SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Shielded Cells”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2019

Gamma-Ray Raster Imaging with Robotic Data Collection (FY19 Annual Report)

This project has developed an alternative imaging capability for imaging and quantifying radioactive materials in situ. This approach uses a robotic-mounted gamma-ray detector which can move around an area of interest, sampling the space at a high frequency. By rastering across the area, an image can be created with no collimation and a high efficiency. An open-source robotic platform was programed to search an open area, collecting gamma-ray spectra every second. Informative path planning was used to direct the robot to areas of higher dose. Finally, a Bayesian particle filter was used to locate the source with minimal counting statistics. The use of a robotic mount allows data collection for long periods of time unattended, and it will also eliminate uncertainties in positioning typically introduced by personnel. This approach will be particularly relevant for gloveboxes, shielded cells, or process piping which may have complex, non-uniform distributions of material.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Tank 22 Supernate Sample Characterization for Select Radionuclides

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Remediation (SRR), through a Technical Assistance Request (G-TAR-H-00007) to provide additional sample characterization on unfiltered Tank 22 supernate identified as sample HTF-22-18-117, which was delivered to SRNL Shielded Cells on December 14, 2018. A summary of the average analytical results for this unfiltered Tank 22 supernate liquid follows. The density of the unfiltered Tank 22 supernate is 1.008 g/mL, 0.2%RSD. The Tank 22 supernate sample was analyzed for a total of 45 radionuclide species, with 15 of these radionuclides showing activity levels above minimum detectable activity of at least one replicate. Cesium-137 showed the highest activity at 2.90E+07 dpm/mL, 2.35 %RSD (1.30E-02 Ci/ L) with U-235 showing the lowest measurable activity at an average of 1.66E-01 dpm/mL, 6.26 %RSD (7.49E-11 Ci/L). The primary beta emitting radionuclides in the unfiltered Tank 22 supernate sample include Sr-90, Y-90 and Cs-137 at average activity concentrations of 1.10E-05, 1.10E-05 and 1.30E-02 Ci/L, respectively. The primary gamma emitting radionuclide is Ba-137 m at an average activity concentration of 1.23E-02 Ci/L (note that the activity concentration for Ba-137 m was calculated as 94.7% the Cs-137 activity concentration).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Characterization and CST Batch Contact Equilibrium Testing of Aged TCCR Tank 10H Batch 1A and 2 Process Supernate Samples

The Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) system uses ion exchange columns filled with Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) media to process radioactive waste solutions for the removal of Cs-137. TCCR currently focuses on dissolving Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank 10H waste (primarily sodium saltcake solids) within the tank followed by at-tank ion exchange column treatment. Previous equilibrium batch contact tests conducted in the SRNL Shielded Cells laboratory and associated analyses indicated that CST cesium removal performance was lower than predicted by ZAM modeling for TCCR Tank 10H Production Supernate Batch 1A. An average cesium distribution coefficient of 1,948 mL/g which corresponds to 94.1% Cs + removal was observed for Batch 1A supernate at 38 °C in January of 2019 using laboratory pretreated IONSIV™ R9120-B a CST from Lot #209900034 (predominant TCCR CST batch) at a phase ratio of 122 mL/g. This cesium loading was approximately 32% lower than model predictions, presumably due to ion exchange competition or fouling associated with alkaline earth or transition metals present in the solutions at low levels. The current testing was designed to: 1) evaluate whether supernate compositional changes during storage would result in improved cesium removal performance with CST, and 2) assist in media selection and handling protocols for future TCCR columns by evaluating several CST manufacturer batches as well as samples of one CST batch which had been pretreated using two different methods (field and laboratory methods).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Tank 22 Settled Sludge Core Sample Characterization and Testing

