Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “unit testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38

Thermal Cycle Testing of the Powersphere Engineering Development Unit

During the past three years the team of The Aerospace Corporation, Lockheed Martin Space Systems, NASA Glenn Research Center, and ILC Dover LP have been developing a multifunctional inflatable structure for the PowerSphere concept under contract with NASA (NAS3-01115). The PowerSphere attitude insensitive solar power-generating microsatellite, which could be used for many different space and Earth science purposes, is ready for further refinement and flight demonstration. The development of micro- and nanosatellites requires the energy collection system, namely the solar array, to be of lightweight and small size. The limited surface area of these satellites precludes the possibility of body mounting the solar array system for required power generation. The use of large traditional solar arrays requires the support of large satellite volumes and weight and also requires a pointing apparatus. The current PowerSphere concept (geodetic sphere), which was envisioned in the late 1990 s by Mr. Simburger of The Aerospace Corporation, has been systematically developed in the past several years.1-7 The PowerSphere system is a low mass and low volume system suited for micro and nanosatellites. It is a lightweight solar array that is spherical in shape and does not require a pointing apparatus. The recently completed project culminated during the third year with the manufacturing of the PowerSphere Engineering Development Unit (EDU). One hemisphere of the EDU system was tested for packing and deployment and was subsequently rigidized. The other hemisphere was packed and stored for future testing in an uncured state. Both cured and uncured hemisphere components were delivered to NASA Glenn Research Center for thermal cycle testing and long-term storage respectively. This paper will discuss the design, thermal cycle testing of the PowerSphere EDU.

Curtis, Henry↗

Assessment of EPRI’s Tan Delta Approach to Manage Cables in Submerged Environments: Statistical Review of EPRI Data

Research conducted by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and other research institutions have concluded that water-trees are one of the leading degradation mechanisms that contribute to the loss of dielectric insulation strength in medium-voltage cable insulating materials in wet or submerged environments. The electrochemical reactions are caused by the combined effect of water presence and relatively high electrical stress. Records of cable failures provided by the licensees in response to Generic Letter (GL) 2007-01 (NRC 2007) have called into question the reliability of medium voltage cables in wetted or submerged environments. EPRI’s dissipation factor or Tan Delta testing guidelines and acceptance criteria have been adopted by most nuclear power plant operators as the primary tool for condition monitoring of medium voltage cables in wet or submerged environments. EPRI has been collecting member data since late 2009 to analyze and provide feedback to members, validate the EPRI-developed acceptance criteria guidelines, support analysis of test results, recommend appropriate actions for the "action required" category, and gather candidate cables for EPRI-sponsored forensic research on causes for insulation degradation. EPRI has collected data from 37 nuclear sites, which represent 44 operating units. The test results have been organized by insulation type, such as cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE); butyl rubber; black, pink, and brown ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR); and compact insulation (black and pink EPR)1. The data have been analyzed, and follow-up information was obtained from members for “action required” test results. EPRI has also performed correlations between Tan Delta tests and the information gathered under the EPRI forensic research on medium-voltage cables. In addition, EPRI has developed guidance by cable insulation type on how to systematically analyze Tan Delta test results. The analysis described here reviewed the two primary EPRI reports (EPRI 3002000557 and EPRI 3002005321) as well as two precedent EPRI reports (EPRI 1028262 and EPRI 1021070) that were cited in the primary reports. The principal results and conclusions from the project analyses are provided.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Zotek® F30 Foam Processing in the Trash Compaction and Processing System (TCPS)

The Trash Compaction and Processing System (TCPS) aims to reduce volume, biologically safen, physically stabilize, manage effluents, and recover resources from astronaut trash in the International Space Station (ISS). The Heat Melt Compactor (HMC) at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) serves as a test system that supports TCPS development by conducting risk reduction activities associated with an ISS flight demonstration. One of the risk reduction activities is to test processing for other types of trash models. A foam model was added to reduce the volume of foam that takes up space in the ISS. This paper will discuss Zotek® F30 foam processing in the HMC unit and testing verification in correlation to defined TCPS requirements.

