Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Environmental Protection Agency”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

Analysis of Monolith Cores from an Engineering Scale Demonstration of a Prospective Cast Stone Process

The primary disposition path of Low Activity Waste (LAW) at the DOE Hanford Site is vitrification. A cementitious waste form is one of the alternatives being considered for the supplemental immobilization of the LAW that will not be treated by the primary vitrification facility. Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) has been directed to generate and collect data on cementitious or pozzolanic waste forms such as Cast Stone. This report documents the coring and leach testing of monolithic samples cored from an engineering-scale demonstration (ES Demo) with non-radioactive simulants. The ES Demo was performed at SRNL in October of 2013 using the Scaled Continuous Processing Facility (SCPF) to fill an 8.5 ft. diameter x 3.25 ft. high container with simulated Cast Stone grout. The Cast Stone formulation was chosen from the previous screening tests. Legacy salt solution from previous Hanford salt waste testing was adjusted to correspond to the average LAW composition generated from the Hanford Tank Waste Operation Simulator (HTWOS). The dry blend materials, ordinary portland cement (OPC), Class F fly ash, and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS or BFS), were obtained from Lafarge North America in Pasco, WA. In 2014 core samples originally obtained approximately six months after filling the ES Demo were tested along with bench scale molded samples that were collected during the original pour. A latter set of core samples were obtained in late March of 2015, eighteen months after completion of the original ES Demo. Core samples were obtained using a 2” diameter x 11” long coring bit. The ES Demo was sampled in three different regions consisting of an outer ring, a middle ring and an inner core zone. Cores from these three lateral zones were further segregated into upper, middle and lower vertical segments. Monolithic core samples were tested using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 1315, which is designed to provide mass transfer rates (release rates) of inorganic analytes contained in monolithic material under diffusion controlled release conditions as a function of leaching time. Compressive strength measurements and drying tests were also performed on the 2015 samples. Leachability indices reported are based on analyte concentrations determined from dissolution of the dried samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Annual Energy Outlook 2016 With Projections to 2040

The Annual Energy Outlook 2016 (AEO2016), prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), presents long-term projections of energy supply, demand, and prices through 2040. The projections, focused on U.S. energy markets, are based on results from EIA’s National Energy Modeling System (NEMS). NEMS enables EIA to make projections under alternative, internally consistent sets of assumptions. The analysis in AEO2016 focuses on the Reference case and 17 alternative cases. EIA published an Early Release version of the AEO2016 Reference case (including U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power Plan (CPP)) and a No CPP case (excluding the CPP) in May 2016.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2016

Idling Reduction for Long-Haul Trucks: An Economic Comparison of On-Board and Wayside Technologies

Reducing the idling of long-haul heavy-duty trucks has long been recognized as a particularly low-hanging fruit of fuel efficiency and emissions reduction. The displacement of about 10 hours of diesel idling every day, for most days of the year, for as many as a million long-haul trucks has very clear benefits. This report considers the costs and return on investment (ROI) for idling reduction (IR) equipment for both truck owners and electrified parking space (EPS) equipment owners. For the truck owners, the key variables examined are idling hours to be displaced (generally 1,000 to 2,000 hours per year) and the price of fuel ($0 to $5/gal). The ideal IR option would provide complete services in varied climates in any location and offer the best ROI on trucks that log many idling hours. For trucks that have fewer idling hours, options with a fixed cost per hour (i.e., EPS) might be most attractive if they were available to all, or even most, truck drivers. EPS, however, is particularly cost effective for trucks on prescribed routes with a need for regular, extended stops at terminals. (EPS is also called truck stop electrification, or TSE.) The analysis shows that all IR options save money when fuel costs more than $2/gal. For trucks requiring bunk heat, a simple heater (plug-in or diesel) is almost always the most costeffective way to provide heat, even if the truck is equipped with an auxiliary power unit (APU) or is parked at a single-system EPS location. For trucks requiring bunk air-conditioning, the use of single-system EPS is most cost effective for those logging fewer idling hours. Even for trucks with higher idling hours, the cost of EPS may be about the same as that for on-board air-conditioning. Clearly, trucks’ locations and seasonal factors—and the availability of EPS— are significant in the choice of “best fit” IR equipment for truck owners. This report also considers costs and payback for owners of EPS infrastructure. An industry that 5 years ago had at least five players has been narrowed to two companies—one in single-system EPS (IdleAir) and the other in dual-system EPS (Shorepower Technologies). Use of EPS by truck drivers has not met initial expectations for a variety of reasons. One area where EPS has particular promise, however, is in the cost-effective provision of reliable air-conditioning. This analysis is focused strictly on cost and fuel savings; it does not consider the important benefits of reduced emissions (i.e., greenhouse gases and criteria pollutants). It is important to note that all IR options provide some emissions benefits. Even where an IR option may not have a rapid ROI, the emissions-reduction benefit may be considerable. Finally, as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) set stricter standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve the fuel efficiency of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, the emissions benefits of IR strategies will become increasingly important.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2016

