Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Brady”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1996

STS-78 Post Flight Presentation

The flight crew of the STS-78 mission, Cmdr. Terence T. Henricks, Pilot Kevin R. Kregel, Payload Cmdr. Susan J. Helms, Mission Specialists Richard M. Linnehan, Charles E. Brady, Jr., and Payload Specialists Jean-Jacques Favier, Ph.D. and Robert B. Thirsk, M.D., back from their seventeen day mission, offer a video and still photo presentation of their journey. Included in the presentation are pre-launch, launch, and post-launch activities; experiments performed in the Spacelab; and re-entry; and the landing at KSC. Each of the STS-78 crew members discuss particular aspects of the mission including the 22 LMS life science and microgravity experiments. The experiments address human physiology, metallic alloys and protein crystal growth, and the study of the behavior of fluids and materials processing in the near-weightless environment of space.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1996

STS-78 Flight Day 17

On this seventeenth day of the STS-78 mission, the flight crew, Cmdr. Terence T. Henricks, Pilot Kevin R. Kregel, Payload Cmdr. Susan J. Helms, Mission Specialists Richard M. Linnehan, Charles E. Brady, Jr., and Payload Specialists Jean-Jacques Favier, Ph.D. and Robert B. Thirsk, M.D., are shown conducting routine firings of the orbiter's reaction control system jets and checking out its flight control systems and aero surfaces in anticipation of the planned landing at the Kennedy Space Center. Commander Tom Henricks and Pilot Kevin Kregel successfully fire Columbia's 44 reaction control system jets and then test the aero surfaces that will be used during Columbia's high speed re-entry. This firings procedure is part of a test to prove a concept that may be used on Space Shuttle Discovery's next mission -- STS-82 -- to service the Hubble Space Telescope. The vernier jet firings should raise the orbit without disturbing any payloads on board, or in the case of the Hubble Space Telescope, without placing any force on the telescope's fragile solar arrays.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1996

STS-78 Flight Day 1

On this first day of the STS-78 mission, the flight crew, Cmdr. Terence T. Henricks, Pilot Kevin R. Kregel, Payload Cmdr. Susan J. Helms, Mission Specialists Richard M. Linnehan, Charles E. Brady, Jr., and Payload Specialists Jean-Jacques Favier, Ph.D. and Robert B. Thirsk, M.D., can be seen preforming pre-launch activities such as eating the traditional breakfast, crew suit-up, and the ride out to the launch pad. Also included are various panoramic views of the shuttle on the pad. The crew can be seen being readied in the white room for their mission. After the closing of the hatch and arm retraction, launch activities are shown including countdown, engine ignition, launch, and the separation of the Solid Rocket Boosters. Henricks shares a unique view of Columbia's climb to orbit with flight controllers from a small camera that was mounted on the flight deck. The video follows Columbia's flight from just before main engine start through main engine cutoff, showing the force of main engine and solid booster ignition as experienced by the astronauts.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1996

STS-78 Flight Day 2

On this second day of the STS-78 flight, mission controllers wake the flight crew, Cmdr. Terence T. Henricks, Pilot Kevin R. Kregel, Payload Cmdr. Susan J. Helms, Mission Specialists Richard M. Linnehan, Charles E. Brady, Jr., and Payload Specialists Jean-Jacques Favier, Ph.D. and Robert B. Thirsk, M.D., with 'Free Falling,' a song by Tom Petty. Crew members are then shown working with various neurological and cardiovascular experiments inside the Spacelab.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1996

STS-78 Flight Day 16

On this sixteenth day of the STS-78 mission, the flight crew, Cmdr. Terence T. Henricks, Pilot Kevin R. Kregel, Payload Cmdr. Susan J. Helms, Mission Specialists Richard M. Linnehan, Charles E. Brady, Jr., and Payload Specialists Jean-Jacques Favier, Ph.D. and Robert B. Thirsk, M.D., are shown continuing their scientific investigations in the Spacelab module. Today's work focuses on how the astronauts' bodies are responding to the microgravity environment after more than two weeks in orbit. The payload crew will continue studies in the adaptation of the neurovestibular system and the musculoskeletal system during spaceflight.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1996

