Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium metal stabilization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4

Practical Considerations for Testing Polymer Electrolytes for High-Energy Solid-State Batteries

Polymer electrolytes are an important class of materials in enabling solid-state batteries, which have the potential to exceed 400 Wh/kg energy density. Despite significant advancements in their lithium-ion transport and mechanical properties over the last two decades, the integration and testing of these novel electrolyte materials into functioning cells with the electrode loadings and dimensions required to meet the cell-level energy density goals have been limited. Here, through multiple representative examples, we demonstrate the need of testing in close to practical cell conditions for a faster and more reliable evaluation of polymeric electrolytes. In particular, the need for testing with thin lithium anodes and practical cycling capacities is demonstrated for evaluation of their lithium-metal interfacial stability and dendritic resistance, respectively, and a testing protocol is suggested. The guidelines presented here will also apply to testing of other solid electrolytes for solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

The effects of aluminum concentration on the microstructural and electrochemical properties of lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide

Cubic lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (Li 7-x Al x La 3 Zr 2 O 12 , LLZO) garnet has gained attention as a promising next-generation electrolyte for lithium batteries due to its high ionic conductivity and chemical stability with lithium metal. The high conductivity can be achieved through doping over a range of aluminum concentrations. In this study, we hot-pressed samples to achieve <2% nominal porosity with aluminum concentrations from x = 0.25–0.55 mol to understand the effect of aluminum on microstructure and electrochemistry. It was observed that beyond the aluminum solubility limit (x = ~0.40), resistive secondary phases formed at the grain boundaries. As a result, the percent grain boundary resistance increased from 17.6 to 41.2% for x = 0.25 and x = 0.55, respectively. Both the grain boundary and bulk activation energies remained relatively constant as the aluminum concentrations increased (~0.44 eV and ~0.39 eV, respectively). It was, therefore, surmised that the mobility term of the Nernst–Einstein equation was roughly independent of aluminum concentration and the major variable controlling bulk conductivity was the number of lithium charge carriers. As a result, as the aluminum concentration increased from x = 0.25 to x = 0.55 the bulk conductivity decreased from 0.56 to 0.15 mS cm -1 . Following these trends of increasing grain boundary resistance and decreasing bulk conductivity with increasing aluminum concentration, x = 0.25 had the highest total conductivity (0.46 mS cm -1 ). We demonstrated that aluminum concentration has a significant effect on the microstructure and electrochemical properties of LLZO. In conclusion, we believe this work could help understand how to link processing, microstructure, and electrochemical properties to guide the manufacturing of LLZO for use in solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Microscale mechanical property variations of Al-substituted LLZO: insights from compression testing and molecular dynamics simulations

Ceramic solid electrolytes based on LLZO (Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 ) are promising candidates for all-solid-state batteries due to their high ionic conductivity and good apparent stability vs. lithium metal, however they are prone to mechanical failure. Lithium metal intrusions, alongside cell stack pressure, transition polycrystalline solid electrolyte grains into a compressed state that promotes crack propagation and fracture. Here this work examines the mechanical response of Al-substituted LLZO to compressive forces by measuring ultimate strength under pillar compression with a flat punch tip. Failure modes characterized by in situ scanning electron microscopy show diverse splitting patterns arising from internal porosity, grain boundaries, and slip planes. Large correlated variations in compressive strength (0.93–2.63 GPa) and Young's modulus (72.1–150.97 GPa) are observed across microscale regions of the solid electrolyte. Molecular dynamics simulations of LLZO with different porosities describe the variation of compressive strength and Young's modulus, and enable a microscale porosity model to be fit accounting for Young's modulus reduction across the solid electrolyte. Overall, the results indicate the importance of microscale mechanical testing of ceramic solid electrolytes to identify preferential sites for mechanical degradation and Li intrusion, and ensure the robust design of all-solid-state lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

