Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Lithium”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Mechanism of Lithium Ion Exchange Into Spinel Manganese Oxide

Lithium manganese oxide (LMO) is an effective absorbent for lithium recovery from brines, characterized by its high adsorption capacity, excellent regeneration performance, and selectivity. Here, this study investigates the mechanisms of material degradation during lithium loading and unloading in LMO, employing a combination of time‐resolved Raman spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Key findings reveal that the A 1g vibrational mode wavenumber shifts from 635 cm −1 at the onset of lithium ion exchange to 656 cm −1 after 12 min, indicating local symmetry loss and manganese (Mn) loss during lithium intercalation. The proposed lithium exchange mechanism involves initial occupation of tetrahedral interstitial voids, followed by migration into interstitial sites between Mn octahedral sites. Computational modeling suggests that the loss of symmetry in MnO cubane‐like groups occurs as lithium migrates, significantly affecting the Raman spectra. Importantly, the study demonstrates that after 100 cycles of lithium/hydrogen loading, a 24% loss in Mn is observed, which correlates with decreased structural stability; however, the structural integrity of LMO is enhanced when subjected to multiple cycles without complete loading. Here, these insights contribute to the understanding of LMO's performance in lithium recovery applications and highlight potential strategies to optimize its use in future technologies.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Lithium Recovery and Conversion from Wastewater Produced by Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries via Two-Stage Electrodialysis

Electrodialysis (ED) is a membrane separation technique that has been well-established in various applications such as desalination, drinking water production, wastewater treatment, and lithium salt production. A limited number of studies have explored its application in lithium salt production, especially from secondary resources like wastewater. This study investigated a route to recover lithium from wastewater generated from the recycling of end-of-life Li-ion batteries. Two electrodialysis methods, namely standard electrodialysis (ED) and bipolar-membrane electrodialysis (BPED), were combined to concentrate lithium ions and convert them to lithium hydroxide (LiOH), a valuable product that can be fed back into the supply chain for manufacturing Li-ion batteries. Lithium (Li⁺) concentration in recycling wastewater was successfully increased by 58% using ED and converted to LiOH (>96% purity) with a further increase in Li⁺ concentration by 67% using BPED. The Coulombic efficiency of the experiments was 91.0 and 92.2%, with specific energy consumption of 1 and 2.5 kWh/kg, and a production rate of 1.01 and 0.14 kg/h/m 2 for the ED and BPED processes, respectively. In addition, preliminary techno-economic and environmental impact analyses show a significant improvement (GHG emission reduction by 77% and total energy reduction by 53%) by producing LiOH via electrodialysis compared to conventional lithium production via brine extraction. The process was assessed to be beneficial for lithium extraction from secondary resources and to enhance overall battery recycling efforts.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Selectively extracting lithium from single and mixed cathode materials

With the burgeoning reliance on lithium-ion batteries for sustainable energy solutions and electric transportation, the environmental and resource management associated with battery disposal are increasingly critical. Addressing these challenges necessitates innovative recycling techniques that recover valuable battery components, particularly lithium. This research introduces a universal, eco-friendly approach tailored for the efficient selective extraction of lithium from both single and mixed cathode materials, achieving impressive selective leaching efficiencies of lithium (99.51 % for LFP, 90 % for NMC, and 97.24 % for mixed cathode). Surprisingly, leaching efficiency of lithium from NMC can be significantly improved by introducing LFP since LFP can remove the dense transition-metal salts on the surface of NMC. The extracted lithium is recovered as lithium carbonate with battery-grade purity. This study also highlights the reuse of formic acid and the adoption of oxygen as an oxidizing agent to prevent wastewater production. Therefore, this method provides a robust foundation for sustainable lithium battery recycling.

economically and environmentally feasible↗
DOE OSTI2025

Tailoring copper current collector roughness and crystallographic orientation to improve lithium plating

