SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “RECYCLE”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Thermo-mechanical recycling via ultrahigh-speed extrusion of film-grade recycled LDPE and injection molding
Not provided.
Inorganic Micelles as Efficient and Recyclable Micellar Catalysts
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Experimental demonstration of enhanced photon recycling in angle-restricted GaAs solar cells
Enhanced open-circuit voltage demonstrated in a high quality GaAs solar cell by limiting the angles of emitted light from the cell.
A molecular basis to rare earth separations for recycling: tuning the TriNOx ligand properties for improved performance
A methoxy-substituted tripodal hydroxylamine ligand, H 3 TriNOx OMe , was synthesized and coordinated to rare earth cations for separation purposes.
Remove, Recycle, Degrade: Regulating Plasma Membrane Protein Accumulation
Not provided.
Enabling Sustained Presence Using Recyclables: An In-Situ, Recyclable 3D Printing Method for Lunar and Deep Space Travel
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Life Cycle Inventory of Current Photovoltaic Module Recycling Processes in Europe
With the rapid and accelerating growth of PV module installation and an increase of PV modules from the nineteen eighties and nineties reaching the end of their 30 year lifespan, their proper end of life treatment gets into focus. This report deals with the approaches, the environmental impacts and the recovered materials of PV module recycling. In this report, the environmental life cycle assessment of the current generation recycling of crystalline silicon (c-Si) and cadmium telluride (CdTe) PV modules is described. Due to the still limited waste stream today, c-Si PV modules are mainly treated in recycling plants designed for treatment of laminated glass, metals or electronic waste. Only the bulk materials glass, aluminium and copper are recovered, while the cells and other materials such as plastics are incinerated. CdTe PV modules have been treated in dedicated recycling plants for many years and life cycle inventories of this process have been published. The semiconductor is recovered in addition to glass and copper. Life cycle inventories of the recycling of current c-Si and CdTe PV modules are compiled following two modelling approaches related to recycling. The cut-off approach uses economic allocation to divide the total efforts of the recycling process between the treatment of the used PV module and the recovered products. The end-of-life approach considers the recycling process separately from the potentially avoided burdens due to recovered materials. The life cycle inventories of c-Si PV module recycling are based on data obtained from four European recyclers surveyed between 2015 and 2016. For CdTe PV module recycling, the life cycle inventories were established based on published data for the First Solar recycling facility in Germany. The life cycle impact assessment is done based on six environmental indicators previously identified as most relevant for PV electricity: particulate matter, freshwater ecotoxicity, human toxicity non-cancer effects, human toxicity cancer effects, mineral, fossil and renewable resource depletion and climate change. The life cycle inventories according to the cut-off approach can be applied to complement existing life cycle inventory data on PV systems. The environmental impacts of the recycling of c-Si PV modules are very small (maximum 1.1 %) compared to the impacts caused by the production of a 3 kWp residential PV system mounted on a slanted roof. In the case of CdTe PV module recycling, the treatment of the PV panels has the highest but still rather minor contribution in the indicator climate change (4.8 %). The life cycle inventories according to the end-of-life approach allow an assessment of the net environmental benefits of recycling. The recovery of glass, metals, and semiconductor material from c-Si and CdTe PV modules causes lower environmental impacts than the extraction, refinement and supply of the respective materials from primary resources. The highest potential benefits are observed in the indicator mineral, fossil and renewable resource depletion. The data quality of the recycling of c-Si PV modules is classified as fair since only limited information is available. In contrast, the data quality of CdTe PV module recycling is considered very good. The study was financed by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) and carried out in the framework of the Task 12 of the Photovoltaic Powers System Programme (PVPS) of the International Energy Agency (IEA).