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Remediation (SRR) Engineering (SRR-E) to provide sample characterization and analyses of Tank 22 settled sludge core sample and the supernatant liquids (supernate) in support of Tank 22 re-baseline data, inhalation dose potential/hydrogen generation and suspension/removal of settled sludge from the bottom of Tank 22. The approximately 9.5 inches of intact Tank 22 core sample from SRR-E, after extrusion in the SRNL Shielded Cells, showed three visually different stratification layers or regions of solids in the extruded core material. Part of the initial physical characterization of these three segments of the Tank 22 core sample included density, weight percent total solids, particle size distribution, X-ray diffractions and scanning electron microscope of each segment material. Given the dissimilarity of the three Tank 22 segment materials after the physical characterization results and the fact that there was no clear line of demarcation to indicate where each segment began and ended across the entire length of the core sample, SRNL in conjunction with the SRR-E customer decided to blend all three segments of the material to form a composite Tank 22 core sample for further analysis and characterization without taking into consideration the proportional weight or mass contribution of each segment. This compositing approach assumes that the errors introduced in any characterization of the Tank 22 core sample will be comparable to the errors when the three segments are separated and combined proportionally by weight to form the composite Tank 22 sample. This compositing approach maximized the quantity of composited Tank 22 material needed for radionuclide and other physical characterizations.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Investigation of Thermolytic Hydrogen Generation Rate in Tank 44 Dissolved Saltcake Samples

Saltcake core samples collected from Tank 44 in 2006 were dissolved to provide material for HGR measurements applicable to F-Area dissolved saltcake material. Additionally, characterization was performed on the Tank 44 saltcake material. The following are key results from the Tank 44 saltcake characterization. The Tank 44 Upper Saltcake Composite, corresponding to the 171 to 285 inch tank level, contained by mass approximately 69% sodium nitrate, 11% sodium carbonate, 8% sodium nitrite, smaller amounts of other salts and components, and 9% unquantified (which includes water, water of hydration, oxygen/hydrogen content of oxides and hydroxides, and uncertainty). The Tank 44 Lower Saltcake Composite, corresponding to the 76 to 114 inch tank level, contained by mass approximately 49% sodium carbonate, 18% sodium nitrate, smaller amounts of other salts, at least 8% sludge, and 9% unquantified (see above). The dissolved saltcake contained free hydroxide less than quantifiable (<0.01 M) due to the limited quantity of material that could be removed from the Shielded Cells based on the sample radioactivity. Measurement by pH paper provided an approximate pH of 12. The following are key results from the Tank 44 HGR testing. During boiling at 106.7 °C, HGR for Tank 44 dissolved saltcake without added glycolate was 7.2×10 -8 ft 3 h -1 ga l-1 . During boiling at 106.9 °C, HGR for Tank 44 dissolved saltcake with 1000 mg/L of added glycolate was 8.2×10 -8 ft 3 h -1 gal -1 . ∙ For the test without added glycolate, the first several HGR measurements at 70, 85, and 100 °C gave indication of the release of dissolved hydrogen and should not be used to represent the sustained thermolytic HGR for those temperatures. The measurements at boiling are the best representation of thermolysis in this testing. Carbon dioxide was observed at concentrations up to 6 vol% in the flow-system offgas for the test at boiling. ∙ Methane generation was observed at 100 °C and boiling. Methane concentration in the total gas generated during testing remained well below the lower flammability limit for methane in air. The addition of 1000 mg/L of glycolate did not have a significant impact on the hydrogen generation rates measured during this testing. The low hydroxide concentration in the Tank 44 dissolved saltcake likely influenced the relatively low thermolytic HGR and high carbon dioxide release observations in this testing. Based on the observation that methane was generated or released upon heating SRS radioactive Tank 44 waste samples to 100 °C and above, we recommend gaining a greater understanding of the cause and mechanism of its generation. First, the applicable literature should be reviewed to reveal the thermolytic methane generation mechanisms of possible methane generating species in the SRS CSTF. If warranted, a plan should be developed for simulant tests with methylated siloxanes and other applicable compounds in order to gain a better mechanistic understanding of methane generation in the SRS CSTF.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Impacts of the Addition of Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) and DR-3 Fuel from H-Canyon to Tank 40 on Acid Stoichiometry and Hydrogen Production

