Role of CO2 in enhancing geopolymer properties formulated with fluidized bed combustion ash
Not Available
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Clean Coal”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Characterization and Recovery of Rare Earths from Coal and By-Products
Coal is a precious resource, both in the United States and around the world. The United States has a 250-year supply of coal, and generates between 30 - 40% of its electricity through coal combustion. Approximately 1 Gt of coal has been mined annually in the US, although the 2015 total will likely be closer to 900 Mt (http://www.eia.gov/coal/production/quarterly/). Most of the coal is burned for power generation, but substantial quantities are also employed in the manufacture of steel, chemicals, and activated carbons. Coal has a positive impact upon many industries, including mining, power, rail transportation, manufacturing, chemical, steel, activated carbon, and fuels. Everything that is in the earth’s crust is also present within coal to some extent, and the challenge is always to utilize abundant domestic coal in clean and environmentally friendly manners. In the case of the rare earths, these valuable and extraordinarily useful elements are present within the abundant coal and coal by-products produced domestically and world-wide. These materials include the coals, as well as the combustion by-products such as ashes, coal preparation wastes, gasification slags, and mining by-products. All of these materials can be viewed as potential sources of rare earth elements. Most of the common inorganic lanthanide compounds, such as the phosphates found in coal, have very high melting, boiling, and thermal decomposition temperatures, allowing them to concentrate in combustion and gasification by-products. Furthermore, rare earths have been found in interesting concentrations in the strata above and below certain coal seams. Much of the recent research on coal utilization in the United States has focused upon the capture of pollutants such as acid gases, particulates, and mercury, and the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. The possible recovery of rare earth and other critical elements from abundant coal and by-products is an exciting new research area, representing a dramatic paradigm shift for coal.
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
Kemper County IGCC Final Public Design Report
The Kemper County IGCC plant is a lignite-fueled 2-on-1 Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle (IGCC) facility incorporating the air-blown Transport Integrated Gasification (TRIG™) technology jointly developed by Southern Company; KBR; and the United States Department of Energy (DOE) at the Power Systems Development Facility (PSDF) in Wilsonville, Alabama. The plant is owned by Mississippi Power Company (MPC) and has a calculated nameplate capacity of 830 MW with a peak net output of 582 MW. As a result of advanced emissions-control equipment, the facility is designed to produce marketable products of ammonia (NH3), sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). The plant is designed to capture 65 percent of the carbon entering to sell for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), which makes the Kemper County plant’s carbon emissions comparable to those of a natural-gas-fired combined cycle power plant. This report describes the basic design and function of the plant as determined at the end of the Detailed Design phase of the project. The technical sections of the report were completed in October 2013, and the cost information was incorporated into Section 6.0 in March 2018.
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
Topical Report: Kemper County IGCC Final Public Design Report
The Kemper County IGCC plant is a lignite-fueled 2-on-1 Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle (IGCC) facility incorporating the air-blown Transport Integrated Gasification (TRIG™) technology jointly developed by Southern Company; KBR; and the United States Department of Energy (DOE) at the Power Systems Development Facility (PSDF) in Wilsonville, Alabama. The plant is owned by Mississippi Power Company (MPC) and has a calculated nameplate capacity of 830 MW with a peak net output of 582 MW. As a result of advanced emissions-control equipment, the facility is designed to produce marketable products of ammonia (NH 3 ), sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). The plant is designed to capture 65 percent of the carbon entering to sell for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), which makes the Kemper County plant’s carbon emissions comparable to those of a natural-gas-fired combined cycle power plant. This report describes the basic design and function of the plant as determined at the end of the Detailed Design phase of the project. The technical sections of the report were completed in October 2013, and the cost information was incorporated into Section 6.0 in March 2018.
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
Topical Report: Reference Plant Cost Estimates for TRIG™ Systems
Southern Company Services, Inc. has conducted a Reference Plant conceptual design for the Transport Integrated Gasification (TRIG™) IGCC technology. While the technical knowledge and cost data gathered from the Kemper County IGCC project provide a basis for this effort, this conceptual design incorporates cost improvements and commercially available technology advancements that are representative of a mature “nth” TRIG™ IGCC project. The design is based on an abundant, sub-bituminous coal feedstock, and includes two options for CO 2 capture. The resulting Reference Plant provides a basis for comparison with other technologies as a first step for evaluating the TRIG™ IGCC technology.