Secondary lithium metal batteries are of great interest due to a high theoretical energy density, but rechargeability is limited by the formation of lithium dendrites that lead to internal short circuits and catastrophic cell failure. Mitigating dendrites through uniform current distribution at the current collector is a promising solution to enabling long cycle life of lithium metal electrodes. Here, the impact of copper crystal orientation and roughness on electrochemically deposited lithium morphology is studied. For 50 cycles, the capacity retention from greatest to least followed polycrystalline copper 95 ± 1 % (MC-PC) ≥ 94.55 ± 0.01 % Cu (110) > 93.0 ± 0.4 % Cu(111) > 75.8 ± 0.1 % Cu(100). Cu(100) performed the worst in all cases with shorts occurring frequently before reaching 50 cycles. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy images showed that after 50 cycles, MC-PC Cu had the best lithium morphology, but at early cycles, Cu(111) formed the densest lithium layer. MC-PC Cu had the most uniform lithium nucleation which may have been caused by increased roughness relative to the single crystal samples. When polycrystalline Cu (F-PC) roughness was systematically controlled, the cumulative Coulombic efficiency increased from about 0.3–0.5 with increasing roughness from an Ra of about 10–40 nm. Lastly, plating rates were studied. Slower rates of 0.25 mA/cm 2 exhibited denser lithium morphology in all cases as compared to 0.5 and 1.0 mA/cm 2 , but the relative porosity of Li deposited on the different current collectors depended on the rate applied.

Copper↗
DOE OSTI2025

New directions and principles for solvent extraction for recovery of lithium from aqueous brines and mineral leachates: A brief review

Increasing demand for lithium for manufacturing of batteries is fueling the unprecedented search for improved recovery and alternative sources. Wider source distribution, lower energy consumption, and greater sustainability make extraction of lithium from brines, both natural and process-derived, an attractive alternative to mineral ores. Solvent extraction, used industrially for production of metals, salts, and pharmaceuticals, has been investigated as a methodology for lithium recovery for several decades. However, industrial application of solvent extraction for lithium recovery has so far been limited. In contrast, direct lithium extraction using adsorbents based on inorganic minerals has rapidly advanced from research to commercialization. A comparison of solvent extraction processes to adsorption highlights these issues and explains the preference for adsorbents. Although the application of solvent extraction has been criticized for use of large amounts of acid, alkali, and organic solvents, steady progress has been made to improve its potential for industrial lithium production, spurred on generally by the advantages of solvent extraction in selectivity and throughput. Previously developed beta-diketone, organophosphate, and crown ether ligands are being adapted and improved. Their novel use with ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, and membrane technologies promises to expand capabilities for extraction of lithium from dilute aqueous sources while improving sustainability. Possibilities for further discovery and innovation abound. In this review, we provide a unique perspective from the field of solvent extraction starting with fundamentals such as ion-transfer theory and apply them to understanding lithium selectivity and extraction behavior. In conclusion, the results are cast in the light of the practical realities of developing economical solvent extraction processes.

Brine↗
DOE OSTI2025

Defect-Mediated Diffusion Pathways in Spodumene Accelerate Lithium Transport

Lithium extraction from naturally occurring α-spodumene is hindered by poor lithium diffusivity, necessitating high-temperature phase transformation to a low-density β polymorph. Although β spodumene exhibits up to 5 orders of magnitude higher lithium-ion diffusivity, both phases have diffusion activation energies between 0.8 and 1 eV, indicating that polymorph density is not the controlling factor over diffusivity. We show that aluminum vacancies facilitate lithium-ion diffusion in α-spodumene by reducing the migration barrier from 2.4 to 0.9 eV. Bond valence site energy and nudged elastic band calculations show a new lithium local minimum site which promotes a one-dimensional percolation network by reducing the lithium intersite distance from 4.5 Å to 2.9 Å. However, aluminum vacancies are energetically unfavorable to percolate through the whole structure, resulting in very low net lithium diffusivity and highlighting the critical role of nonstoichiometric defects in facilitating lithium transport in rigid aluminosilicate structures.

Chemical structure↗
DOE OSTI2024

Transient Chemo‐Mechanical Model of Lithium Plating Impacted by External Pressure

Abstract Lithium anodes show great promise in commercial applications, but are hindered by lithium plating and dendrite growth which cause safety concerns during long‐term cell operation. Stack pressure is experimentally observed to improve cell lifetime; however, the relationship between stress and lithium deposition has remained difficult to elucidate. In this work, a transient, 3D, finite‐element model of the evolution of a lithium anode due to stripping and plating is developed. The evolution of a microscale protrusion on the anode surface is tracked over one charge‐discharge cycle with respect to stack pressure and lithium yield strength. Lithium plastic deformation, nonconformal anode‐separator contact, and separator porosity effects are accounted for. Over the course of several hours of stripping/plating, the anode surface evolves to a similar morphology under pressure regardless of the initial conditions due to lithium plastic deformation and hardening. The rate of this evolution highly depends on the applied pressure and assumed lithium yield strength.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Modeling the influence of the solid electrolyte interphase on the sand’s time and dendrite formation on lithium metal electrodes

