DOE OSTI2017
Infiltration and exfiltration are among the largest envelope-related contributors to the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) loads in commercial buildings. Air leakage is responsible for about 6% of the total energy used by the commercial building sector. New air sealing technologies have recently emerged that aim to improve the performance of air barrier systems by simplifying their installation procedure. These include the 3M 3015 primer-less self-adhered membrane, 3M 3015VP vapor permeable primer-less self-adhered membrane, and 3M 2085VP vapor permeable fluid-applied air barrier membrane. ORNL verified the performance of the 3M 3015, 3015VP and 2085VP air- and water- resistive barriers by conducting two field studies. The first one involved side-by-side evaluations in eight unoccupied test facilities in Cottage Grove, MN, that included the 3M membranes and commonly used air barrier materials such as a self-adhered membrane with primer and a mechanically-fastened membrane with taped joints. The facilities were monitored for 24 months and the collected data were used to calibrate simulation models that in turn were employed to calculate energy consumption and savings because of improvements in airtightness. After two years, results indicate that the test facilities with the new 3M technologies had leakage rates that were slightly lower than the buildings with traditional air barrier materials. The calibrated model for the test facility with the 3M 3015 membrane was used to calculate energy savings due to improved airtightness when compared to a building without an air barrier. Findings suggest that a building in Minneapolis, MN, or Fairbanks, AK, that has a properly installed air barrier system can have annual HVAC electricity use that is about 36% lower than if the building did not have an air barrier. Similarly, decreases in natural gas use can be about 25%. The second field evaluation involved the LifeSource building in Minneapolis, MN, and the Sierra Trading Post building in Woodbury, MN. Both of these were recently completed and use the 3M 3015 and 3015VP membranes as their air- and water- resistive barriers, respectively. Blower door test results show that LifeSource has an average air leakage rate of 0.06 cfm/ft 2 at 75 Pa, or 85% lower than the 0.4 cfm/ft 2 at 75 Pa specified in the 2015 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). The leakage rate in the Sierra building is 0.15 cfm/ft 2 at 75 Pa or 63% than the IECC value. According to simulation results, LifeSource lowered its annual heating and cooling cost by about $\$$4600 or 10% when compared to a similar building that lacked an air barrier system. In the case of the Sierra building, savings were $5,900 or 41%. These field evaluations serve as examples of the level of building envelope airtightness that can be achieved by using air barrier materials that are properly installed, and illustrate the energy and financial savings that building envelopes with low air leakage rates could attain.
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