Engineering PapersSearch

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “PAT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4

Atlas/Centaur-SOHO Pre-Launch News Conference

Live coverage of a pre-launch news conference on the Atlas/Centaur SOHO mission is presented. George Diller, NASA Public Affairs, introduces the panel. Floyd Curington, NASA Launch Manager, Kennedy Space Center, presents countdown activities. Pat Symons, Launch Vehicle Manager, NASA Lewis Research Center, analyzes the time duration from liftoff to spacecraft separation. Fabrizio Felici, SOHO Mission Director European Space Agency (ESA), explains the important features of SOHO, which includes a payload of 650 kilos and 12 major instruments with multisensors. Ken Sizemore, International Solar Terrestrial Physics (ISTP) Project Manager Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), talks about the successful international collaboration between the ESA and NASA. Joel Tumbiolo, Launch Weather Officer United States Air Force (USAF, presented the weather forecast. SOHO was launched aboard an Atlas II rocket on November 23, 1995. The news conference ends with a brief question and answer period.

Source record

Demonstration of Plasma Arc Environmental Technology Applications for the Demilitrization of DOD Stockpiles

Since 1989 the US Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL) have been active participants in the research and development towards establishing Plasma Arc Technology (PAT) as an efficient, economical, and safe hazardous waste immobilization tool. A plasma torch capable of generating high temperatures makes this technology a viable and powerful tool for the thermal destruction of various military industrial waste streams into an innocuous ceramic material no longer requiring hazardous waste landfill disposal. The emerging plasma environmental thermal treatment process has been used to safely and efficiently meet the waste disposal needs for various demilitarized components disposal needs, such as: (1) pyrotechnic smoke assemblies, (2) thermal batteries, (3) proximity fuses, (4) cartridge actuated devices (CADs), and (5) propellant actuated devices (PADs). MSE Technology Applications, Inc., (MSE) has proposed and fabricated a Mobile Plasma Treatment System to be a technology demonstrator for pilotscale mobile plasma waste processing. The system is capable of providing small-scale waste remediation services, and conducting waste stream applicability demonstrations. The Mobile Plasma Treatment System's innovative concept provides the flexibility to treat waste streams at numerous sites and sites with only a limited quantity of waste, yet too hazardous to transport to a regional fixed facility. The system was designed to be operated as skid mounted modules; consisting of a furnace module, controls module, offgas module, and ancillary systems module. All system components have been integrated to be operated from a single control station with both semi-continuous feeding and batch slag-pouring capability.

Smith, Ed

Demonstration of Plasma Arc Environmental Technology Applications for the Demilitarization of DOD Stockpiles

Since 1989 the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL) have been active participants in the research and development toward establishing Plasma Arc Technology (PAT) as an efficient, economical, and safe hazardous waste immobilization tool. A plasma torch capable of generating high temperatures makes this technology a viable and powerful tool for the thermal destruction of various military industrial waste streams into an innocuous ceramic material no longer requiring hazardous waste landfill (Class 1) disposal. The emerging pl asma environmental thermal treatment process, has been used to safely and efficiently meet the waste disposal needs for various demilitarized components disposal needs, such as: pyrotechnic smoke assemblies, thermal batteries, proximity fuses, cartridge actuated devices (CAD's), and propellant actuated devices (PAD's). MSE Technology Applications, Inc., (MSE) has proposed and fabricated a Mobile Plasma Treatment System to be a technology demonstrator for pilot-scale mobile plasma waste processing. The system is capable of providing small-scale waste remediation services, and conducting waste stream applicability demonstrations. The Mobile Plasma Treatment System's innovative concept provides the flexibility to treat waste streams at numerous sites and sites with only a limited quantity of waste, yet too hazardous to transport to a regional fixed facility. The system was designed to be operated as skid mounted modules; consisting of a furnace module, controls module, offgas module, and ancillary systems module. All system components have been integrated to be operated from a single control station with both semi-continuous feeding and batch slag-pouring capability.

Smith, Ed

STS-105 Flight Day 8 Highlights

On this eighth day of the STS-105 mission, Expedition 2 crewmember Susan Helms and Expedition 3 crewmember Vladimir Dezhurov are seen working in the Destiny Laboratory Module. The three crews gather (STS-105 crew Commander Scott Horowitz, Pilot Fred Sturckow, and Mission Specialists Dan Barry and Pat Forrester, Expedition 2 crew Commander Yuriy Usachev and Flight Engineers James Voss and Susan Helms, and Expedition 3 crew Frank Culbertson, Jr., Mikhail Turin, and Vladimir Dezhurov) for the change of command ceremony, where the Expedition 3 crew officially takes control of the International Space Station from the Expedition 2 crew, and the three crews answer questions about the mission in an on-orbit interview. Footage shows Hawaii from space.