Lithium metal is a sought after battery material for its high energy density due to the low electrochemical potential and density. However, lithium metal is also highly reactive, which results in a strong propensity for dendrite formation. The Sand’s time has previously been used to predict the time of dendrite initiation on metals that do not form a solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI), but it has been shown that the Sand’s time is not accurate for lithium electrodes when using transport parameters associated with the electrolyte. Thus, we built a numerical model to simulate lithium ion transport through a growing SEI to predict the Sand’s time. The numerical model is shown to be more accurate than previous analytical solutions, especially for low current densities. We then analyze the sensitivity of the Sand’s time to different SEI properties and the chemical potential gradients present in the SEI, driving lithium transport. The results showed that high lithium concentration has a greater impact at high current density, while fast diffusivity is more important at low current density. Lastly, we modeled the influence of surface roughness on the plating evolution and chemical potential gradients when an SEI is present in comparison to the electrolyte. As a result, we demonstrate that the SEI plays a critical role in lithium electrode stability, and that improved characterization techniques are needed to better understand transport through the SEI and increase lithium metal utilization in energy storage devices.

Chemistry↗
DOE OSTI2026

Variations in lithium vapor cave performance predictions due to radial transport and recycling assumptions

The lithium vapor cave is a detached divertor design that uses a single private flux region baffle to contain a dense cloud of lithium vapor to dissipate heat flux. Plasma flows are created via fuel gas puffing in order to minimize lithium contamination of the main plasma. Significant modeling using the 2D edge code SOLPS-ITER has already been performed, predicting that sufficient target heat flux reductions (q$^{max}_{Target}$ MW m −2 ) with ( $n$ Li /$n$ e ) LCFS < 0.05 is possible in a case with 90 MW m −2 unmitigated heat flux in NSTX-U. Low heat flux and low upstream concentration was found with a variety of combinations of divertor geometries, target recycling coefficients, upstream plasma parameters, lithium evaporation locations and deuterium fueling locations, with variations in performance found for each design choice. However, the most universal uncertainty of SOLPS-ITER simulations has until now remained unaddressed systematically, namely the cross-field anomalous particle and heat diffusivities. This article aims to bound the uncertainty in lithium concentration prediction as a result of the assumed deuterium cross-field transport and recycling. For the simulations presented here, a factor of 2.1 increase in the upstream lithium density prediction across a factor of four decrease to the assumed deuterium radial particle diffusivity is found. This result is compared across different assumed deuterium recycling coefficients, known to reduce with lithium injection. Upstream lithium density is found to vary by a factor of 2.4 across a feasible range of recycling coefficients at similar $n$$^{OMP,sep}_{e}$.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Battery‐Grade Lithium Materials: Virgin Production and Recycling, a Techno‐Economic Comparison

Lithium has been identified as an essential mineral to the economic and national security of the United States. It is vital for rechargeable batteries that surround us daily from the personal electronics to large-scale energy storage. With a comprehensive techno-economic analysis, the cost of battery-grade lithium compounds production, i.e., lithium carbonate (LC) is evaluated and lithium hydroxide monohydrate (LHM), from both virgin (spodumene ore and brine) and recycled feedstocks (spent lithium-ion batteries). The goal of this study is to inform about the economics of lithium compounds production with comprehensive insights into differences in manufacturing routes and pave a pathway to explore more innovative, domestic manufacturing processes in future for their cost competitiveness and environmental impact. The study includes details on mining and extraction operations as well as unit level operation in the refining process. Moreover, process level information has been collected for pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical battery recycling routes. This analysis shows that brine and direct lithium extraction are the cheapest pathways to produce LC or LHM (between $\$3.39$ and 6.20 kg −1 ). The cost of production in the ore and recycling routes can range between $\$4.17$ and $\$53.41$ kg −1 and is highly depending on capital equipment investment, plant location, and the price of spodumene concentrate SC6.0.