STS-78 Flight Day 8

On this eighth day of the STS-78 mission, the flight crew, Cmdr. Terence T. Henricks, Pilot Kevin R. Kregel, Payload Cmdr. Susan J. Helms, Mission Specialists Richard M. Linnehan, Charles E. Brady, Jr., and Payload Specialists Jean-Jacques Favier, Ph.D. and Robert B. Thirsk, M.D., continue to conduct experiments primarily focusing on the effects of weightlessness on human physiology. Results from the studies of muscle activity, task performance, and sleep will help future mission planners organize crew schedules for greater efficiency and productivity. For a second consecutive day, Henricks, Kregel, Thirsk, and Favier continue to enter responses to a battery of problem-solving tasks on the Performance Assessment Work Station, a laptop computer.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1996

STS-78 Flight Day 12

On this twelfth day of the STS-78 mission, the flight crew, Cmdr. Terence T. Henricks, Pilot Kevin R. Kregel, Payload Cmdr. Susan J. Helms, Mission Specialists Richard M. Linnehan, Charles E. Brady, Jr., and Payload Specialists Jean-Jacques Favier, Ph.D. and Robert B. Thirsk, M.D., are awakened by the Canadian national anthem, 'Oh Canada.' This morning, Thirsk is shown delivering a holiday message to Prime Minister Jean Chretien and other dignitaries gathered at Parliament Hill in Ottawa. The crew is then shown celebrating Canada Day aboard the Space Shuttle. Also this morning, Mission Specialist Susan Helms discusses the progress of Columbia's flight with WBBM Radio in Chicago.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1996

Migrational Instabilities in Particle Suspensions

This work deals with an instability arising from the shear-induced migration of particles in dense suspensions coupled with a dependence of viscosity on particle concentration. The analysis summarized here treats the inertialess (Re = O) linear stability of homogeneous simple shear flows for a Stokesian suspension model of the type proposed by Leighton and Acrivos (1987). Depending on the importance of shear-induced migration relative to concentration-driven diffusion, this model admits short-wave instability arising from wave-vector stretching by the base flow and evolving into particle-depleted shear bands. Moreover, this instability in the time-dependent problem corresponds to loss of ellipticity in the associated static problem (Re = O, Pe = O). While the isotropic version of the Leighton-Acrivos model is found to be stable with their experimentally determined parameters for simple shear, it is known that the stable model does not give a good quantitative description of particle clustering in the core of pipe flow (Nott and Brady 1994). This leads to the conjecture that an appropriate variant on the above model could explain such clustering as a two-phase bifurcation in the base flow.

Goddard, Joe D.↗
NASA NTRS1996

STS-78 Mission Highlights Resource Tape

The flight crew of the STS-78 mission, Cmdr. Terence T. Henricks, Pilot Kevin R. Kregel, Payload Cmdr. Susan J. Helms, Mission Specialists Richard M. Linnehan, Charles E. Brady, Jr., and Payload Specialists Jean-Jacques Favier, Pd.D. and Robert B. Thirsk, M.D., present a video mission over-view of their space flight. Images include: pre-launch activities such as eating the traditional breakfast, crew suit-up, and the ride out to the launch pad. Also, included are various panoramic views of the shuttle on the pad. The crew can be seen being readied in the white room' for their mission. After the closing of the hatch and arm retraction, launch activities are shown including countdown, engine ignition, launch, and the separation of the Solid Rocket Boosters. Following an on-time launch, the crew of Endeavor are shown setting up a variety of experiments that will operate for much of the mission.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2000

NASA Animal Enclosure Module Mouse Odor Containment Study for STS-107 September 15, 1999;SJSU Odor Panel Data

Experiment #153 by Scott Brady is manifested for shuttle flight STS-107. This evaluation of space flight induced stress and its effects on neuronal plasticity will use 18 six month old C57Bl/6 male mice. A 21 day evaluation study was proposed to determine the length of time groups of 6, 9, or 12 mice could be housed in the Animal Enclosure Module (AEM) without odor breakthrough. This study was performed at NASA-Ames Research Center beginning on September 15, 1999. NASA personnel, were responsible for animal care, maintenance, facilities, hardware, etc. San Jose State personnel performed the odor panel evaluations and data reduction. We used similar procedures and methods for earlier tests evaluating female mice.