Source record

STS-105 Flight Day 9 Highlights

On this ninth day of the STS-105 mission, Mission Specialists Dan Barry and Pat Forrester are seen during their spacewalks as they work on the exterior of the Destiny Laboratory Module, installing handrails and connecting cables.

Source record

STS-105 Flight Day 7 Highlights

On this seventh day of the STS-105 mission, Mission Specialists Dan Barry and Pat Forrester are seen as they perform their spacewalks to install the Early Ammonia Servicer to the International Space Station (ISS). A brief ceremony is shown as Expedition 3 crewmembers Mikhail Turin and Vladimir Dezhurov commemorate the 1000th flight day anniversary of the ISS.

Source record

STS-105 Flight Day 11 Highlights

On this 11th day of the STS-105 mission, the three crews, Expedition 2 (Commander Yuriy Usachev and Flight Engineers James Voss and Susan Helms), Expedition 3 (Frank Culbertson, Jr., Mikhail Turin, and Vladimir Dezhurov), and STS-105 (Commander Scott Horowitz, Pilot Fred Sturckow, and Mission Specialists Dan Barry and Pat Forrester), gather to say a few words about the changeover of the control of the International Space Station (ISS). Footage shows the undocking of Discovery from the ISS. STS-105 and E2 crews answer questions about the stay on the ISS in an on-orbit interview.

Source record

STS-105 Flight Day 12 Highlights

In this 12th day of the STS-105 mission, Discovery continues to fly towards Earth after the previous day's undocking from the International Space Station (ISS). Several on-orbit interviews are conducted, including questions to the STS-105 crew (Commander Scott Horowitz, Pilot Fred Sturckow, and Mission Specialists Dan Barry and Pat Forrester) about spaceflight, questions to the Expedition 2 crew (Commander Yuriy Usachev and Flight Engineers James Voss and Susan Helms) about their stay on the ISS, and questions to the Expedition 3 crew (Frank Culbertson, Jr., Mikhail Turin, and Vladimir Dezhurov) about some of the experiments on board the ISS. Typhoon 14 is seen from above as Discovery passes over the storm.

Source record

STS-105 Post-Flight

The crewmembers of STS-105, Commander Scott Horowitz, Pilot Fred Sturckow, and Mission Specialists Dan Barry and Pat Forrester, narrate this video as footage from the mission is seen, starting with the boarding and launch of Discovery. Various on-orbit activities are shown, including on-orbit activities (H Reflex Experiment), the rendezvous and docking of Discovery with the International Space Station (ISS), the transfer of materials from the Multipurpose Logistics Module, extravehicular activities, and the exchange of resident ISS crews. The video ends with Discovery undocking from the ISS and the landing of the orbiter.

Source record

STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 4-6

A continuation of 'STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 1-3' (internal ID 2002046550), this video shows footage from flight days four through six of the STS-105 mission. Commander Scott Horowitz helps Mission Specialist Pat Forrester maneuver the Space Shuttle's robotic arm as it grapples the Multipurpose Logistics Module (MPLM) from Discovery's payload bay to the International Space Station (ISS). The three crews, STS-105 (Commander Horowitz, Pilot Fred Sturckow, and Mission Specialists Dan Barry and Forrester), Expedition 2 (Commander Yuriy Usachev and Flight Engineers James Voss and Susan Helms), and Expedition 3 (Commander Frank Culbertson, Jr. and Flight Engineers Mikhail Turin and Vladimir Dezhurov), are seen during unloading operations as they transfer equipment from the MPLM to the ISS. Forrester and Barry check their equipment and suits for the next day's spacewalks. The E2 crew shows the E3 crew around ISS. The crescent moon and the end of a sunset are seen from space. For activities from flight days 7-13, see 'STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 7-9' (internal ID 2002046552) and 'STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 10-13' (internal ID 2002046551).