SEI Formation and Lithium-Ion Electrodeposition Dynamics in Lithium Metal Batteries via First-Principles Kinetic Monte Carlo Modeling

The stabilization and enhanced performance of lithium metal batteries (LMBs) depend on the formation and evolution of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) layer as a critical component for regulating the Li metal electrodeposition processes. This study employs a first-principles kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) model to simulate the SEI formation and Li + electrodeposition processes on a lithium metal anode, integrating both the electrochemical electrolyte reduction reactions and the diffusion events giving place to the SEI aggregation processes during battery charge and discharge processes. The model replicates the competitive interactions between organic and inorganic SEI components, emphasizing the influence of the cycling regime. Results indicate that grain boundaries within the SEI facilitate faster lithium-ion transport compared to crystalline regions, crucial for improving the performance and stability of LMBs. The findings underscore the importance of dynamic SEI modeling for further development of next-generation high-energy-density batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interfacial engineering for stabilizing polymer electrolytes with 4V cathodes in lithium metal batteries at elevated temperature

Poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO) polymer electrolytes are promising candidates for next-generation rechargeable lithium batteries. However, the poor interfacial stability between 4 V cathodes and PEO electrolytes impedes their applications in 4 V lithium batteries with high energy density. Here, we demonstrate a facile and effective strategy to enhance the interfacial stability by the synergy of Li 1.5 Al 0.5 Ge 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP) coating on the cathode surface, and salt combination in the electrolyte, even with a cut-off voltage of 4.25–4.4 V vs. Li + /Li. Nano-LAGP coated Li|PEO|LiCoO 2 cell delivers stable cycling with a capacity retention of 81.9%/400 cycles and 84.7%/200 cycles at 60 °C when charged to 4.25 and 4.3 V in pure polyether electrolyte, respectively. Steady cycling is also demonstrated at room temperature and with LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 (NCM523) cathode. This work offers a viable and scalable approach to improve the stability between PEO electrolytes and 4 V cathodes and open up new possibilities for practical application of 4 V lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Unveiling the Role of Lithium Iodide in Stabilizing Solid Interfaces in All-Solid-State Li Metal Batteries

A critical challenge in all-solid-state lithium metal batteries (ASSLMBs) is achieving a stable interface between the lithium metal anode and the solid electrolyte. Leveraging its success in Li/I 2 batteries, lithium iodide has garnered significant attentions for its potential to enhance interfacial stability and overall cell performance in ASSLMBs. Here, we elucidate the role of lithium iodide in stabilizing the solid interface in all-solid-state Li metal batteries with a Li argyrodite electrolyte, particularly focusing on its influence on lithium deposition behavior and interfacial evolution. Through in situ optical imaging, we demonstrate more uniform lithium deposition on an iodide-contained argyrodite electrolyte compared to a chloride-based counterpart. Complementary density functional theory calculations attribute improved lithium plating behavior to the enhanced lithiophilicity and better ionic conductivity of lithium iodide at the solid interface, effectively reducing localized current density. In conclusion, these findings provide useful insights into the mechanisms through which lithium iodide enhances the interfacial stability in ASSLMBs.

Anions↗

Effect of Propagating Dopant Reactivity on Lattice Oxygen Loss in LLZO Solid Electrolyte Contacted with Lithium Metal

Lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO) is widely known as the most stable solid electrolyte against lithium metal electrodes. This thermodynamic stability can be lost by the presence of dopants which are required to stabilize the cubic phase of LLZO and can be reduced by lithium metal. However, the role of oxygen in such reactions is taken for granted. In this work, the reduction of Nb-substituted LLZO (Nb-LLZO) is explored by Li metal and shows that interfacial reactions propagate and lead to the decomposition with substantial Nb 5+ reduction deep into the bulk electrolyte. Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analyses show much of the reduction is due to oxygen vacancies formed, leading to increased electronic conductivity mapped with conductive Atomic Force Microscopy. Density functional theory calculations indicate oxygen release is favored by increased excess lithiation of Nb-LLZO. Electrochemical impedance of polycrystalline Nb-LLZO shows the continuous evolution of ionically resistive interphases near the lithium metal interface with Nb-LLZO while single crystals show little reactivity at room temperature and self-limiting reduction at 60°C. This work underlines the role of grain boundaries in propagating destructive solid electrolyte reactions and highlights previously unseen mechanisms involving lattice oxygen in LLZO.