battery recycling↗
DOE OSTI2025

Revisiting the Impact of Anion Selection on Sulfur Redox Reaction Kinetics for High Sulfur Loading Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide (LiTFSI) is widely used in lithium–sulfur (Li–S) battery electrolytes due to its stability with lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and moderate compatibility with lithium metal anodes. However, LiTFSI presents environmental concerns due to its association with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are environmentally persistent and potentially toxic, raises sustainability concerns. This research also reveals that LiTFSI limits sulfur redox reactions (SRRs), making it less effective than other lithium salts. Additionally, some salts previously considered incompatible with Li-S systems due to their reactivity with LiPSs are demonstrated to perform effectively. For the first time, a protective, porous cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) formed in situ through reactions between salt anions and LiPS is reported. The cells delivered a high specific capacity of 1230.8 mAh g −1 at 0.05 C with a sulfur loading of ≈6 mg cm −2 , limited lithium anode, maintaining a capacity retention of 76.2% after 100 cycles at 0.1 C. Under harsh conditions, such as high sulfur loading, lean electrolyte conditions (3 µL mg −1 ), and in anode-free cells, the cells continued to deliver outstanding capacity. This work provides valuable guidelines for understanding and selecting lithium salts to advance electrolyte design for Li–S batteries.

high loading batteries↗
DOE OSTI2026

Impact of Anode to Cathode Crossover in Lithium‐metal Batteries With High‐Nickel Cathodes

The advancement of high-energy-density lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) is hindered by the chemical instability of both lithium-metal anode and high-nickel layered oxide cathodes. While cathode-to-anode crossover is well-documented, the reverse process of anode-to-cathode crossover remains underexplored. Here, we systematically investigate such crossovers and the degradation pathway in pouch cells with a localized high-concentration electrolyte, comparing NMC622, NMC811, and NMC90 cathodes paired with lithium-metal and graphite anodes. Despite delivering higher initial capacities, LMBs exhibit faster capacity fade under long-term cycling at 45 °C. To isolate cathode-side degradation, galvanostatic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (GEIS) measurements of cycled cathodes paired with delithiated lithium iron phosphate (LFP) counter electrodes reveal significantly higher charge-transfer resistance in cathodes cycled with lithium-metal. Surface characterization via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) reveals greater electrolyte decomposition on cathodes cycled with lithium metal, leading to thicker, more organic-rich cathode–electrolyte interphases (CEIs), consistent with the elevated charge-transfer resistance observed in GEIS measurements. Notably, NMC90 shows the most pronounced CEI thickening, linking higher cathode surface reactivity to greater susceptibility to anode-to-cathode crossover. This work presents compelling evidence of crosstalk degradation originating from lithium-metal anodes and underscores the importance of cross-interface stability for the design of durable LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Critical review of lithium recovery from geothermal brines with implications for Smackover Formation, USA

The rapidly growing demand for lithium, a critical element for energy storage and national security technologies, has intensified concerns over the long-term availability and environmental impact of conventional lithium sources, such as hard-rock mining. To meet future demand, it is vital to explore unconventional resources that can provide sustainable domestic supplies. Geothermal brines, produced as a byproduct of geothermal energy generation, offer a promising alternative for lithium recovery by leveraging existing infrastructure and renewable energy production. In particular, the Smackover Formation, an extensive reservoir of high-salinity brines spanning Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama in the U.S. Gulf Coast, holds significant untapped lithium reserves. Co-producing geothermal energy and lithium from these brines aligns with sustainable extraction objectives while addressing resource scarcity. This review synthesizes current knowledge of lithium occurrence in the Smackover Formation and geothermal resources in the region, while also exploring how emerging tools such as machine learning can enhance resource targeting and co-production efficiency. Finally, we discuss key technical challenges and outline future research directions needed to advance lithium extraction from geothermal brines and secure a resilient domestic supply chain.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Unveiling the thermite-driven lithium fire ignition in solid-state batteries

Here, this study challenges the assumption of the non-flammability of lithium metal all-solid-state batteries (LiSSBs) and other lithium metal batteries without flammable electrolytes. Through thermodynamic calculations and ex situ experiments, we reveal for the first time the risk of thermite reactions between lithium metal and LiFePO 4 in both charged and discharged states. Reactivity is worsened by excess lithium metal in the cell, reaching final maximum adiabatic temperatures of 2,500°C in the charged state, which is hot enough to boil lithium. The thermite reaction triggers spontaneously at 500°C, with poor surface contact, while increasing surface contact through mixing initiates the reaction at room temperature in an inert environment. Despite its fast kinetics, this reaction is transport limited due to lithium passivation, leading to long burn times and reignition risks. Given the risk of lithium metal contacting the cathode during failure, understanding these reactions is crucial for ensuring the safe deployment of LiSSBs.