H-Canyon plans to discard Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) material that is currently stored in Tanks 16.3 and 16.4. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) determined that a portion of the SRE material can be added to Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) in Tank 40 and the remainder will be added to Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) that is currently being prepared in Tank 51. A processing flowsheet for both the nitric-formic acid flowsheet and the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet were previously developed for SB9 sludge-only and coupled operation with the Actinide Removal Process – Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (ARP-MCU) and the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Due to the compositional change in Tank 40 after the addition of SRE material, it is necessary to determine the influence on the acid stoichiometry operating window and hydrogen production for SB9 processing. An assessment was completed to address the influence of an addition of SRE and DR-3 Fuel from H-Canyon on the chemistry of Tank 40, the defined acid stoichiometry window (with and without SWPF streams) for the nitric-formic and nitric-glycolic acid flowsheets, and the resulting influence of the hydrogen production. Hydrogen production during the SRAT/SME cycles consists of thermolytic, radiolytic, and catalytic hydrogen. For the nitric-formic acid flowsheet, catalytic hydrogen dominates the hydrogen production during DWPF operation mode for the SRAT and SME vessels. This report was written to summarize that assessment. No SRNL testing is needed prior to adding up to 7,100 additional gallons of SRE and DR-3 Fuel from H-Canyon to Tank 40. Also, the addition of SRE will not exceed the Shielded Cells reported values for catalytic hydrogen for either the nitric-formic acid flowsheet (Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) limit of 0.15 lb/h) or the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet (TSR limit 0.024 lb/h). The addition of the ARP stream from SWPF and the use of the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet are both expected to decrease hydrogen generation, leading to a larger safety margin in the CPC.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Glycolate Analysis in Tank 22: Developing and Testing Analytical Methods for the Savannah River Site Liquid Waste System

Researchers developed and tested a range of techniques to support a low mg/L Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) of glycolate in radioactive Tank 22 waste solution by Ion Chromatography (IC) and by proton NMR. For the IC method, Dionex OnGuard II cartridges were tested as a means of removing alkali earth and transition metals that can interfere during ion chromatography applications especially when analyzing for low-concentration, chelating analytes. Additionally, concentrations of nitrate in the raw Tank 22 sample (5,000 to 10,000 mg/L) were managed by using reasonable levels of sample dilution. The resulting IC performance quality was enhanced by improving the baseline, increasing sensitivity [Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) of 12 mg/L and Limit of Detection (LOD) of 4.0 mg/L], and resolving analytes into well-defined Gaussian peaks when using the Dionex OnGuard II H⁺ cartridges to remove matrix interferences. High concentrations of nitrate limited the performance of the IC method. To achieve an acceptable baseline, samples with high nitrate content require more dilution, resulting in higher detection limits. Tests on samples with higher concentrations of nitrate (Tank 30 and 32 supernate with approximately 150000 mg/L nitrate) suggested that IC detection limits for glycolate in these samples would be > 500 mg/L. Thus, an LOQ of 12 mg/L is not feasible by this IC method on evaporator feed samples. An alternative method of glycolate analysis, using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H NMR), was developed by the research team. In initial tests, the H NMR technique provided reasonable quantitation of glycolate in Tank 22 conditions by direct observation of the liquid. The H NMR method may provide improved detection limits for solutions with higher nitrate concentrations. We recommend further development of this analysis for high nitrate LWS samples such as evaporator feed and evaporator drop tank content. A method for pretreatment of samples using crystalline silicotitanate (CST) was developed and tested. The objective of the pretreatment was to facilitate analysis of samples with higher levels of radioactivity. The pretreatment did not influence the glycolate concentration in solution, and the pretreatment is projected to reduce Cs 137 activity in a sample by a factor of 16,200. The double strike CST pretreatment was demonstrated and would allow milliliters of higher activity samples to be transferred from the Shielded Cells and handled in a containment unit for glycolate analysis. The various studies validated IC and H NMR methods for glycolate analysis, defined the range of applicability, and demonstrated key supporting analytical protocols. Based on the results, high quality glycolate analysis of Tank 22 is feasible down to approximately 12 mg/L, with the potential for broader applicability of the methods to other conditions in the Savannah River Site Liquid Waste System (LWS).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Additional Analysis of the 2H-Evaporator Wall Scale Sample HTF-17-57

