SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Guidelines”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2008

Assessing and mitigating radiation effects in Xilinx FPGAs

The main purpose of this guideline is to document the current understanding of the effort and tradeoffs involved in using SRAM-based FPGAs with maximum achievable upset tolerance. This guideline summarizes the different testing strategies to be considered when assessing the SEE tolerance of SRAM-based FPGAs. For critical applications, in-beam testing of flight designs is strongly recommended in order to verify that the upset mitigation is working as well as the designer intended. At present, there are four manufacturers (Actel, Xilinx, Atmel, and Aeroflex) offering six FPGA types to the military market (i.e., some military spec screening and testing are specified) and four device types to the aerospace application market, which indicates that the manufacturers have added radiation parameter specifications. There is also a Honeywell and BAE Systems device that has been under development for several years, but it does not appear to be available yet; inquiries to Honeywell’s military/aerospace marketing arm on this product have been unanswered.

Allen, Greg↗

NASA NTRS2002

Electron-induced Luminescence and X-ray Spectrometer (ELXS) system for life detection

NASA has developed guidelines for space missions and their affiliated research. A primary theme of these guidelines is the link between the possibility of extraterrestrial life and the past or present existence of liquid water.

in-situ↗

NASA NTRS2018

Development of a Guidebook in Support of the NASA R&M Standard

This paper describes a guidebook currently in development to support the application of the NASA R&M Standard [1]. NASA-STD-8729.1A identifies the objectives and strategies for how to develop a system or design that is reliable and maintainable. Rather than requiring a checklist of mandatory tasks, such as specific design or Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) analyses, the standard explains objectives that need to be accomplished, and how to accomplish the objectives in the form of strategies. Currently, the standard presents the hierarchy without defining or explaining elements, or how to use the hierarchy efficiently. This is where this accompanying guideline comes into play; the guideline helps clarify through discussion and examples the standard in more detail, and how to apply it in real world situations that engineers face every day.

DiVenti, Anthony↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Capabilities Assessments for Autonomous Missions: A Multi-Team Research Effort to Reduce Risk in the Human-System Integration Architecture for Future Deep-Space Missions

In future exploration missions beyond low earth-orbit, crew will have to execute complex operations and respond to off-nominal events, without real-time support from Mission Control. It is anticipated that increased reliance on automated systems, including human-centric vehicle and information architecture, will need to be designed to support the crew; increased risk to performance, health, and safety may occur if these are not implemented appropriately. The Human Factors and Behavioral Performance Element (HFBP) in the NASA Human Research Program supports research to characterize and mitigate such human health and performance risks, including the Risk of Adverse Outcome Due to Inadequate Human Systems Integration Architecture (HSIA). The HSIA risk addresses the integration of onboard capability and the crew roles and responsibilities necessary to enable the crew to respond effectively and efficiently in the increasingly autonomous mission operations environment. In 2017, HFBP released the “Human Capabilities Assessments for Autonomous Missions” (HCAAM) research topic to address HSIA related questions. HCAAM is a major NASA research effort that has assembled a multidisciplinary team from seven institutions to work closely with design and engineering efforts on research towards developing and refining human performance standards, guidelines and automation tools. The scientific focus is on quantitative assessment of human capabilities relevant to future deep-space missions during which earth/spacecraft communication is so delayed and intermittent that the crew must be able to function autonomously. The integrated strategy of the HCAAM project characterizes human capabilities and limitations related to potential performance decrements during long duration exploration mission spaceflight as relevant to both routine and complex task performance; defines system characteristics that reduce the likelihood or impact of potential decrements in human performance capabilities; performs integrated assessment of intelligent system responses within the context of an operational environment with relevant NASA tools, systems, and data structures in order to determine positive or negative interactions and validate recommended approaches; and proposes specific updates to existing standards and guidelines for inclusion in NASA handbooks for the design of future spacecraft intelligent systems that provide crew performance assessment/feedback, and to also serve as decision-support aids for the onboard crew (i.e., NASA-STD-3001, and NASA/SP-Human Integration Design Handbook (HIDH)). The scientific research vectors being addressed by the seven HCAAM teams include: - crew task performance (accuracy, efficiency) (crew + automation) - crew performance (accuracy, efficiency) - crew Situation Awareness - procedure design and multi-modal enhancement - concurrent tasking (mixed manual + some level of autonomy) - task handover - crew self-planning and time-lining - task design - trust in automation, real-time calibration - human multi-sensory feedback and guidance - human trust in on-board software-based intelligent assistants - virtual assistants The presentation will highlight plans and progress made in each of these research areas as well as the methods by which surrogate astronaut crews in the NASA JSC HERA spaceflight analog facility will function as human test subjects for all of the HCAAM research projects.

