Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “chip scale”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optical Time Transfer for Bistatic SAR Spacecraft

A spacecraft-to-spacecraft optical time-transfer simulation has been developed as a tool for informing NASA’s Surface Deformation and Change (SDC) mission architecture. The SDC mission will combine radar images from multiple spacecraft to improve understanding of the Earth’s sea-level and landscape changes. Spacecraft must be precisely synchronized in order to create sharp radar images. Simulation of multiple spacecraft time-synchronizing via laser communication can inform technology choices of a mission by providing a picosecond-precision level estimate of clock error. This timing and ranging simulation has been combined with a radar system performance analysis pipeline. The simulated timing errors are used to predict performance of bistatic SAR systems in the presence of oscillator noise and time synchronization in accuracy. This analysis includes both analytic approximation equations from existing literature, and a numerical radar simulation to extract key system performance parameters like phase error and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)degradation. Precision time-transfer techniques facilitate the accurate synchronization of clocks between any combination of terminals. Most time-transfer technology for comparing two clocks at different terminals use radio frequencies (RF) to measure the time delay between the sending and receiving of signals. Laser technology offers the capability to transmit high data rates with systems that are of smaller size and lower power than comparable RF systems. The clocks on independent spacecraft will have some phase and frequency errors between them that result in clock drift. The two clock models that are included in this bi-directional MATLAB simulation are a cesium-based Chip-Scale Atomic Clock (CSAC) and a rubidium-based Miniature Atomic Clock (MAC). The CSAC has flown as hardware for small satellite missions such as the University of Florida’s CHOMPTT mission. A study of example orbits, including that of NASA NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar Mission (NISAR) mission, and lasing rates demonstrate the impact of flight configuration parameters on the synchronization error between two spacecraft. The MATLAB timing simulation uses a Runge-Kutta 4th-order method to propagate spacecraft orbits and computes the light-travel time estimate between them. The simulation outputs the estimated range and estimated clock error based on a user-defined spacecraft cluster configuration. The radar simulation and analytic approximations are applied to evaluate a potential future NASA bistatic SAR constellation architecture. In the proposed architecture, satellites follow each other in the same orbit at 800 km altitude, with a 210 km baseline. We also baseline the CSAC as an ultra stable oscillator, and use NASA’s NISAR for baseline radar system parameters to compute a clock-system introduced phase error of 5.6 degrees without synchronization by frequent time transfer. We build on this base case with a sensitivity analysis of radar performance over a proposed range of constellation and radar system parameters. With this analysis pipeline, we comment on which radar parameters should or should not be changed to minimize synchronization requirements. This analysis technique could be extended or modified to evaluate the timing requirements of other geometries for other future multistatic SAR missions, or other interferometric satellite missions.

Surface Deformation and Change↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Estimation of Timing Performance with Pulsed Laser Links for Small Satellite PNT

Satellite constellations are growing in size and in utility for applications as diverse as providing reliable, low-latency internet service to rural areas orEarth science missions.This expansion of satellite constellations brings attention to the need for responsive and reliable satellite communication.Current research in the PrecisionSpace Systems Laboratory at the University of Florida focuses on using pulsed laser communications as the method of relaying time signals instead of the radio frequency (RF)signals.The upcoming CLICK (CubeSat Laser Infrared CrosslinK) missions (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Florida, NASA Ames Research Center) will demonstrate a spacecraft-to-spacecraft laser communication link and time-transfer.For pre-flight technology assessment of missions such as CLICK, a simulation of a spacecraft constellation in Earth orbit has been created to estimate clock synchronization and precision orbit determination based on measured instrumentation performance.We have developed a novel MATLAB-based numerical simulator to model spacecraft-to-spacecraft laser time-transfer and estimate the offset between the spacecraft clocks over time.This simulation includes timing errors associated with laser pulse generation and detection, as well as non-Gaussian clock drift models.The two on-board clocks modeled are a cesium-based Chip-Scale Atomic Clock (CSAC) and a rubidium-based Miniature Atomic Clock (MAC), both produced by Microchip.An example case of two spacecraft in a circular, low-Earth orbit receiving GPS position, GPS timing, and laser pulse time-of-flight measurements is simulated.The positions and velocities of the two spacecraft at a reference epoch and the constant clock model coefficients are estimated.Polynomial models of different orders were used as clock models. The effect of clock model order on the root-mean-square (RMS) of the clock error is apparent in the case using GPS and lasing measurements, showing that the clock model improves with increasing clock model order. Results compare the estimated clock model of a mission operation that only uses GPS measurements and a mission operation that uses both GPS and laser pulse time-of-flight measurements between spacecraft referenced to their on-board CSACs or on-board MACs. Including lasing measurements reduces the RMS clock model error by approximately 80% of the RMS of the cases with only GPS measurements.This simulation tool can be used to optimize the lasing operations schedule based on mission timing performance objectives. During this presentation, I will discuss the details of the simulation and clock model estimation, as well as discuss the results.I will compare the results of incorporating lasing timing measurements to using only GPS measurements and the outcomes of using different orders of polynomials.

