Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “WASTES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38

Using Robotic Manipulators for Radioactive Waste Inspection - 20090

The global nuclear industry has a growing volume of nuclear waste which needs to be scanned, sorted according to its activity and material type, then processed into the correct waste packages for long term storage and disposal. It is vital that there is a detailed understanding of the waste inventory stored in long term waste containers, as knowledge of their contents could predict or prevent any adverse effects in storage. The numerous 'scan and sort' tables which are currently used at many different facilities around the world to sort waste into their correct containers are human operated and require very slow gamma scanning procedures combined with educated guesswork to manually sort the waste. This often leads to excessive conservatisms, with placement of lower activity wastes in higher activity containers, which in turn costs significantly more to store. In the United Kingdom it costs UK Pounds 46 k per cubic meter to store intermediate level waste compared to just UK Pound 2.9 k per cubic meter to store low level waste according to a 2008 Department of Energy and Climate Change report in the UK. A proposed solution to this problem, is the use of a robotic manipulator to automatically inspect the 'scan and sort table' in order to produce an accurate 3D model of the table's waste contents and attach an overlaid radiation map. The radiation map contains spectrometry data and can in consequence be used to distinguish and locate specific radioisotopes. The 3D model should be as accurate as possible in order to allow for a second robot arm with an attached gripper to grasp the objects and place them into their designated long-term storage container. Various scanning procedures are explored in this study including basic raster scanning, adaptive raster scanning and point sampling. The optimal solution will in practice be defined by the required application and activity level of the wastes being inspected. The results presented in this study indicate that it is possible to produce a centimeter accurate 3D model of a mixed assortment of components on a nuclear waste 'scan and sort' table. In addition, it was shown that the waste objects emitting radiation could be accurately identified and located, with an overlaid radiation map. This study is applicable across the nuclear waste management sector. Many of the ideas and concepts developed in this study are applicable in other decommissioning settings for example, dismantling of legacy gloveboxes or routine inspection of nuclear waste packages in storage. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Development of a Waste Management Organization for the Whiteshell Laboratories Closure Project - 18317

Whiteshell Laboratories (WL) has been generating and managing radioactive waste for over fifty years in support of a wide variety of research and operational applications. The current mission of the WL site, located in Manitoba, Canada, is to fully decommission the site to an approved end-state criterion and to disposition the waste in compliance with national and provincial regulations. To expedite the decommissioning schedule from over thirty years to nine years, which was a contractual commitment for the site operating company, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL), it became apparent that a centralized and optimized organization be established to coordinate all waste management activities and to fulfill the mission to process, condition, transport and disposition all radioactive wastes, which include Low-Level Waste (LLW), Intermediate-Level Waste (ILW) and High-Level Waste (HLW). The WL Waste Management Division was effectively established as a two-person operation in 2016 and has rapidly expanded to fulfill the mandate of managing nearly 30,000 cubic meters of LLW, ILW and HLW. This paper outlines the early lessons learned from managing important organizational changes without disrupting ongoing work practices; developing executive-level waste management strategies based on options studies and cost-benefit analysis comparisons; selection of storage vs. disposal disposition strategies; evaluation and selection of transportation methods and packages for LLW, ILW and HLW; and the need to develop an entire suite of programmatic documentation and procedures to support and instill a strong conduct of operations culture. The waste management strategy, which now focuses on transporting the waste to another province (Ontario) in a disposal ready form, represents the first large-scale radioactive waste transportation campaign in Canada that includes all three classes of waste. This paper provides additional insight on the overall waste management strategies for the WL Closure Project. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

A Decade of Innovative Approaches to Treating and Dispositioning Radioactive Waste at the Savannah River Site - 20620

