SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “test reactor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2020

Irradiation-induced damage in concrete-forming aggregates: revisiting literature data through micromechanics

The radiation-induced volumetric expansion (RIVE) of aggregate-forming minerals causes damage in concrete exposed to high levels of fast neutrons fluence ( \(>\,\sim \,10^{19}\, \hbox {n}\,\hbox {cm}^{-2}\) at kinetics energy above 0.1 MeV). Historical post-irradiation RIVE and Young’s modulus data obtained in test reactors were revisited using a polycrystalline homogenization model (self-consistent scheme) accounting for the aggregates’ minerals content and the formation of voids/cracks during irradiation. It was found that the formation of extra voids/cracks can contribute to the aggregate expansion more substantially than the cumulated expansions of aggregate-forming minerals. Furthermore, the rate of void creation appears to be inversely correlated to the silica content, although aggregates of higher silicate contents exhibit higher RIVEs. The loss of Young’s modulus decreases exponentially with the aggregates’ expansion. At a comparable RIVE level, the relative loss of modulus is more significant in aggregates of higher silica content.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2020

Evaluation of Changes to the MTR Fuel Dissolution Flowsheet to Increase the Number of L-Bundles Charged to a Dissolver

Material Test Reactor (MTR) fuels are dissolved in the H-Canyon facility using a Hg-catalyzed, HNO₃ dissolution flowsheet. The flowsheet is based on experimental work in which laboratory-scale experiments were used to provide bounding values for both offgas and H₂ generation rates. The generation of H₂ gas, primarily from the dissolution of Al, is controlled by limiting the surface area exposed to the solution. The number of L-Bundles charged and their submergence level defines the exposed surface area which is directly proportional to the H₂ generation rate. For the MTR fuel dissolution flowsheet, the maximum number of L-Bundles which can be charged to a dissolver was specified as a function of the Al concentration in the solution and the submergence level of the bundle. The MTR fuels are currently dissolved in the 6.1D dissolver. To reach the desired terminal Al concentration, a total of 12 L-Bundles of fuel are dissolved per batch. Depending on the submergence level being used in the dissolver, the 12 bundles are dissolved in three charges of four bundles per charge or in a sequence of three, four, and five bundles. However, if six L-Bundles could be dissolved in the initial charge, a dissolver batch could be completed in two dissolutions instead of three. To assess the feasibility of dissolving six bundles in the first charge, the Savannah River National Laboratory evaluated changes to the MTR flowsheet which increase the number of bundles which can be charged to a dissolver. Since the development of the existing MTR fuel dissolution flowsheet, improved offgas measurement methods have been developed to more accurately calculate the offgas composition and generation rate during laboratory-scale dissolutions. In the first part of this study, improvements in the calibration model for the Raman spectrometer (used for offgas characterization) and a more effective data smoothing routine were applied to existing data. The uncertainty in the offgas composition data used to define the MTR fuel dissolution flowsheet were subsequently re-evaluated which resulted in an approximate 50% reduction in the uncertainty of the H₂ gas concentration measurements. The reduced uncertainty was used in new calculations to define the maximum number of L-Bundles which can be charged to either the 6.1D or 6.4D dissolver as a function of the Al concentration. With the reduced uncertainty in the H₂ concentration measurements, a flowsheet was defined which supported initially charging 6 bundles to a dissolver. This flowsheet is based on the use of 0.002 M Hg, an L-Bundle immersion depth of 54 in., an air sparge/purge flowrate of 40 scfm, an iodine reactor operating temperature of 200 °C, and not exceeding 60% of the H₂ LFL in the dissolver offgas. In the second phase of this study, calculations were performed to assess the impact of changing various operating parameters to increase the number of L-Bundles charged to an H-Canyon dissolver. Applying the improved offgas measurement techniques including the reduced uncertainty in the H₂ concentration measurements to the existing data, the number of bundles of MTR fuel which can be charged to either the 6.1D or 6.4D dissolver were calculated based on varying the bundle immersion depth (44-60 in.), air sparge/purge flowrate (40-60 scfm), iodine reactor operating temperature (150-200 °C), and the percentage of the H₂ LFL which must not be exceeded (60-76%). Qualitatively, the percentage of the LFL had the largest influence on the maximum number of bundles which can be charged to a dissolver followed by the air sparge/purge flowrate, L-Bundle immersion depth, and the iodine reactor operating temperature. During the evaluation of each variable, the other variables were held at the baseline flowsheet conditions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Development of Innovative Measurement Techniques for Fission Product Transport Quantification

