Performance of the Initial Implementation of the Shift Monte Carlo Code in SCALE 6.3 [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “KENO”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Frequent Fulcrum Functions: The Basics of SCALE’s Graphical User Interface [Slides]
This tutorial introduces the Fulcrum graphical user interface and the basic functions that enhance the common activities of creating, editing, navigating, executing, and visualizing SCALE input files. This tutorial will help you become familiar with the Fulcrum input file text editor and the integrated input development environment features of autocompletion, automatic checking, cursor context, and input navigation. In addition, the Fulcrum and SCALE runtime environment will be reviewed to improve the understanding of job execution workflow. This tutorial does not cover data and geometry plotting. Please see the Advanced User Interface Capabilities tutorial for details regarding plotting data and geometry. No prior experience with SCALE is required. You can follow along using SCALE 6.2 or 6.3-beta.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Horizontal Split Table Conceptual Design for Validation of Nuclear Data used in Advanced Reactors [Slides]
This presentation discusses a methodology that was developed to create conceptual designs of benchmark critical experiments for advanced reactors and nuclear data testing. A first concept that was explored was a pebble-bed high-temperature gas cooled reactor, based on the HTR-10 reactor. The very high correlation is a proof of concept that the design is similar to the application, and performing such critical experiments would help nuclear data testing and validation. Other concepts could be explored if needed, such as a molten-salt reactor, a sodium-cooled fast reactor, or heat pipe reactors/microreactor.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Adapting CLUTCH Methodology to Multigroup TSUNAMI-3D for Eigenvalue Sensitivity Calculations [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data (VALID) Online Repository [Slides]
VALID continues to serve as a library of high-quality models used for evaluating SCALE and nuclear data. Large number of cases are in the pipeline. Online repository is available for use. Future plans include simplifying the process for adding cases, including additional models outside the ICSBEP Handbook (HTC models, DNCSH models, International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments [IRPhE], SINBAD, etc.), and increasing the availability of models and results for external users.
KENO↗
The Case for and Against a Gadolinium Bias in SCALE: Round 2
The “Opening Arguments” for and against a gadolinium bias in SCALE were presented at the American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in June, 2018. Some critical experiments included in the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data (VALID) indicate a significant bias as a function of gadolinium concentration. Other experiments indicate that no significant bias exists. The work presented here develops a larger suite of gadolinium-bearing benchmark models to further examine code, data, and benchmark performance. The new benchmark models have been reviewed for accuracy, but documentation and review for addition to the VALID library have not been completed. The problematic benchmarks included in VALID are HEU-SOL-THERM-014 and -016. These are two evaluations from a series of experiments from the Institute for Physics and Power Engineering (IPPE), Russia, documented in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) Handbook. The entire set of evaluations also includes HEU-SOL-THERM-015, -017, -018, -019, and -025. Each evaluation contains a different uranium concentration, and different configurations within each evaluation include different gadolinium concentrations. These 7 evaluations contain a total of 52 configurations and form the largest subset of experiments considered, and they allow for a more complete assessment of the performance of these benchmarks than has historically been possible using just the HEU-SOL-THERM-014 and -016 results. Additional solution experiments are considered, including MIX-SOL-THERM-006 and -007 and PU-SOL-THERM-034. MIX-SOL-THERM-007 is in the VALID library, whereas MIX-SOL-THERM-006 and PU-SOL-THERM-034 are not. The results for MIX-SOL THERM-007 have not shown a gadolinium trend. These mixed- and plutonium-fueled solutions include 28 configurations. Some experiments including solid fuel and solid gadolinium are also included. These experiments include highly enriched uranium (HEU) foils moderated with polyethylene in HEU-MET-THERM-010, -016, and -034, and low enriched uranium (LEU) pin arrays with gadolinia absorber rods in LEU-COMP THERM-036 and -043. A total 32 cases with solid fuel are included. The IPPE solution benchmarks show a fairly high degree of variability, but no clear trend as a function of gadolinium concentration can be observed. The mixed- and plutonium-fueled solutions show less variability than the HEU solutions and also no trend relative to gadolinium concentration. The solid-fueled experiments also show no trend as a function of gadolinium content. The entire set of benchmarks shows no clear trend on gadolinium content or the energy of the average neutron lethargy causing fission.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