Savannah River National Laboratory previously analyzed scale samples from both the wall and cone sections of the 242-16H Evaporator prior to chemical cleaning. The samples were analyzed for uranium and plutonium isotopes required for a Nuclear Criticality Safety Assessment of the scale removal process. The analysis of the scale samples found the material to contain crystalline nitrated cancrinite and clarkeite and significant amounts of mercury. Savannah River Remediation subsequently requested additional analyses on the samples. Inspection of the sample bottles revealed that no sample remained of the cone scale (HTF-17-56) while approximately 4 g of the wall scale sample (HTF-17-57) remained. The wall sample was subsequently ground with a mortar and pestle, at which time it was discovered that the sample contained a significant amount of liquid, metallic mercury. The portion of the sample that was not mercury was approximately 3 g. This portion of the sample was analyzed to determine the concentrations of selected radionuclides. The following radionuclide concentrations were measured: <9.6E+02 dpm/g H-3, 2.9E+02 dpm/g C-14, 5.6E+03 dpm/g Tc-99, and 1.6E+02 dpm/g I-129. Blank samples were also analyzed to evaluate sample contamination from the Shielded Cells environment. All blank sample results were below detectable limits. Due to the limited sample size and the anticipated low levels of the target radionuclides, no replicate sample analysis was conducted.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-21-24, -25) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-21-26, -27) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

Feed limits have been established for the 2H-Evaporator system to ensure nuclear criticality is not possible and corrosion is minimized. These limits are protected by the Enrichment Control Program (ECP) and the Corrosion Control Program (CCP) that require periodic sampling and analysis to confirm that the waste supernate composition stays within the limits. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) obtained samples from two different heights within each of the two waste tanks supporting the 2H-Evaporator operations on March 26, 2021. The Tank 38H (evaporator drop tank) and Tank 43H (evaporator feed tank) samples were received by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) Shielded Cells on March 26, 2021. Analysis of these samples provides information necessary for determining compliance with the ECP and CCP. The sample characterization was requested via a Technical Task Request (TTR) and conducted based on a Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Analysis of Defense Waste Processing Facility Sample: Recycle Collection Tank Sample Batch 4945

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Remediation (now Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC)), through a Technical Task Request, to characterization the “as-received” Recycle Collection Tank (RCT) Sample identified as sample batch 4945 [Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) batch 796)], which was delivered to SRNL Shielded Cells on January 28, 2021. The RCT characterization data will be used as input to the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Recycle Diversion Project. This RCT report is the first of three sample characterization reports that will be used for this DWPF Project. The other DWPF reports will involve the characterization of the Off-Gas Condensate Tank (OGCT) and the Slurry Mix Evaporator Condensate Tank (SMECT) samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Investigation of Thermolytic Hydrogen Generation Rate in Tank 44 Dissolved Saltcake Samples