This document provides the progress of a research project at Texas A&M University (TAMU), led by Idaho National Laboratory (INL), in support of the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) program and work scope area of gas-cooled fast reactors. The VTR TAMU INL project started in October 2018. The document includes the main objectives of the project, scaling analysis applied to the experimental facilities, experimental methodology including instrumentation and techniques applied, and up-to-date results from the experimental and numerical studies.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Evaluation of the Dissolution Behavior of L-Bundle End Caps and HFIR Fuel Carriers

The H-Canyon facility is currently using the 6.1D dissolver for the dissolution of Material Test Reactor (MTR) fuel and the 6.4D dissolver for the dissolution of High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel using mercury-catalyzed HNO₃ dissolution flowsheets. The processing strategy for both dissolvers involves the dissolution of multiple charges of fuel per batch. After the designated heating cycle, the dissolvers are opened, and the charging wells are probed to determine if the MTR or HFIR fuel has dissolved. If undissolved fuel fragments are beyond a certain height, the dissolver must be closed and heated for an additional amount of time to dissolve the remaining material. In recent MTR fuel dissolutions, “high probes” (i.e., excessive undissolved material) were frequently observed, which resulted in extended dissolution times. The suspected cause of the high probes was the incomplete dissolution of the L-Bundle End Cap, rather than the fuel or fuel bundles. The End Cap is hypothesized to be binding in the insert well and not dropping into the acid as the L-Bundle and fuel dissolve. Once the End Cap is dislodged by the probe and drops into the acid, the dissolution rate of the End Cap appears to be significantly reduced compared to the dissolution rate of the fuel and other parts of the L-Bundle. A similar issue has also been observed with the lifting bail on the HFIR fuel carriers. During HFIR fuel dissolutions, the lifting bail on the outer carrier has resulted in high probes due to incomplete dissolution. In one case, a partially dissolved bail was caught in one of the insert well holes which prevented the probe from going to the bottom of the well.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Impact of MURR LEU Conversion on Beryllium Reflector Lifetime

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

As-Run Thermal Analysis for the CSM-10584 Experiment

The purpose of this document is to present the as-run specimen temperatures for the CSM-10584 experiment irradiated in position B-5 of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) for Cycles 164A and 164B.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Completion of Irradiation of Sensors in ATRC Milestone

This set of PowerPoint slides demonstrates how milestone "M2CT-21IN0702023: Perform test of neutron flux sensors in the Advanced Test Reactor Critical Facility". It supports an entry in PICS claiming achievement of the milestone. These slides provide a good summary of the purpose and impact of the milestone for our DOE Headquarters colleagues.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2020

Post-Irradiation Examinations of the ATF Experiments - 2020 Status

This report contains the results of post-irradiation examination (PIE) of both Accident Tolerant Fuels-1 (ATF-1) rodlets and ATF-2 rodlets irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). The experiment is part of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Technology Research and Development (NTRD) program’s Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC). The ATF-1 PIE focused on the continuation of the analyses of five rodlets, one containing U 3 Si 2 fuel, two containing UN-U 3 Si 5 composites, and two with UN-U 3 Si 2 composites. The non-destructive examinations of the U 3 Si 2 rodlet showed results comparable to the previously investigated rodlets. The profilometry of the UN-U 3 Si 2 composites highlighted permanent deformation of the cladding at the pellet-pellet interface, suggesting that hourglassing of the composite pellet occurred during irradiation, causing increased localized stresses on the Zirlo cladding tube due to Pellet-Cladding Mechanical Interaction (PCMI). The UN-U 3 Si 5 rodlets, which were contained in Kanthal cladding, did not show enhanced cladding deformation at the pellet interfaces; however, it is to be noted that the initial gap of these two rodlets was larger than typical light water reactor (LWR) gaps. The larger gap might have been sufficient to accommodate the fuel swelling without having contact between the fuel and cladding, explaining the absence of PCMI. Regarding the fission products, no axial redistribution of the major gamma emitters was observed in any of the composite rodlets. Fission gas measurements on the UN-U 3 Si 5 rodlets also has been performed. The estimated fission gas release, based on the calculated fission product inventory, remains limited, with a higher fission gas release for the rodlet that experienced a higher power.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Automated Internal Energy Calibration by OnTheFly for AGR-5/6/7