Timing Performance↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

KNaCK-SLAM: Kinematic Navigation and Cartography Knapsack Velocity-aided LiDAR Inertial Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM)

As manned missions return to the Moon and continue on to Mars in the near future, surface navigation and mapping in extremely low solar illumination and unstructured environments without navigation aids like Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) becomes more important than even. This work explores the use of LiDAR-based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) to solve those problems. A LiDAR-based SLAM system be deployed as a self-contained instrument independent of external sensor inputs, and can operate in unlit environments where Vision-based SLAM system are inoperable. Furthermore, the advent of chip-scale frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) LiDAR technology provides Doppler-velocity information for each sensed point in the scene, which can be used to further constrain localization error in the SLAM front-end. Here we discuss the development of SLAM algorithm that makes use of the unique velocity and range sensing capabilities of FMCW-LiDAR based sensors for rover and kinematic (i.e. person-mounted) mobile navigation and terrain mapping applications for surface exploration and scientific investigations.

Kyle Miller↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Entry, Descent, and Landing Analysis of Low Mass Martian Probe for Surface Climate Network

Aeolus is a mission to provide the first direct measurements of Martian atmospheric wind speeds and correlate them with thermal and compositional data to bring together a complete systematic description for the global energy balance and climate cycles of Mars. Objective A of the Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG) Goal II cites a Science Investigation Area to develop a network of surface landers to provide global, diurnal and synoptic coverage of the near-surface environment to characterize present Mars climate [1]. Aeolus will characterize the present Martian global climate system via an orbiter element and a novel surface network element. A series of low mass, low power probes will be distributed across the Martian surface and measure pressure, sky opacity, temperature, wind speed, water vapor and other trace gases. Low mass and power electrical systems designed to operate in extreme cold and daily thermal cycling for one Martian year could facilitate lower cost, Class-D science probes. Aeolus is targeting a total per-probe mass of <5 kg. Recent advances in nanofabrication of chip-scale sensors that are highly robust to temperature and shock, combined with a novel packaging concept (the deployable sensor probe [2]) originally developed by the Aerospace Corp., for the first time enables a Mars surface climate sensor network. These probes are folded flat during transit to Mars and automatically deploy into the final reentry configuration once released from the orbiter. The capability to fold for stowage significantly increases the probe quantity carried by the orbiter.

EDL↗
NASA NTRS2022

A Sub-THz CMOS Molecular Clock with 20 ppt Stability at 10,000 s Based on A Dual-Loop Spectroscopic Detection and Digital Frequency Error Integration

This paper presents a dual-loop chip-scale molecular clock (CSMC), which enhances the Allan Deviation performance by combining high signal-to-noise ratio of using fundamental mode and long-term stability of using higher order modes in derivative molecular absorption spectroscopy. In addition, digital frequency-error integration is adopted in the frequency-locked loop to provide an infinite open-loop DC gain, which fully suppresses any frequency drift caused by the temperature-sensitive crystal oscillator. This new generation CSMC is implemented in 65-nm CMOS, and achieves 20 ppt (part-per-trillion) Allan Deviation at 10,000 s averaging time with 71-mW power consumption.