This year marks the 70. anniversary of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS), located near Aiken, South Carolina. SRS is a key industrial complex responsible for environmental stewardship, environmental cleanup, waste management, and disposition of nuclear materials. SRS also continues to have a role in critical defense-related activities and the reprocessing of used reactor fuel. The SRS encompasses 803 square kilometers (310 square miles) in parts of Aiken, Barnwell, and Allendale counties. The Liquid Waste Mission starts with the safe receipt and storage of radioactive liquid waste in the waste tanks, which principally includes Cold War legacy waste, but also waste from support of National Aeronautics Space Administration missions, medical isotope production, and research activities. This 133,000 cubic meters (m{sup 3}) (35 million gallons [Mgal]) of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) is currently held in 43 large underground waste tanks. The capacity of each of these tanks range from 2,800 m{sup 3} to 5,000 m{sup 3} (0.75 to 1.33 Mgal) and were placed in operation between 1954 and 1986. In July 2009, the DOE awarded a stand-alone contract to execute the Liquid Waste Mission at SRS. The Liquid Waste Contractor selected was Savannah River Remediation LLC1 (SRR), which is responsible for receipt, storage, retrieval and treatment of all HLW, disposal of the decontaminated low-activity waste fraction, as well as operationally closing cleaned HLW tanks. Since July 2009, SRR has successfully grouted and operationally closed six large underground tanks, poured 1,476 canisters of vitrified HLW (a stable glass waste form), treated approximately 34,200 m{sup 3} (9.0 Mgal) of HLW, and dispositioned over 41,200 m{sup 3} (10.9 Mgal) of decontaminated salt solution as low-level waste (LLW) into the Saltstone Disposal Units (SDUs) being constructed by SRR on site. The innovative work performed by SRR in the LLW portion of its mission has earned it the Richard S. Hodes Award. The work conducted by SRR is the same work championed by the late Richard S. Hodes, a respected physician, statesmen, and Chairman of the Southeast Compact Commission for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Remote Handled Hot Cell Facility and Other Research Transuranic Waste (Debris)

This acceptable knowledge (AK) Summary Report has been prepared for the Central Characterization Program (CCP) for remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste generated and managed by Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The waste described in this report was predominately generated in the SNL/NM Hot Cell Facility (HCF) during the removal and packaging of experimental material and decontamination operations in Building 6580 at Technical Area (TA)-V. The waste stream also includes a very small amount of waste (estimated at less than 1 gram of fuel similar to that used for research at the HCF) originating from classified research at TA-I. In addition, the waste also includes secondary waste termed by SNL/NM as process generated waste (PGW), created during repackaging operations for this waste at the Auxiliary Hot Cell Facility (AHCF). The waste has been stored at the Sandia Pulsed Reactor (SPR) Dense Pack Storage Facility within TA-V or the Manzano Bunkers located at Manzano Base within Kirtland Air Force Base. All of the waste is being repackaged at the AHCF. This report was prepared in accordance with CCP-TP-005, CCP Acceptable Knowledge Documentation (Reference 1), to implement the AK requirements of DOE/WIPP-02-3214, Remote-Handled TRU Waste Characterization Program Implementation Plan (WCPIP) (Reference 2); Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, Waste Analysis Plan (WIPP-WAP) (Reference 3); and DOE/WIPP-02-3122, Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP-WAC) (Reference 4).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Waste Management Approach for a Potential Future U.S. Closed Fuel Cycle - 16233

The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy has chartered an effort to develop technologies to enable safe and cost effective recycle of commercial used nuclear fuel (UNF) in the U.S. Part of this effort includes the evaluation of exiting waste management technologies for effective treatment of wastes in the context of current U.S. regulations and development of waste forms and processes with significant cost and/or performance benefits over those existing. This study summarizes the results of these ongoing efforts with a focus on the highly radioactive primary waste streams. The primary streams considered and the recommended waste forms include: •Tritium separated from either a low volume gas stream or a high volume water stream. The recommended waste form is low-water cement in high integrity containers. •Iodine-129 separated from off-gas streams in aqueous processing. There are a range of potentially suitable waste forms. As a reference case, a glass composite material (GCM) formed by the encapsulation of the silver Mordenite (AgZ) getter material in a low-temperature glass is assumed. A number of alternatives with distinct advantages are also considered including a fused silica waste form with encapsulated nano-sized AgI crystals. •Carbon-14 separated from LWR fuel treatment off-gases and immobilized as a CaCO3 in a cement waste form. •Krypton-85 separated from LWR and SFR fuel treatment off-gases and stored as a compressed gas. •An aqueous reprocessing high-level waste (HLW) raffinate waste which is immobilized by the vitrification process in one of three forms: a single phase borosilicate glass, a borosilicate based glass ceramic, or a multi-phased titanate ceramic [e.g., synthetic rock (Synroc)]. •An undissolved solids (UDS) fraction from aqueous reprocessing of LWR fuel that is either included in the borosilicate HLW glass or is immobilized in the form of a metal alloy in the case of glass ceramics or titanate ceramics. •Zirconium-based LWR fuel cladding hulls and stainless steel (SS) fuel assembly hardware that are washed and super-compacted for disposal or as an alternative Zr purification and reuse (or disposal as low-level waste, LLW) by reactive gas separations. •Electrochemical process salt HLW which is immobilized in a glass bonded Sodalite waste form known as the ceramic waste form (CWF). •Electrochemical process UDS and SS cladding hulls which are melted into an iron based alloy waste form. Mass and volume estimates for each of the recommended waste forms based on the source terms from a representative flowsheet are reported.