Final Report of a CRADA Between Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Cummins, Incorporated (CRADA No.PNNL/283): “Enhanced High and Low Temperature Performance of NO x Reduction Catalyst Materials”

The NO x Storage-Reduction (NSR, also known as lean-NO x trap – LNT), is based upon the concept of storing NO x as nitrates over storage components, typically barium species, during a lean-burn operation cycle and then reducing the stored nitrates to N 2 during fuel-rich conditions over a precious metal catalyst [1]. NO x Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), on the other hand, is accomplished by deliberately introducing reductant urea into the engine exhaust to reduce NO x with the aid of a Cu(Fe)/zeolite catalyst [2]. These two technologies have been recognized as the most promising approaches for meeting stringent NO x emission standards for diesel vehicles within the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) 2007/2010 mandated limits. For NSR, problems arising from either or both thermal and SO 2 deactivation must be addressed to meet durability standards. For SCR, SO 2 deactivation is less of an issue, but hydrothermal deactivation of the zeolite catalysts must be addressed. With continuing R&D efforts in advanced powertrains, highly novel operating modes for internal combustion engines (ICEs) are being researched in order to meet the very stringent new demands for fuel efficiency (e.g., U.S. ‘‘CAFE’’ standards for average miles/gallon are scheduled to increase dramatically over the next 10–15 years). These new ICE engine operation modes, while highly fuel-efficient, result in much lower exhaust temperatures than current engines; temperatures so low that it is hard to imagine how the current catalytic emission control technologies will be able to function. For example, while steady-state operation of the NO x reduction technology at 150 °C may be required, current ‘‘light-off’’ temperatures for CHA-based zeolite catalysts are closer to 200 °C. Therefore, understanding low-temperature limitations in NO x reduction has become one of the most daunting challenges in R&D on new catalyst materials and processes that can effectively eliminate emissions at these quite low exhaust temperatures. This project has two clear focuses: (1) development of potassium-based high-temperature NSR materials, and studying their key causes of deactivation and methods of regeneration. By comparing results obtained on ‘Simple Model’ Pt-K/Al 2 O 3 with ‘Enhanced Model’ Pt-K/ MgAlO x and Pt-K/TiO 2 materials, we have developed an understanding of the role of various additives on the deactivation and regeneration processes. Studies have also been performed on the real commercial samples being used in a Dodge Ram truck with a Cummins diesel emission control system. However, the results about these ‘commercial samples’ will not be covered in this report. Following a brief description of our experimental approach, we will present a few highlights from some of the work performed in this CRADA with more details about these results provided in publications/reports/presentations lists presented at the end of the report. (2) for the Cu and Fe/Chabazite SCR catalysts, since these are so newly developed and references from open literature and industry are nearly absent, our work started from zeolite synthesis and catalyst synthesis methodology development, before research on their low- and high-temperature performance, deactivation, regeneration, etc. was conducted. Again, most work reported here is based on our “model” catalysts synthesized in-house. Work done on the ‘commercial samples’ will not be covered in this report.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2016