Han, Ruonan↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System Technology Operations and Navigation Experiment (CAPSTONE) Pathfinder for Artemis Gateway

The Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System Technology Operations and Navigation Experiment (CAPSTONE) mission was developed by NASA in collaboration with Advanced Space, LLC of Westminster, Colorado. This technology demonstration mission serves as a pathfinder for near rectilinear halo orbit (NHRO) operations around the Moon. The NHRO, (Perilune = 3,200 km; Apolune = 70,000 km) is the intended orbit for NASA’s Artemis Gateway, a small, human-tended space station planned for lunar orbit. The CAPSTONE mission will validate simulations and confirm operational planning for Gateway while also validating performance of navigation and station-keeping requirements for Gateway’s Power and Propulsion Element. Thus, this mission will provide operational experience to NASA, commercial, and international missions for operations in a demanding orbital regime. The CAPSTONE mission consists of a 12-unit (U) CubeSat developed, integrated, and tested by the Terran Orbital Corporation that carries a payload communications system capable of cross-link ranging with NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). CAPSTONE contains a chip scale atomic clock (CSAC) for a one-way ranging experiment with NASA’s Deep Space Network, a dedicated payload flight computer for software demonstration, and a camera. The launch, coordinated by NASA’s Launch Services Program, was provided by Rocket Lab on its Electron launch vehicle utilizing their Photon upper stage to deploy the CAPSTONE spacecraft into lunar orbit. The mission launched June 28, 2022. The CAPSTONE spacecraft deployed from Rocket Lab’s Photon stage and traversed an approximately 4 month highly efficient transfer phase entering the NRHO Novermber 13, 2022 for a six-month primary mission phase. The mission is currently in a twelve-month technology enhancement operations phase. The CAPSTONE technology demonstration mission is lead by Advanced Space, LLC. Spacecraft development and mission operations is conducted by Terran Orbital Corporation of Irvine, California. Noted accomplishments for the CAPSTONE mission include demonstration of the accessibility of NHROs, validation of key operational concepts in the NHRO environment, laying the foundation for commercial support of future lunar operations, and accelerating the availability of peer-to-peer navigation capabilities provided by the Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System (CAPS). The CAPSTONE mission is funded through NASA's Small Spacecraft Technology (SST) program, which is one of several programs within NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate. The program is chartered to develop and demonstrate technologies to enhance and expand the capabilities of small spacecraft with a particular focus on enabling new mission architectures through the use of small spacecraft, expanding the reach of small spacecraft to new destinations, and augmenting future missions with supporting small spacecraft. The CAPSTONE mission launch was provided by NASA’s Exploration Systems Development Missions Directorate’s Advanced Exploration Systems Division. Coordination and acquisition of the launch was managed by NASA’s Launch Services Program. The CAPSTONE mission and project status will be presented.

Elwood Agasid↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System Technology Operations and Navigation Experiment (CAPSTONE) Pathfinder for Artemis Gateway

The Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System Technology Operations and Navigation Experiment (CAPSTONE) mission was developed by NASA in collaboration with Advanced Space, LLC of Westminster, Colorado. This technology demonstration mission serves as a pathfinder for near rectilinear halo orbit (NHRO) operations around the Moon. The NHRO, (Perilune = 3,200 km; Apolune = 70,000 km) is the intended orbit for NASA’s Artemis Gateway, a small, human-tended space station planned for lunar orbit. The CAPSTONE mission will validate simulations and confirm operational planning for Gateway while also validating performance of navigation and stationkeeping requirements for Gateway’s Power and Propulsion Element. Therefore, this mission will provide operational experience to NASA, commercial, and international missions for operations in a demanding orbital regime. The CAPSTONE mission consists of a 12-unit (U)+ CubeSat developed, integrated, and tested by the Terran Orbital Corporation that carries a payload communications system capable of crosslink ranging with NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). CAPSTONE contains a chip-scale atomic clock (CSAC) for a one-way ranging experiment with NASA’s Deep Space Network, a dedicated payload flight computer for software demonstration, and a camera. The launch, coordinated by NASA’s Launch Services Program, was provided by Rocket Lab on its Electron launch vehicle using their Photon upper stage to deploy the CAPSTONE spacecraft. The mission launched June 28, 2022. The CAPSTONE spacecraft deployed from the Photon stage and traversed an approximately 4-month, highly fuel-efficient transfer phase entering the NRHO November 13, 2022, for a six-month primary mission phase. The mission is currently in a twelve-month technology enhancement operations phase. The CAPSTONE technology demonstration mission is led by Advanced Space, LLC. Spacecraft development and mission operations are conducted by Terran Orbital Corporation of Irvine, California. Noted accomplishments for the CAPSTONE mission include demonstrating the accessibility of NHROs; validating key operational concepts in the NHRO environment; laying the foundation for commercial support of future lunar operations; and accelerating the availability of peer-to-peer navigation capabilities provided by the Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System (CAPS). The CAPSTONE mission is funded through NASA’s Small Spacecraft Technology (SST) program, which is one of several programs within NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate. The program is chartered to develop and demonstrate technologies to enhance and expand the capabilities of small spacecraft with a particular focus on enabling new mission architectures through the use of small spacecraft, expanding the reach of small spacecraft to new destinations, and augmenting future missions with supporting small spacecraft. The CAPSTONE mission launch was provided by NASA’s Exploration Systems Development Missions Directorate’s Advanced Exploration Systems Division. Coordination and acquisition of the launch was managed by NASA’s Launch Services Program. The CAPSTONE mission and project status will be presented.