The software program, OnTheFly, was developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to keep high-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors energy calibrated during very long experiments. Over time, spectra produced from a HPGe detector will slowly stretch or contract, causing the energy calibration to change. If the energy calibration changes too much, it will cause energy lines to be misidentified. The higher the energy line the more affected they are by this change. OnTheFly tracks and adjusts the slowly changing energy calibrations so the energy lines will not be misidentified. OnTheFly was used with the Fission Product Monitoring System (FPMS) during the AGR-5/6/7 irradiation experiment performed at INL’s Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). Five HPGe detectors were used to monitor the five capsules in AGR-5/6/7. There were also two extra HPGe detectors that were maintained as spares. Before each ATR cycle of the experiment, the HPGe detectors were energy calibrated with a thorium radioactive source. During each ATR cycle, each detector would acquire data for 8 hours and then reset and acquire data for another 8 hours. After each 8-hour run, the spectra would be saved and analyzed autonomously. The results were then read by OnTheFly and used to produce a new energy calibration for each detector. The new energy calibrations were compared to the current energy calibrations and, if certain criteria were met, the new energy calibration would replace the current energy calibration. The new energy calibration would be used for future spectra. OnTheFly was run at least every couple of days but could be run as much as after each 8-hour run. OnTheFly kept the spectra energy calibrated during the ATR cycles over the 2 years and 5 months that the AGR-5/6/7 experiment ran.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2021

MITR Low-Enriched Uranium Conversion Fluid-Structure Interaction Preliminary Design Verification

The U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Material Management and Minimization (M 3 ) has developed and is pursuing an integrated approach to address the persistent threat posed by unintentional proliferation of nuclear materials. The NNSA M 3 approach reduces the risk of highly enriched uranium (HEU) and plutonium falling into the hands of non-state actors by minimizing the use of and, when possible, eliminating weapons-usable nuclear material around the world. In this geopolitical context, most research and test reactors, both domestic and international, have completed or started a program of conversion from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) as fuel. Conversion of civilian research reactors from HEU to LEU, and the return of the HEU to the country of origin, are important components of the NNSA non-proliferation program. Worldwide, 71 reactors have been converted to the use of LEU fuel, and an additional 32 have been confirmed to be permanently shut down. The U.S., with 20 reactor conversions, is among the 39 countries on six continents where conversions have occurred. With recent conversions in Ghana and Nigeria, an important milestone was reached in completing conversion of all reactors on the continent of Africa to LEU fuel. Africa thus becomes the third continent to have completed conversion of all HEU reactors to LEU, following Australia and South America

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2021

FY21 Status report on the CMVB and CNWG International Collaborations

The ART-GCR Methods area includes an international collaboration work package that covers the tasks defined for the Computational Methods Validation and Benchmark (CMVB)and Civil Nuclear Energy Research and Development Working Group (CNWG) projects. This report summarizes the status of the FY21 tasks and planned FY22 DOE contributions. The CMVB Project Arrangement (PA) is not yet formally approved by all signatories, and no work has therefore been performed in FY21 at INL related to this activity. The CNWG activities inFY21 consisted of the simulation of the High Temperature Test Reactor (HTTR) Loss Of Forced Cooling (LOFC) experimental with the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) codes Griffin, BISON and RELAP-7 based on the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE).It was found that the multiphysics coupled suite is capable of simulating all the important phenomena occurring during the Depressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (DLOFC) experiments showing promising agreement with the measurements given the number of uncertainties and approximations introduced into the model.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

VTR Casting Furnace Conceptual Design

This TEV describes the development of a conceptual design for a fuel casting system to be used in the development and demonstration of fuel designs for the new Versatile Test Reactor (VTR). This system will be installed in the Fuel Manufacturing Facility (FMF). The system will be in a shielded glovebox and will be used to melt fuel materials and injection cast these materials into fuel slugs, which will further be used to fabricate fuel elements for the VTR. This TEV covers only the injection casting system itself. Operations such as removing the castings from the injection molds, trimming of the castings, and installation of the castings into fuel element cladding are beyond the scope of the TEV. The conceptual design herein is principally concerned with the mechanical portion of the casting system and does not include details of the control or power supply systems.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Low-Cost Recyclable Oxygen Carrier and Novel Process for Chemical Looping Combustion