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
Topical Report: Kemper County IGCC Commissioning and Startup Report
The Kemper County IGCC plant was a lignite-fueled 2 x 1 Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle (IGCC) facility that demonstrated the air-blown Transport Integrated Gasification (TRIG™) technology jointly developed by Southern Company, KBR, Inc. (KBR), and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at the Power Systems Development Facility (PSDF) in Wilsonville, Ala. The plant is owned by Mississippi Power Company (MPC) and has a calculated nameplate capacity of 830 MW with a peak net output of 582 MW. As a result of advanced emissions control equipment, the facility is designed to produce marketable products of ammonia (NH 3 ), sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). The plant is designed to capture 65 percent of the carbon producing a CO 2 stream for use in enhanced oil recovery (EOR), making the plant carbon emissions comparable to those of a natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant. This report describes the unit commissioning activities from the end of construction through first coal operations to the gasifier. These activities include precommissioning planning, commissioning of major equipment, and operation of processes leading up to first coal feed.
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
A U.S.-China coal power transition and the global 1.5 °C pathway
As the world seeks to increase ambition rapidly to limit global warming to 1.5 °C, joint leadership from the world's largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters—the United States (U.S.) and China—will be critical to deliver significant emissions reductions from their own countries as well as to catalyze increased international action. After a period of uncertainty in international climate policy, these countries now both have current leadership that supports ambitious climate action. In this context, a feasible, high-impact, and potentially globally catalytic agreement by the U.S. and China to transition away from coal to clean energy would be a major contribution toward this global effort. We undertake a plant-by-plant assessment in the power sector to identify practical coal retirement pathways for each country that are in line with national priorities and the global 1.5 °C target. Our plant-by-plant analysis shows that the 1.5 °C-compatible pathways may result in an average retirement age of 47 years for the U.S. coal plants and 22 years for Chinese coal plants, raising important questions of how to compare broader economic, employment, and social impacts. We also demonstrate that such pathways would also lead to significant emissions reductions, lowering overall global energy-related CO 2 emissions by about 9% in 2030 relative to 2020. A catalytic effect from the possibility of other countries taking compatible actions is estimated to reduce global emissions by 5.1 Gt CO 2 in 2030 and by 10.1 Gt CO 2 in 2045.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
CO 2 Binding Organic Liquids Gas Capture with Polarity Swing Assisted Regeneration
This report outlines the comprehensive bench-scale testing of the CO 2 -binding organic liquids (CO 2 BOLs) solvent platform and its unique Polarity Swing Assisted Regeneration (PSAR). This study outlines all efforts on a candidate CO 2 BOL solvent molecule, including solvent synthesis, material characterization, preliminary toxicology studies, and measurement of all physical, thermodynamic and kinetic data, including bench-scale testing. Equilibrium and kinetic models and analysis were made using Aspen Plus™. Preliminary process configurations, a technoeconomic assessment and solvent performance projections for separating CO 2 from a subcritical coal-fired power plant are compared to the U.S. Department of Energy's Case 10 monoethanolamine baseline.
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
US-China Clean Energy Research Center on Building Energy Efficiency: Materials that Improve the Cost-Effectiveness of Air Barrier Systems
The US–China Clean Energy Research Center (CERC) was launched in 2009 by US Energy Secretary Steven Chu, Chinese Minister of Science and Technology Wan Gang, and Chinese National Energy Agency Administrator Zhang Guobao. This 5-year collaboration emerged from the fact that the United States and China are the world’s largest energy producers, energy consumers, and greenhouse gas emitters, and that their joint effort could have significant positive repercussions worldwide. CERC’s main goal is to develop and deploy clean energy technologies that will help both countries meet energy and climate challenges. Three consortia were established to address the most pressing energy-related research areas: Advanced Coal Technology, Clean Vehicles, and Building Energy Efficiency (BEE). The project discussed in this report was part of the CERC-BEE consortia; its objective was to lower energy use in buildings by developing and evaluating technologies that improve the cost-effectiveness of air barrier systems for building envelopes.
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
Building envelope advancement under the US-China Clean Energy Research Center for building energy efficiency
The US–China Clean Energy Research Center (CERC) was launched in 2009 by U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu, Chinese Minister of Science and Technology Wan Gang, and Chinese National Energy Agency Administrator Zhang Guobao. 1 This five-year collaboration emerged from the fact that the U nited States and China are the world’s largest energy producers, energy consumers , and greenhouse gas emitters 2 (Figure 1) , and that their joint effort could have positive repercussions worldwide. CERC’s main goal is to develop and deploy clean energy technologies that will help both countries meet energy and climate challenges. Three consortia were established to address the most pressing energy-related research areas: Advanced Coal Technology, Clean Vehicles, and Building Energy Efficiency (BEE).