Elwood Agasid↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Node – 1: Initial Flight Results and the Role of Surface Psuedolites in Lunar Navigation

On February 22, 2024, the Intuitive Machines IM-1 NOVA-C lander, nick-named Odysseus, landed on the lunar surface, carrying with it a cadre of NASA scientific and technology demonstration payloads. These payloads and missions marked the first delivery of NASA instruments to operate from the lunar surface since the Apollo landings. One of these payloads is Lunar Node -1 (LN-1), a navigation beacon demonstration mission. The payload was designed and built by NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center. The payload’s main goal was to demonstrate and provide insight into the use of lunar surface-based radio navigation aids. As part of the mission, LN-1 successfully conducted multiple one-way transmissions from the NOVA-C vehicle to Deep Space Network ground receivers using its onboard S-band transmitter, while being disciplined by an onboard Space Chip Scale Atomic Clock. LN-1 transmitted to DSN on an almost daily basis during transit to the moon, including two surface passes. The payload was originally plan to conduct 7-10 days of surface operation as an always-on beacon. These passes focused on evaluating two main navigation approaches: performance and stability of ranging using time-based transfer techniques on a cubesat size and grade platform, as well as one-way psuedonoise ranging approaches. To assess performance, the measurements were compared to independent navigation solutions using multiple approaches including: one-way Doppler tracking, two-way Doppler Tracking, and visual verification of the landing location provided by visual observations from orbital platforms. While the mission only conducted limited surface operations, the data provides some initial insight to performance form the lunar surface. These results are compared with initial ground-based testing as well as continued evaluation of the flight-space platform using multiple grades of oscillators for maintaining clock and frequency stability. These focus on the timing stability of platform in a deep-space environment as well variations in state determination. Given these insights, this paper provides additional description and evaluation of how this approach can be utilized as part of a broader lunar navigation architecture, such as being developed and deployed across multiple international space agencies. Analysis is provided to develop overall timing requirements and assessment of operational scenarios, such as orbit and surface location determination. In addition, the results support discussion as to how surface pseudolites could best be used within existing standard signal definitions, such as defined in the LunaNet Interoperability Specifications. This will consider concerns such as the near-/far- problem as well as operational considerations, including whether a beacon is better suited as two- or one-way ranging platform. The use cases are focused on how these psuedolites can provide additional coverage to augment and support planned operational coverage. For example, this analysis provides analysis of mid-latitude surface missions, where there may be limited geometry and availability of orbital relays. The results will show how these navigation psuedolites can fit within the developing architecture to provide additional robustness, capability, and support multiple use cases. Lastly, the paper will discuss challenges and next steps to be addressed in the implementation and testing of a follow-on payload and a continued path towards demonstration and integration of this capability into Lunar PNT architectures.

Evan Anzalone↗
NASA NTRS2024

Autonomous Navigation of a Lunar Relay Using GNSS and Other Measurements

NASA’s Lunar Communications Relay and Navigation Services (LCRNS) project will establish a relay constellation at the Moon to provide the south pole region with communications and position, navigation, and time (PNT) services. These services will require highly accurate knowledge of position, velocity, and time (PVT) for each relay. This paper explores one approach for performing onboard PVT estimation, the LCRNS PNT Instrument (LPI). This paper considers different configurations of the instrument, specifically different measurement types and clocks, and the resulting navigation performance. Simulation results are first shown for an instrument configuration that uses GPS pseudorange and Doppler measurements with a highly sensitive GPS receiver (i.e., an acquisition and tracking threshold of 23 dB-Hz) and a chip-scale atomic clock (CSAC). The importance of Doppler, clock quality, receiver sensitivity, and optical navigation is examined through comparison of these results to other instrument configurations. Clock quality (i.e., stability) is the strongest determinant of achievable performance, and the inclusion of GPS Doppleralso has a significant effect. Finally, simulation results are compared to two laboratory tests: first a case that includes GPS receiver hardware in the loop, then a case that includes optical navigation and filter flight software in the loop. These agreeclosely with the simulation results and provide evidence the simulation is accurately modeling the instrument under development.

