Results for “Common Research Model (CRM)” — Page 4

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Computational Analysis of a Boundary-Layer Ingesting Tailcone Thruster Configuration Within the National Transonic Facility Using the LAVA Solver

Boundary-layer ingesting (BLI) propulsion systems are one of the many technologies currently under investigation within the aerospace community to meet NASA’s Advanced Air Transport Technology project goal of a sustainable future in aviation. To that end, an experimental campaign was conducted in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) to study the propulsion-airframe integration effects of the Boundary-Layer Ingesting Tailcone System installed in the aft portion of a 2.7% scale design of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM). This test was accompanied by a numerical simulation effort using the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) solver, to validate the applicability of current best-practice Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models in accurately predicting the relevant flow-physics in free-air. A total of 205 steady RANS simulations were performed using LAVA, covering the range of conditions present in the NTF test matrix. Flow conditions ranged from 5- to 15-million Reynolds number, Mach numbers of 0.75, 0.80 and 0.85, and angles-of-attack between –3° and 4°. Four different mass-flow plugs were also tested to assess propulsor operating condition effects. Sensitivity to these flow conditions are analyzed in detail, especially in terms of the nacelle flow distortion which was the main subject of the study. Aerodynamic load coefficients, aftbody boundary-layer measurements and fuselage pressure tap results are also discussed, providing a wide range of validation results from this experimental campaign. This validation effort shows that current best-practices using RANS models within the LAVA solver flow solver are well suited for predicting the inlet flow distortion characteristics of novel aircraft configurations employing BLI at the aft end of the fuselage.

AATT↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Analyses Performed in Support of a Wind Tunnel Test of a Boundary-Layer Ingestion Configuration

Boundary Layer Ingestion (BLI) has been proposed as a technology with the potential to decrease fuel burn. However, one major concern for BLI configurations is the potential degradation of the flow quality, both on the airframe and at the fan face, resulting from the tightly integrated propulsor. A wind tunnel test was performed in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at the NASA Langley Research Center to investigate the flow quality ingested by a tail cone thruster configuration, similar to the Single Aisle Turboelectric Aircraft Concept with Aft Boundary Layer Ingestion (STARC-ABL). The wind tunnel model was a modified version of the Common Research Model (CRM) to include an aft-mounted, flow-through propulsor. The experimental data obtained from the wind tunnel test provide insight into the flow and enables an assessment of the accuracy of the USM3D-ME flow solver for predicting the flow at the fan face, which will be crucial for fan design purposes. Both grid refinement and turbulence model studies were performed for the Clean and Cruise MFP configurations at the condition corresponding to ReMAC = 5 million, Mach = 0.8, and alpha = 2 deg. The selected grid refinement level and turbulence model were then used to perform simulations over the range of conditions considered in the NTF wind tunnel test. The condition sweep comparisons illustrate favorable agreement with the experimental data over the entire range of conditions and for all Mass Flow Plug (MFP) configurations. The largest differences were observed for the Idle MFP configuration, with approximately 3% difference observed between USM3D-ME and the experimental data. Future work should investigate the impact of higher fidelity turbulence models and grid adaptation on the USM3D-ME predictions.

CRM↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Computational Analysis of a Boundary Layer Ingesting Tailcone Thruster Configuration Using the LAVA Curvilinear Solver

Boundary layer ingesting (BLI) propulsion systems are one of the many technologies currently under investigation within the aerospace community to meet NASA's Advanced Air Transport Technology project goal of a sustainable future in aviation. To that end, an experimental campaign was conducted in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) wind tunnel to study the propulsion-airframe integration effects of the Boundary Layer Ingesting Tailcone System installed in the aft portion of a 2.7% scale design of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM). This test was accompanied by a numerical simulation effort using the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) curvilinear solver to validate the applicability of current best-practice Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models in accurately predicting the relevant flow physics in free-air. A total of 205 steady RANS simulations were performed using LAVA, covering the range of conditions present in the NTF test matrix. Flow conditions ranged from 5- to 15-million Reynolds number, Mach numbers of 0.75, 0.80 and 0.85, and angles of attack between -3 and 4 degrees. Four different mass-flow plugs were also tested to assess propulsor operating condition effects. Sensitivity to these flow conditions is analyzed in detail, especially in terms of the nacelle flow distortion which was the main subject of the study. Aerodynamic load coefficients, aft body boundary layer measurements and fuselage pressure tap results are also discussed, providing a wide range of validation results from this experimental campaign. This validation effort shows that current best-practices using RANS models within the LAVA curvilinear solver flow solver are well suited for predicting the inlet flow distortion characteristics of novel aircraft configurations employing BLI at the aft end of the fuselage. This talk will cover the combined experimental and numerical efforts that resulted from this BLI-focused investigation.