Fuel Cycle↗

Production patterns of packaging waste categories generated at typical Mediterranean residential building worksites

Highlights: • On-site segregation level: 1.80%; training and motivation strategies were not effective. • 70% Cardboard waste: from switches and sockets during the building services stage. • 40% Plastic waste: generated during structures and partition works due to palletizing. • >50% Wood packaging waste, basically pallets, generated during the envelope works. - Abstract: The construction sector is responsible for around 28% of the total waste volume generated in Europe, which exceeds the amount of household waste. This has led to an increase of different research studies focusing on construction waste quantification. However, within the research studies made, packaging waste has been analyzed to a limited extent. This article focuses on the packaging waste stream generated in the construction sector. To this purpose current on-site waste packaging management has been assessed by monitoring ten Mediterranean residential building works. The findings of the experimental data collection revealed that the incentive measures implemented by the construction company to improve on-site waste sorting failed to achieve the intended purpose, showing low segregation ratios. Subsequently, through an analytical study the generation patterns for packaging waste are established, leading to the identification of the prevailing kinds of packaging and the products responsible for their generation. Results indicate that plastic waste generation maintains a constant trend throughout the whole construction process, while cardboard becomes predominant towards the end of the construction works with switches and sockets from the electricity stage. Understanding the production patterns of packaging waste will be beneficial for adapting waste management strategies to the identified patterns for the specific nature of packaging waste within the context of construction worksites.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Natural and Engineered Features Supporting Environmental Performance of Idaho National Laboratory’s Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility

The Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL’s) Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste (RH LLW) Disposal Facility has been designed and constructed to receive waste generated at the INL site in support of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) and Naval Reactors (NR) missions. The facility has been designed to receive legacy RH LLW currently in storage at INL facilities and new waste generated by nuclear research programs. RH LLW to be received at the facility is solid waste consisting of surface contaminated debris; ion exchange resins used to purify cooling and canal water; activated metals generated during reactor core change outs and Naval spent fuel management; and nuclear Research & Development. Disposal of INL's RH LLW poses unique disposal challenges due to high radiation levels (contact rates up to 600 Sv/hr [60,000 Rem/hr]) that require remote handling and adequate shielding for transportation and disposal. The facility has been designed to meet the requirements of DOE Order 435.1 [1], including the all-pathways dose, air pathway dose, inadvertent intruder doses, and radon emissions limits. This paper presents an overview of natural and engineered design features that support the safety case and enhance the environmental performance of the facility. These include location selection, use of reinforced pre-cast concrete vaults; a robust hydraulic drainage system; use of steel waste canisters for waste disposal; the facility monitoring system; facility layout; and crediting waste forms. The facility performance assessment (PA) [2] developed to meet the requirements of DOE Order 435.1 “Radioactive Waste Management” credits each of these protective features. Releases from waste forms disposed of at this facility are limited by corrosion of the steel waste canisters which will ultimately allow contact with infiltrating water followed by transport of radionuclides from the vault system. The steel waste canisters were credited for their ability to limit water contact with the waste based on the demonstrated ability of the reinforced pre-caste concrete vaults to provide long-term structural protection of the steel waste canisters. Verification of hydraulic and concrete performance was conducted through laboratory data, field infiltration tests supported by a robust monitoring system, and numerical modeling. Releases into the vault system from activated metals are based on site-specific corrosion data. Radionuclide transport from the vault system from all waste forms is based on site-specific climatological, hydrologic, and stratigraphic data. At INL, the groundwater pathway historically and appropriately has received the most attention. By crediting aspects of the natural system, the engineered vault system, and the waste, estimated radiologic doses via the groundwater pathway are minimal. Air pathway doses were reduced by differentially crediting corrosion of aluminum and stainless steel activated metals resulting in the pathway being screened out of the PA. Groundwater and inadvertent intruder doses were reduced through selective facility layout. This paper provides an overview of the system-wide protective features incorporated into the facility design along with an extensive reference list to supporting technical papers and analyses that provide data and interpretation.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Nuclear aircraft carrier inactivation - Execution of waste management initiatives - 15565

