Comparison of Two Load Prediction Methods for Strain-Gage Balances
Data from a high-capacity semi-span balance is used to perform a detailed comparison of the load prediction accuracy of two strain-gage balance load prediction methods. Both methods independently obtain their load prediction equations from multivariate least squares fits of balance calibration data. The first method is called Non-Iterative Method. This approach directly uses regression models of the individual load components of a balance for the load prediction. The second method is called Iterative Method. This alternate approach uses a load iteration equation for the load prediction that is constructed from the regression models of the gage outputs of the balance. Basic characteristics of the two methods are reviewed. Afterwards, both methods are applied to calibration and check load data of the chosen balance. Finally, selected analysis results are compared. These comparisons confirmed that the load prediction accuracy of the two methods is the same for all practical purposes.