Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “gravity assist”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

MMS Extended Mission Design: Evaluation of a Lunar Gravity Assist Option

This paper will describe a study that was carried out on the design of a set of maneuvers that were considered for the later stages of an extended mission of the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission. The goal of these maneuvers was to put MMS into a significantly different orbit from those flown heretofore, so allowing science collection in a different region of the magnetosphere. This study was made feasible by the fact that the rate at which fuel is being consumed to maintain small formations on the MMS high-apogee orbit is less than expected pre-flight: the current consumption rate is only about 2 kg/yr/spacecraft. In addition, the spacecraft finished the prime mission with a significant amount of fuel remaining: this was about 1-sigma above the mean when compared with pre-launch Monte Carlo simulations. The resulting situation is similar to that of a libration orbit mission, where station-keeping requires so little fuel that any margin at all will lead to an extensive mission lifetime. In the case of MMS, the spacecraft could, if desired, perform formation flying in the current orbit for several decades. Alternatively, the spacecraft could use a significant fraction of the remaining fuel to perform major orbit modifications, while still leaving enough to conduct formation flying for on the order of a decade. The extended mission maneuvers studied here are further apogee-raises, with the goal of setting up one or more lunar gravity assists. Geometry dictates that a lunar encounter is only achievable when the MMS apogee vector lies approximately in the lunar orbit plane: this limits the possible dates to mid-2021 or early 2027.

Design↗
NASA NTRS2002

Applications of Tisserand's criterion to the design of gravity assist trajectories

In this paper, a procedure is described for finding these encounter times using Lambert's theorem and a new criterion based on Tisserand's criterion to identify pairs of transfer orbits between the launch planet and intermediate planet and between the intermediate planet and target planet.

Tisserand gravity assist Lambert's theorem traject↗
NASA NTRS1992

Trajectories to the outer planets using aero-gravity assist flybys of Venus and Mars

The trajectory concept used here is to flyby Venus and then Mars with moderately high speeds expecting to use both gravity and aeroassisted (wave rider) turns in the atmospheres of the planets in order to form fast trajectories to the planets beyond Jupiter. The first part of the paper contains a description of the development of earth-Venus-Mars trajectories yielding the required speeds at Mars in the interval 2001 to 2015. The second part consists in identifying cases in which Mars is at the proper longitude for each target and obtaining trajectories. Trajectories to Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto have been found.

Bender, David F.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Hypersonic maneuvering to provide planetary gravity assist

This paper examines the potential of aeroassist maneuvers at Mars for missions to the sun and to Pluto, using a high-lift/drag vehicle such as the waverider to perform an atmospheric 'fly-around' of Mars, in order to rotate the planetocentric velocity vector, thus adding to the rather small rotation due to gravity alone. A fly-around in one direction or the other can place the aphelion or the perihelion of the resulting orbit at the Mars distance, for missions toward the sun or toward Pluto, respectively. The parameters of such maneuvers are given as a function of earth launch velocity.

Mcronald, Angus D.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Loop Heat Pipe Temperature Oscillation Induced by Gravity Assist and Reservoir Heating

The Laser Thermal Control System (LCTS) for the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) to be installed on NASA's Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat-2) consists of a constant conductance heat pipe and a loop heat pipe (LHP) with an associated radiator. During the recent thermal vacuum testing of the LTCS where the LHP condenser/radiator was placed in a vertical position above the evaporator and reservoir, it was found that the LHP reservoir control heater power requirement was much higher than the analytical model had predicted. Even with the control heater turned on continuously at its full power, the reservoir could not be maintained at its desired set point temperature. An investigation of the LHP behaviors found that the root cause of the problem was fluid flow and reservoir temperature oscillations, which led to persistent alternate forward and reversed flow along the liquid line and an imbalance between the vapor mass flow rate in the vapor line and liquid mass flow rate in the liquid line. The flow and temperature oscillations were caused by an interaction between gravity and reservoir heating, and were exacerbated by the large thermal mass of the instrument simulator which modulated the net heat load to the evaporator, and the vertical radiator/condenser which induced a variable gravitational pressure head. Furthermore, causes and effects of the contributing factors to flow and temperature oscillations intermingled.