After 6 years of planning efforts, in June 2013, Newport News Shipbuilding (NNS) began the execution phase of the inactivation of the USS Enterprise. The USS Enterprise decommissioning involves implementation of a new approach to defueling aircraft carriers, utilizing new processes for defueling and shipment of spent nuclear fuel and waste. During planning for this complex endeavor, NNS developed several process improvement initiatives including streamlining waste management processes and technology insertion using modeling and simulation (M and S) capabilities. One of the new approaches involves the establishment of a Waste Packaging Area (WPA) onboard the ship. The process assists with maximizing waste loading and shipments directly from the ship. Another waste management initiative includes the NNS/ Waste Vendor teaming effort to facilitate more efficient loading and shipment of inactivation waste. With execution underway, these initiatives are being put to the test to see if they can withstand the rigors of day-to-day production. NNS has implemented the use of the Modeling and Simulation (M and S) technology. During the planning phase, the M and S 3D Spatial Arrangement Tool was utilized to determine the optimal equipment layout within the new M-290 facility used for spent fuel packaging and ship-out and to determine the appropriate shipping container placement on the ship to maximize waste loading. The M and S technology proved to be a beneficial application resulting in continued utilization through the execution phase of the carrier inactivation. NNS is currently expanding the M-290 Facility Model to provide a visual representation of the facility, its processes, resources, and variable parameters that can be utilized as a decision support tool through simulation of the spent fuel packaging and ship-out process through the facility's life-cycle. NNS is also expanding the application of the waste management model to effectively predict waste forecast. The simulation model is linked with the defueling schedule which captures the operational elements of the waste flow process. The model extrapolates the data to provide waste generation output to assess the most efficient and cost effective path for radiological waste shipments offsite. The ability to conduct waste forecasting allows streamlining of the waste management process in support of complex defueling operations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Addressing the Legacy Waste Challenge - IAEA Activities in Support of Member States - 16304

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) promotes the safe and peaceful uses of nuclear energy including the safe management of radioactive waste. Although safe and effective radioactive waste processing technologies and practices are well established and widespread, the issue of legacy waste remains a challenge for many IAEA member states. The primary source of the world-wide legacy waste inventory has its origins in past nuclear weapons programs and associated research and development activities. Other sources include historical waste in old storage and disposal facilities that were either never intended to be a permanent end-state or are no longer considered adequate from a safety perspective. Additionally, many IAEA member states with less advanced nuclear energy programs, often have small inventories of legacy radioactive waste arising from medical, research and industrial activities but lack the processing capabilities to put these wastes into a safe form for storage and disposal. These wastes have the potential to create a safety and environmental hazard and pose a radioactive waste management challenge for many reasons including lack of characterization data and process knowledge, waste package degradation, or the presence of hazardous or mixed waste components. The Waste Technology Section (WTS) within the Department of Nuclear Energy at the IAEA has an extensive program of activities to support the safe retrieval, processing, storage and disposal of radioactive waste including legacy waste. These include publications, co-ordinated research projects, technical co-operation activities, and information exchange forums including workshops, technical meetings and virtual networks. This paper will present an overview of recent IAEA activities and accomplishments aimed as assisting member states with addressing their legacy waste inventories. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Roll Compaction of Powdered Radioactive Wastes - 18251