Li metal, solid-state electrolytes↗

Mechanical Milling – Induced Microstructure Changes in Argyrodite LPSCl Solid-State Electrolyte Critically Affect Electrochemical Stability

Microstructure of argyrodite solid-state electrolyte (SSE) critically affects lithium metal electrodeposition/dissolution. While the stability of unmodified SSE is mediocre, once optimized state-of-the-art electrochemical performance is achieved (symmetric cells, full cells with NMC811) without secondary interlayers or functionalized current collectors. Planetary mechanical milling in wet media (m-xylene) is employed to alter commercial Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl) powder. Quantitative stereology demonstrates how milling progressively refines grain and pore size/distribution in the SSE compact, increases its density, and geometrically smoothens the SSE-Li interface. Mechanical indentation demonstrates that these changes lead to reduced site-to-site variation in the compact's hardness. Milled microstructures promote uniform early-stage electrodeposition on foil collectors and stabilize solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) reactivity. Analysis of half-cells with bilayer electrolytes demonstrates the importance of microstructure directly contacting current collector, with interface roughness due to pore and grain size distribution being key. For the first time, short-circuiting Li metal dendrite is directly identified, employing 1.5 mm diameter “mini” symmetrical cell and cryogenic focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) electron microscopy. The branching sheet-like dendrite traverses intergranularly, filling the interparticle voids and forming an SEI around it. Importantly, mesoscale modeling reveals the relationship between Li-SSE interface morphology and the onset of electrochemical instability, based on underlying reaction current distribution.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Manipulating the diffusion energy barrier at the lithium metal electrolyte interface for dendrite-free long-life batteries

Abstract Constructing an artificial solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on lithium metal electrodes is a promising approach to address the rampant growth of dangerous lithium morphologies (dendritic and dead Li 0 ) and low Coulombic efficiency that plague development of lithium metal batteries, but how Li + transport behavior in the SEI is coupled with mechanical properties remains unknown. We demonstrate here a facile and scalable solution-processed approach to form a Li 3 N-rich SEI with a phase-pure crystalline structure that minimizes the diffusion energy barrier of Li + across the SEI. Compared with a polycrystalline Li 3 N SEI obtained from conventional practice, the phase-pure/single crystalline Li 3 N-rich SEI constitutes an interphase of high mechanical strength and low Li + diffusion barrier. We elucidate the correlation among Li + transference number, diffusion behavior, concentration gradient, and the stability of the lithium metal electrode by integrating phase field simulations with experiments. We demonstrate improved reversibility and charge/discharge cycling behaviors for both symmetric cells and full lithium-metal batteries constructed with this Li 3 N-rich SEI. These studies may cast new insight into the design and engineering of an ideal artificial SEI for stable and high-performance lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Crossover Effects of Transition‐Metal Ions on Lithium‐Metal Anode in Localized High Concentration Electrolytes

Abstract The stability of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) is critical to the cycle life of lithium‐metal batteries (LMBs). While the crossover effect of transition‐metal ions from cathode to anode is extensively studied in lithium‐ion batteries with graphite anodes, its impact on LMBs remains largely unexplored. Herein, this study investigates the electrochemical and chemical properties of SEI layers formed on lithium‐metal anodes in localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) containing dissolved transition‐metal ions (Ni 2+ , Mn 2+ , and Co 2+ ). It is demonstrated that transition‐metal ions in LHCEs reduce the coulombic efficiency (CE) and significantly degrade the cycle life of LMBs. Time‐of‐flight secondary‐ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS) reveals that SEI structures differ depending on the dissolved TM ion, with Mn 2+ and Co 2+ inducing severe destabilization, and Ni 2+ exhibiting a less severe impact. These findings underscore the detrimental effects of transition‐metal crossover effects in LMB systems.