ARMD↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Study of Trailing Edge Mini Flaps Interactions on a Wind Tunnel Scale Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model

This paper presents a computation study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with trailing edge mini-flaps. A vortex-lattice model of the CRM is developed with transonic small disturbance and integral boundary-layer corrections coupled with NASTRAN equivalent beam model for the rapid CRM aeroelastic simulation. The simulations are performed with individual trailing edge mini-flap deflected and a series of groups of two adjacent trailing edge mini-flaps deflected at the same time. A surrogate model is developed to estimate the aerodynamic interactions between the flaps. To validate the surrogate model, static aeroelastic simulations are performed using FUN3D CFD solver.

Interaction↗

NASA NTRS2022

Semispan Test Results of an Active Flow Control Enabled High-Lift Common Research Model in Landing Configuration

A 10%-scale semispan, Active Flow Control (AFC) enabled, simplified high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-SHL-AFC) was tested in the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel at the NASA Langley Research Center. The main objective of the test was to develop an AFC system that can provide the necessary lift recovery on a simple-hinged flap high-lift system while minimizing its pneumatic power requirement. Three new types of AFC approaches were examined: Double-Row Sweeping Jets (DRSWJ), Alternating Pulsed Jets (APJ), and High Efficiency Low Power (HELP) actuators. The DRSWJ and the APJ actuators used two rows of unsteady jets, whereas the HELP actuators used an upstream row of sweeping jets combined with a downstream row of steady jets to overcome strong adverse pressure gradients. The test was conducted mostly at a freestream Mach number of 0.20. For exploration purposes, a limited number of runs were made at lower Mach numbers or using vortex generators (VGs). Minimal sensitivity to Mach number or VGs, for the cases evaluated, were observed. The AFC-induced lift coefficient increment was maintained over the AFC-off case for most flow-control cases examined. The CRM-SHL-AFC configuration equipped with HELP actuation was the only actuator configuration able to match or exceed the targeted lift performance of a reference conventional high-lift configuration. The presented aerodynamic data include lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients as a function of angle of attack, with and without the Transonic Wall Interference Correction System (TWICS) method applied. Lift increments as a function of AFC pneumatic power usage (i.e., nozzle pressure ratio, mass flow, momentum coefficient, and power coefficient) are also presented at a lower angle of attack (α = 8.9°) and at maximum lift (α= 17.1°). At the two angles of attack, the surface pressure distributions and autospectral densities from the unsteady pressure transducers for the AFC-off case and the best HELP actuation case are compared.

high-lift↗

NASA NTRS2018

A Qualitative Study on the Effects of Mesh Guideline Modification for Unstructured Mesh Generation of the NASA High Lift Common Research Model (HL-CRM)

As part of the 1st Geometry and Mesh Generation Workshop, unstructured tetrahedral and unstructured hybrid Computational Fluid Dynamics meshes were generated according to the meshing guidelines supplied by the 3rd High Lift Prediction Workshop. During this process, it was noted that application of some meshing guidelines became a bottleneck in the process and negatively impacted the quality of the meshes. A study is performed to compare the FUN3D simulation from the baseline medium-resolution workshop unstructured mesh with those on meshes resulting from guideline variations to the baseline. Recommendations on the elimination or reduction of meshing guidelines for high lift aerodynamic cases like the High Lift Common Research Model are based on the resulting data.

Jones, William T.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA 5.2%-Scale Semispan High Lift Common Research Model Wind Tunnel Test at the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel

A wind tunnel test of the NASA 5.2%-scale Semispan High Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) was conducted at the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) in the fall of 2022. The main purpose of the test was a model checkout before shipping it overseas. The model was shipped to Germany in the spring of 2023, and the team wanted to be sure that instrumentation in the model was working, all of the model parts fit together well, and model changes could be done smoothly, as designed while installed in a wind tunnel. Force and moment and pressure data were collected during the test, and while these data were a secondary objective, they can be used for for tunnel-to-tunnel verification of the model, and for database supplementation for the NASA CRM-HL ecosystem. The test was run from August 15, 2022 through September 8, 2022. Eight configurations were tested at Mach 0.2 and 0.26, over an alpha range from -4deg to +24deg. All of the configurations that were tested accomplished testing of all model parts. This test campaign was a unique opportunity to test a complicated model design in a wind tunnel that is less expensive to test in and has easier model access than the tunnel that it was designed to run in. The test was invaluable in providing lessons learned about building up and running the model, and the model was returned to the model manufacturer from December 2022 to February 2023 for updates to make model changes easier, to make design fixes on the model, and to do clean up work on the model.

