Results for “SLS” — Page 4

NASA NTRS2019

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Tools for Human Factors Engineering Assessments for Safe Sls Worksites

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) Human Factors Engineering (HFE) Team is implementing mockup fabrication, virtual reality (VR) and motion capture (MoCap) into HFE analyses of SLS worksites through its Virtual Environments Lab (VEL). MSFC HFE Team is responsible for the Space Launch System (SLS) worksite analyses of the integration activities performed at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). With a wide variety of tasks, it is important to verify that SLS can be safely integrated at KSC early in the design process. If the ground support crew cannot safely complete the tasks, redesign efforts must be implemented. MSFC HFE is responsible for verification through methods such as drawing inspection, observation of tasks performed, and building physical mockups. There is a need, however, for a faster analysis early in the process that can impact design safety before drawings are finalized. This need is addressed through MSFC’s VEL.

Andrews, Tanya↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis and Comparison of Surface Roughness Effects on Pressure Data from SLS Wind Tunnel Test

Unsteady flows are becoming a more characterized field of study as advancements in technology is allowing for more high-speed, time-resolved data acquisition. It is important to understand these flows as the shock-wave boundary-layer interactions and separation they are involved with can generate extreme loads caused by high pressure and temperature on the body of a flight vehicle. It is vital to characterize these loads, as they can impede upon the structural integrity of a high-speed system. A common instrument utilized today to characterize pressure distributions caused by unsteady flows are unsteady pressure transducers. Set flush with the surface of a flight vehicle or wind tunnel model, these transducers can provide a pressure distribution, capturing the frequency of unsteady loads that could impinge upon the test article. A couple negative aspects of this instrumentation is that they are expensive, have long lead times, and a pressure distribution can only be determined in one discrete location where the transducer is installed. An optical diagnostic known as unsteady pressure-sensitive paint (uPSP) can help to satisfy these deficiencies. This is a spray paint that can be applied to a surface of a model to provide a global pressure distribution across the whole painted region.2 A complete picture of the fluid dynamic pressures occurring on the surface of a test article can be analyzed, especially in locations where it may have been impossible to install a transducer. Pressure-sensitive paint is also less expensive than traditional pressure transducers, which are, on average, about $2,000 each including the cost of installation.3 Unsteady PSP will not replace unsteady pressure transducers, but the transducers can be used to validate the PSP response to the flow and measure frequencies higher than the frequency response of the paint. One issue that can arise using these tools simultaneously, is that the surface roughness of the uPSP can affect the pressure readings of the transducers. Applying the uPSP to the surface of the model is going to affect the flow in some way as the topography of the model is now different than if it was not painted. One study with steady PSP conducted by Amer, Obara, and Liu at NASA Langley concluded that the PSP surface roughness was minimally intrusive at different test conditions with various lift, drag, etc., however, it was noted that data from some pressure transducers had decreased, likely due to the uneven application of the PSP in the localized region of the transducers.9 Sugioka et. al. tested various formulations of uPSP to study surface roughness effects on a Common Research Model (CRM) in transonic flow. The influence of uPSP on the surface of the model, depending on how it was formulated, was noted to have the possibility of relocating the shock wave present in the flow. This study was conducted to examine and compare transducer data acquired in December 2017 of a 4% scale model of the Space Launch System (SLS) performed at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (UPWT). One goal of the test was to demonstrate to the customer the potential of the uPSP system developed at NASA ARC. The effect of uPSP on transducer signals also became an interest in this experiment and is the reason for this data analysis. The results of this study were discussed with the SLS team to help them make decisions regarding the next test on an SLS model with the PSP and Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel teams.

pressure-sensitive paint↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SLS Evolution: Comparing Configurations Using System Exergy

A human mission to the moon and Mars is the stated space exploration goal of the United States and the international community. To achieve these goals, NASA is developing the Space Launch System (SLS) and the Orion crew capsule as key elements in the architecture for missions to the moon and Mars. SLS will continue to evolve, adding capability that will further aid the missions to the moon and Mars. This paper examines the various configurations of SLS using energy analysis.

Terry Hawes↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SLS Ignition Overpressure-Sound Suppression System Performance Evaluated Against Historical Configurations

During the start-up of a number of launch vehicles that include solid rocket motor (SRM), the ignition transient and acoustic environments are mitigated by the implementation of a water spray system located immediately below the SRM nozzle exit plane (NEP). For NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS), this water system is referred to as the Ignition Overpressure / Sound Suppression (IOP/SS) system. The SLS Induced Environments (IE) technical discipline conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the design and as-tested performance of the IOP/SS water that will operate underneath both Boosters during the Artemis I launch. As part of this evaluation, flow rates and imagery from a number of integrated launch pad / mobile launcher IOP/SS flow tests were studied. Additional insight was leveraged from the Shuttle heritage IOP/SS system that includes data and imagery from a number of Flight Readiness Firings (FRF) and water flow tests. Lastly, the IE study included a qualitive comparison of the Shuttle and SLS systems to the equivalent water flow systems for Titan and Atlas V and determined that the NASA water flow systems are substantially different than those supporting other launch vehicles.