Janine Criselda Young↗

Zotek® F30 Foam Processing in the Trash Compaction and Processing System

The Trash Compaction and Processing System (TCPS) aims to reduce volume, biologically safen, physically stabilize, manage effluents, and recover resources from astronaut trash in the International Space Station (ISS). The Heat Melt Compactor (HMC) at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) serves as a test system that supports TCPS development by conducting risk reduction activities associated with an ISS flight demonstration. One of the risk reduction activities is to test processing for other types of trash models. A foam model was added to reduce the volume of foam that takes up space in the ISS. This paper will discuss Zotek® F30 foam processing in the HMC unit and testing verification in correlation to defined TCPS requirements.

Janine Young↗

Utilizing Testing Frameworks for Launch Control Systems Continuous Integration

Command and control software is an integral part of the launch procedure. The most important part of this type of software is its ability to communicate well with the user and relay information in a correctly formatted way such that the user can understand the data. There is a tool that aides the communication between the different parts of the system, and effectively, the user. This instrument is capable of taking several complex values and ensuring that they are correctly sorted into their distinctive message values and distributed properly among the different facets of the system. This tool will easily translate and publish the data inside of messages in the system to something that is readable and understandable. The tool also allows for transmission of the recorded data to the user, effectively ensuring the communication between different components of the system. As well as keeping track of messages and ensuring that the information contained within each of them reaches the correct location, this tool has the ability to keep track of its own statistics and determine how many messages passed in were erroneous and how many were successfully transmitted. It is able to check and see what the total message failure count is when an invalid message is given, as well as the number of different messages and their respective types passed into the tool. This tool is of great value to the new Space Launch System (SLS). As such, the tool must be thoroughly tested with test cases that, although improbable, are possible, where the tool may not function properly. Testing an interface this complex is necessary to ensure mission safety and create unlikely scenarios where the tool would work as intended, and stretch its limits to test that even under the most uncommon conditions it would still continue to function. This software will be an important part of the control system for the newest spacecraft which will fly deeper into space than humans have ever travelled. It will fly beyond the moon, into deep space to Mars and perhaps set the groundwork for a manned mission even further to create more opportunities for interplanetary and even interstellar travel by humans. This mission relies heavily on software and hardware to ensure the safety of the humans that will be on board and therefore must be checked, exhausting each and every different situation, such that there is not a doubt surrounding the well-being of the humans aboard the rocket. That is why testing is such an important part of the mission. It provides evidence that the systems aboard the rocket and on the launch pad are safe.

Unit Testing↗

An electric propulsion long term test facility

An existing test facility was modified to provide for extended testing of multiple electric propulsion thruster subsystems. A program to document thruster subsystem characteristics as a function of time is currently in progress. The facility is capable of simultaneously operating three 2.7-kW, 30-cm mercury ion thrusters and their power processing units. Each thruster is installed via a separate air lock so that it can be extended into the 7m x 10m main chamber without violating vacuum integrity. The thrusters exhaust into a 3m x 5m frozen mercury target. An array of cryopanels collect sputtered target material. Power processor units are tested in an adjacent 1.5m x 2m vacuum chamber or accompanying forced convection enclosure. The thruster subsystems and the test facility are designed for automatic unattended operation with thruster operation computer controlled. Test data are recorded by a central data collection system scanning 200 channels of data a second every two minutes. Results of the Systems Demonstration Test, a short shakedown test of 500 hours, and facility performance during the first year of testing are presented.

Trump, G.↗

Design of a Facility to Test the Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generator Engineering Unit

The Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generator (ASRG), a high efficiency generator, is being considered for space missions. An engineering unit, the ASRG engineering unit (EU), was designed and fabricated by Lockheed Martin under contract to the Department of Energy. This unit is currently under extended operation test at the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) to generate performance data and validate the life and reliability predictions for the generator and the Stirling convertors. A special test facility was designed and built for the ASRG EU. This paper summarizes details of the test facility design, including the mechanical mounting, heat-rejection system, argon system, control systems, and maintenance. The effort proceeded from requirements definition through design, analysis, build, and test. Initial testing and facility performance results are discussed.

Lewandowski, Edward J.↗

The solar simulation test of the ITALSAT thermal structural model

The ITALSAT structural/thermal model (STM) was submitted to a solar simulation test in order to verify the spacecraft thermal design and the thermal mathematical model which will be used to predict the on orbit temperatures. The STM was representative of the flight model in terms of configuration, structures, appendages and thermal hardware; dissipating dummy units were used to simulate the electronic units. The test consisted of the main phases: on station (beginning of life), on station (end of life), and transfer orbit. Preliminary results indicate that the test performances were satisfactory. The spacecraft measured temperatures were up to 15 degrees higher than the predicted ones. This imposes a careful correlation analysis in order to have reliable flight temperature predictions.