Thermal Control Systems↗
NASA NTRS2015

Loop Heat Pipe Temperature Oscillation Induced by Gravity Assist and Reservoir Heating

The Laser Thermal Control System (LCTS) for the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) to be installed on NASA's Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat-2) consists of a constant conductance heat pipe and a loop heat pipe (LHP) with an associated radiator. During the recent thermal vacuum testing of the LTCS where the LHP condenser/radiator was placed in a vertical position above the evaporator and reservoir, it was found that the LHP reservoir control heater power requirement was much higher than the analytical model had predicted. Even with the control heater turned on continuously at its full power, the reservoir could not be maintained at its desired set point temperature. An investigation of the LHP behaviors found that the root cause of the problem was fluid flow and reservoir temperature oscillations, which led to persistent alternate forward and reversed flow along the liquid line and an imbalance between the vapor mass flow rate in the vapor line and liquid mass flow rate in the liquid line. The flow and temperature oscillations were caused by an interaction between gravity and reservoir heating, and were exacerbated by the large thermal mass of the instrument simulator which modulated the net heat load to the evaporator, and the vertical radiator/condenser which induced a variable gravitational pressure head. Furthermore, causes and effects of the contributing factors to flow and temperature oscillations intermingled.

0000↗
NASA NTRS1980

Material capture by double lunar gravity assist

The equations yielding the performance of a single lunar flyby in removing incoming hyperbolic excess velocity to capture payloads on interplanetary trajectories are briefly derived. The impossibility of using a single lunar flyby to capture a body entering the earth-moon system with a hyperbolic velocity in excess of about 1.9 km/s is discussed, and a method of using a double flyby of the moon to significantly improve this performance is developed. The equations for achieving a double lunar flyby are derived by solving the orbital equations and Lambert's problem both for the incoming trajectory in the plane of the moon's orbit and for arbitrary declination. For the in-plane case it is shown that the maximum removable hyperbolic excess velocity is 2.2687 km/s. For the inclined case, it is shown that the use of a double lunar flyby allows capture for declinations in excess of 54 degrees, and that for declinations less than 38 degrees the double lunar flyby offers better performance than the single lunar flyby.

Ross, D. J.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Alternative gravity-assist sequences for the ISEE-3 escape trajectory

The International Sun-Earth Explorer-3 (ISEE-3) was moved from its mission halo orbit upstream of the earth's magnetosphere on June 10, 1982. Multiple lunar swingby maneuvers were then used to shape the trajectory for extensive exploration of the distant geomagnetic tail and finally to place the spacecraft on a course that will intercept the comet Giacobini-Zinner on September 11, 1985. With this new mission objective, the spacecraft was renamed the International Cometary Explorer (ICE). A double-lunar-swingby control technique involving five passes by the moon was eventually implemented to accomplish this, but in the process of finding this solution several feasible, though less optimal, alternative trajectory sequences implementing the same procedure were discovered. This paper provides a descriptive comparison of these very different orbital profiles and serves to illustrate the utility and great flexibility of this orbital control procedure. Targeting methodology for finding constrained solutions in this space is also presented.

Muhonen, D.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Control of libration point orbits using lunar gravity-assisted transfer

The Interplanetary Physics Laboratory, WIND, will be placed in a small-amplitude halo orbit in late 1995. A lunar swingby is used to achieve the halo orbit. Using the lunar swingby reduces the fuel required to achieve the desired orbit. The spacecraft's position and velocity with respect to the Moon near the time of swingby are shown to determine the characteristics of the halo orbit. The shape of the halo orbit, its x-, y-, and z-amplitudes, must be designed to meet mission constraints. A convenient set of parameters for displaying the dependence of the halo orbit's shape upon the lunar swingby is formulated. The use of the lunar swingby adds additional constraints to the trajectory in terms of attainable swingby parameters. Strategies for obtaining the desired swingby parameters in view of these mission constraints are discussed. The limits on attainable halo orbit shapes using the lunar swingby technique are discussed in terms of minimum and maximum x-, y-, and z-amplitudes. The relevance of previous work on this topic is discussed.

Sharer, P.↗