HCAAM VNSCOR↗

NASA NTRS2024

Test and Analysis of the 8-foot Diameter Cylindrical Sandwich Composite Test Article CTA8.2B: As part of the NASA Engineering and Safety Center Shell Buckling Knockdown Factor Project

The buckling response of thin-walled cylindrical structures have long been shown to be sensitive to various imperfections. That is, imperfections related to load introduction, boundary conditions, material property variation, and geometric deviations can all contribute to experimentally obtained buckling loads being lower than the buckling loads predicted for perfect representations of the same thin-walled cylindrical structure. To account for the influence of geometry-based imperfections of a thin-walled cylindrical structure on buckling response, a design factor (also known as a buckling knockdown factor) is used during the design phase. Guidelines for buckling knockdown factors are readily available in NASA SP-8007, Buckling of Thin Walled Circular Cylinders, which was updated in 2020. Prior to this recent update, NASA SP-8007 had not been updated since 1969, and since that time, computational analysis, experimental testing, and manufacturing methods have significantly improved. The NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) Shell Buckling Knockdown Factor Project (SBKF, NESC Assessment 07-010-E) had the goal of developing buckling design recommendations for select classes of metallic and composite launch-vehicle structures [3]. Specifically, the test and analysis results from the fourth SBKF composite test article SBKF-P3-CYL-CTA8.2B, which is referred to as CTA8.2B, are described in this paper. This test was the fourth in a series of four tests on sandwich composite cylinders that will be used to experimentally validate analysis methods, which in turn can be used to develop new analysis-based shell buckling design guidelines for typical sandwich composite launch vehicle cylindrical structures. Publications describing previous test validation with analysis are available in Refs. CTA8.2B was designed to occupy one corner of the design space with approximately equal bending stiffnesses in the axial and transverse directions and have a larger ratio of radius to effective shell thickness. Each test article had a unique design and was designed to occupy a specific region of the design space. CTA8.2B was an 8-foot diameter honeycomb-core sandwich cylinder that was fabricated and tested at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). The primary objectives of this test were to interrogate the structural capability of a composite test article, and to verify the test article design and analysis approach for cylinders subjected to axial compression and combined axial and bending loads. First, descriptions of the test article design and test are given in Section 2.0, and modeling and analysis methods used in support of the test article design and testing activities are described briefly in Section 3.0. Then, select test results are presented and compared to predicted results in Section 4.0, and concluding remarks are presented in Section 5.0. Finally, drawings of CTA8.2B and references used to support the test and analysis are provided in the Appendix.

Nonlinear analysis↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Planetary Protection Program Overview and Update

NASA has an integrated planetary protection strategy that leverages COSPAR Policy guide-lines, workshops, scientific consensus, partnerships and international working groups to develop policy and implementation guidelines. The Oÿce of Safety and Mission Assurance, which in-cludes NASA’s Oÿce of Planetary Protection, depends on these activities to support NASA’s missions in the assurance of crew safety and mission success while protecting the public and planetary environment from harmful contamination. This report will detail the overall planetary protection policy development perspective to sup-port NASA’s upcoming mission opportunities for exploration to include crewed Mars and sam-ple return missions. NASA continues to evolve its strategies, policies, and standards. NASA’s support in the COSPAR workshop series on Refining Planetary Protection Requirements for Crewed Missions to Mars have resulted in a NASA interim directive and paved the way for the development of NASA planetary protection roadmaps. These Agency level roadmaps address technology development and testing required to fill knowledge gaps for developing responsive policy guidelines and quantitative technical standards. In addition to workshops and tech-nology management strategies, NASA is also leveraging the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine’s Committee of Planetary Protection to serve as a source of advice on planetary protection measures. Finally, the report will include how the Oÿce of Safety and Mission Assurance is incorporating planetary protection into existing and new multi-agency partnerships.