Holley, Daniel C.↗
NASA NTRS2013

Environmental Assessment for Central Campus Complex John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida

This Environmental Assessment addresses the Proposed Action to consolidate multiple facilities in the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Industrial Area by constructing two new buildings in the existing headquarters area between NASA Parkway, 3rd Street, C Avenue, and D Avenue. Under the Proposed Action, the historic Headquarters Building will be demolished and a new building will be constructed closer to the Operations and Checkout Building by centering it on D A venue (Hunton Brady Architects, P A and Jones Edmunds and Associates, Inc. 2011). This option was selected from a group of 15 initial sketches as the most viable option during a Central Campus Complex Siting Study completed in February 2011. A No-Action Alternative is also presented in which no demolition or construction of new facilities would occur. Implementing the Proposed Action will have major impacts to cultural resources, while the remaining environmental impacts will be minor.

Dankert, Donald↗
DOE OSTI2021

Effect of Added Gadolinium Oxide on the Thermal Air Oxidation of Uranium Dioxide

To develop a more reliable and stable UO2-based nuclear fuel, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) investigated modifying fuel with several soluble lanthanides and zirconium. This article provides the results of these studies investigating gadolinium doping at levels up to 10 mass%. The authors characterized and compared commercially- and PNNL-prepared gadolinium-doped UO2 to determine the oxygen-to-metal ratio, elemental distribution, chemical composition, physical appearance, lattice parameters, and grain structure using atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy, and X-ray diffractometry. After confirming PNNL-prepared UO2 and (Gd,U)O2 were similar to commercially prepared UO2 and (Gd,U)O2, we measured the thermal behavior of these gadolinium-doped UO2 materials to air oxidation using differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. Addition of gadolinium stabilized the first oxidation product U4¬O9/U3O7 and slowed the subsequent oxidation to U3O8. Comparison of our measured two-step oxidation of UO2 to U3O8 at 325°C to common gas/solid kinetic reaction models found that each oxidation step is best described as a convolution of kinetic behaviors; the gadolinium insertion into the UO2 lattice enforces a significant alteration in mechanism and oxidation rate. Noticeable changes in mechanism become apparent between 1% and 3% gadolinium content.

Uranium Dioxide, Gadolinium Oxide, Thermal Air Oxi↗
DOE OSTI2021

Understanding the Correlation between Ga Speciation and Propane Dehydrogenation Activity on Ga/H-ZSM-5 Catalysts

H-ZSM-5 zeolite-supported Ga (Ga/H-ZSM-5) has been considered as a selective catalyst for nonoxidative propane dehydrogenation (PDH) for decades; however, the reaction mechanism remains a topic of considerable discussion. In particular, the correlation between various Ga species present on the catalyst at the reaction conditions and the PDH activity has yet to be established. In this work, intrinsic PDH rates and activation energies were determined on Ga + –H + pair sites and isolated Ga + sites on Ga/H-ZSM-5 samples with a wide range of Si/Al and Ga/Al ratios. Here, the turnover frequency on Ga + –H + pair sites in the PDH is higher than that of isolated Ga + sites by a factor of ~15. Experimental measurements combined with a dual-site model show the activation energy in the PDH on the Ga + –H + pair sites and isolated Ga + sites to be 90.8 ± 1.5 and 117 ± 4.7 kJ·mol –1 , respectively. These results demonstrate that Ga+–H+ pair sites are much more active in the PDH than isolated Ga + sites. The activation energy of GaH x decomposition to form H 2 was determined to be 40–60 kJ·mol –1 higher than that of the PDH on Ga species, suggesting that the GaH x decomposition is unlikely to be part of the PDH mechanism. Although both Brønsted acid and Ga sites interact with propane, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy results provide strong evidence suggesting that the alkyl mechanism is more likely in the PDH on Ga/H-ZSM-5 catalysts.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