Ignition Overpressure↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SLS Ignition Overpressure-Sound Suppression System Performance Evaluated Against Historical Configurations

During the start-up of a number of launch vehicles that include solid rocket motor (SRM), the ignition transient and acoustic environments are mitigated by the implementation of a water spray system located immediately below the SRM nozzle exit plane (NEP). For NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS), this water system is referred to as the Ignition Overpressure / Sound Suppression (IOP/SS) system. The SLS Induced Environments (IE) technical discipline conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the design and as-tested performance of the IOP/SS water that will operate underneath both Boosters during the Artemis I launch. As part of this evaluation, flow rates and imagery from a number of integrated launch pad / mobile launcher IOP/SS flow tests were studied. Additional insight was leveraged from the Shuttle heritage IOP/SS system that includes data and imagery from a number of Flight Readiness Firings (FRF) and water flow tests. Lastly, the IE study included a qualitive comparison of the Shuttle and SLS systems to the equivalent water flow systems for Titan and Atlas V and determined that the NASA water flow systems are substantially different than those supporting other launch vehicles.

Ignition Overpressure↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA’s SLS (Space Launch System) Rocket Ready for Artemis II Lunar Mission

In early 2026, NASA will launch the Artemis II mission, an approximately 10-day long lunar mission that will fly three NASA astronauts and one CSA (Canadian Space Agency) astronaut on a free-return trajectory around the Moon, following a one-day checkout of their Orion spacecraft in Earth orbit. The mission will be the first to launch astronauts aboard NASA’s Orion spacecraft and on top of the agency’s SLS (Space Launch System) rocket. The mission will also deploy four 12U CubeSats as secondary payloads from the Orion stage adapter, following Orion separation and departure. The payloads, developed by four of NASA’s international partners, will perform a variety of science and technology investigations. The SLS and Orion for the mission are currently stacked in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida and are undergoing final preparations to rollout to Launch Pad 39B for a tanking test before launch. In addition to preparations for the Artemis II mission, significant progress is being made on the SLS for the Artemis III mission, which is targeted to return astronauts to the lunar surface no later than 2029. Major components of the core stage and solid rocket boosters are already at NASA Kennedy undergoing build-up for the mission. Data from the Artemis II launch and mission, as well as progress to subsequent missions, as available, will be presented.

Bruce R Askins↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA’s SLS (Space Launch System) Rocket Ready for Artemis II Lunar Mission

In early 2026, NASA will launch the Artemis II mission, an approximately 10-day long lunar mission that will fly three NASA astronauts and one CSA (Canadian Space Agency) astronaut on a free-return trajectory around the Moon, following a one-day checkout of their Orion spacecraft in Earth orbit. The mission will be the first to launch astronauts aboard NASA’s Orion spacecraft and on top of the agency’s SLS (Space Launch System) rocket. The mission will also deploy four 12U CubeSats as secondary payloads from the Orion stage adapter, following Orion separation and departure. The payloads, developed by four of NASA’s international partners, will perform a variety of science and technology investigations. The SLS and Orion for the mission are currently stacked in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida and are undergoing final preparations to rollout to Launch Pad 39B for a tanking test before launch. In addition to preparations for the Artemis II mission, significant progress is being made on the SLS for the Artemis III mission, which is targeted to return astronauts to the lunar surface no later than 2029. Major components of the core stage and solid rocket boosters are already at NASA Kennedy undergoing build-up for the mission. Data from the Artemis II launch and mission, as well as progress to subsequent missions, as available, will be presented.

Bruce Askins↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Methodology and Development of SLS Liftoff Loads

The methodologies and development of the loads experienced during liftoff of the NASA SLS Block I vehicle will be presented in this paper. The liftoff loads analysis traditionally captures the dynamics of vehicle/pad separation after engine/booster ignition coupled with other launch day environments like wind, overpressure, and engine side loads. Additionally, the liftoff analysis includes an on-pad engine shutdown prior to booster ignition. The SLS liftoff analysis is performed using a Monte Carlo analysis and this paper will explore the Monte Carlo process and the statistical approach to calculating the limit loads.

SLS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Kestrel IDDES Simulations for SLS Transition Analysis

Complex computational simulations are needed to support the Space Launch System (SLS) program, and the fidelity of the computational results must be defended. More specifically, a number of databases are produced for the transition phase of flight, which occurs after the rocket clears the tower but before reaching transonic speeds. In an effort to reduce computational uncertainty, many of the computational parameters were altered to determine the sensitivity of the results to the value of the parameter and then updating the best practice procedures. The baseline routines were developed over many years through the maturation of the SLS program, and this paper delivers a detailed discussion of these baseline results. This section is followed by demonstration of perturbing some of the more significant parameters, including time step and turbulence model, and concluded with a summary of the herein determined best practices for such analysis.