Frank Groen↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EVM and Schedule Management

The objective of EVMS surveillance is to ensure that the management control processes that support the performance measurement baseline (PMB) are in place, compliant with the EVMS guidelines, are routinely being used, and provide timely and reliable data. The PMB is a triple constraint where the constraints are schedule, budget and scope. For Surveillance, NASA uses the DCMA EVM Compliance Metrics (DECM) Tests that are aligned with the EIA-748 EVM Standard. Guidelines 6 is Scheduling Work, and DECM has 23 Tests for evaluating if the IMS supports project goals in its planning, statusing and forecasting. This session will focus on the Test Metric that analyzes forecast start/finish dates riding the status date of the IMS for two or more consecutive months as an example of how surveillance works in concert with IMS health checks. It will cover how to run the test to recognize trends and how this test helps ensure that the forecast is credible in support of critical path analysis.

EVM↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Resilience Modeling in Complex Engineered Systems with Human-Machine Interactions

In recent times, there has been a growing interest in resilience-based design. Resilience-based design operates on the concept that failures and unexpected events will happen, and when they occur, complex engineered systems should be able to operate within acceptable bounds and recover reasonably. Humans can contribute to the resilience of a system by quickly detecting unforeseen events and taking corrective measures. To this effect, researchers have proposed guidelines and design approaches that can help promote human-system resilience. However, there is no early design stage tool to validate if a system is indeed resilient after applying these guidelines and design methods. In this research, we integrate the Human Error and Functional Failure Reasoning (HEFFR) framework into the fmdtools toolkit to enable designers to model the combined (machine, human, and joint) failures, including their propagation and dynamic effects, during early design stages. This integrated tool also allows designers to model the effects of performance shaping factors, team dynamics, and human-machine interactions in systems of systems. A demonstrative example of a remotely operated rover is explored to demonstrate how this approach can be applied to understand resilience in complex engineered systems with human interactions.

Lukman Irshad↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Laying The Foundations for FAIR-ER Science: ISA And LSDA Data Submission Process in NASA’s Evolving Data Management Environment

The Life Sciences Data Archive (LSDA) archives data resulting from research on the effects of spaceflight on humans and the development of countermeasures to mitigate spaceflight hazards. Archivists work with researchers to ensure that unique and high value data products and their metadata are preserved and managed to support current and future research. Currently, LSDA is updating its procedures and data submission requirements in response to the evolving data preservation environment at NASA. LSDA is implementing best practices for research data management through the establishment of clear data submission guidelines, integration of the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability) principles, and use of the ISA (Investigation, Study, Assay) research metadata framework for data discoverability and transparency into the data management processes. These changes directly impact LSDA’s requirements for research data submissions. The newly revised Research Data Submission Agreement (RDSA), formerly the Data Submission Agreement (DSA), introduces ISA-compatible metadata collection standards to LSDA’s process. Adherence to LSDA’s data submission guidelines enhances the FAIR-ness of the repository’s collections for future users. This presentation will discuss (1) how submission of research data and associated metadata are impacted by current data management policies, (2) benefits of the adoption of FAIR principles and the ISA metadata framework for retrospective studies utilizing existing LSDA datasets and historic data collections, and (3) the support LSDA will provide to researchers during this transition.