CRM-HL↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA NTF CRM General Briefing

General briefing for the NASA NTF Common Research Model

NTF↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Testing of High-Lift Common Research Model at Takeoff Configurations

The 10% scale High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) was tested in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) in support of the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project. The main objective of the wind tunnel test was to improve the aerodynamic performance of a representative aircraft model during takeoff operations using localized active flow control (AFC). This approach involves the application of AFC concepts locally to a relatively small region; therefore, it has the potential to cause minimal architectural change to current aircraft configurations. In addition, the power requirements of localized AFC could be supplied with onboard air resources. Recent exploratory studies identified the aileron as a target area for improving lift-to-drag ratio using localized AFC concepts. The idea is to deflect the ailerons beyond their nominal deflection angles and use AFC to reduce flow separation that occurs at larger aileron deflections. Several AFC concepts with different configurations were evaluated with the goal of achieving high-lift performance improvement. The assessment of AFC configurations is reported in a companion paper. The focus of the current paper is to report the data relevant to the CRM-HL takeoff configurations and establish a reference case for localized AFC application. Three takeoff configurations —reference, nominal, and high-lift improved—are documented. These takeoff configurations are obtained by varying aileron deflection. Wind tunnel measurements including surface static pressures and force and moment data are presented. In addition, surface tuft flow visualization, mainly on the aileron, is provided to understand the flow characteristics developed over the aileron during takeoff.

Wind tunnel test↗

NASA NTRS2018

Distributed-Flap Layout Trade Study on a Highly Flexible Common Research Model

The results of a layout trade study of a full-span, trailing-edge flap system for the NASACommon Research Model (CRM) are presented. Previously developed analysis and design tools areused to determine the potential performance benefits of several flap layouts on a highlyflexible version of the aircraft wing. The wing is first re-twisted for optimal aerodynamicperformance at the design cruise condition while addressing aeroelastic effects. Several flaplayouts are then installed on the new baseline wing. The deflection of each segment on allflap layouts is then optimized for aerodynamic performance at an overspeed flight conditionto ascertain the effectiveness of each flap system. The results indicate that employing two-segmentflaps greatly improves overspeed performance as compared to using no or justsingle-segment flaps. The study also showed that additional segments offer only incrementalimprovements in performance. The results also show that using only four spanwise flaps canproduce meaningful performance gains. Overall, the trade study results suggest a simpledistributed flap system (four spanwise flaps with two segments each) can reduce the drag ofthe Common Research Model by 13 counts at a Mach number that is 3.5 percent higher than thedesign cruise point.

Common Research Model (CRM)↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Testing of High-Lift Common Research Model at Takeoff Configurations

The 10% scale High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) was tested in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) in support of the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project. The main objective of the wind tunnel test was to improve the aerodynamic performance of a representative aircraft model during takeoff operations using localized active flow control (AFC). This approach involves the application of AFC concepts locally to a relatively small region; therefore, it has the potential to cause minimal architectural change to current aircraft configurations. In addition, the power requirements of localized AFC could be supplied with onboard air resources. Recent exploratory studies identified the aileron as a target area for improving lift-to-drag ratio using localized AFC concepts. The idea is to deflect the ailerons beyond their nominal deflection angles and use AFC to reduce flow separation that occurs at larger aileron deflections. Several AFC concepts with different configurations were evaluated with the goal of achieving high-lift performance improvement. The assessment of AFC configurations is reported in a companion paper. The focus of the current paper is to report the data relevant to the CRM-HL takeoff configurations and establish a reference case for localized AFC application. Three takeoff configurations —reference, nominal, and high-lift improved—are documented. These takeoff configurations are obtained by varying aileron deflection. Wind tunnel measurements including surface static pressures and force and moment data are presented. In addition, surface tuft flow visualization, mainly on the aileron, is provided to understand the flow characteristics developed over the aileron during takeoff.