Most of low- and intermediate-level radioactive wastes must be solidified by a proper binding matrix and disposed at the centralized disposal site. So it is desirable to achieve a high loading of radwastes in a drum to reduce the disposal fee while meeting both the national regulations and the waste acceptance criteria of the disposal site. In general, the radioactive wastes (liquid, dried powder and sludge) were solidified by mixing with a proper binding matrix (cement, polymer, asphalt, etc.), but their solidified volume inevitably increases due to the limitation of incorporating of radwaste into a binding matrix. To solve this problem, some Korean NPPs operate both a CTS (Concentrate Treatment System, evaporation and granulation) and a polymer solidification system. The size distribution of granulated wastes produced by CTS is so broad (diameter; several μm ∼ several cm) that a polymer cannot impregnate the void space between particles due to their small size. However, if the powdered radwaste can be compacted into high density pellets, and the pellets can be loaded in a drum with maximum waste loading, then the binding matrix can fill the void between pellets, it might be more desirable to keep the size distribution of pellets constant to reduce the solidified waste volume. This compaction methodology can greatly reduce the disposal fee due to the reduction of the solidified waste volume, and can facilitate polymer solidification due to the constant size of the radwaste pellets. This methodology is also applicable to solidify powdered wastes such a depleted uranium used as a catalyst, ash and sludge. Loading radwaste compacted with bentonite pellets versus particles into a container serves, as an engineered or natural barrier in a deep geologic disposal system. Roll compaction is a typical agglomeration process for dry powders and depends on the device parameters and the material properties. This study, firstly, was focused on the design of roll compactor (briquetting machine), the shape and size of pellet, and secondly the loading method of pellets into a drum, their solidification in polymer, and evaluating the overall volume reduction. We used bentonite (particle size; 85 ∼ 100 μm) as a material to be compacted instead of radwaste powders (concentrates and depleted uranium wastes) without the addition of agglomeration agents. In the design of roll, we considered the diameter (200 mm) and width (41 mm) of roll, two types of pocket shapes (< 9 mm, 0.275 ml), and the surface of the pocket. Fig. 2 shows two pellet shapes, tetragonal and circular. The pressure of roll compactor, one of the main process variables, is > 320 kg f/cm{sup 2}, and the roll gap is 0.5 mm. The powders are compacted in a compaction zone between two counter-rotating rolls according to the complicated mechanisms. As a result of the state and the apparent density of the pellets obtained by changing the pressure from 0 to 286 kg f/cm{sup 2}, the pellets were unstable at pressure=0, but above 148 kg f/cm{sup 2} the pellets were more stable, and the apparent density of the pellets was 2.63 g/cm{sup 3} at 148 kg f/cm{sup 3}, and 2.68 g/cm{sup 3} at 286 kg f/cm{sup 2}. The roller speed (rpm) can determine the capacity (kg/h) of a compactor, and depends on both the compaction pressure and the feeding rate. By increasing the roll speed from 2 to 4 rpm, the apparent density of pellets was decreased gradually from 2.74 g/cm{sup 3} to 1.45 g/cm{sup 3}. We designed the special feeding system in order to feed powders uniformly to the roll gripping zone and to supply powders into the narrowest part of the roll gap. At a constant roll speed (3 rpm) and a constant compaction pressure (286 kg f/cm{sup 2}), the apparent density of the pellets was linearly proportional to the feeding rate from 2.18 to 2.74 g/cm{sup 3} by changing the feeding rate of powders from 8 to 12 rpm. In the polymer solidification of the obtained pellets, we used epoxy resin as a solidification agent, and showed their solidified waste forms in Fig. 5. The incorporation ratio (wt.%) of powders/polymer was about 71.7/28.3 in tetragonal pellets, 71.9/28.1 in circular pellets. We calculated the volume reduction in an aspect of powders itself and the solidified waste form. In powder case, through the comparison of the apparent density of the obtained pellets (2.74 g/cm{sup 3}) and raw powders (0.93 g/cm{sup 3}), the volume reduction was calculated as about 2.74/0.93 = 2.95 times. This means that powders can be compacted to 1/2.95 times. And in waste form case, the weight ratio of powder/polymer in a mixing method (workable) and a compaction method is about 0.42, 2.56, individually. Therefore the volume reduction was calculated as about 2.56/0.42 = 6.01 times. We found a compaction methodology for the volume reduction of powdered radioactive wastes, and their polymer solidification will be more effective to reduce the volume of radwastes to be disposed. After a characterization of the solidified waste form incorporated pellets (including sintered pellets), this methodology will be applied to treat depleted uranium wastes used as catalyst, and to solve the problem of NPPs' polymer solidification system, as mentioned above. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Effects of Blending and In-Tank Pretreatment on Direct Feed Hanford High Level Waste Vitrification - 18434

A direct feed high level waste (DFHLW) option is under consideration for early operations of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). In this option, the Pretreatment Facility would be bypassed in order to support an earlier start-up of the HLW Vitrification Facility. For HLW, this would mean that ultrafiltration and caustic leaching that would otherwise have been performed either would not be performed or would be replaced by interim pretreatment functions such as in-tank washings. These changes could result in higher aluminum contents, higher chromium contents, higher fractions of supernate, and lower solids contents in the HLW feed. As a result, glass formulations and downstream vitrification operations will be impacted. In the present work, we investigate the effects of various waste blending and in-tank pretreatment scenarios on DFHLW glass waste loadings, canister counts, and processing rates. Eleven source tanks and five waste groups were selected for the studies of waste blending. In addition, the five waste groups selected were the subjects of an in-tank pretreatment study. Glass property-composition models and melter test data were used to calculate waste loadings, canister counts, processing rates, and treatment durations for a range of DFHLW scenarios. The processing scenarios were defined by the types of waste blending and in-tank pretreatment that were assumed. Blending cases were evaluated that ranged between the 'No Blend' and 'Total Blend' extremes and included pairwise blending (blending of two source tanks, either completely or in various proportions) and macro-batches formed from various combinations of the source tanks. Over 36,000 possible pairwise blending scenarios were evaluated and an optimal retrieval/blending sequence was identified. The waste loading of this optimal sequence is within 0.03 wt% of the 'Total Blend' case. Further, a total of 38 retrieval sequences were identified that have waste loadings within 0.1 wt% of the 'Total Blend' case. To evaluate the effects of in-tank pretreatment, an in-tank wash/settle/decant process was assumed and tank-specific wash factors were employed. Washing of the macro-batch blends gave a general increase in HLW loading, decrease in canister count, and decrease in glass yield. Glass yields are towards the low end of the values expected for the WTP, which could lead to lower than nominal glass production rates. The waste loading increases and canister count reductions with washing were small for two of the wastes indicating that direct treatment of the unwashed waste may be practical. For wastes that are relatively low in sulfate and halides, excessive washing is counterproductive. The results highlight the importance of maintaining high solids content in the HLW feed to maintain glass production rates. The results also illustrate that the optimum washing strategy will need to be evaluated on a tank-to-tank basis. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Enhanced Evaluation Criteria to Meet the WIPP Waste Acceptance Criteria - 18655