Benjamin W Ashman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Node – 1: Initial Flight Results and the Role of Surface Psuedolites in Lunar Navigation

On February 22, 2024, Intuitive Machines NOVA-C lander, nick-named Odysseus, landed on the lunar surface, carrying with it a cadre of NASA scientific and technology demonstration payloads. These payloads and missions marked the first delivery of NASA instruments to operate from the lunar surface since the Apollo landings. One of these payloads is Lunar Node -1 (LN-1), a navigation beacon demonstration mission. The payload was designed and built by NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center. The payload’s main goal was to demonstrate and provide insight into the use of lunar surface-based radio navigation aids. As part of the mission, LN-1 successfully conducted multiple one-way transmissions from the NOVA-C vehicle to Deep Space Network ground receivers using its onboard S-band transmitter, while being disciplined by an onboard Space Chip Scale Atomic Clock. LN-1 transmitted to DSN on an almost daily basis during transit to the moon, including two surface passes. The payload was originally plan to conduct 7-10 days of surface operation as an always-on beacon. These passes focused on evaluating two main navigation approaches: performance and stability of ranging using time-based transfer techniques on a cubesat size and grade platform, as well as one-way psuedonoise ranging approaches. To assess performance, the measurements were compared to independent navigation solutions using multiple approaches including: one-way Doppler tracking, two-way Doppler Tracking, and visual verification of the landing location provided by visual observations from orbital platforms. While the mission only conducted limited surface operations, the data provides some initial insight to performance form the lunar surface. These results are compared with initial ground-based testing as well as continued evaluation of the flight-space platform using multiple grades of oscillators for maintaining clock and frequency stability. These focus on the timing stability of platform in a deep-space environment as well variations in state determination. Given these insights, this paper provides additional description and evaluation of how this approach can be utilized as part of a broader lunar navigation architecture, such as being developed and deployed across multiple international space agencies. Analysis is provided to develop overall timing requirements and assessment of operational scenarios, such as orbit and surface location determination. In addition, the results support discussion as to how surface pseudolites could best be used within existing standard signal definitions, such as defined in the LunaNet Interoperability Specifications. This will consider concerns such as the near-/far- problem as well as operational considerations, including whether a beacon is better suited as two- or one-way ranging platform. The use cases are focused on how these psuedolites can provide additional coverage to augment and support planned operational coverage. For example, this analysis provides analysis of mid-latitude surface missions, where there may be limited geometry and availability of orbital relays. The results will show how these navigation psuedolites can fit within the developing architecture to provide additional robustness, capability, and support multiple use cases. Lastly, the paper will discuss challenges and next steps to be addressed in the implementation and testing of a follow-on payload and a continued path towards demonstration and integration of this capability into Lunar PNT architectures.

Evan J Anzalone↗
NASA NTRS1985

A VLSI single chip (255,223) Reed-Solomon encoder

A description of a working single chip implementation of a Reed-Solomon encoder. The code used is the Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems (CCSDS) standard (255,223) code. The architecture that leads to this single very large scale integration chip design makes use of a bit-serial finite field multiplication algorithm of E. R. Berlekamp.

Deutsch, L. J.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Input-output, expandable-parity network

Large-scale integrated circuit generates and checks parity of four eight-bit registers. In addition, circuit will indicate by output signal whether parity error exists. Circuit can also generate or check parity of words up to 32 bits. This is done by making appropriate internal wiring connections on the large-scale integrated chip.

Mckevitt, J. F., III↗
NASA NTRS1979

Future trends in image processing software and hardware

JPL image processing applications are examined, considering future trends in fields such as planetary exploration, electronics, astronomy, computers, and Landsat. Attention is given to adaptive search and interrogation of large image data bases, the display of multispectral imagery recorded in many spectral channels, merging data acquired by a variety of sensors, and developing custom large scale integrated chips for high speed intelligent image processing user stations and future pipeline production processors.

Green, W. B.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Fast transform decoding of nonsystematic Reed-Solomon codes

A Reed-Solomon (RS) code is considered to be a special case of a redundant residue polynomial (RRP) code, and a fast transform decoding algorithm to correct both errors and erasures is presented. This decoding scheme is an improvement of the decoding algorithm for the RRP code suggested by Shiozaki and Nishida, and can be realized readily on very large scale integration chips.

Truong, T. K.↗