LiFePO4↗
DOE OSTI2024

Round-robin analysis of highly depleted lithium for Generation IV nuclear reactor applications

Lithium reference materials containing unnaturally high abundances of 7 Li are not currently available, which poses quality control problems for highly depleted lithium materials (i.e., depleted in 6 Li) required for Generation IV nuclear reactors. This study presents an interlaboratory comparison of a lithium carbonate (NIST SRM924a) containing nominally natural isotopic abundances (~92.4 % Li-7) and a highly depleted lithium hydroxide material (~99.95 % Li-7). The natural lithium isotope abundances of NIST SRM924a are confirmed, and the 6 Li/ 7 Li ratio of the lithium hydroxide ranged from 0.000399 to 0.000436 with an average of 0.000428 ± 0.000023 (2SD, n = 9). Finally, going forward this material can be used as quality control for analytical work involving highly depleted lithium.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Probing the Surface Chemistry of Lithium Nitridation

Chemical synthesis of Li 3 N through lithium nitridation has potential to advance rechargeable battery and nitrogen fixation technology. However, studies of the conditions for forming Li 3 N on the lithium surface via nitrogen gas exposure report contradictory findings, such as the spontaneous reaction of Li with pure N 2 , the impossibility of forming Li 3 N through pure Li and N 2 interaction, the requirement of trace H 2 O to catalyze the reaction, and evidence to the contrary. In this study, ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS) was applied to evaluate the in situ chemical evolution of the lithium metal surface under nitrogen gas up to 800 mTorr. At pressures ≤10 mTorr, no Li 3 N was detected. At higher pressures, surface Li 3 N rapidly reacts with trace CO 2 . Additionally, because metallic lithium is readily oxidized by trace gases, the atomic nitrogen concentration of the lithium surface remains below 2%. When nitridation follows oxidation by O 2 gas, CO 2 gas, or H 2 O vapor, surface Li 3 N formation is inhibited. These results suggest that nitrogen gas can diffuse through the oxidized lithium metal surface to react with subsurface metallic lithium.

Binding energy↗
DOE OSTI2024

Deep Eutectic Solvents as Candidates for Lithium Isotope Enrichment

Nuclear fusion is a phenomenon that is well known within the nuclear physics community as a viable option for alternative energy as many natural gases and fossil fuels are phased out of commercial use. Deuterium and tritium fusion reactions are currently the leading candidates for nuclear fusion, with a major limiting factor being a means to produce tritium on an industrial scale. Lithium-6 is a well-known isotope that can produce tritium and helium following a fission reaction with a neutron. Unfortunately, the lithium-6 enrichment methods are limited to the COLEX process, which leaves behind an alarming amount of mercury waste as a potential environmental contaminant. Deep eutectic solvents are believed to be a potential alternative to lithium isotope separations due to the ease of generation, in addition to the minimum environmental waste generated when these solvents are employed. Previous studies have suggested that deep eutectic solvents are capable of separating lithium isotopes by utilizing a 2-thenoyltrifluoroacetone and trioctylphosphine oxide system that can biphasically react with a buffered solution containing lithium chloride. This system displays a separation factor of 1.068, which when compared to the 1.054 separation within the COLEX process, makes it a potential candidate for lithium-6/7 separation. Within this study, we investigate this system in comparison to two newly synthesized deep eutectic solvents and find that within these acetylacetone-based systems, little isotopic separation is observed. We investigate these systems both experimentally and computationally, showing the different lithium cation affinities, in addition to proposing how the electron-donating or -withdrawing nature can influence these systems.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2025

Deconvoluting the impact of current collector structure and electrolyte selection on Coulombic efficiency of lithium metal anodes

Lithium metal batteries are regarded as a promising avenue for significantly boosting the gravimetric energy density of batteries, particularly for electric vehicles. However, the instability of the lithium metal anode continues to hinder performance. While 3D structured current collectors for lithium metal anodes have been frequently proposed as a solution, few studies explore the impact of these structures when combined with various electrolytes and the inclusion of a lithium reservoir within the structure. This study pairs four commercially available copper current collectors with four different electrolytes to assess how these factors influence cycling performance with a 4 mAh/cm2 lithium reservoir. Coulombic efficiency (CE) measurements revealed no statistically significant difference in CE across different current collectors within the same electrolyte. However, significant variations were noted when the current collector remained intact, and the electrolyte was changed. Although polarization, electrochemical impedance, and lithium morphology varied between structures and electrolytes, no consistent patterns emerged to suggest superior performance by any specific current collector structure. Therefore, the choice of structure appears inconsequential when a lithium reservoir is present, and efforts should focus on selecting and designing the electrolyte.

White, Julia↗