Guo, Zezhou [Materials Science and Engineering Pro↗

Early transition metal stabilized high capacity cobalt free cathodes for lithium-ion batteries

A cathode for a lithium battery includes LiNi 0.5 -x/2Mn 0.5 -x/2M x O 2 where M is at least one selected from the group consisting of Mo, Ti, Cr, Zr and V, and x is between 0.005-0.02. The LiNi 0.5 -x/2Mn 0.5 -x/2M x O 2 can be coated with Mn 2 P 2 O 7 . The Mn 2 P 2 O 7 can be 1-3 wt. %, based on the total weight of the LiNi 0.5 -x/2Mn 0.5 -x/2M x O 2 and Mn 2 P 2 O 7 . A cathode composition, a lithium battery, and a method of making a lithium battery are also disclosed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Polymer-Stabilized Liquid Metal Nanoparticles as a Scalable Current Collector Engineering Approach Enabling Lithium Metal Anodes

Dendrites and dead lithium formation over prolonged cycling have long been challenges that hinder the safe implementation of metallic Li anodes. In this study, we employ polymer-stabilized liquid metal nanoparticles (LM-P NPs) of eutectic gallium indium (EGaIn) to create uniform Li nucleation sites enabling homogeneous lithium electrodeposition. Block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(acrylic acid) (PEO-b-PAA) were grafted onto the EGaIn surface, forming stabilized, well-dispersed NPs. Using a scalable spray coating approach, LM-P NPs were fabricated on copper current collectors, providing lithiophilic PEO sites and interactive carboxyl groups to guide Li deposition. The Li-EGaIn alloying process greatly reduced the Li + diffusion barrier, enabling fast Li transport through the coating layer, resulting in decreased nucleation overpotential. Therefore, about five times lower Li nucleation overpotential was obtained on the LM-P modified Cu with an optimal composition of the polymers than the bare Cu substrates. DFT computations was used to reveal the binding properties between the LM-P layer and Li. Due to the regulated Li plating/stripping process, as-obtained 30 μm Li anodes paired with LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 (NCM8 11 ) with a negative/positive electrode capacity (N/P) ratio ~ 10 exhibited stable cycling performance at 0.5C for over 250 cycles, with an average Coulombic efficiency of 99.55%. Ultrathin Li (1 μm) anodes with an N/P ratio ~ 0.6 were also demonstrated in Li|LiFePO 4 cells, which examined the stabilization of Li by LM-P NPs and monitored practical loadings of Li anodes that are close to anode-free systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Conformal hetero-electrolyte interface between soft oxyhalides and garnet enables low-pressure lithium-reservoir-free solid-state batteries

The operation of solid-state batteries with a lithium metal anode and a high voltage cathode requires solid electrolytes (SEs) that are chemically stable with lithium, have a wide electrochemical window, and accommodate volume changes in the electrodes. Unfortunately, no SE has exhibited satisfactory mechanical and electrochemical properties that fit these requirements to date. Dual solid electrolyte systems that use a different SE for the anolyte and catholyte present a viable solution. Here, we focus on oxyhalide SEs that demonstrate superior ionic conductivity and cathode compatibility, where their lithium metal reactivity and poor reduction stability can be resolved using a lithium garnet (Li 6.5 La 3 Zr 1.5 Ta 0.5 O 12 , LLZTO) separator. Nonetheless, this imposes a new hetero-electrolyte (H-E) interface at the anolyte|catholyte contact that defines the ion transport across the boundary. We report its promising properties, which are deconvoluted from the electrical measurements of bilayer symmetric cells, for three representative oxyhalide catholytes, LiNbOCl 4 , LiTaOCl 4 , and Li 3 Al 3 O 2 Cl 8 . Pressure-dependent measurements reveal that the relative softness of the oxyhalides (hardness ≤0.4 GPa) enables H-E resistances lower than 150 Ω cm 2 at 2–3 MPa. Mesoscale modelling reveals that the transfer-active contact area of oxyhalides with LLZTO is about 2–3-fold higher than that of argyrodite, Li 6 PS 5 Cl. The low H-E resistance of the LiNbOCl 4 |Li 6.5 La 3 Zr 1.5 Ta 0.5 O 12 dual electrolyte enables the cycling of a Li|LiNi 0.82 Mn 0.07 Co 0.11 O 2 full cell with a high discharge capacity (200 mA h g −1 ) at 60 °C and ∼7 MPa. Importantly, we demonstrate a Li-reservoir-free full cell with high Coulombic efficiency (>99.5%) and capacity at 1 MPa using this approach coupled with a garnet-silver interlayer.