Giommi, M.↗

BY-110 Headspace Sampling Comparison Test: Volume 1

The Hanford Tank Operations Contractor, Washington River Protection Solutions, conducted comparison tests of two Hanford Waste tank vapor sampling systems to determine the relative differences in quantifying Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPC) while sampling the same waste tank. The systems are the traditional in situ, inline headspace sampling (HS) method and the recently developed slipstream sampling unit for testing respirator chemical cartridges known as the cartridge test (CT) rig. The comparison test was performed to determine if results obtained using the CT rig are similar to results obtained using the traditional HS method. Using the CT rig would provide efficiencies in headspace vapors sampling such as applying ALARA principles, minimizing worker entries to the tank farms, and eliminating the physical strain of manually lowering the headspace sampling bundles into the waste tanks. Six sampling events were conducted during January and February 2018 to collect headspace vapor samples from Hanford tank BY-110 with the two systems. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory was tasked with conducting an analysis of the analytical results to assess the comparability of the sampling methods and make recommendations on future testing or deployment of the CT method.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

BY-110 Headspace Sampling Comparison Test: Volume 2: Raw Data

The Hanford Tank Operations Contractor, Washington River Protection Solutions, conducted comparison tests of two Hanford Waste tank vapor sampling systems to determine the relative differences in quantifying Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPC) while sampling the same waste tank. The systems are the traditional in situ, inline headspace sampling (HS) method and the recently developed slipstream sampling unit for testing respirator chemical cartridges known as the cartridge test (CT) rig. The comparison test was performed to determine if results obtained using the CT rig are similar to results obtained using the traditional HS method. Using the CT rig would provide efficiencies in headspace vapors sampling such as applying ALARA principles, minimizing worker entries to the tank farms, and eliminating the physical strain of manually lowering the headspace sampling bundles into the waste tanks. Six sampling events were conducted during January and February 2018 to collect headspace vapor samples from Hanford tank BY-110 with the two systems. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory was tasked with conducting an analysis of the analytical results to assess the comparability of the sampling methods and make recommendations on future testing or deployment of the CT method.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

EMC Test Challenges for NASA's James Webb Space Telescope

This presentation describes the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) tests performed on the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM), the science payload of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in August 2015. By its very nature of being an integrated payload, it could be treated as neither a unit level test nor an integrated spacecraft observatory test. Non-standard test criteria are described along with non-standard test methods that had to be developed in order to evaluate them. Results are presented to demonstrate that all test criteria were met in less than the time allocated.

McCloskey, John↗

EMC Testing on the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM) - A Summary of the EMC Test Campaign for the Science Payload of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)

This paper describes the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) tests performed on the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM), the science payload of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in August 2015. By its very nature of being an integrated payload, it could be treated as neither a unit level test nor an integrated spacecraft/observatory test. Non-standard test criteria are described along with non-standard test methods that had to be developed in order to evaluate them. Results are presented to demonstrate that all test criteria were met in less than the time allocated.

Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)↗

Hardware Demonstration: Radiated Emissions as a Function of Common Mode Current

This presentation describes the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) tests performed on the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM), the science payload of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in August 2015. By its very nature of being an integrated payload, it could be treated as neither a unit level test nor an integrated spacecraft observatory test. Non-standard test criteria are described along with non-standard test methods that had to be developed in order to evaluate them. Results are presented to demonstrate that all test criteria were met in less than the time allocated.

Hardware Demonstration↗

EMC Test Challenges for NASAs James Webb Space Telescope

This presentation describes the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) tests performed on the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM), the science payload of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in August 2015. By its very nature of being an integrated payload, it could be treated as neither a unit level test nor an integrated spacecraft observatory test. Non-standard test criteria are described along with non-standard test methods that had to be developed in order to evaluate them. Results are presented to demonstrate that all test criteria were met in less than the time allocated.