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
Environmentally significant shifts in trace element emissions from coal plants complying with the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAAs) reduced criteria air pollution from coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) in the United States, but compliance strategies additionally altered the magnitude and phase of environmentally significant trace element emissions. This report quantitatively assesses changes in trace element emissions stemming from CAAAs compliance, attributes these changes to specific CAAAs compliance strategies, and discusses implications for future environmental regulatory design. We combine plant-level coal purchase and installed air pollution control device data with a trace element partitioning model to approximate changes in trace element mass entering and exiting CFPPs in the solid, liquid, and gas phase between 1993 and 2017. Though US coal combustion decreased by 2% during this period, the vast majority of trace element emissions reductions stem from the 18-64% reductions in the fleet-wide average concentrations of arsenic, bromine, chloride, lead, mercury, and selenium in the combusted coal. Combined with the installation of air pollution control technologies, these shifts concluded in nationwide reductions of gas phase trace element emissions by between 49 and 68% for the elements included in this study. In contrast, installation of flue gas desulfurization devices increased the mass of trace elements discharged in wastewater. This work reinforces the value of multi-phase emissions regulations in ensuring that contaminants are not shunted from regulated to unregulated phases.
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
Full-scale FEED Study for Retrofitting the Prairie State Generating Station with an 816 MWe Capture Plant using Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Technology
A full front-end engineering design (FEED) study to for a carbon capture system for Unit #2 (816 MWe) at the Prairie State Generating Company’s (PSGC) Energy Campus in Marissa, IL based on the KM CDR Process CO 2 capture technology from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) using their proprietary solvent KS-21TM. If built this carbon capture plant would be the world's largest to date. The cost of capture of 100 percent of the plant emissions was calculated to be $43.42 per metric tonne of CO 2 based on levelized costs for 30 years of operation (85% capacity factor), and includes Interest on Debt and Return on Equity During Operation.
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
Cryogenic Carbon Capture Development Final/Technical Report
This project extends and leverages the work completed under funding from ARPA-E and other sources by exploring aspects of the Cryogenic Carbon Capture™ (CCC) process and issues discovered during those projects, but that were not within the scope or budget of previous projects or that became apparent during field tests. Our successful completion of the tasks outlined in this project has increased the reliability, efficiency, and scalability of the CCC process and we are better prepared for pilot-scale testing. The first phase of this project improved key areas of the process through iterative design and experiment, culminating with recommendations for improvements to the existing skid-scale system developed under non-federal funding. The second phase of this project implemented the improved unit operations into the Cryogenic Carbon Capture External Cooling Loop (CCC ECL™) skid and field tests the improved system at a coal-fired power plant.
20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
Carbon Mineralization by Aqueous Precipitation for Beneficial Use of CO2 from Flue Gas
The objective of this project is to demonstrate an innovative process to mineralize CO2 from flue gas directly to reactive carbonates and maximize the value and versatility of its beneficial use products. The program scope includes the design, construction, and testing of a CO2 Conversion to Material Products (CCMP) Pilot Demonstration Plant utilizing CO2 from the flue gas of a power production facility in Moss Landing, CA as well as flue gas from coal combustion. This topical report covers Phase 2b, which is the construction phase of pilot demonstration subsystems that make up the integrated plant. The subsystems included are the mineralization subsystem, the Alkalinity Based on Low Energy (ABLE) subsystem, the waste calcium oxide processing subsystem, and the fiber cement board production subsystem. The fully integrated plant is now capable of capturing CO2 from various sources (gas and coal) and mineralizing into a reactive calcium carbonate binder and subsequently producing commercial size (4ftx8ft) fiber cement boards. The topical report provides a description of the “as built” design of these subsystems and the results of the commissioning activities that have taken place to confirm operability. At the end of Phase 2b, the CCMP pilot demonstration is fully ready for testing.
Clean Coal Technology↗
Carbon Dioxide Adsorption via Ultra-High Surface Area Carbon
In this Phase 1 project, Vuronyx Technologies investigated the use of a high surface area carbon for adsorption of carbon dioxide. Current industry practice of CO 2 capture is by using amine-based scrubbing systems via absorption–regeneration technology. The amine solvent binds with the CO 2 generated during coal combustion in the absorption reactor, and is sent to a stripper column for solvent regeneration and recycling. The separated CO 2 is then cooled and transported for compression and sequestration. Amine based CO 2 removal is energy intensive and not costeffective due to the energy penalty associated with the stripping of CO 2 and regeneration of solvent.