Saltcake core samples collected from Tank 44 in 2006 were dissolved to provide material for HGR measurements applicable to F-Area dissolved saltcake material. Additionally, characterization was performed on the Tank 44 saltcake material. The following are key results from the Tank 44 saltcake characterization. The Tank 44 Upper Saltcake Composite, corresponding to the 171 to 285 inch tank level, contained by mass approximately 69% sodium nitrate, 11% sodium carbonate, 8% sodium nitrite, smaller amounts of other salts and components, and 9% unquantified (which includes water, water of hydration, oxygen/hydrogen content of oxides and hydroxides, and uncertainty). The Tank 44 Lower Saltcake Composite, corresponding to the 76 to 114 inch tank level, contained by mass approximately 49% sodium carbonate, 18% sodium nitrate, smaller amounts of other salts, at least 8% sludge, and 9% unquantified (see above). The dissolved saltcake contained free hydroxide less than quantifiable (<0.01 M) due to the limited quantity of material that could be removed from the Shielded Cells based on the sample radioactivity. Measurement by pH paper provided an approximate pH of 12. The following are key results from the Tank 44 HGR testing. During boiling at 106.7 °C, HGR for Tank 44 dissolved saltcake without added glycolate was 7.2×10 -8 ft 3 h -1 gal -1 . During boiling at 106.9 °C, HGR for Tank 44 dissolved saltcake with 1000 mg/L of added glycolate was 8.2×10 -8 ft 3 h -1 gal -1 . For the test without added glycolate, the first several HGR measurements at 70, 85, and 100 °C gave indication of the release of dissolved hydrogen and should not be used to represent the sustained thermolytic HGR for those temperatures. The measurements at boiling are the best representation of thermolysis in this testing. Carbon dioxide was observed at concentrations up to 6 vol% in the flow-system offgas for the test at boiling. Methane generation was observed at 100 °C and boiling. Methane concentration in the total gas generated during testing remained well below the lower flammability limit for methane in air. The addition of 1000 mg/L of glycolate did not have a significant impact on the hydrogen generation rates measured during this testing. The low hydroxide concentration in the Tank 44 dissolved saltcake likely influenced the relatively low thermolytic HGR and high carbon dioxide release observations in this testing. Based on the observation that methane was generated or released upon heating SRS radioactive Tank 44 waste samples to 100 °C and above, we recommend gaining a greater understanding of the cause and mechanism of its generation. First, the applicable literature should be reviewed to reveal the thermolytic methane generation mechanisms of possible methane generating species in the SRS CSTF. If warranted, a plan should be developed for simulant tests with methylated siloxanes and other applicable compounds in order to gain a better mechanistic understanding of methane generation in the SRS CSTF.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

Modeling of Glycolate Destruction in the Recycle Collection Tank

The Savannah River Site’s DWPF is being upgraded with the introduction of the NG flowsheet. Glycolic acid has been shown to be a superior alternative to formic acid for sludge processing. The new flowsheet improves or maintains necessary parameters such as 1) reduction of mercury, 2) adjustment of feed rheology, 3) pH stability, and 4) adjustment of melter oxidation/reduction potential. Further, the use of glycolic acid virtually eliminates the potential for catalytic hydrogen generation in DWPF processing DWPF process condensates are collected and returned to the Savannah River Site (SRS) CSTF. The RCT collects off-gas condensate during chemical processing, vitrification, and other unit operations performed in DWPF and is the singular return vessel delivering recycle effluent back to CSTF. Each batch of recycle will have a small amount of glycolate from chemical processing and melter off-gas condensates. To avoid potential flammability issues due to thermolysis of glycolate in the CSTF, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) provided to Savannah River Remediation (SRR) at their request a Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP) to quantify and mitigate glycolate returns via DWPF’s recycle stream. The request included testing of a process to oxidize glycolate and other organic species that are responsible for hydrogen generation from thermolysis. Following that work SRR provided a Task Technical Request (TTR) that requested process modeling. In 2021 a TTQAP was issued to cover the modeling work. Modeling draws data from laboratory scale studies using chemical simulants and radioactive waste samples. Chemical kinetic modeling was performed to evaluate the feasibility of using sodium permanganate to destroy glycolate in the RCT. The results from the laboratory studies were summarized in a series of reports. Reference 9 is a report of lab scale processing of actual DWPF Slurry Mix Evaporate Condensate Tank (SMECT) and Offgas Condensate Tank (OGCT) samples in the SRNL Shielded Cells. Tests at caustic conditions demonstrated sodium permanganate was effective in converting glycolate to oxalate, and permanganate (Mn 7+ ) is reduced to manganate (Mn 6+ ) with no significant formation of carbon dioxide or carbonate. Equation (1) was found to best describe the observed reaction of glycolate with permanganate under nominal (60 to 145 mg/L in RCT) glycolate entrainment conditions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