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is a deep geologic repository for the disposal of Transuranic (TRU) waste and the only such disposal facility of its kind. TRU waste is radioactive mixed waste generated by the U. S. Department of Energy in support of National Defense. In 2014, the WIPP facility was shut down when two separate accidents occurred in the repository. The two accidents were a fire on a large underground haul truck that prompted evacuation and filled the mine with smoke and soot, and a radiation release that contaminated the exhaust ventilation and disposal areas of the mine. DOE performed two accident investigations in 2014 that resulted in many corrective actions. Some of the corrective actions resulted in significant changes in the WIPP Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) and are required to be applied to all TRU waste upon the resumption of shipments to WIPP. WIPP re-opened and began taking shipments again in 2017 and a large backlog of over 25,000 TRU waste containers that were certified prior to the new WAC have been undergoing re-evaluation since the re-opening. This paper will focus on the new WAC criteria that TRU waste must meet above-and-beyond previous WAC criteria and the implementation of new processes for approval. The primary area for these changes is in the area of waste characterization using Acceptable Knowledge (AK) and new detailed analyses required for chemical compatibility. The accident investigation revealed that the radiation release was due to a thermal runaway and bursting of the waste container due to inadvertent mixtures of nitrates and combustibles resulting in ignitable waste forms. In other words, the TRU waste container had incompatible contents that went undiscovered and created a hazard characteristic that was prohibited at WIPP. Through detailed chemical compatibility evaluations and new oversight, the DOE should be able to prevent a similar accident (see Figure 1). The new chemical compatibility evaluations and evaluations of oxidizing chemicals combined with combustibles are complex and detailed. Chemical compatibility is not a new requirement, but a much more detailed evaluation is a new requirement. And, obtaining historical information about the generation of the final waste form for legacy packaged waste can be very challenging. Specifically, determining possible amounts of chemicals in the waste can be extremely challenging. This paper does not explore in depth, the details of oxidizing chemicals. Other papers presented will discuss oxidizing chemicals. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

A Study on Establishment of Scenario Considering to Location and Treatment for Waste Tracking System

Radioactive waste of domestic generated KAERI, KHNP and KNFC etc. Agency of radioactive waste generation have each waste tracking system and waste streaming. We need to establish integrated waste classification for waste tracking and management efficiency. This study main point is the integration of radioactive waste classification and the cording of domestic generators, waste disposal site, etc. We also created a scenario through this coding. First, This study was able to identify the status of domestic radioactive Waste Tracking System. Second, through this study, WTS scenarios were prepared by analyzing each waste management agency and transportation report. If WTS scenario establish from integration of waste streaming, it will be possible tracking, back tracking and management of radioactive waste more efficiency. Third, This study coded all the sources of radioactive waste generators, acceptor agency, waste classification and treatment. Using this code, we tracking the scenario from generator to acceptor and display it as bar-code. Also, if we later convert this bar-code to a Qr-code, it thought that it will be easier tracking radioactive waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Transporting Non-Compliant TRU Wastes in the OPTIMUS{sup TM} Packages - 20493