Source record

STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 7-9

A continuation of 'STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 1-3' (internal ID 2002046550) and 'STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 4-6' (internal ID 2002046549), this video shows footage from flight days seven through nine of the STS-105 mission. Mission Specialists Dan Barry and Pat Forrester are seen preparing for and performing their spacewalks, where they install an Early Ammonia Servicer on the International Space Station (ISS). The Expedition 2 crew (Commander Yuriy Usachev and Flight Engineers James Voss and Susan Helms) hands control of the ISS over to the Expedition 3 crew (Commander Frank Culbertson, Jr. and Flight Engineers Mikhail Turin and Vladimir Dezhurov) in a short ceremony. Barry and Forrester return to space the next day for another spacewalk to install handrails and heater cables. Hawaii is seen from space as ISS passes over, and the smoke from forest fires in Oregon and Idaho is shown. For footage from flight days 10-13, see 'STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 10-13' (internal ID 2002049551).

Source record

STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 10-13

A continuation of 'STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 1-3' (internal ID 2002046550), 'STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 4-6' (internal ID 2002046549), and 'STS-105 Mission Highlights Resource Tape: Flight Days 7-9' (internal ID 2002046552), this video shows footage from flight days 10 through 13 of the STS-105 mission. The Multipurpose Logistics Module (MPLM) is moved from the International Space Station (ISS) to the payload bay of Discovery. The STS-105 crew (Commander Scott Horowitz, Pilot Fred Sturckow, and Mission Specialists Dan Barry and Pat Forrester) and Expedition 2 crew (Commander Yuriy Usachev and Flight Engineers James Voss and Susan Helms) bid farewell to the Expedition 3 crew (Commander Frank Culbertson, Jr. and Flight Engineers Mikhail Turin and Vladimir Dezhurov), who are to remain on ISS. ISS is seen against the Earth as Discovery performs its fly-around after the orbiter undocks. There is no flight day footage from flight day 12. Discovery is seen landing.

Source record

Support for the 2001 Gordon Research Conference on the Origins of Solar Systems

This grant provided partial support for participants at the Gordon Research Conference on Origins of Solar Systems, held at Connecticut College, June 17 through June 22, 2001. This conference was chaired by the PI (David Stevenson) and Pat Cassell (NASA Ames) was Vice-Chair. In addition to the money provided by this grant ($15,000), the Gordon Research Conference organization provided about $22,000 (in large part from registration fees) and BPI provided $10,000 (through Director David Black); the latter targeted primarily for students and postdocs. Accordingly the grant money from NASA was used to cover the costs of registration and travel for about one half of the invited speakers (22 in total) and discussion leaders (about 10 in total).

Stevenson, David J.

Methodology Development for Assessment of Spaceport Technology Returns and Risks

As part of Kennedy Space Center's (KSC's) challenge to open the space frontier, new spaceport technologies must be developed, matured and successfully transitioned to operational systems. R&D investment decisions can be considered from multiple perspectives. Near mid and far term technology horizons must be understood. Because a multitude of technology investment opportunities are available, we must identify choices that promise the greatest likelihood of significant lifecycle At the same time, the costs and risks of any choice must be well understood and balanced against its potential returns The problem is not one of simply rank- ordering projects in terms of their desirability. KSC wants to determine a portfolio of projects that simultaneously satisfies multiple goals, such as getting the biggest bang for the buck, supporting projects that may be too risky for private funding, staying within annual budget cycles without foregoing the requirements of a long term technology vision, and ensuring the development of a diversity of technologies that, support the variety of operational functions involved in space transportation. This work aims to assist in the development of in methods and techniques that support strategic technology investment decisions and ease the process of determining an optimal portfolio of spaceport R&D investments. Available literature on risks and returns to R&D is reviewed and most useful pieces are brought to the attention of the Spaceport Technology Development Office (STDO). KSC's current project management procedures are reviewed. It is found that the "one size fits all" nature of KSC's existing procedures and project selection criteria is not conducive to prudent decision-making. Directions for improving KSC's - procedures and criteria are outlined. With help of a contractor, STDO is currently developing a tool, named Change Management Analysis Tool (CMAT)/ Portfolio Analysis Tool (PAT), to assist KSC's R&D portfolio determination. A critical review of CMAT/PAT is undertaken. Directions for the improvement of this tool are provided. STDO and KSC intend to follow up on many, if not all, of the recommendations provided.

