DOE OSTI2014
We compared the structural properties and electrical characteristics of high-κ Lu{sub 2}O{sub 3} and Lu{sub 2}TiO{sub 5} gate dielectrics for amorphous indium-gallium-zinc oxide (α-InGaZnO) thin-film transistor (TFT) applications. The Lu{sub 2}O{sub 3} film has a strong Lu{sub 2}O{sub 3} (400) peak in the X-ray diffraction pattern, while the Lu{sub 2}TiO{sub 5} sample shows a relatively weak Lu{sub 2}TiO{sub 5} (102) peak. Atomic force microscopy reveals that the Lu{sub 2}O{sub 3} dielectric exhibits a rougher surface (about three times) than Lu{sub 2}TiO{sub 5} one. In X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis, we found that the intensity of the O 1s peak corresponding to Lu(OH){sub x} for Lu{sub 2}O{sub 3} film was higher than that of Lu{sub 2}TiO{sub 5} film. Furthermore, compared with the Lu{sub 2}O{sub 3} dielectric, the α-InGaZnO TFT using the Lu{sub 2}TiO{sub 5} gate dielectric exhibited a lower threshold voltage (from 0.43 to 0.25 V), a higher I{sub on}/I{sub off} current ratio (from 3.5 × 10{sup 6} to 1.3 × 10{sup 8}), a smaller subthreshold swing (from 276 to 130 mV/decade), and a larger field-effect mobility (from 14.5 to 24.4 cm{sup 2}/V s). These results are probably due to the incorporation of TiO{sub x} into the Lu{sub 2}O{sub 3} film to form a Lu{sub 2}TiO{sub 5} structure featuring a smooth surface, a low moisture absorption, a high dielectric constant, and a low interface state density at the oxide/channel interface. Furthermore, the stability of Lu{sub 2}O{sub 3} and Lu{sub 2}TiO{sub 5} α-InGaZnO TFTs was investigated under positive gate-bias stress (PGBS) and negative gate-bias stress (NGBS). The threshold voltage of the TFT performed under NGBS is more degradation than that under PGBS. This behavior may be attributed to the electron charge trapping at the dielectric–channel interface under PGBS, whereas the oxygen vacancies occurred in the InGaZnO under NGBS.
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