Data submission↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Volumetric Limits for Carry in a Spacesuit

Though there is a plethora of ergonomic guidelines for manual material handling, including maximum weight limits, there is not much guidance for the largest size of an object that a person can carry. Moreover, given the new Artemis space program’s intent to reestablish and maintain human presence on the Moon, there is a need to set manual material handling requirements for the partial gravity environment. Lunar surface carry limits while wearing a pressurized spacesuit is chief among them. Specifically, volumetric limits are required to determine the maximum dimensions of an item that a crewmember will be able to carry on the lunar surface. This study will assess spacesuit motion data to determine acceptable locations where the hand can be positioned for carrying an object, as hand position will vary with the crewmember anthropometry, spacesuits constraints and mechanism. Maximum volume limits will be derived from clearances between the suit and the gloved hand. The mobility of the suit and task contexts (e.g., terrain types, ground clearance) will also be taken into consideration to ensure that the volume being carried does not interfere with suit hardware or impart any mobility restrictions. The specific analysis methods and outcomes will be detailed in the final proceeding. The outcome of this study is expected to provide guidelines for maximum volumes that can be carried both two-handed and one-handed while wearing a spacesuit.

Y. Hernandez↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Laying the Foundations for FAIR-er Science: ISA and the LSDA Data Submission Process in NASA's Evolving Data Management Environment

LSDA↗

NASA NTRS2022

Unlocking the Spacecraft and Human Habitat Microbiome to Enable the Next Generation of Space Exploration

Planetary protection is the discipline that prevents harmful contamination of the solar system during exploration activities. The current international guidelines and NASA policy addressing biological contamination on spacecraft surfaces contains prescriptive guidelines of spore requirements (e.g., 300 spores/m2, 5×105 spores per spacecraft) applicable to spacecraft bound for Mars. To verify these requirements spacecraft engineers sample spacecraft surfaces throughout the assembly, test and launch operations phase of the mission using damp water cotton swabs and polyester wipes. After sampling, the potential biological contamination is enumerated using a series of traditional microbiology techniques to include sonication, heat shocking at 80°C for 15min to select for spores, and growth on tryptic soy agar at 32°C for 72 hours. To enable crewed missions to Mars and robotic exploration of the Ocean Worlds a risk informed decision making / performance-based approach to assess biological contamination offers a promising solution in the trade space. Recognizing the need for a performance-based approach, NASA’s new Planetary Protection policies now incorporate the agility for missions to be able to leverage a performance or prescriptive approach. One of top contenders in the option space is a coupled quantitative, descriptive and functional based approach to be able to assess the quantity, types and capabilities of the biological contamination present on spacecraft surfaces. A tailored, mission by mission assurance case could then be formulated by building an argument around the target body, projected capabilities surrounding the types of organisms their potential for survival and proliferation, and ability to be transported on the target body to contaminate an area of biological interest. A performance-based requirement would then be used to demonstrate the mission’s compliance in protecting the planetary environment safety objectives. This symposium talk will showcase the background and need case for NASA to develop such a capability as well as provide an update on the efforts underway in developing a transparent and responsible performance-based approach to biological contamination assessments on spacecraft surfaces.

Habitat Microbiome↗

NASA NTRS2022

A Network of Field-Calibrated Low-Cost Sensor Measurements of PM2.5 in Lomé, Togo, Over One to Two Years

Air pollution is a leading cause of global premature mortality and is especially prevalent in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In sub-Saharan Africa, preliminary monitoring networks, satellite retrievals of air-quality-relevant species, and air quality models show ambient fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) concentrations that far exceed the World Health Organization guidelines, yet many areas remain largely unmonitored and understudied. Deploying a network of five low-cost PurpleAir PM 2.5 monitors over 2 years (2019–2021), we present the first multiyear ambient air pollution monitoring data results from Lomé, Togo, a major West African coastal city with a population of about 1.4 million people. The full-study time period network-wide mean measured daily PM 2.5 concentration is 23.5 μ g m –3 m –3 . The strong regional influence of the dry and dusty Harmattan wind increases the local average PM 2.5 concentration by up to 58% during December through February, but the diurnal and weekly trends in PM 2.5 are largely controlled by local influences. At all sites, more than 87% of measured days exceeded the new WHO Daily PM 2.5 guidelines; these first measurements highlight the need for air quality improvement in a rapidly growing urban metropolis.

