Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “HTTR REACTOR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

64 records · Page 4

Analysis of the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor Using MOOSE Tools

This presentation shows the development of neutronics and thermal hydraulics models of the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor using codes in the Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment. We show preliminary results of full-power steady state and a loss of forced cooling transient from that steady state.

21 - SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLAN↗

NRC Multiphysics Analysis Capability Deployment (FY2021--Part 1)

This report details progress and activities of Idaho National Laboratory (INL) on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) project “Development and Modeling Support for Advanced Non-Light Water Reactors.” The tasks completed for this report are as follows: First, Task 1d: The net radiation transfer method was implemented into MOOSE for modeling reactor cavity cooling system geometries. RCCS models for two experiments were created: (1) Natural Convection Shutdown Heat Removal Test Facility (NSTF) experiment R022, and (2) HTTR VCS mockup. For validation, computed temperature distributions were compared to measured temperatures. Next, Task 4c: An algorithm for computing the pebble bed reactor equilibrium core isotopic com-position was developed and an initial version is implemented into the reactor multi-physics code Griffin. Initial results for a simplified axisymmetric pebble bed reactor are presented. Finally, Task 7: generation of a reference plant model for molten salt cooled pebble bed reactor.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Economic Dispatch Model of Nuclear High-Temperature Reactor with Hydrogen Cogeneration in Electricity Market

Hydrogen produced without carbon emissions could be a useful fuel as nations look to decarbonize their electricity, transport, and industry sectors. Using the iodine–sulfur (IS) cycle coupled with a nuclear heat source is one method for producing hydrogen without the use of fossil fuels. An economic dispatch model was developed for a nuclear-driven IS system to determine hydrogen sale prices that would make such a system profitable. The system studied is the HTTR-GT/H2, a design for power and hydrogen cogeneration at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency’s High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor. This study focuses on the development of the economic model and the role that input data plays in the final calculated values. Using a historical price duration curve shows that the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) or breakeven sale price of hydrogen would need to be 98.1 JPY/m3 or greater. Synthetic time histories were also used and found the LCOH to be 67.5 JPY/m3. The price duration input was found to have a significant effect on the LCOH. As such, great care should be used in these economic dispatch analyses to select reasonable input assumptions.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

PRISMATIC CORE COUPLED TRANSIENT BENCHMARK

The Prismatic Modular Reactor (PMR) is one of the High Temperature Reactor (HTR) design concepts that have existed for some time. Several prismatic units have operated in the world (DRAGON, Fort St. Vrain, Peach Bottom) and one unit is still in operation (HTTR). The deterministic neutronics and thermal-fluids transient analysis tools and methods currently available for the design and analysis of PMRs have lagged behind the state of the art compared to LWR reactor technologies. This has motivated the development of more accurate and efficient tools for the design and safety evaluations of the PMR. In addition to the work invested in new methods, it is essential to develop appropriate benchmarks to verify and validate the new methods in computer codes. The purpose of this benchmark is to establish a well-defined problem, based on a common given set of data, to compare methods and tools in core simulation and thermal hydraulics analysis with a specific focus on transient events. The benchmark-working group is currently seeking OECD/NEA sponsorship. This benchmark is being pursued and is heavily based on the success of the PBMR-400 exercise.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Final Report on Utilization of TRU TRISO Fuel as Applied to HTR Systems Part II: Prismatic Reactor Cross Section Generation

The deep-burn prismatic high temperature reactor is made up of an annular core loaded with transuranic isotopes and surrounded in the center and in the periphery by reflector blocks in graphite. This disposition creates challenges for the neutronics compared to usual light water reactor calculation schemes. The longer mean free path of neutrons in graphite affects the neutron spectrum deep inside the blocks located next to the reflector. The neutron thermalisation in the graphite leads to two characteristic fission peaks at the inner and outer interfaces as a result of the increased thermal flux seen in those assemblies. Spectral changes are seen at least on half of the fuel blocks adjacent to the reflector. This spectral effect of the reflector may prevent us from successfully using the two step scheme -lattice then core calculation- typically used for light water reactors. We have been studying the core without control mechanisms to provide input for the development of a complete calculation scheme. To correct the spectrum at the lattice level, we have tried to generate cross-sections from supercell calculations at the lattice level, thus taking into account part of the graphite surrounding the blocks of interest for generating the homogenised cross-sections for the full-core calculation. This one has been done with 2 to 295 groups to assess if increasing the number of groups leads to more accurate results. A comparison with a classical single block model has been done. Both paths were compared to a reference calculation done with MCNP. It is concluded that the agreement with MCNP is better with supercells, but that the single block model remains quite close if enough groups are kept for the core calculation. 26 groups seems to be a good compromise between time and accu- racy. However, some trials with depletion have shown huge variations of the isotopic composition across a block next to the reflector. It may imply that at least an in- core depletion for the number density calculation may be necessary in the complete calculation scheme.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