CFD↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Methodology and Development of SLS Liftoff Loads

The methodologies and development of the loads experienced during liftoff of the NASA SLS Block I vehicle will be presented in this paper. The liftoff loads analysis traditionally captures the dynamics of vehicle/pad separation after engine/booster ignition coupled with other launch day environments like wind, overpressure, and engine side loads. Additionally, the liftoff analysis includes an on-pad engine shutdown prior to booster ignition. The SLS liftoff analysis is performed using a Monte Carlo analysis and this paper will explore the Monte Carlo process and the statistical approach to calculating the limit loads.

SLS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Methodology and Development of SLS Ascent Loads

The methodology and development of the Space Launch System (SLS) Block 1 Boost and Core phase Ascent loads will be presented in this paper. As is common practice, a series of fixed time/mass Finite Element Models of the vehicle were developed for the purpose of evaluating the structural loads and accelerations for particular Mach or time ranges associated with the Boost and Core phases of flight. Load contributors, which vary between bins, include the flight mechanic induced portion of the loads (e.g., Static-Elastic (STEL) or Vehicle Load Indicator (VLI) tool results), gust loads, buffet loads, Solid Rocket Booster thrust oscillations, Core Stage Engine thrust oscillations, maneuvering loads, thrust vector-related dispersions, and Programmed Test Input induced loads. Each of these load contributors will be examined in this paper, as well as the Loads Combination Equations used to generate the final loads. In addition to the typical coupled loads analysis, an Ascent loads evaluation is included in the SLS Artemis 1 Day of Launch process; a summary of this evaluation will also be presented in this paper.

SLS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reanalysis of Rat Data from Spacelab Life Sciences 2 (SLS-2) to Reveal Research Gaps in Spaceflight Data

Using and analyzing the legacy data obtained in space life sciences missions has the potential to provide researchers a complete picture of the molecular changes associated with space without further experimentation. This project’s objective is to extract, filter, organize, and analyze all Rattus norvegicus data and metadata obtained from Columbia’s Spacelab Life Sciences 2 (SLS-2, STS-58) mission to explore the ways that we can compile information from model organisms, in our case rats, to create a reliable model to understand biological mechanisms in response to these space flight changes. By reusing rare space legacy data coupled with data analysis techniques, we can combine individual preexisting datasets with current ones to gain new, comprehensive insights about the effects of spaceflight on our bodies. Our methods can also lead to the creation of a standardized pipeline that could be applied to other space life science datasets for analysis. In this review, every biological experiment conducted on rats in the SLS-2 Mission was studied with our pipeline to create a new biological library and model that could be used by scientists from around the world to make novel discoveries and develop new hypotheses from this priceless information without the limitation of the costs of spaceflight experimentation.

rats↗

NASA NTRS1995

Experiment kits for processing biological samples inflight on SLS-2

This paper describes development of an innovative, modular approach to packaging the instruments used to obtain and preserve the inflight rodent tissue and blood samples associated with hematology experiments on the Spacelab Life Sciences-2 (SLS-2) mission. The design approach organized the multitude of instruments into twelve 5- x 6- x l-in. kits which were each used for a particular experiment. Each kit contained the syringes, vials, microscope slides, etc., necessary for processing and storing blood and tissue samples for one rat on a particular day. A total of 1245 components, packaged into 128 kits and stowed in 17 Zero(registered trademark) boxes, were required. Crewmembers found the design easy to use and laid out in a logical, simple configuration which minimized chances for error during the complex procedures in flight. This paper also summarizes inflight performance of the kits on SLS-2.