Joglekar, Prafulla

NASA Aviation Safety Program Systems Analysis/Program Assessment Metrics Review

The goal of this project is to evaluate the metrics and processes used by NASA's Aviation Safety Program in assessing technologies that contribute to NASA's aviation safety goals. There were three objectives for reaching this goal. First, NASA's main objectives for aviation safety were documented and their consistency was checked against the main objectives of the Aviation Safety Program. Next, the metrics used for technology investment by the Program Assessment function of AvSP were evaluated. Finally, other metrics that could be used by the Program Assessment Team (PAT) were identified and evaluated. This investigation revealed that the objectives are in fact consistent across organizational levels at NASA and with the FAA. Some of the major issues discussed in this study which should be further investigated, are the removal of the Cost and Return-on-Investment metrics, the lack of the metrics to measure the balance of investment and technology, the interdependencies between some of the metric risk driver categories, and the conflict between 'fatal accident rate' and 'accident rate' in the language of the Aviation Safety goal as stated in different sources.

Louis, Garrick E.

Coping with the diagnostic complexities of the compartment syndrome

This review recognizes that, given the various complexities associated with the condition, no pat answers can be given to fit every patient with the compartment syndrome. The authors first give a definition of the syndrome, together with a brief account of how this self-perpetuating pathologic cycle is triggered. Next, they delineate specific anatomical features of compartments that are likely to be involved, and follow this with an inventory of symptoms and signs to look for in suspected cases. After sorting out the entities that can mimic the compartment syndrome, the authors describe three essential techniques of measuring tissue pressure, which can prove invaluable in diagnosing the compartment syndrome.

NASA Program Biomedical Research

Visual-vestibular integration motion perception reporting

Self-orientation and self/surround-motion perception derive from a multimodal sensory process that integrates information from the eyes, vestibular apparatus, proprioceptive and somatosensory receptors. Results from short and long duration spaceflight investigations indicate that: (1) perceptual and sensorimotor function was disrupted during the initial exposure to microgravity and gradually improved over hours to days (individuals adapt), (2) the presence and/or absence of information from different sensory modalities differentially affected the perception of orientation, self-motion and surround-motion, (3) perceptual and sensorimotor function was initially disrupted upon return to Earth-normal gravity and gradually recovered to preflight levels (individuals readapt), and (4) the longer the exposure to microgravity, the more complete the adaptation, the more profound the postflight disturbances, and the longer the recovery period to preflight levels. While much has been learned about perceptual and sensorimotor reactions and adaptation to microgravity, there is much remaining to be learned about the mechanisms underlying the adaptive changes, and about how intersensory interactions affect perceptual and sensorimotor function during voluntary movements. During space flight, SMS and perceptual disturbances have led to reductions in performance efficiency and sense of well-being. During entry and immediately after landing, such disturbances could have a serious impact on the ability of the commander to land the Orbiter and on the ability of all crew members to egress from the Orbiter, particularly in a non-nominal condition or following extended stays in microgravity. An understanding of spatial orientation and motion perception is essential for developing countermeasures for Space Motion Sickness (SMS) and perceptual disturbances during spaceflight and upon return to Earth. Countermeasures for optimal performance in flight and a successful return to Earth require the development of preflight and in-flight training to help astronauts acquire and maintain a dual adaptive state. Despite the considerable experience with, and use of, an extensive set of countermeasures in the Russian space program, SMS and perceptual disturbances remain an unresolved problem on long-term flights. Reliable, valid perceptual reports are required to develop and refine stimulus rearrangements presented in the PAT devices currently being developed as countermeasures for the prevention of motion sickness and perceptual disturbances during spaceflight, and to ensure a less hazardous return to Earth. Prior to STS-8, crew member descriptions of their perceptual experiences were, at best, anecdotal. Crew members were not schooled in the physiology or psychology of sensory perception, nor were they exposed to the appropriate professional vocabulary. However, beginning with the STS-8 Shuttle flight, a serious effort was initiated to teach astronauts a systematic method to classify and quantify their perceptual responses in space, during entry, and after flight. Understanding, categorizing, and characterizing perceptual responses to spaceflight has been greatly enhanced by implementation of that training system.

Harm, Deborah L.

Damage Tolerance Analysis of Space Shuttle External Tank Lug Fillet Welds Using NASGRO

The damage tolerance of the External Tank (ET) lug welds were reassessed because of an increase in the loads due to the removal of the protuberance air load (PAT.,) ramp. The analysis methods included detailed finite element analysis (FEA) of the ET welded lugs and FEA of the lug weld test configuration. The FEA results were used as input to the crack growth analysis code NASGRO to calculate the mission life capability of the ET lug welds and to predict the number of cycles to failure in the lug weld testing. The presentation presents the method of transferring the FEM results to the NASGRO model and gives correlations between FEM and NASGRO stress intensity calculations.

Allen, Phillip A.