New reactor cavity cooling system having passive safety features using novel shape for HTGRs and VHTRs

A new, highly efficient reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) with passive safety features without a requirement for electricity and mechanical drive is proposed for high temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGRs) and very high temperature reactors (VHTRs). The RCCS design consists of continuous closed regions; one is an ex-reactor pressure vessel (RPV) region and another is a cooling region having heat transfer area to ambient air assumed at 40 (°C). The RCCS uses a novel shape to efficiently remove the heat released from the RPV with radiation and natural convection. Employing the air as the working fluid and the ambient air as the ultimate heat sink, the new RCCS design strongly reduces the possibility of losing the heat sink for decay heat removal. Therefore, HTGRs and VHTRs adopting the new RCCS design can avoid core melting due to overheating the fuels. The simulation results from a commercial CFD code, STAR-CCM+, show that the temperature distribution of the RCCS is within the temperature limits of the structures, such as the maximum operating temperature of the RPV, 713.15 (K) = 440 (°C), and the heat released from the RPV could be removed safely, even during a loss of coolant accident (LOCA). Finally, when the RCCS can remove 600 (kW) of the rated nominal state even during LOCA, the safety review for building the HTTR could confirm that the temperature distribution of the HTTR is within the temperature limits of the structures to secure structures and fuels after the shutdown because the large heat capacity of the graphite core can absorb heat from the fuel in a short period. Therefore, the capacity of the new RCCS design would be sufficient for decay heat removal.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Verification and Validation of High-Fidelity Multi-Physics Simulation Codes for Advanced Nuclear Reactors (Year 2)

The project objective is to verify and validate a suite of high-fidelity multi-physics simulation methods and codes developed during the previous I-NERI projects, against Monte Carlo solutions and experimental measurements for LWR and VHTR cores. Using benchmark problems developed during the previous year, ANL and KAERI continued to work on verifying the neutronics code DeCART and associated cross section libraries. Initial progress was also made on validating the code against experimental data. KAERI focused on verifying the DeCART code against numerical benchmark problems such as a PMR200 2-D pin cell/core and a HTTR 2-D block/core as well as improving DeCART capabilities such as the cross-section library group structure optimization, the fundamental and generalized adjoint equation solver, cylindrical boundary treatment, improved ray tracing, and implementing the direct resonance integral table method for resonance treatment. Verification test results for the updated capabilities showed substantial improvements in the estimation of eigenvalue and reaction rates.

Lee, C. H.↗

Decay Heat Quantification in the High Temperature Test Reactor

The proper calculation of decay heat is necessary for both postulated accidents as well as normal spent fuel repository safety analysis. Since the 1970s, the nuclear industry has primarily relied on the use of the ANSI/ANS-5.1 standard or one of it’s predecessors as the tool for calculating such heat. However, different reactor systems can have substantially different materials, neutron spectrums, operating characteristics, etc.…that lead to vastly different isotopic compositions in the fuel over time. The ANSI/ANS-5.1 standard is specific to Light Water Reactors, and thus may not be well suited for other systems such as high temperature gas reactors. Recent developments in the SCALE 6 code developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory have allowed for a more accurate treatment of the complexity associated with high temperature reactor TRISO fuel. Also, the standalone isotopic depletion and generation code ORIGEN-S, a module of SCALE, has been validated against experimental data for LWRs for properly characterizing decay heat. And most recently, Japan Atomic Energy Agency has used the ORIGEN code to generate HTGR cross section libraries to be used to quantify the decay heat generated in the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor at the Oarai Research and Development Center. Given the Idaho National Laboratory’s continued research into the viability of HTGRs as a next generation power reactor, an independent decay heat quantification analysis has been performed for a variety of fuel enrichments, TRISO particle packing fractions, and fuel temperatures using a similar approach. Furthermore, these data are then used as input into the RAVEN code developed at INL. A Reduced Order Model mathematical model in RAVEN is ‘trained’ to create a response mechanism to the various input parameters. Preliminary results demonstrate the potential for using this methodology to accurately predict decay heat generation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

SCALE Code Validation for Prismatic High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors

Using experimental data published in the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments for the fresh cold core of the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor, a comprehensive validation study has been carried out to assess the performance of the SCALE code system for analysis of high-temperature gas-cooled reactor configurations. This paper describes part of the results of that effort. The studies performed included criticality evaluations for the full core and for the annular cores realized during the fuel loading, as well as calculations and comparisons for excess reactivity, shutdown margin, control rod worths, temperature coefficient of reactivity, and reaction rate distributions. Comparisons of the SCALE results with both experimental values and MCNP-calculated values are presented. The comparisons show that the SCALE calculated results, obtained with both multigroup and continuous energy cross sections, are in reasonable agreement with the experimental data and the MCNP predictions.

code validation↗