The OPTIMUS{sup TM} product line of packages was developed with the purpose of providing a versatile and modular packaging option for shipping problematic wastes and fissile material contents. The product line includes a high-activity design in the OPTIMUS-H and a low activity design in the OPTIMUS-L. The two variants utilize a singular containment vessel design, that is enclosed in different protective components that offer different levels of shielding along with thermal and impact protection. The thick shielding provided by the OPTIMUS-H packaging allows for higher activity contents than the OPTIMUS-L to be transported. But the lightweight design of the OPTIMUS-L packaging allows for more packages to be transported in a single shipment. The containment vessel design shared between the two packages provides leak-tight containment of all radioactive contents along with the capabilities to easily leak test and the option to inert and backfill the contents, as necessary, prior to each shipment of the package. Together the OPTIMUS package designs offer significant flexibility and are capable of handling a wide variety of waste materials and other radioactive contents. One of the primary contents covered in the initial design effort for these packages is TRU waste contents beyond the standard waste materials that are compliant with the WIPP Waste Acceptance Criteria. More specifically, the initial content of interest is TRU Waste drums containing sealed containers with potentially flammable gases. While there are multiple other packaging options available for transporting standard WIPP compliant TRU wastes, the goal of the OPTIMUS packages is to offer a superior option for transporting both standard TRU wastes as well as the more problematic non-compliant wastes, among other contents. The non-compliant TRU waste contents explicitly included for the OPTIMUS packages are standard aerosol cans and DOT 3E lecture bottles. However, the methods applied for the package containment can be easily adjusted to cover other sealed container types with potentially flammable gases. The primary challenges with including these items are both the obvious issue of potential for flammable gases (e.g. aerosol propellants) in the package, but also the uncertainty in the exact state of the contents. Because these desired contents are waste materials, the characterization of the materials present in the waste may include some uncertainties. For example, though it may be known that there are one or more aerosol cans in a TRU waste drum, it may not be known if this can is full, spent, or anywhere in between. Also there may be equal uncertainty in the contents of the aerosol can, specifically in the potentially flammable propellant remaining in the can. To include these types of non-compliant items as acceptable contents for the package, the methods utilized in the safety analyses of the OPTIMUS packages must consider all of the uncertainties in the characterization of the waste. The methods utilized cover a range of concerns with transporting contents of this nature including pressure buildup, gas generation, and gaseous combustion for demonstrating the containment of the package. The ability to transport these problematic contents in the OPTIMUS packages gives TRU waste generating sites the option to relocate these drums to an offsite location where the non-compliant items can be properly managed through removal or destruction. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Trace element partitioning in ashes from boilers firing pure wood or mixtures of solid waste with respect to fuel composition, chlorine content and temperature

Highlights: • Different solids waste incineration is discussed in grate fired and fluidized bed boilers. • We explained waste composition, temperature and chlorine effects on metal partitioning. • Excessive chlorine content can change oxide to chloride equilibrium partitioning the trace elements in fly ash. • Volatility increases with temperature due to increase in vapor pressure of metals and compounds. • In Fluidized bed boiler, most metals find themselves in fly ash, especially for wood incineration. - Abstract: Trace element partitioning in solid waste (household waste, industrial waste, waste wood chips and waste mixtures) incineration residues was investigated. Samples of fly ash and bottom ash were collected from six incineration facilities across Sweden including two grate fired and four fluidized bed incinerators, to have a variation in the input fuel composition (from pure biofuel to mixture of waste) and different temperature boiler conditions. As trace element concentrations in the input waste at the same facilities have already been analyzed, the present study focuses on the concentration of trace elements in the waste fuel, their distribution in the incineration residues with respect to chlorine content of waste and combustion temperature. Results indicate that Zn, Cu and Pb are dominating trace elements in the waste fuel. Highly volatile elements mercury and cadmium are mainly found in fly ash in all cases; 2/3 of lead also end up in fly ash while Zn, As and Sb show a large variation in distribution with most of them residing in the fly ash. Lithophilic elements such as copper and chromium are mainly found in bottom ash from grate fired facilities while partition mostly into fly ash from fluidized bed incinerators, especially for plants fuelled by waste wood or ordinary wood chips. There is no specific correlation between input concentration of an element in the waste fuel and fraction partitioned to fly ash. Temperature and chlorine content have significant effects on partitioning characteristics by increasing the formation and vaporization of highly volatile metal chlorides. Zinc and cadmium concentrations in fly ash increase with the incineration temperature.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Arvia organics destruction: an innovative treatment approach for dioxins, furans and other problematic (Orphan) organic wastes - 15380