Palmer, Max [University of California, Santa Barba↗

Tuned Reactivity at the Lithium Metal–Argyrodite Solid State Electrolyte Interphase

Thin intermetallic Li 2 Te–LiTe 3 bilayer (0.75 µm) derived from 2D tellurene stabilizes the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) of lithium metal and argyrodite (LPSCl, Li 6 PS 5 Cl) solid-state electrolyte (SSE). Tellurene is loaded onto a standard battery separator and reacted with lithium through single-pass mechanical rolling or transferred directly to SSE surface by pressing. State-of-the-art electrochemical performance is achieved, e.g., symmetric cell stable for 300 cycles (1800 h) at 1 mA cm -2 and 3 mAh cm -2 (25% DOD, 60 µm foil). Cryo-stage focused ion beam (Cryo-FIB) sectioning and Raman mapping demonstrate that the Li 2 Te–LiTe 3 bilayer impedes SSE decomposition. The unmodified Li–LPSCl interphase is electrochemically unstable with a geometrically heterogeneous reduction decomposition reaction front that extends deep into the SSE. Decomposition drives voiding in Li metal due to its high flux to the reaction front, as well as voiding in the SSE due to the associated volume changes. Analysis of cycled SSE found no evidence for pristine (unreacted) lithium metal filaments/dendrites, implying failure driven by decomposition phases with sufficient electrical conductivity that span electrolyte thickness. In conclusion, DFT calculations clarify thermodynamic stability, interfacial adhesion, and electronic transport properties of interphases, while mesoscale modeling examines interrelations between reaction front heterogeneity (SEI heterogeneity), current distribution, and localized chemo-mechanical stresses.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Crossover Effects in Lithium–Metal Batteries with a Localized High Concentration Electrolyte and High–Nickel Cathodes

While crossover effects, such as transition–metal dissolution, are well–understood in lithium–ion batteries, there is a limited understanding of the effect of crossed–over chemical species in cells with oxide cathodes and lithium–metal anodes. In this work, the effects of cathode–to–anode and anode–to–cathode crossover are explored in cells with a high–nickel cathode, lithium–metal anode, and a localized high–concentration electrolyte (LHCE). Dramatic differences are found among cells; a lithium–metal anode paired with a high–nickel cathode has three times less solid–electrolyte interphase growth than a lithium–metal anode paired with lithium metal. Meanwhile, the cathode paired with lithium metal has 2–3 times higher capacity fade than the same cathode paired with graphite. Decomposition and crossover of the FSI salt is identified as the main source of these changes. The fluorine in the salt is first stripped off at the lithium–metal anode, and the remaining sulfur and nitrogen cross over to the cathode. Although the reduction in fluorine content harms the surface stability of the cathode, the lithium–metal anode benefits from the increased fluorine content. Furthermore, because the lithium–metal anode is typically the bottleneck for cells with thin lithium, crossover is a major factor in the enhanced performance of lithium–metal batteries with LHCE.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