Lift-to-Drag↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind Tunnel Testing of AFC over a Deflected Aileron on the High-Lift Common Research Model

Active flow control (AFC) using discrete fluidic actuators distributed along the span, just upstream of the deflected aileron of the 10% scale high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL), was evaluated during a wind tunnel test in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. For this set of experiments, a new outboard section was fabricated incorporating a deflectable aileron. Aileron deflection angles of 0, 7.5, 16, and 25 were investigated. This experimental investigation is in response to a recent study by Boeing potential to use AFC with a drooped aileron during takeoff to improve lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) by as much as 5%, depending on AFC mass flow rate. AFC is used at deflection angles above the nominal deflection of 7.5 to control the resulting flow separation that occurs and potentially improve L/D. Improvements in aircraft low-speed L/D can affect vehicle range and/or payload. Tuft flow visualization data, steady and unsteady surface pressure data, and force and moment data are used to compare the flowfields with and without AFC. Parameters varied include actuator momentum coefficient and aileron deflection angle. The surface pressure and tuft flow visualization results indicate that without AFC, the flow over a majority of the aileron upper surface is separated for aileron deflection angles larger than 7.5. When AFC is applied, the flow is reattached to the aileron. Force and moment results show that a local increase in lift leads to an increase in L/D of at least 3.5% using mass flow rates thought to be available from air sources onboard a commercial transport.

AFC↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind Tunnel Testing of AFC over a Deflected Aileron on the High-Lift Common Research Model

Active flow control (AFC) using discrete fluidic actuators distributed along the span, just upstream of the deflected aileron of the 10% scale high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL), was evaluated during a wind tunnel test in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. For this set of experiments, a new outboard section was fabricated incorporating a deflectable aileron. Aileron deflection angles of 0, 7.5, 16, and 25 were investigated. This experimental investigation is in response to a recent study by Boeing potential to use AFC with a drooped aileron during takeoff to improve lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) by as much as 5%, depending on AFC mass flow rate. AFC is used at deflection angles above the nominal deflection of 7.5 to control the resulting flow separation that occurs and potentially improve L/D. Improvements in aircraft low-speed L/D can affect vehicle range and/or payload. Tuft flow visualization data, steady and unsteady surface pressure data, and force and moment data are used to compare the flowfields with and without AFC. Parameters varied include actuator momentum coefficient and aileron deflection angle. The surface pressure and tuft flow visualization results indicate that without AFC, the flow over a majority of the aileron upper surface is separated for aileron deflection angles larger than 7.5. When AFC is applied, the flow is reattached to the aileron. Force and moment results show that a local increase in lift leads to an increase in L/D of at least 3.5% using mass flow rates thought to be available from air sources onboard a commercial transport.

AFC↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Slat-gap and Slat-cove Filler Treatments for Noise Reduction Assessment on the High Lift Common Research Model in the NASA LaRC 14x22

Airframe noise is an important issue during the approach and landing phases of flight because engines are throttled back, and airframe sources become an equal or greater contributor to environmental noise. The leading-edge slat component of the high-lift system for transport aircraft has been identified as a prominent source of airframe noise. Noise production mechanisms and potential treatments to mitigate airframe noise have been areas of active research for nearly three decades. Two promising technologies for slat noise reduction are the slat-gap filler (SGF) and slat-cove filler (SCF). Previous work was done using a 2D section of a transport class aircraft wing to demonstrate their feasibility via benchtop and computational models. A wind tunnel test campaign was recently undertaken to test the SGF and SCF technologies in a flight-like environment by installing dynamically scaled treatments on the 10%-scale High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL), which is representative of a commercial twin-aisle transport aircraft. Advancement of the SGF and SCF technologies to overcome challenges of integration with 3D airframe structures, computational simulations of the CRM-HL predicting the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance and structural loads, and design of wind tunnel model hardware with features accommodating noise treatments were conducted in parallel. Details of innovations in the SGF and SCF technologies for 3D airframe feasibility will be described. The loads the treatments must sustain in flight and the influence of those loads on the design is also discussed. Finally, the design of wing leading-edge assemblies to treat the 10% CRM-HL with dynamically scaled SGF and SCF components is presented. The treatments were successfully tested in 2020/2021 providing a demonstration of leading-edge noise reduction using components that would allow slat articulation.

airframe noise reduction↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA 5.2%-Scale Semispan High Lift Common Research Model Wind Tunnel Test at the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel

A wind tunnel test of the NASA 5.2%-scale Semispan High Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) was conducted at the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) in the fall of 2022. The main purpose of the test was a model checkout before shipping it overseas. The model was shipped to Germany in the spring of 2023, and the team wanted to be sure that instrumentation in the model was working, all of the model parts fit together well, and model changes could be done smoothly, as designed while installed in a wind tunnel. Force and moment and pressure data were collected during the test, and while these data were a secondary objective, they can be used for for tunnel-to-tunnel verification of the model, and for database supplementation for the NASA CRM-HL ecosystem. The test was run from August 15, 2022 through September 8, 2022. Eight configurations were tested at Mach 0.2 and 0.26, over an alpha range from -4deg to +24deg. All of the configurations that were tested accomplished testing of all model parts. This test campaign was a unique opportunity to test a complicated model design in a wind tunnel that is less expensive to test in and has easier model access than the tunnel that it was designed to run in. The test was invaluable in providing lessons learned about building up and running the model, and the model was returned to the model manufacturer from December 2022 to February 2023 for updates to make model changes easier, to make design fixes on the model, and to do clean up work on the model.