air pollution↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Mining and Processing: Considerations for Responsible Space Mining & Connections to Terrestrial Mining

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) of the United States of America (US) has initiated the Artemis Moon to Mars program to send astronauts (the first woman and person of color) back to the lunar surface, create a sustainable human lunar exploration program, and lead the first human exploration mission to the Mars surface in the late 2030’s [1]. Besides reinvigorating human exploration beyond low Earth orbit not seen since the Apollo program and enabling new scientific activities and discoveries, a major objective of this program is to characterize the resources that exist on the Moon and Mars, and learn how to utilize them for human exploration and the commercialization of cis-lunar space. Commonly known as In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU), the search for, acquisition, and processing of resources in space has the potential to greatly reduce the dependency on transporting mission consumables and infrastructure from Earth, thereby reducing mission costs, risks, and dependency on Earth. With the launch of Artemis I in November 2022 and the anticipation of several robotic missions to the Moon under the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program, greater recognition and excitement about NASA’s Artemis program and lunar exploration activities is growing in the public. With the recognition that past statements and concept videos of human exploration of the Moon are actually becoming real, there is also a growing awareness of the possible positive and negative consequences and impacts these exploration activities may have on the Moon and Mars. On the positive side, the development of ISRU and lunar mining and processing can enable and grow lunar surface exploration and cis-lunar commercial activities, as well as provide benefits to terrestrial industries through spin-in and spin-back of advanced technologies and autonomous operations. On the negative side, there is a perception that space mining will impact the lunar surface and environment negatively for science, and that cultural beliefs about the Moon need to be addressed and considered before these operations occur. This paper will begin to explore the potential driving attributes and guidelines that will address how best to maximize the lessons and connections to terrestrial mining to reduce the risk and cost of lunar ISRU and space commercial activities, enhance efforts to achieve the terrestrial ‘mine of the future’, and provide viable markets for space-derived technologies until commercial space mining is established. This paper will also begin to explore the potential driving attributes and guidelines that could address how to minimize the environmental and surface impacts of lunar ISRU and foster ‘responsible’ space mining that can be implemented until more official agreements and treaties are signed. The existing robust mining regulations adopted globally will be used as a basis for this examination and suggestions will be presented to adopt these agreements for use in space mining.

ISRU↗

NASA NTRS2024

Evolution of Spaceflight Renal Stone Risks and Update to the NASA Human Research Program (HRP) Renal Stone Evidence Report and Integrated Concept of Operations

BACKGROUND: The NASA HRP Evidence Report on the Risk of Renal Stone Formation is being updated based on new information obtained from 9 years of data from NASA’s astronaut renal stone surveillance program. In addition, the Concept of Operations for missions beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) was created to supplement the Evidence Report, and the NASA clinical practice guideline(CPG)for renal stone surveillance was updated. OVERVIEW: A literature review was performed to evaluate the state of literature regarding renal stone prevention, mitigation, and management both in terrestrial and spaceflight environments. Current renal stone treatment guidelines for the ISS, which were created by the Inflight Clinical Medicine Working Group and approved by the Multilateral Medical Operations Panel (MMOP)were reviewed, as well as recent ultrasound technology demonstrations onboard the ISS. This information was used in conjunction with emerging evidence from the surveillance program to update the Evidence Report and in-flight Concept of Operations. DISCUSSION: There are known and emerging renal stone prevention strategies including astronaut selection, the use of medications and resistive exercise, early diagnosis with regular urine studies and ultrasound imaging. In-flight treatment options include pharmaceuticals, use of lithotripsy and propulsive ultrasound, placement of percutaneous drains and other modalities. This information is useful to gauge future risks and update our strategies for prevention and management of renal stones in astronauts to reduce the risk of in-flight renal stone colic that could cause morbidity and mission impact.