The safe and efficient disposal of radionuclide-contaminated organic wastes is a key component in the life-cycle of a nuclear power plant. Technologies are available for the processing of some of these wastes although there are a number of waste streams for which the disposition path is not clear or does not exist at all. For example, waste streams such as dioxin, furan and PCB-laden oils pose an issue for the US Dept. of Energy complex. These wastes present a challenge as they cannot be readily treated using existing treatment technologies because of legislative and material constraints such as gaseous phase radioactivity discharge limits, waste elemental content, by-product generation and waste resistance to thermal decomposition. Alternate methods of organics destruction can circumvent some of these issues by using different mechanisms of organics oxidation. One such innovative method, known as the Arvia organics destruction process, combines adsorption with electrochemical combustion and offers such an alternative. This technology, based on a patented material, Nyex{sup TM} that is able to act as both an adsorbent and as an electrode, allows the electrochemical combustion of adsorbed organics to occur on the material's surface. The result is the destruction of organics whilst the bulk of inorganic and radionuclide components remain in the aqueous phase. These components can subsequently be treated using existing waste processing technologies. This paper outlines recent work conducted on demonstrating the Arvia process against the destruction of dioxin, furan and PCB-laden wastes that demonstrates that the technology successfully removes these target species to below discharge standards in the aqueous phase. Based on these successful trials a test unit has been designed to demonstrate the process on actual radioactive wastes at the DOE Oak Ridge facility. The successful treatment of F027-coded waste has also been demonstrated and will be reported. The above work showcases the development, scaling and application of an innovative technology, first presented to the industry at the Waste Management Symposia in 2012, as another option for the treatment of challenging wastes with expensive, complex or no current disposal routes. The Arvia process adds to the portfolio of available treatment technologies and will help facilitate the decommissioning and waste disposal responsibilities of the nuclear industry. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

German research and development for high level waste in light of the new site selection process - 15516

The German government decided 50 years ago, that radioactive waste is to be disposed of in Deep Geologic Repositories, preferably in a salt rock formation. Soon after, in 1967, research in the Asse salt mine was initiated. Since then substantial progress has been achieved in the development of the radioactive waste disposal programme in Germany. For a geologic repository for High Level Waste in salt a reference concept has been developed, which represented the radioactive waste management processes from transport of High Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel to an interim storage site, waste conditioning and repackaging for disposal, to emplacement of the waste packages. The feasibility of the reference concept has been proven by demonstration tests for all relevant equipment: a pilot conditioning plant has been built as well as the main equipment for the entire transport chain including the shaft transport and emplacement technologies for heavy loads fulfilling strict requirements for nuclear and mining safety. Also the backfilling technology has been optimised for the purposes of a repository for radioactive waste. Finally, tests have been performed to verify thermo-mechanical models for the host rock. The demonstration tests have been performed to an extent which even would allow immediate licensing of the repository and the employed equipment. The Research and Development work was completed by further optimisation of the reference concept. Construction and operation of deep geologic repositories for low and intermediate level radioactive wastes in Germany benefited from the above mentioned but also stimulated the knowledge and experience build-up for the repositories for High Level Waste. Despite the well progressed work for a deep geologic repository in salt R and D work in Germany for already a long time also considered other host rock formations. While work for crystalline rock mainly consisted of relatively small contributions to international research projects due to the limited occurrence of suitable sites in Germany, projects and developments for repositories in clay formations have had an increasing contribution to the overall Research and Development work for radioactive waste repositories in Germany. In July 2013 a new site selection act was put into force, which set the initiating conditions for the German programme on radioactive waste management. Principally, a process was initiated to search for a site for a deep geologic repository for High Level Waste independent from earlier decisions. This means that a site shall be determined without predetermination by earlier decisions. Nevertheless, to enable a sound decision for a site selection it is necessary to be able draw back on the knowledge and experience from earlier activities. Otherwise, tedious learning processes would have to be experienced again. Since efforts to open up a site selection process again grew since the late 1990's projects had been implemented timely to capture existing knowledge. The paper at hand describes the achievements of R and D activities in Germany, the change of radioactive waste management policy and the endeavours to maintain the achievements. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Issues and Challenges for the Disposal of Solid Radioactive Waste in the UK - 16597

The latest UK radioactive waste inventory describes the UK as having roughly 4.5 million m{sup 3} of solid radioactive waste - waste that either exists now or which will arise in future. This quantity excludes the potential waste that could be generated from the final site clearance of nuclear sites, estimated to be at least 3 times the current inventory volume. Most solid radioactive waste (by volume) is managed in the near-surface, at the national Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) or in other appropriately permitted landfill sites. The UK has yet to develop solutions for the final disposal of Higher Activity Radioactive Waste (HAW) but has established arrangements for packaging of waste now for storage while maximising the probability that these packages will be disposable once a solution is provided. Irrespective of the final disposal solution, the principles that govern the safe management of solid radioactive waste are common across the UK. Recent experience in the UK, including from the review of the environmental safety case for the LLWR, identified a number of issues relevant to solid waste disposal which are pertinent to other existing Low Activity Radioactive Waste (LAW) disposal sites as well as the development of safety cases for HAW disposal facilities. These issues include: scoping the extent of 'wastes' included in any assessment (e.g. whether to include the 'package' as well as its contents); the importance of understanding the waste heterogeneity; non-radioactive characteristics of waste, and understanding of external factors such as climate and landscape change. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