20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
Cooling Strategies for Vane Leading Edges in a Syngas Environment Including Effects of Deposition and Turbulence
The Department of Energy has goals to move land based gas turbine systems to alternate fuels including coal derived synthetic gas and hydrogen. Coal is the most abundant energy resource in the US and in the world and it is economically advantageous to develop power systems which can use coal. Integrated gasification combined cycles are (IGCC) expected to allow the clean use of coal derived fuels while improving the ability to capture and sequester carbon dioxide. These cycles will need to maintain or increase turbine entry temperatures to develop competitive efficiencies. The use of coal derived syngas introduces a range of potential contaminants into the hot section of the gas turbine including sulfur, iron, calcium, and various alkali metals. Depending on the effectiveness of the gas clean up processes, there exists significant likelihood that the remaining materials will become molten in the combustion process and potentially deposit on downstream turbine surfaces. Past evidence suggests that deposition will be a strong function of increasing temperature. Currently, even with the best gas cleanup processes a small level of particulate matter in the syngas is expected. Consequently, particulate deposition is expected to be an important consideration in the design of turbine components. The leading edge region of first stage vanes most often have higher deposition rates than other areas due to strong fluid acceleration and streamline curvature in the vicinity of the surface. This region remains one of the most difficult areas in a turbine nozzle to cool due to high inlet temperatures and only a small pressure ratio for cooling. The leading edge of a vane often has relatively high heat transfer coefficients and is often cooled using showerhead film cooling arrays. The throat of the first stage nozzle is another area where deposition potentially has a strongly adverse effect on turbine performance as this region meters the turbine inlet flow. Based on roughness levels found on in service vanes (Bons, et al., 2001, up to 300 microns) flow blockage in first stage turbine nozzles can easily reach 1 to 2 percent in conventional turbines. Deposition levels in syngas fueled gas turbines are expected to be even more problematic. The likelihood of significant deposition to the leading edge of vanes in a syngas environment indicates the need to examine this effect on the leading edge cooling problem. It is critical to understand the influence of leading edge geometry and turbulence on deposition rates for both internally and showerhead cooled leading edge regions. The expected level of deposition in a vane stagnation region not only significantly changes the heat transfer problem but also suggests that cooling arrays may clog. Addressing the cooling issue suggests a need to better understand stagnation region heat transfer with realistic roughness as well as the other variables affecting transport near the leading edge. Also, the question of whether leading edge regions can be cooled internally with modern cooling approaches should also be raised, thus avoiding the clogging issue. Addressing deposition in the pressure side throat region of the nozzle is another critical issue for this environment. Issues such as examining the protective effect of slot and full coverage discrete-hole film cooling on limiting deposition as well as the influence of roughness and turbulence on effectiveness should be raised. The objective of this present study is to address these technical challenges to help enable the development of high efficiency syngas tolerant gas turbine engines.
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
The potential impact of rate-based or mass-based rules on coal-producing states under the Clean Power Plan
Not Available
Godby, Robert (ORCID:0000000209761776)↗
Beneficial Use of Carbon Dioxide in Precast Concrete Production
The feasibility of using carbon dioxide as feedstock in precast concrete production is studied. Carbon dioxide reacts with calcium compounds in concrete, producing solid calcium carbonates in binding matrix. Two typical precast products are examined for their capacity to store carbon dioxide during the production. They are concrete blocks and fiber-cement panels. The two products are currently mass produced and cured by steam. Carbon dioxide can be used to replace steam in curing process to accelerate early strength, improve the long-term durability and reduce energy and emission. For a reaction within a 24-hour process window, the theoretical maximum possible carbon uptake in concrete is found to be 29% based on cement mass in the product. To reach the maximum uptake, a special process is developed to promote the reaction efficiency to 60-80% in 4-hour carbon dioxide curing and improve the resistance to freeze-thaw cycling and sulfate ion attack. The process is also optimized to meet the project target of $10/tCO 2 in carbon utilization. By the use of self-concentrating absorption technology, high purity CO 2 can be produced at a price below $40/t. With low cost CO 2 capture and utilization technologies, it is feasible to establish a network for carbon capture and utilization at the vicinity of carbon sources. If all block produces and panel producers in United States could adopt carbon dioxide process in their production in place of steam, carbon utilization in these two markets alone could consume more than 2 Mt CO 2 /year. This capture and utilization process can be extended to more precast products and will continue for years to come.
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