Well Integrity for Natural Gas Storage in Depleted Reservoirs and Aquifers

Introduction Motivation The 2015-2016 Aliso Canyon/Porter Ranch natural gas well blowout emitted approximately 100,000 tonnes of natural gas (mostly methane, CH 4 ) over four months. The blowout impacted thousands of nearby residents, who were displaced from their homes. The high visibility of the event has led to increased scrutiny of the safety of natural gas storage at the Aliso Canyon facility, as well as broader concern for natural gas storage integrity throughout the country. Federal Review of Well Integrity In April of 2016, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) through the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), announced the formation of a new Interagency Task Force on Natural Gas Storage Safety. The Task Force enlisted a group of scientists and engineers at the DOE National Laboratories to review the state of well integrity in natural gas storage in the U.S. The overarching objective of the review is to gather, analyze, catalogue, and disseminate information and findings that can lead to improved natural gas storage safety and security and thus reduce the risk of future events. The “Protecting our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2016’’ or the ‘‘PIPES Act of 2016,’’which was signed into law on June 22, 2016, created an Aliso Canyon Natural Gas Leak Task Force led by the Secretary of Energy and consisting of representatives from the DOT, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Department of Commerce and the Department of Interior. The Task Force was asked to perform an analysis of the Aliso Canyon event and make recommendations on preventing similar incidents in the future. The PIPES Act also required that DOT/PHMSA promulgate minimum safety standards for underground storage that would take effect within two years. Background on the DOE National Laboratories Well Integrity Work Group One of the primary areas that the Task Force is studying is integrity of natural gas wells at storage facilities. The DOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE) took the lead in this area and asked scientists and engineers from the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)) to form a Work Group to address this area. This Work Group is an expansion of the original “Lab Team” comprising scientists and engineers from SNL, LLNL, and LBNL which was formed to support the State of California’s response to the Aliso Canyon incident and operated under the Governor of California’s Aliso Canyon Emergency Order (1/6/2016). The Lab Team played a key role in advising the State of California’s Department of Conservation (DOC) in its oversight of SoCalGas during and after the incident.

03 NATURAL GAS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Technetium, Iodine, and Chromium Adsorption/Desorption Kd Values for Vadose Zone Pore Water, ILAW Glass, and Cast Stone Leachates Contacting an IDF Sand Sequence

Performance and risk assessments of immobilized low-activity waste (ILAW) at the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) have shown that risks to groundwater are quite sensitive to adsorption-desorption interactions occurring in the near- and far-field environment. These interactions between the underlying sediments and the contaminants present in the leachates that descend from the buried glass, secondary waste grouts, and potentially Cast Stone low-activity waste packages have been represented in these assessments using the contaminant distribution coefficient (Kd) construct. Some contaminants (99Tc, 129I, and Cr) present in significant quantities in these wastes have low Kd values and tend to drive risk to public health and the environment. Relatively small changes in the Kd value can cause relatively large changes in the retardation factor. Thus, even relatively small uncertainty in the Kd value can result in a relatively large uncertainty in the risk determined through performance assessment modeling. The purpose of this study is to further reduce the uncertainty in Kd values for 99Tc, iodine (iodide and iodate), and Cr (chromate; CrO42-) by conducting systematic adsorption-desorption experiments using actual sand-dominated Hanford formation sediments from beneath the IDF and solutions that closely mimic Hanford vadose zone pore water and leachates from Cast Stone and ILAW glass waste forms. Twenty-four batch and 21 flow-through column experiments were conducted, yielding 261 Kd measurements for these key contaminants, and contributing to our understanding for predicting transport from wastes disposed to the IDF. While the batch Kd methodology is not well-suited for measuring Kd values for non-sorbing species (as noted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), the batch Kd results presented here are not wholly inconsistent with the column Kd results, and could be used for sensitivity purposes. Results from the column experiments are consistent with the best estimate and lower range of Kd values reported by Krupka et al. and Cantrell et al.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Methodology for Outdoor Water Savings Model and Spreadsheet Tool for U.S. and Selected States

Green lawns and landscaping are archetypical of the populated American landscape, and typically require irrigation, which corresponds to a significant fraction of residential, commercial, and institutional water use. In North American cities, the estimated portion of residential water used for outdoor purposes ranges from 22-38% in cooler climates up to 59-67% in dry and hot environments, while turfgrass coverage within the United States spans 11.1-20.2 million hectares (Milesi et al. 2009). One national estimate uses satellite and aerial photography data to develop a relationship between impervious surface and lawn surface area, yielding a conservative estimate of 16.4 (± 3.6) million hectares of lawn surface area in the United States—an area three times larger than that devoted to any irrigated crop (Milesi et al. 2005). One approach that holds promise for cutting unnecessary outdoor water use is the increased deployment of “smart” irrigation controllers to increase the water efficiency of irrigation systems. This report describes the methodology and inputs employed in a mathematical model that quantifies the effects of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s WaterSense labeling program for one such type of controller, weather-based irrigation controllers (WBIC). This model builds off that described in “Methodology for National Water Savings Model and Spreadsheet Tool–Outdoor Water Use” and uses a two-tiered approach to quantify outdoor water savings attributable to the WaterSense program for WBIC, as well as net present value (NPV) of that savings. While the first iteration of the model assessed national impacts using averaged national values, this version begins by evaluating impacts in three key large states that make up a sizable portion of the irrigation market: California, Florida, and Texas. These states are considered to be the principal market of “smart” irrigation controllers that may result in the bulk of national savings. Modeled water savings and net present value for these three states should be more accurate and representative than the averaged national values given state-specific inputs such as lot size, water price, and housing stock. To complete the picture of national impacts, the remaining WBIC shipments not assigned to these three states are assessed using the original methodology based on the averaged national values.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2017