Vitrification of Hanford Tank Wastes for Condensate Recycle and Feed Composition Changeover Testing
During the vitrification of Hanford Site nuclear waste at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), which is a part of the safe and efficient retrieval, treatment, and disposal mission of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection, the offgas condensate generated from the waste-to-glass conversion is currently planned to be concentrated by evaporation in the Effluent Management Facility (EMF). This concentrated condensate can then be recycled back to the incoming waste and vitrified. To test the recycle process, an apparatus was designed and built to mimic the EMF evaporator and was then used to concentrate a volume of condensate produced during the vitrification of a sample of Hanford tank 241-AP-107 (referred to herein as AP-107) waste in a continuous laboratory-scale melter (CLSM). The concentrated condensate was added to an additional sample of AP-107 waste, to mimic one round of the recycle process, and the combined solution was vitrified, producing a second round of recycle condensate. In the current study, the EMF test apparatus was used to concentrate the second-round recycle condensate under evaporation conditions (at 45 °C and 1.4 psia) designed to emulate EMF operation. The condensate was successfully concentrated by a factor of ~10 while retaining over 95 % of the technetium-99 ( 99 Tc), Cs, and I inventories in the concentrate. Another portion of AP-107 waste was retrieved by Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) and transferred to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), where it was pretreated and then combined with the second-round recycle AP-107 condensate concentrate and glass-forming chemicals (GFCs) to form the two-time recycle AP-107 melter feed, approximating a second round to the recycling action to be performed at the WTP. A portion of AP-105 waste was also retrieved by WRPS and provided to PNNL for pretreatment and combining with GFCs to form AP-105 melter feed. The two-time recycle AP-107 and AP-105 melter feeds were processed consecutively in the CLSM. The CLSM run proceeded for 13.63 hours, producing 9.70 kg of glass for an average glass production rate of 1464 kg m 2 d -1 during the two-time recycle AP-107 feed charging and 1568 kg m 2 d -1 during the AP-105 feed charging. The rate during AP-107 charging was essentially equivalent to the rate when processing no-recycle AP-107 feed and lower than that achieved when processing one-time recycle AP-107 feed. However, all rates were within the potential range of variability when processing melter feeds with similar composition in the CLSM. Likewise, the rate during AP-105 charging was higher than the previous rate processing AP-105, but within the potential CLSM range. The cold-cap characteristics changed from the typically thin AP-107 cold cap to a foamy-edged cold cap as previously seen with AP-105 shortly after transitioning to the AP-105 melter feed. The glass produced during the CLSM run was within 10 % of its target composition for the primary glass components. The CaO and Li 2 O targets varied by more than 1 wt% between the two-time recycle AP-107 and AP-105 glass targets and it took about 2 turnovers of the CLSM glass inventory to reach a relative chemical steady state in the glass for CaO and Li 2 O after the melter feed inputs were switched. The 99 Tc and total cesium content in the melter feeds were maintained at concentrations expected to be experienced at the WTP. During the CLSM run, while processing the two-time recycle AP-107 melter feed at a relative chemical steady state, the 99 Tc/Cs ratio was 10, and 34% of 99 Tc and 74% of Cs were retained in the glass. These values were higher than those measured in the CLSM run with one-time recycle AP-107 melter feed. After the transition to processing the AP-105 melter feed, when the production reached a relative chemical steady state, the 99 Tc/Cs ratio was 77 while 44% of 99 Tc was retained in the glass. The C's retention during this time frame reached 200% due to the excess C's in the glass after the target content decreased to 15% of its initial level in the two-time recycle AP-107 melter feed to the lower target in the Ap-105 melter feed. While iodine was below inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analytical reporting limits in the melter feed and glass samples, it was detected in quantities above the analytical reporting limits in the liquid and filter samples collected from the CLSM offgas treatment system. The behavior of iodine in the CLSM offgas treatment system followed a similar pattern to those of 99 Tc and Cs.
Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste
Highlights: • This paper reviews the current pathways for recycling of solid plastic waste, via both mechanical and chemical recycling. • The predominant industrial technologies, design strategies and recycling examples of specific waste streams are reviewed. • The main challenges and some potential remedies are discussed. - Abstract: This review presents a comprehensive description of the current pathways for recycling of polymers, via both mechanical and chemical recycling. The principles of these recycling pathways are framed against current-day industrial reality, by discussing predominant industrial technologies, design strategies and recycling examples of specific waste streams. Starting with an overview on types of solid plastic waste (SPW) and their origins, the manuscript continues with a discussion on the different valorisation options for SPW. The section on mechanical recycling contains an overview of current sorting technologies, specific challenges for mechanical recycling such as thermo-mechanical or lifetime degradation and the immiscibility of polymer blends. It also includes some industrial examples such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling, and SPW from post-consumer packaging, end-of-life vehicles or electr(on)ic devices. A separate section is dedicated to the relationship between design and recycling, emphasizing the role of concepts such as Design from Recycling. The section on chemical recycling collects a state-of-the-art on techniques such as chemolysis, pyrolysis, fluid catalytic cracking, hydrogen techniques and gasification. Additionally, this review discusses the main challenges (and some potential remedies) to these recycling strategies and ground them in the relevant polymer science, thus providing an academic angle as well as an applied one.
Contribution of cooperative sector recycling to greenhouse gas emissions reduction: A case study of Ribeirão Pires, Brazil
Highlights: • Cooperative recycling achieves environmental, economic and social objectives. • We calculate GHG emissions reduction for a recycling cooperative in São Paulo, Brazil. • The cooperative merits consideration as a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project. • A CDM project would enhance the achievements of the recycling cooperative. • National and local waste management policies support the recycling cooperative. - Abstract: Solid waste, including municipal waste and its management, is a major challenge for most cities and among the key contributors to climate change. Greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced through recovery and recycling of resources from the municipal solid waste stream. In São Paulo, Brazil, recycling cooperatives play a crucial role in providing recycling services including collection, separation, cleaning, stocking, and sale of recyclable resources. The present research attempts to measure the greenhouse gas emission reductions achieved by the recycling cooperative Cooperpires, as well as highlight its socioeconomic benefits. Methods include participant observation, structured interviews, questionnaire application, and greenhouse gas accounting of recycling using a Clean Development Mechanism methodology. The results show that recycling cooperatives can achieve important energy savings and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, and suggest there is an opportunity for Cooperpires and other similar recycling groups to participate in the carbon credit market. Based on these findings, the authors created a simple greenhouse gas accounting calculator for recyclers to estimate their emissions reductions.
The influence of printed electronics on the recyclability of paper: A case study for smart envelopes in courier and postal services
Highlights: • Study of the influence of components of printed electronics in paper recycling. • Comparison between paper recycled with and without resistors, batteries and layouts. • Mechanical and optical properties are evaluated in paper handsheets obtained. • Tensile strength of recycled paper is slighted reduced by layouts. • Optical properties of recycled paper slightly varies with layouts and batteries. - Abstract: The aim of this paper is to analyse the effects of the presence of printed electronics on the paper waste streams and specifically on paper recyclability. The analysis is based on a case study focussed on envelopes for postal and courier services provided with these intelligent systems. The smart printed envelope of the study includes a combination of both conventional (thin flexible batteries and resistors) and printed electronic components (conductive track layout based on nanosilver ink). For this purpose, a comparison between envelopes with and without these components (batteries, resistors and conductive track layouts) was carried out through pilot scale paper recycling tests. The generation of rejects during the recycling process as well as the final quality of the recycled paper (mechanical and optical properties) were tested and quantitatively evaluated. The results show that resistors are retained during the screening process in the sieves and consequently they cannot end up in the final screened pulp. Therefore, mechanical and optical properties of the recycled paper are not affected. Nevertheless, inks from the conductive track layouts and batteries were partially dissolved in the process water. These substances were not totally retained in the sieving systems resulting in slight changes in the optical properties of the final recycled paper (variations are 7.2–7.5% in brightness, 8.5–10.7% in whiteness, 1.2–2.2% in L{sup ∗} values, 3.3–3.5% in opacity and 16.1–27% in yellowness). These variations are not in ranges able to cause problems in current paper recycling processes and restrict the use of recycled paper in current applications. Moreover, real impacts on industrial recycling are expected to be even significantly lower since the proportion of paper product with printed circuits in the current paper waste streams are much lower than the ones tested in this work. However, it should be underlined the fact that this situation may change over the next years due to the future developments in printed electronics and the gradual penetration of these types of devices in the market.