Semispan↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Active Flow Control Enhanced Aileron of the High-Lift Common Research Model at Takeoff Condition

An experimental investigation was conducted in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel on the NASA 10% scale High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) to improve the high-lift aerodynamic performance of the takeoff configuration. Active flow control (AFC) was applied at the aileron hinge line to control flow separation at high aileron deflection angles to increase lift-to-drag ratio (L/D). Improvements in low speed L/D can increase vehicle payload and/or range resulting in a more efficient vehicle. Aileron deflection angles of 0°, 7.5°, 16°, and 25° were investigated. Flow control was applied to the two largest aileron deflections, which are considered the high-lift (HL) improved takeoff configurations. A companion paper will discuss baseline flow characteristics of the CRM-HL at the three takeoff conditions: reference, nominal, and HL-improved. In this paper, we focus on the aerodynamic improvement obtained when AFC was applied to an aileron deflected at 16° relative to the nominal configuration of 7.5° deflection. Multiple flow control parameters, including actuator type, spacing, and intensity, were investigated to evaluate the efficiency of the actuation system. The different AFC configurations tested were assessed with tuft visualization, steady surface pressure data, and force and moment data. The results indicated that all actuation types and spacings examined led to an increase in lift across the range of angles of attack investigated. Flow separation was mitigated with the injection of momentum at the aileron hinge line. The configurations with the smallest spacing produced the highest improvement in L/D. Steady jet actuation showed higher efficiency but similar aerodynamic performance when compared to the sweeping jet actuators. This work was performed in support of the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project.

CRM-HL↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transition Prediction for the 30P30N Airfoil and the CRM-HL using FUN3D

The ability to accurately model transition over high-lift configurations can lead to improved agreement between stationary Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations and experimental measurements. In this work, selected transport-equation-based RANS models for transition prediction in the NASA FUN3D flow solver are used to simulate flow over the 30P30N three-element airfoil and the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). The primary RANS-based transition model is the Langtry-Menter (LM) 𝜸-Re𝜽𝒕 model coupled with the Menter shear-stress transport model. Additionally, the existing capability for transition prediction based on linear stability correlations is used to allow the modeling of transition over multiple elements of the 30P30N configuration. This approach pairs an algebraic transition model with the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model that relies on an imposed transition location in FUN3D and the parabolized stability equations as implemented in the LASTRAC code. Predictions based on these different transition prediction approaches and models are compared with each other, experimental data, and previous simulations by evaluating the lift and drag coefficients, the surface-pressure/skin-friction distributions, and the locations of transition onset. Results are presented for multiple angles of attack for the 30P30N airfoil and CRM-HL. For the CRM-HL, a grid resolution study is performed for the LM transition model and the SA turbulence model.

High Lift↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Active Flow Control Enhanced Aileron of the High-Lift Common Research Model at Takeoff Condition

An experimental investigation was conducted in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel on the NASA 10% scale High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) to improve the high-lift aerodynamic performance of the takeoff configuration. Active flow control (AFC) was applied at the aileron hinge line to control flow separation at high aileron deflection angles ( δ a ) to increase lift-to-drag ratio (R/J). Improvements in low speed R/J can increase vehicle payload and/or range resulting in a more efficient vehicle. Aileron deflection angles of 0°, 7.5°, 16°, and 25° were investigated. Flow control was applied to the two largest aileron deflections, which are considered the high-lift (HL) improved takeoff configurations. A companion paper will discuss baseline flow characteristics of the CRM-HL at the three takeoff conditions: reference, nominal, and HL-improved. In this paper, we focus on the aerodynamic improvement obtained when AFC was applied to δ a = 16° relative to the nominal configuration, δ a = 7.5°. Multiple flow control parameters, including actuator type, spacing, and intensity, were investigated to evaluate the efficiency of the actuation system. The different AFC configurations tested were assessed with tuft visualization, steady surface pressure data, and force and moment data. The results indicated that all actuation types and spacings examined led to an increase in lift across the range of angles of attack investigated. Flow separation was mitigated with the injection of momentum at the aileron hinge line. The configurations with the smallest spacing produced the highest improvement in L/D . Steady jet actuation showed higher efficiency but similar aerodynamic performance when compared to the sweeping jet actuators. This work was performed in support of the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project.

High-Lift Common Research Model↗