1QCY17 Saltstone waste characterization analysis

In the first quarter of calendar year 2017, a salt solution sample was collected from Tank 50 on January 16, 2017 in order to meet South Carolina (SC) Regulation 61-107.19 Part I C, “Solid Waste Management: Solid Waste Landfills and Structural Fill – General Requirements” and the Saltstone Disposal Facility Class 3 Landfill Permit. The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested to prepare and ship saltstone samples to a United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certified laboratory to perform the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and subsequent characterization.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Milestone Report - M3FT-15OR03120213 - A Literature Survey to Identify Potentially Problematic Volatile Iodine-Bearing Species Present in Off-Gas Streams

Four radionuclides have been identified as being sufficiently volatile in the reprocessing of nuclear fuel that their gaseous release needs to be controlled to meet U.S. regulatory requirements (Jubin et al. 2011, 2012). These radionuclides are 3 H, 14 C, 85 Kr, and 129 I. Of these, 129 I has the longest half-life and potentially highest biological impact. Accordingly, control of the release of 129 I is most critical with respect to U.S. regulations for the release of radioactive material in stack emissions. Current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulation governing nuclear facilities (40 CFR 190) states that the total quantity of radioactive materials entering the general environment from the entire uranium fuel cycle, per gigawatt-year of electrical energy produced by the fuel cycle, must contain less than 5 mCi of 129 I. The study of inorganic iodide in off-gas systems has been almost exclusively limited to I 2 , and the focus of organic iodide studies has been CH 3 I.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

KIVA-hpFE: Predictive turublent reactive and multiphase flow in engines : Science Supporting Mission of the Laboratory

Research and development of KIVA-hpFE for turbulent reactive and multiphase flow particularly as related to engine modeling program has relevance to National energy security and climate change. Climate change is a source problem, and energy national security is consumption of petroleum products problem. Accurately predicting engine processes leads to, lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, where engines in the transportation sector currently account for 26% of the U.S. GHG emissions. Less dependence on petroleum products leads to greater energy security. By Environmental Protection Agency standards, some vehicles are now reaching 42 to the 50 mpg mark. These are conventional gasoline engines. Continued investment and research into new technical innovations, the potential exists to save more than 4 million barrels of oil per day or approximately $200 to $400 million per day. This would be a significant decrease in emission and use of petroleum and a very large economic stimulus too! It is estimated with further advancements in combustion, the current emissions can be reduced up to 40%. Enabling better understanding of fuel injection and fuel-air mixing, thermodynamic combustion losses, and combustion/emission formation processes enhances our ability to help solve both problems. To provide adequate capability for accurately simulating these processes, minimize time and labor for development of engine technology, are the goals of our KIVA development program.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2017

Variable Renewable Energy in Long-Term Planning Models: A Multi-Model Perspective

Long-term capacity expansion models of the U.S. electricity sector have long been used to inform electric sector stakeholders and decision makers. With the recent surge in variable renewable energy (VRE) generators - primarily wind and solar photovoltaics - the need to appropriately represent VRE generators in these long-term models has increased. VRE generators are especially difficult to represent for a variety of reasons, including their variability, uncertainty, and spatial diversity. To assess current best practices, share methods and data, and identify future research needs for VRE representation in capacity expansion models, four capacity expansion modeling teams from the Electric Power Research Institute, the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory conducted two workshops of VRE modeling for national-scale capacity expansion models. The workshops covered a wide range of VRE topics, including transmission and VRE resource data, VRE capacity value, dispatch and operational modeling, distributed generation, and temporal and spatial resolution. The objectives of the workshops were both to better understand these topics and to improve the representation of VRE across the suite of models. Given these goals, each team incorporated model updates and performed additional analyses between the first and second workshops. This report summarizes the analyses and model 'experiments' that were conducted as part of these workshops as well as the various methods for treating VRE among the four modeling teams. The report also reviews the findings and learnings from the two workshops. We emphasize the areas where there is still need for additional research and development on analysis tools to incorporate VRE into long-term planning and decision-making.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2017