Comparative environmental and human health evaluations of thermolysis and solvolysis recycling technologies of carbon fiber reinforced polymer waste
Highlights: • Performed life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of pyrolysis for CFRP waste recycling. • Performed LCIA of solvolysis using supercritical water (SCW) for CFRP recycling. • Performed comparative LCIA of pyrolysis vs SCW-based solvolysis for CFRP recycling. • Closed current knowledge gap about sustainability of SCW-based solvolysis. • Compared LCIA of pyrolyzer’s heating using natural gas in lieu of electricity. - Abstract: This quantitative research aims to compare environmental and human health impacts associated with two recycling technologies of CFRP waste. The ‘baseline’ recycling technology is the conventional thermolysis process via pyrolysis and the ‘alternative’ recycling technology is an emerging chemical treatment via solvolysis using supercritical water (SCW) to digest the thermoset matrix. Two Gate-to-Gate recycling models are developed using GaBi LCA platform. The selected functional unit (FU) is 1 kg CFRP waste and the geographical boundary of this comparative LCIA is defined to be within the U.S. The results of this comparative assessment brought to light new insights about the environmental and human health impacts of CFRP waste recycling via solvolysis using SCW and, therefore, helped close a gap in the current state of knowledge about sustainability of SCW-based solvolysis as compared to pyrolysis. Two research questions are posed to identify whether solvolysis recycling offers more environmental and human health gains relative to the conventional pyrolysis recycling. These research questions lay the basis for formulating two null hypotheses (H{sub 0,1} and H{sub 0,2}) and their associated research hypotheses (H{sub 1,1} and H{sub 1,2}). LCIA results interpretation included ‘base case’ scenarios, ‘sensitivity studies,’ and ‘scenarios analysis.’ The results revealed that: (a) recycling via solvolysis using SCW exhibits no gains in environmental and human health impacts relative to those impacts associated with recycling via pyrolysis and (b) use of natural gas in lieu of electricity for pyrolyzer’s heating reduces the environmental and human health impacts by 37% (lowest) and up to 95.7% (highest). It is recommended that on-going experimental efforts that focus only on identifying the best solvent for solvolysis-based recycling should also consider quantification of the energy intensity as well as environmental and human health impacts of the proposed solvents.