The University of North Dakota, through its Institute for Energy Studies and Energy & Environmental Research Center, partnered with Envergex LLC, Barr Engineering and Microbeam Technologies to develop a transformational enabling technology for advancement of Chemical Looping Combustion technology. Industrial support was provided by Carbontec Energy Corporation. The project targeted the two biggest challenges to chemical looping combustion: (1) High costs of oxygen carrier replacement/loss due to expensive manufacturing and high replacement rates from physical attrition and/or decrease in reactivity, and (2) Inherently slow fuel char conversion which represents the rate-limiting step for chemical looping combustion and results in very large equipment sizes, and overall lower carbon dioxide capture efficiency. The project activities were addressed in a series of seven tasks. Task 1 extended throughout the entire project and oversaw project management and execution. Task 2 and 3 focused on development and evaluation of the novel oxygen carrier. Task 4 to 7 focused on design of the novel reactor, testing with the novel oxygen carrier and a techno-economic assessment of the process. The list of tasks are: Task 1 – Project management and planning, Task 2 – Laboratory scale oxygen carrier manufacturing and assessment, Task 3 – Modeling and laboratory-scale evaluation of oxygen carrier performance with coal, Task 4 – 10-kilowatt thermal integrated system installation, Task 5 – Scaled-up oxygen carrier manufacturing, Task 6 – 10-kilowatt testing, and Task 7 – Process design and techno-economic analysis.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

DOE OSTI2022

FY22 Status Report on the ART-GCR CMVB and CNWG International Collaborations

This work presents the numerical model for the high temperature test reactor (HTTR) loss of forced cooling (LOFC) experiment with the INL codes Griffin, BISON, and RELAP-7, based on the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework. Promising results were obtained, with the overall behavior of the reactor successfully captured. Changes in the heat transfer coupling, as compared to the fiscal year (FY)-21 model, enabled drastic improvement of the steady-state solution, both in terms of computational time and global energy discrepancies. The former was reduced by a factor of roughly 60, whereas the latter decreased from 11% to less than 2%. Furthermore, the discrepancy in the steady-state multiplication factor was improved from +2,300 and +2,900 pcm (for the 30 and 9 MW cases) to -700 and +1,200 pcm, respectively, and now falls well within the large measurement uncertainties stemming from graphite impurities. Validation of the Monte Carlo model used to generate cross sections was also performed against available measurements. Though significant, the discrepancies remain acceptable overall in light of the large uncertainty. Numerous improvements are still needed to better compare with the experiment involving the 9 MW case and to instill greater confidence in the model’s ability to accurately predict the 30 MW behavior. Specifically, the power levels predicted by the 9 MW transient simulation following re-criticality remain low, pointing to an underestimation of the passive cooling of the core. A key aspect of future work will be to better understand the flow pattern during the LOFC event, particularly to determine if natural or forced convection is occurring inside the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). More generally, additional validation data would be immensely useful for further enhancing the numerical model and better matching the experiments. In addition, a more sophisticated thermal-hydraulics model that simulates all the channels as a single system model should be considered to take into account the rest of the primary loop. Finally, even if the results are in better agreement with the experiments, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification will be necessary to evaluate the model uncertainty.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Updated Reference VTR Core for CD-1

A preliminary reference core design was previously developed for the Versatile Test Reactor. The main features are that it is a 300 MW th sodium-cooled fast reactor using ternary metallic fuel U-20Pu-10Zr and able to achieve peak fast fluxes (E n > 0.1 MeV) in excess of 4.0x10 15 n/cm 2 -s. The plutonium in the fuel was assumed to be “reactor grade”, with a fissile quality of about 72% (i.e., 239 Pu and 241 Pu comprise 72% of the plutonium isotopes), and the uranium was assumed to be low-enriched uranium with 5% 235 U. This preliminary core design has been used through the CD-0 phase of the VTR project. Progression of the work after CD-0 led to revising, updating and refining the reference VTR core design, based on considerations from the various VTR teams: fuel, experiment, safety, and plant design teams. The objective of this report is to summarize the various changes made and details added to the model, to provide a description of the updated reference VTR core design and of its performance characteristics. This includes the traditional reactor physics characteristics, fuel cycle details, reactivity coefficients, temperature distributions, control rod worths and shutdown requirements. All of these define the updated “reference VTR core” intended to be used through CD-1.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Technical Evaluation of Accelerated Basin De-Inventory Material Addition to Sludge Batch 11

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions has a need to discard spent nuclear fuel (SNF), currently stored in L Basin, to the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) for vitrification. The Department of Energy (DOE) has approved the Accelerated Basin De-inventory (ABD) Program for discarding SNF via transfers from H-Canyon to the Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste (LW) system. The first ABD discards will occur during the preparation of Sludge Batch (SB) 11. An initial impact evaluation of the LW flowsheet was performed by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) prior to the approval of the ABD Program. This evaluation addressed the LW downstream facilities based on the current H-Canyon flowsheet sequence for the average ABD discard. The flowsheet evaluation only included aluminum-clad SNF, specifically Materials Test Reactor (MTR) fuel and High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel similar to the planned SB11 discard. Following this evaluation, the flowsheet has been slightly altered to address (i) new nuclear criticality safety controls for DWPF that credit a higher amount of gadolinium as a neutron poison for all of the enriched uranium contained in a SB and (ii) potential additions of the H-Canyon neutralized fuel stream prior to the Low Temperature Aluminum Dissolution (LTAD) process in Tank 51. The early introduction of ABD material into the SB assembly process is being investigated to provide flexibility regarding transfer opportunities for H-Canyon to Tank 51 for SB11 and future sludge batches.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