Savage, P. D.↗

NASA NTRS1994

Mammalian Vestibular Macular Synaptic Plasticity: Results from SLS-2 Spaceflight

The effects of exposure to microgravity were studied in rat utricular maculas collected inflight (IF, day 13), post-flight on day of orbiter landing (day 14, R+O) and after 14 days (R+ML). Controls were collected at corresponding times. The objectives were 1) to learn whether hair cell ribbon synapses counts would be higher in tissues collected in space than in tissues collected postflight during or after readaptation to Earth's gravity; and 2) to compare results with those of SLS-1. Maculas were fixed by immersion, micro-dissected, dehydrated and prepared for ultrastructural study by usual methods. Synapses were counted in 100 serial sections 150 nm thick and were located to specific hair cells in montages of every 7th section. Counts were analyzed for statistical significance using analysis of variance. Results in maculas of IF dissected rats, one 13 day control (IFC), and one R + 0 rat have been analyzed. Study of an R+ML macula is nearly completed. For type I cells, IF mean is 2.3 +/-1.6; IFC mean is 1.6 +/-1.0; R+O mean is 2.3 +/- 1.6. For type II cells, IF mean is 11.4 +/- 17.1; IFC mean is 5.5 +/-3.5; R+O mean is 10.1 +/- 7.4. The difference between IF and IFC means for type I cells is statistically significant (p less than 0.0464). For type It cells, IF compared to IFC means, p less than 0.0003; and for IFC to R+O means, p less than 0.0139. Shifts toward spheres (p less than 0.0001) and pairs (p less than 0.0139) were significant in type II cells of IF rats. The results are largely replicating findings from SLS-1 and indicate that spaceflight affects synaptic number, form and distribution, particularly in type II hair cells. The increases in synaptic number and in sphere-like ribbons are interpreted to improve synaptic efficacy, to help return afferent discharges to a more normal state. Findings indicate that a great capacity for synaptic plasticity exists in mammalian gravity sensors, and that this plasticity is more dominant in the local circuitry. The local circuit includes type II cells and is interpreted to be responsible for shaping the final output of the system.

Ross, Muriel D.D.↗

NASA NTRS2012

Analytical Approaches to Guide SLS Fault Management (FM) Development

Extensive analysis is needed to determine the right set of FM capabilities to provide the most coverage without significantly increasing the cost, reliability (FP/FN), and complexity of the overall vehicle systems. Strong collaboration with the stakeholders is required to support the determination of the best triggers and response options. The SLS Fault Management process has been documented in the Space Launch System Program (SLSP) Fault Management Plan (SLS-PLAN-085).

Patterson, Jonathan D.↗

NASA NTRS2012

Risk Assessment and Scaling for the SLS LH2 ET

In this report the main physics processes in LH2 tank during prepress and rocket flight are studied. The goal of this investigation is to analyze possible hazards and to make risk assessment in proposed LH2 tank designs for SLS with 5 engines (the situation with 4 engines is less critical). For analysis we use the multinode model (MNM) developed by us and presented in a separate report and also 3D ANSYS simulations. We carry out simulation and theoretical analysis the physics processes such as (i) accumulation of bubbles in LH2 during replenish stage and their collapsing in the liquid during the prepress; (ii) condensation-evaporation at the liquid-vapor interface and tank wall, (iv) heating the liquid near the interface and wall due to condensation and environment heat, (v) injection of hot He during prepress and of hot GH2 during flight, (vi) mixing and cooling of the injected gases due to heat transfer between the gases, liquid and the tank wall. We analyze the effects of these physical processes on the thermo- and fluid gas dynamics in the ullage and on the stratification of temperature in the liquid and assess the associated hazards. A special emphasize is put on the scaling predictions for the larger SLS LH2 tank.

Hafiychuk, Halyna↗

NASA NTRS2014

Flight Testing of the Space Launch System (SLS) Adaptive Augmenting Control (AAC) Algorithm on an F/A-18

The Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) Flight Mechanics and Analysis Division developed an adaptive augmenting control (AAC) algorithm for launch vehicles that improves robustness and performance on an as-needed basis by adapting a classical control algorithm to unexpected environments or variations in vehicle dynamics. This was baselined as part of the Space Launch System (SLS) flight control system. The NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) was asked to partner with the SLS Program and the Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) Game Changing Development Program (GCDP) to flight test the AAC algorithm on a manned aircraft that can achieve a high level of dynamic similarity to a launch vehicle and raise the technology readiness of the algorithm early in the program. This document reports the outcome of the NESC assessment.

Dennehy, Cornelius J.↗

NASA NTRS2015

SLS Launched Missions Concept Studies for LUVOIR Mission

NASA's "Enduring Quests Daring Visions" report calls for an 8- to 16-meter Large UV-Optical-IR (LUVOIR) Surveyor mission to enable ultra-high-contrast spectroscopy and coronagraphy. AURA's "From Cosmic Birth to Living Earth" report calls for a 12-meter class High-Definition Space Telescope to pursue transformational scientific discoveries. The multi-center ATLAST Team is working to meet these needs. The MSFC Team is examining potential concepts that leverage the advantages of the SLS (Space Launch System). A key challenge is how to affordably get a large telescope into space. The JWST design was severely constrained by the mass and volume capacities of its launch vehicle. This problem is solved by using an SLS Block II-B rocket with its 10-m diameter x 30-m tall fairing and 45 mt payload to SE-L2. Previously, two development study cycles produced a detailed concept called ATLAST-8. Using ATLAST-8 as a point of departure, this paper reports on a new ATLAST-12 concept. ATLAST-12 is a 12-meter class segmented aperture LUVOIR with an 8-m class center segment. Thus, ATLAST-8 is now a de-scope option.

Mirror↗