Improving actinides recycling, a key step towards a more sustainable nuclear energy - 15617
Nuclear energy is thought to be one of the energy sources that could help mitigating the global climate change together with the renewables, due to its low green-house-gases emissions, its reliability and its high load power. However, nuclear energy will only develop if future nuclear energy systems meet the criteria of sustainability in terms of durability, bearability and liveability. Nowadays, many countries chose the so-called once-through cycle which basically considers spent nuclear fuel as a waste, whereas others reprocess their spent fuel to recover the energetically-valuable material Pu (and partially U) to produce Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX) to be irradiated in a second cycle (twice-through cycle). Both options can be considered relevant, fitting diverse criteria; but if we consider a long lasting prospective for nuclear options, the once-through cycle sustainability is clearly lower (low consumption of natural resource, no recycling of potentially valuable energetic material, larger volume of waste...). Reversely, twice-through cycle can be seen as a first step towards an improved sustainability with a partial recycling of U/Pu and the reduction of the waste volume and toxicity. However, it is likely not sufficient for the long-term and implementing more efficient recycling is a key-driver to improve the environmental friendship, the economics and the social acceptability of nuclear energy. Future nuclear fuel cycles will have to better preserve the natural resource by improving the actinides recycling, to minimize the volume and toxicity of nuclear waste, to ensure their long-term confinement and to prevent any proliferation-risk. Such a gradual and progressive process calls for implementing appropriate technologies, either for reactors but also for fuel treatment/recycling facilities. This paper will describe the successive step that would allow improving the overall sustainability. Indeed, recycled Pu can be once recycled in MOX fuel feeding similar PWRs (Pressurized Water Reactor). Together with the recycling of reprocessed uranium, this first step already allows preserving ∼17% of the natural U resource and to confine ultimate wastes without Pu in a tailored durable wasteform. Subsequent Pu multi-recycling requires introducing Fast Reactors (FR) to efficiently use U-238 available in natural and depleted uranium stockpiles. In parallel, recycling processes would have to be adapted for treating spent LWR and SFR MOX spent fuels, which is currently under study thanks to an ambitious R and D program dedicated on MOX treatment and recycling. For the longer term, minor actinides recycling would allow decreasing the waste burden towards future generations: (i) Am-recycling leads to decrease the waste residual heat-power and increase the repository density and lifespan, (ii) Cm-recycling leads to decrease waste long-term toxicity. The stepwise implementation of these different processes defines a path towards sustainability for nuclear energy that are described in this paper from the fuel cycle viewpoint. (authors)
Impacts of Recycling Time on Fuel Cycle Transition
The purpose of this work is to show the importance of assumptions regarding the recycling time for time-dependent fuel cycle scenarios that involve transition from the current state of the U.S. fuel cycle to cycles based on continuous recycling via fast reactors. The recycling time is defined here as the total time between when the fuel is discharged from the reactor core and when its recovered heavy metals (HM) are recycled back into the core as part of the fresh/new fuel. The main processes occurring within the recycling time include cooling, separations, and fuel fabrication. The minimum recycling time required for fast reactor fuel largely depends on the minimum cooling time, which will be longer if discharged fuel needs to be moved to a centrally-located separations facility. A longer cooling time is needed for the heat load and fuel characteristics to reach safer levels for handling and transportation. Therefore, if the separation and fabrication facilities were co-located with reactors on-site, then the total recycling time could be reduced by several years. For fuel cycle transition scenarios in which external fissile materials (Pu or TRU) are limiting, these longer recycling times may prolong the transition to the continuous recycling system of fast reactors as well as impact the fuel cycle system performance during the transition. Therefore, in order to demonstrate the quantitative impacts of these recycling time assumptions, an example scenario of transition to the fast reactor fleet with continuous recycle was modeled in the fuel cycle systems code DYMOND. It must be emphasized that this is a point study that demonstrates how a longer recycling time can impact the rate of transition under specific conditions and assumptions. For alternative scenarios, such as those in which there are no fissile material constraints, there are likely no significant impacts due to recycling time. (authors)
Vitrification of Hanford Tank Wastes for Condensate Recycle and Feed Composition Changeover Testing (Rev. 1)