E Stratton↗

NASA NTRS2024

Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Airborne Contaminants: Revision C

The enclosed table lists official Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations (SMACs) for selected airborne contaminants. They are based upon experiments conducted at standard pressure and oxygen environments and may or may not be applicable to altered atmospheres. The values listed in this summary document are applicable only to ambient conditions at standard temperature and oxygen (14.7 psi and 21% O2 at 25°C). These are guideline values set by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/Johnson Space Center (JSC) Toxicology Group in cooperation with the National Research Council Committee on Toxicology (NRCCOT), through publication in the peer- reviewed scientific literature, or NASA Technical Memoranda. Based on documented guidance (NRC, 1992; NRC, 2016), NASA has established SMACs for 58 chemical compounds that are particularly relevant to atmospheric contamination of the International Space Station (ISS) and targets of Exploration. Some long-term limits (1000-days) have also been established to support manned deep-space exploration. Summaries of these SMACs are presented in tabular form as part of this publication. This document provides a tabular summary of values that have been previously established based on guidelines established by NASA and the National Research Council’s Committee on Toxicology and vetted and published through the NRCCOT and/or non-NASA scientific literature and NASA Technical Memoranda. Short‐term (1‐ and 24‐hour) SMACs apply to off‐nominal situations, such as accidental releases aboard a spacecraft. These limits permit risk of minor, reversible effects, such as mild mucosal irritation. In contrast, the long‐term SMACs are set to fully protect healthy crewmembers from adverse effects resulting from continuous exposure to specific air pollutants for up to 1000 days. Because allergic reactions or chemical idiosyncrasy to certain airborne pollutants are very difficult to predict, crewmembers with allergies or unusual sensitivity to trace pollutants may not be afforded complete protection, even when long‐term SMACs are not exceeded.

SMACs↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The NASA Jitter Handbook Development Activity: A Multidisciplinary Collaborative Effort

Spaceflight missions hosting high-performance vibration-sensitive optical sensor payloads with stringent pointing stability requirements are especially challenged in the areas of predicting, managing, controlling, and testing spacecraft line-of-sight (LoS) jitter. The community recognizes that this is a formidable multidisciplinary engineering task. However, while some textbooks and references in the aerospace literature may touch on the subject of jitter, important details of specific flight proven methodologies and techniques used by today’s jitter engineering practitioners are not readily accessible. There is no know engineering reference document with guidelines and best practices for managing and mitigating space-craft jitter. To fill this knowledge gap the NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) has undertaken the task of developing a NASA Jitter Handbook which would include lessons learned and best practices for design, analysis, and test, along with operational guidelines to mitigate jitter. In this paper the plan for this handbook development will be described along with the envisioned handbook framework, key NASA stakeholders, and potential envisioned jitter engineering case studies. Opportunities exist technical collaboration on this handbook with NASA-external organizations.

Christopher D'Souza↗

NASA NTRS1995

Biological monitoring of iodine, a water disinfectant for long-term space missions

In order to establish guidelines for exposure of astronauts to iodine, used as a water disinfectant in space, we studied the usefulness of hair, saliva, and urine for biological monitoring in humans and in the human hair/nude mouse model. The monitoring of iodine in patients that received 150 mCi of Na131I (carrier-free) showed similar patterns of elimination for blood, saliva, and urine. The mean correlation coefficient (r) between iodine elimination for blood/saliva was 0.99, for blood/urine, 0.95, and for saliva/urine, 0.97. The absolute value of iodine concentrations in urine revealed marked variability, which was corrected by adjusting for creatinine levels. The autoradiographic studies of human hair demonstrated that iodine is rapidly incorporated into external layers of the hair root and can be removed easily during washing. These data were confirmed after iodine exposure using the human hair/nude mouse model. Hair does not provide satisfactory information about exposure due to unstable incorporation of iodine. The most useful medium for biological monitoring of astronauts exposed to high doses of iodine in drinking water is urine, when adjusted for creatinine, and saliva, if quantitative evaluation of flow rate is provided.

NASA Discipline Environmental Health↗