Air pollution control strategies directly limiting national health damages in the US
Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) from fuel combustion significantly contributes to global and US mortality. Traditional air pollution control strategies typically focus on emission reductions for specific air pollutants or sectors to maintain air pollutant concentrations within acceptable levels. Here we directly set national PM 2.5 mortality cost reduction targets within a global human-earth system model with US state-level energy systems, identifying endogenously the control actions, sectors, and locations that most cost-effectively reduce PM 2.5 mortality. Our results show that substantial health benefits can be cost-effectively achieved by using electricity to replace sources with high primary PM 2.5 emission intensities, including industrial coal, building biomass, and industrial liquids. Increasing the stringency of PM 2.5 reduction targets expedites the phaseout of high emission intensity sources, leading to larger declines in major air pollutant emissions, but very limited co-benefits in reducing CO 2 emissions. Control strategies achieve the greatest mortality cost reductions in the East North Central and Middle Atlantic states.