In Situ Studies of Methanol Decomposition Over Cu(111) and Cu2O/Cu(111): Effects of Reactant Pressure, Surface Morphology, and Hot Spots of Active Sites
The dissociative adsorption of methanol was investigated on Cu(111) and ultrathin Cu 2 O films. We employed synchrotron-based Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (AP-XPS) and Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) to study the dynamics of gas–solid interactions, and calculations based on Density Functional Theory (DFT) were used to examine the reaction path. C 1s XPS spectra revealed that methanol underwent dissociative adsorption on plain Cu(111) to form methoxy (CH 3 O), formaldehyde (H 2 CO), and formate (HCOO) at a pressure range of 0.5–10 mTorr, with these species remaining on the surface after evacuation. This was accompanied by the appearance of a low coverage (~0.05 ML) of O ads in the O 1s which can be considered a highly active site for methanol activation. The high activity is apparent by a coverage of 0.8 ML of methoxy at room temperature. STM was unable to image these species at room temperature as they were highly mobile on metallic copper. In contrast, for CH 3 OH on Cu 2 O/Cu(111), STM showed clear hot spots for reaction and a complex array of adsorption structures. On the oxide substrate, there was decomposition of methanol to H 2 CO, CH 3 O, HCOO, and hydrocarbon species (CH x ) due to the subsequent interactions of methanol with lattice oxygen. Cu(111) remained entirely saturated with decomposition products under 10 mTorr of methanol (θ ≈ 0.97 ML), whereas the Cu 2 O overlayer was saturated at a much lower coverage (θ ≈ 0.30 ML). STM revealed rows and step edges of Cu 2 O decorated with decomposition products and metallic Cu islands ~5 nm in size. The difference in activity between Cu(111) and Cu 2 O/Cu(111) is attributed to the significant amount of O present on the oxide surface. Additionally, Density Functional theory (DFT) calculations described the XPS measurements well, showing a likely methanol dissociation to *CH 3 O and therefore a surface reduction. More importantly, the DFT results revealed that it was the chemisorbed oxygen on Cu 2 O/Cu(111) which oxidized the dissociated *CH 3 O to *HCOO and eventually CO 2 , while the reaction only involving upper oxygen on the Cu 2 O hexagonal ring led to the formation of H 2 CO.