CFD-Chemical Model of One-Third Scale Demonstration of DOE Sealed Canister with ATR Fuel

Road-ready and final disposition packaging configurations for the advanced test reactor (ATR) fuel currently specifies storage within helium backfilled DOE sealed standard canisters. The aluminum cladding of the ATR fuel contains an oxyhydroxide layer of boehmite/bayerite that generates hydrogen when subjected to irradiation. Understanding the effect of this hydrogen buildup over time to important for long term storage considerations. Previous modeling efforts have built a coupled CFD-chemical model to simulate the temperature gas phase concentrations within the DOE sealed standard canisters. A demonstration case for these DOE sealed canisters will be eventually performed with a one-third scale mockup that has been instrumented with thermocouples and gas concentration probes. This study seeks to model the planned canister for validation of the previously developed model, such that confidence in its long-term prediction can be increased. The deployment of the instrumented lid for online monitoring in intended for a period of 10+ years based on previous monitoring of commercial fuel storage; however, the model is still run for the previously used 50-year storage periods. This case is modeled with a G-value using a bi-linear function such that it decreases at higher dose rates to be consistent with experiments. Validation efforts of the model would likely revolve around the results for the 1st year, so the results of this timeframe are also highlighted. For dried fuel of the nominal decay heat (18W), the predicted hydrogen concentration is 0.19% after 1 year, 0.91% after 10 years, and 2.8% after 50 years, with a maximum pressure of 1.26 atm. Consistent with previous modeling, the decay heat of the fuel is the main factor that influences the results. For undried fuel in pure helium, the hydrogen concentration ranges from 0.23 to 1.2% after 1 year, 1.25-6.2% after 10 years and 8.8 to 18.84% after 50 years. For dried fuel in pure helium the hydrogen concentration ranges from 0.06% to 0.34% after 1 year, 0.35-2.11% after 10 years and 0.95 to 6.6% after 50 years. While long-term results in the presence of residual air are mostly the same, early reactions with O 2 can delay significant production of H 2 until it is consumed to form more water vapor, lowering the range to 0.14 to 1.0% after 1 year. The maximum absolute pressure that is reached across any scenario is 2.06 atm. In the event of residual air, the presence of nitric acid is possible in the range of 18-131 ppm after 1 year, 174-1180 ppm after 10 years, and 586-3500 ppm after 50 years. As long as the fuel is sufficiently dried, or of nominal decay heat, a 4% lower flammability limit of hydrogen will not be reached within a 10-year monitoring period.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Milestone 1.2.11: H 2 Production from Surrogate Non-Native Corrosion Plumes on Aluminum 6061-T6 Fuel Cladding Surrogates

Thick, localized, “non-native” corrosion plumes have been identified on Advanced Test Reactor fuel elements, raising concern on their impact on the radiolytic formation of molecular hydrogen gas (H 2 ) from aluminum-clad spent nuclear fuel (ASNF) under proposed extended (> 50 years) dry storage conditions. Here, we report our findings on H 2 generation from the gamma irradiation (up to 52 MGy) of surrogate “non-native” corrosion plume coupons: ambient-temperature-corroded (~350 days in water) aluminum alloy 6061 (AA6061) coupons in helium gas environments with ~0% added relative humidity. Additionally, we provide a comparison of proposed ASNF drying techniques— vacuum drying only, vacuum drying + 100 °C for 4 hr, and vacuum drying + 220 °C for 4 hr—on the yield of H 2 from these surrogate systems. The presented data indicates that similar amounts of H 2 (~2 × 10–3 µmol J–1) are formed from gamma irradiated AA6061 coupons corroded under different temperature regimes, i.e., ambient/350 days vs. 90 C/30 days. These findings validate current, complimentary modelling predictions based on high-temperature-corrosion irradiation data only. Further, the application of a heat treatment procedure (100 and 220 °C), in conjunction with vacuum drying, accelerated the rate at which a steady-state H 2 yield was attained, in comparison to vacuum only, due to the removal of H 2 precursors in the form of adsorbed waters. Interestingly, within the confidence limits of our measurements, negligible difference in total H 2 yield was found between the two investigated heat treatment procedures.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