relative to the dry polymer material by nearly 4 orders of magnitude. This increase is due to the partial solvation of lithium ions by ethylene carbonate, which leads to Li + diffusion along the solvent–polymer interface. This differs from the vehicular transport mechanism for lithium ions in pure solvent. We use a combination of broadband dielectric spectroscopy, X-ray scattering, and all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to probe the effect of the solvent on the polymer morphology and to elucidate the mechanism of lithium ion transport.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2023

Improved Thermal Stability of Oxysulfide Glassy Solid-State Electrolytes

In this study, the crystallization kinetics of (oxy)sulfide 70Li 2 S·(30-x)P 2 S 5 ·xP 2 O 5 (x = 0, 2, 5) solid-state electrolytes are reported. It was found that 5 mol% P 2 O 5 glass co-former slowed the crystallization rate of the Li 7 P 3 S 11−x/4 O x/4 ceramic phase by a factor of 10. After 10 min at 230 °C, a 70Li 2 S·30P 2 S 5 sulfide glass was 92% devitrified whereas a 70Li 2 S·25P 2 S 5 ·5P 2 O 5 oxysulfide glass was only 8% devitrified. The improved thermal stability of oxysulfide glasses was then utilized to demonstrate the fabrication of a standalone, reinforced SSE separator by hot pressing. More importantly, it was recognized that the microstructure of 70Li 2 S·25P 2 S 5 ·5P 2 O 5 oxysulfide SSE separators could be modified by hot pressing without changing ionic conductivity. This result was achieved because the precipitation of a superionically conductive Li 7 P 3 S 11−x/4 O x/4 ceramic phase was limited. A study was then conducted to determine what effect microstructure has on the susceptibility of SSE separators to shorting by lithium metal penetration. Hot-pressed separators were found to be more susceptible to shorting than cold-pressed separators. X-ray Computer Tomography (XCT) of post-mortem samples showed that hot-pressed samples failed by transverse microcrack pathways, which underscores the importance of low defect density in dense SSE separators.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