SB10 Frit Recommendation, and Evaluations of the Glass Variability Study and Cs-137 Concentrations in Strip Effluent Based on May 2021 Projections

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is currently preparing to initiate processing of Sludge Batch 10 (SB10), which is comprised of material from Tanks 11H, 13H, 15H, and 26F, Alternate Feed Stock-2 (AFS-2) and Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) material from H-Canyon. In support of SB10 qualification, frit development using 2020 Tank 40 blend projections and experimental work for the glass variability study were previously conducted. Frit 473 and Frit 209 were identified as candidate frits and both were included in the development of the variability study test matrix; however, a final frit recommendation was postponed until more information could be determined about the composition of SB10 after washing. In May 2021, Savannah River Remediation (SRR) reprojected SB10 based on the analytical results from the Tank 51 qualification sample that was washed in the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) Shielded Cells Facility.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Analysis of Defense Waste Processing Facility Sample: Recycle Collection Tank Sample Batch 4945

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Analysis of Defense Waste Processing Facility Sample: Off-Gas Condensate Tank Sample Batch 27862

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Remediation (now Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC)), through a Technical Task Request (X-TTR-H-00107), to characterize the “as-received” Off-Gas Condensate Tank (OGCT) Sample identified as sample batch 27862, which was delivered to SRNL Shielded Cells on April 30, 2021. This OGCT report is the third of three sample characterization reports dealing with this Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Recycle Diversion Project. The other two recycling stream characterization reports are the Recycle Collection Tank (RCT) and the Slurry Mix Evaporator Condensate Tank (SMECT) sample report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Analysis of Defense Waste Processing Facility Sample: Slurry Mix Evaporator Condensate Tank Sample Batch 4638

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Remediation (SRR, now Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC)), through a Technical Task Request, to characterization the “as-received” Slurry Mix Evaporator Condensate Tank (SMECT) sample identified as sample batch 4638, which was delivered to SRNL Shielded Cells on March 19, 2021. The SMECT characterization data will be used as input to the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Recycle Diversion Project. This SMECT report is the second of three sample characterization reports that will be used for this DWPF Project. The other two DWPF characterization reports involve the characterization of the Recycle Collection Tank (RCT) sample and the future Off-Gas Condensate Tank (OGCT) characterization report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Radioactive Waste Sludge Washing and Demonstration of the Nitric-Glycolic Acid Flowsheet for Sludge Batch 10 Qualification

For each sludge batch that is processed in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) performs qualification testing to demonstrate that the sludge batch (SB) is processible. During processing of SB9, DWPF will be transitioning from the Nitric-Formic Acid (NFA) flowsheet to the Nitric-Glycolic Acid (NGA) flowsheet. Thus, the qualification of SB10 was requested to only be performed using the NGA flowsheet. In order to qualify the batch for the NGA flowsheet, Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) and Slurry Mix Evaporator (SME) cycles, designated SC-19, were performed using SB10 Tank 51 sample material. SRNL received Tank 51 material in the midst of Tank Farm washing. SRNL continued the washing in the SRNL Shielded Cells. The SRNL process included the addition of Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) material from H Canyon, simulating the transfer of SRE from H Canyon to Tank 51 during Tank Farm washing. The washed SB10 Tank 51 material, with SRE, was characterized prior to flowsheet qualification testing.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2025

Macromolecules & Manufacturing Science

Outline • SRNL Overview • Mission overview • Polymers enabling the mission • R&D Highlights • Polymers in radiation environments • Tooling in shielded cells • Packaging for nuclear material shipments • Polymers supporting tank waste remediation • Ref electrode • Epoxy and polymer grout • Polymers for fusion energy • Deuterium labelling • Polymers for additive manufacturing • Coalescence and blends: experimental and predictive • Process modelling and sorting through big data (peregrine and latticeJ)

Chatham, Camden [Savannah River National Laborator↗