Electromagnetics↗

EMC Test Challenges for NASA's James Webb Space Telescope

This presentation describes the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) tests performed on the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM), the science payload of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in August 2015. By its very nature of being an integrated payload, it could be treated as neither a unit level test nor an integrated spacecraft observatory test. Non-standard test criteria are described along with non-standard test methods that had to be developed in order to evaluate them. Results are presented to demonstrate that all test criteria were met in less than the time allocated.

Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)↗

Robotic Grasp Assistance for Decontamination and Decommissioning Tasks: Initial Applications with RoboGlove - 17310

RoboGlove, developed by NASA and General Motors, is a wearable robotic grasp assist device designed to augment human strength and endurance during manual tasks. Recent testing as part of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management's (DOE-EM's) Science of Safety Initiative has provided the opportunity to explore the glove's use within the context of decontamination and decommissioning work. Capable of providing a wearer with an additional 65-90 N (15-20 lb) of additional continuous grip strength, RoboGlove has the potential to decrease fatigue during long duration tasks, thereby reducing the risk of repetitive stress and other work related injuries. While current work at NASA focuses on integrating robotic grasp assistance with space suit gloves, the effort described herein focuses on the terrestrial application of RoboGlove to DOE-EM's cleanup mission. Following a brief technical description of RoboGlove, testing by United Steelworkers Union personnel at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant is described. Members of the workforce, in collaboration with NASA technologists, studied RoboGlove utility and performance while using tools common to the nuclear decontamination and decommissioning efforts at the plant. Results and feedback from this testing aim at identifying candidate activities for which RoboGlove holds particular promise as a workforce tool, in an effort to facilitate the infusion of robotic technology into routine workflow and processes across the DOE complex for the benefit of worker safety and health. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Status of the NGNP graphite creep experiments AGC-1 and AGC-2 irradiated in the advanced test reactor

The United States Department of Energy's Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Program will be irradiating six nuclear graphite creep experiments in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) located at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The graphite experiments will be irradiated over the next six to eight years to support development of a graphite irradiation performance data base on the new nuclear grade graphites now available for use in high temperature gas reactors. The goals of the irradiation experiments are to obtain irradiation performance data, including irradiation creep, at different temperatures and loading conditions to support design of the next generation nuclear plant (NGNP) very high temperature gas reactor, as well as other future gas reactors. The experiments will each consist of a single capsule that will contain six peripheral stacks of graphite specimens, with half of the graphite specimens in each stack under a compressive load, while the other half of the specimens will not be subjected to a compressive load during irradiation. The six peripheral stacks will have three different compressive loads applied to the top half of three diametrically opposite pairs of specimen stacks, while a seventh stack will not have a compressive load. The specimens will be irradiated in an inert sweep gas atmosphere with on-line temperature and compressive load monitoring and control. There will also be sampling the sweep gas effluent to determine if any oxidation or off-gassing of the specimens occurs during irradiation of the experiment.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

SU-E-P-46: Clinical Acceptance Testing and Implementation of a Portable CT Unit

Purpose: Planning for the first installation in New England of a new portable CT unit to be used in the Operating Room required the integration of many departments including Surgery, Neurosurgery, Information Services, Clinical Engineering, Radiology and Medical Physics/Radiation Safety. Acceptance testing and the quality assurance procedures were designed to optimize image quality and patient and personnel radiation exposure. Methods: The vendor’s protocols were tested using the CT Dosimetry phantoms. The system displayed the CTDIw instead of the CTDIvol while testing the unit. Radiation exposure was compared to existing CT scanners from installed CT units throughout the facility. Brainlab measures all 4 periphery slots on the CT Dosimetry phantom. The ACR measures only the superior slot for the periphery measurement. A comprehensive radiation survey was also performed for several locations. Results: The CTDIvol measurements were comparable for the following studies: brain, C-Spine, and sinuses. However, the mobile CT measurements were slightly higher than other CT units but within acceptable tolerance if measured using the ACR method.Based on scatter measurements, it was determined if any personnel were to stay in the OR Suite during image acquisition that the appropriate lead apron and thyroid shields had to be worn.In addition, to reduce unnecessary scatter, there were two mobile 6 foot wide shields (1/16″ lead equivalent) available to protect personnel in the room and adjacent areas. Conclusion: Intraoperative CT provides the physician new opportunities for evaluation of the progression of surgical resections and device placement at the cost of increasing the amount of trained personnel required to perform this procedure. It also brings with it challenges to keep the radiation exposure to the patients and staff within reasonable limits.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