During the vitrification of Hanford Site nuclear waste at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), which is a part of the safe and efficient retrieval, treatment, and disposal mission of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection, the offgas condensate generated from the waste-to-glass conversion is currently planned to be concentrated by evaporation in the Effluent Management Facility (EMF). This concentrated condensate can then be recycled back to the incoming waste and vitrified. To test the recycle process, an apparatus was designed and built to mimic the EMF evaporator and was then used to concentrate a volume of condensate produced during the vitrification of a sample of Hanford tank 241-AP-107 (referred to herein as AP-107) waste in a continuous laboratory-scale melter (CLSM). The concentrated condensate was added to an additional sample of AP-107 waste, to mimic one round of the recycle process, and the combined solution was vitrified, producing a second round of recycle condensate. In the current study, the EMF test apparatus was used to concentrate the second-round recycle condensate under evaporation conditions (at 45 °C and 1.4 psia) designed to emulate EMF operation. The condensate was successfully concentrated by a factor of ~10 while retaining over 95 % of the technetium-99 (99Tc), Cs, and I inventories in the concentrate. Another portion of AP-107 waste was retrieved by Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) and transferred to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), where it was pretreated and then combined with the second-round recycle AP-107 condensate concentrate and glass-forming chemicals (GFCs) to form the two-time recycle AP-107 melter feed, approximating a second round to the recycling action to be performed at the WTP. A portion of AP-105 waste was also retrieved by WRPS and provided to PNNL for pretreatment and combining with GFCs to form AP-105 melter feed. The two-time recycle AP-107 and AP-105 melter feeds were processed consecutively in the CLSM. The CLSM run proceeded for 13.63 hours, producing 9.70 kg of glass for an average glass production rate of 1464 kg m 2 d -1 during the two-time recycle AP-107 feed charging and 1568 kg m 2 d -1 during the AP-105 feed charging. The rate during AP-107 charging was essentially equivalent to the rate when processing no-recycle AP-107 feed and lower than that achieved when processing one-time recycle AP-107 feed. However, all rates were within the potential range of variability when processing melter feeds with similar composition in the CLSM. Likewise, the rate during AP-105 charging was higher than the previous rate processing AP-105, but within the potential CLSM range. The cold-cap characteristics changed from the typically thin AP-107 cold cap to a foamy-edged cold cap as previously seen with AP-105 shortly after transitioning to the AP-105 melter feed. The glass produced during the CLSM run was within 10 % of its target composition for the primary glass components. The CaO and Li 2 O targets varied by more than 1 wt% between the two-time recycle AP-107 and AP-105 glass targets and it took about 2 turnovers of the CLSM glass inventory to reach a relative chemical steady state in the glass for CaO and Li 2 O after the melter feed inputs were switched.
Development of wind turbine blade recycling baselines in the United States
Over the past several years, the wind energy industry has received scrutiny regarding wind turbine blade (WTB) recycling due to the landfilling of WTBs caused by a lack of industrially viable recycling solutions. The amount of WTBs that will need to be recycled is set to increase in the United States as the deployment of wind energy is expected to rapidly grow to meet the nation's energy goals by 2035. While significant progress has been made worldwide, it is still unclear which WTB recycling solutions would be the most cost and energy effective within the United States for the existing fleet of wind turbines. To guide researchers and industry with a clear path forward, a range of options for WTB recycling in the United States are modeled through development of baseline scenarios and the use of formal life cycle assessment (LCA). Model data have been collected through literature review, industry engagement, and expert opinion regarding current end of life practices and considerations surrounding equipment, labor, and logistics. A detailed baseline for WTB decommissioning processes has been developed and used to assess alternative approaches, such as on-site shredding to compare the impacts on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The developed LCA model and baseline scenarios for WTB recycling is used to assess the current WTB decommissioning practices in the United States along with emerging recycling pathways, including cement kiln co-processing and pyrolysis. Initial findings indicate that there are different approaches to decommissioning WTBs in the United States, each of which has unique implications for recycling. In light of this finding, additional results from the modeling will be used to better understand decommissioning practices and assist in making educated decisions on recycling pathways for the future. Throughout the analysis, focus was given to where international efforts might differ from the United States. WTB recycling is occurring worldwide, and different countries have different drivers for creating markets for recycled WTB materials. The contrasts and similarities between the United States and other countries offer insight to areas of opportunity that the United States could investigate and areas that can be readily transferred from existing solutions. By modeling and characterizing the current decommissioning practices and potential recycling solutions for the United States, a clearer vision will be created for pathways forward as to how to handle end of life WTBs to enable more efficient and cost-effective opportunities for material recovery from end-of-life WTBs.