Variable Renewable Energy in Long-Term Planning Models: A Multi-Model Perspective

Long-term capacity expansion models of the U.S. electricity sector have long been used to inform electric sector stakeholders and decision-makers. With the recent surge in variable renewable energy (VRE) generators — primarily wind and solar photovoltaics — the need to appropriately represent VRE generators in these long-term models has increased. VRE generators are especially difficult to represent for a variety of reasons, including their variability, uncertainty, and spatial diversity. This report summarizes the analyses and model experiments that were conducted as part of two workshops on modeling VRE for national-scale capacity expansion models. It discusses the various methods for treating VRE among four modeling teams from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The report reviews the findings from the two workshops and emphasizes the areas where there is still need for additional research and development on analysis tools to incorporate VRE into long-term planning and decision-making. This research is intended to inform the energy modeling community on the modeling of variable renewable resources, and is not intended to advocate for or against any particular energy technologies, resources, or policies.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2016

Water Network Tool for Resilience Version 0.1

Water utilities are vulnerable to a wide variety of human-caused and natural disasters. These disruptive events can result in loss of water service, contaminated water, pipe breaks, and failed equipment. Furthermore, long term changes in water supply and customer demand can have a large impact on the operating conditions of the network. The ability to maintain drinking water service during and following these types of events is critical. Simulation and analysis tools can help water utilities explore how their network will respond to disruptive events and plan effective mitigation strategies. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Sandia National Laboratories are developing new software tools to meet this need. The Water Network Tool for Resilience (WNTR, pronounced winter) is a Python package designed to help water utilities investigate resilience of water distribution systems over a wide range of hazardous scenarios and to evaluate resilience-enhancing actions. The following documentation includes installation instructions and examples, description of software features, and software license. It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the Python Programming Language.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2018

Discharge Permit-1845 Quarterly Status Report July 2018

Trichloroethene (TCE) and nitrate have been identified as constituents of concern in groundwater at the Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM) Technical Area (TA)-V Groundwater (TAVG) Area of Concern (AOC) based on detections above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maximum contaminant level (MCL) in samples collected from monitoring wells. The EPA MCLs and the State of New Mexico drinking water standards for TCE and nitrate are 5 micrograms per liter and 10 milligrams per liter (as nitrogen), respectively.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Meteorology Tower Site Inspections

This Environmental Protection and Compliance Division (EPC) Compliance Programs Group (CP) procedure describes the routine inspection of meteorology monitoring sites and equipment required to assure representative monitoring of meteorological conditions. Annual site inspection is recommended by ANSI/ANS-3.11-2005 (ANS 2010) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA; EPA 1999) for conformance to siting requirements. Trees and shrubs can grow over time to impact measurements. More frequent inspection is recommended by EPA (EPA 1999) and based on EPC-CP operating experience to identify signs of instrument or tower damage and wear and to perform routine cleaning of selected instruments.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Integrated Component-Specific Measurements to Develop Emission Factors for Compressors and Gas Gathering Lines

The Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and other critical stakeholders (e.g., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), state regulators, and industry) seek to more accurately characterize and quantify methane emissions from compressors and gathering lines within the Gathering and Boosting (G&B) segment of the natural gas system network. These efforts will reduce uncertainties in emissions estimates in USEPA’s current Green House Gas Inventory (GHGI) under their Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). For this study, four G&B stations in the Gulf Coast Area were visited four times over the course of one year. Components were classified according to equipment and component type and emissions from select components were measured using multiple measurement technologies. The following major equipment types were considered: i) compressors, ii) separators, iii) dehydrators, iv) coalescers, v) slug catchers, vi) yard piping, vii) tanks, and viii) gathering lines. Individual components on each equipment type were further divided into the following main categories: i) connectors, ii) valves, iii) pressure relief valves (PRV), iv) meters, v) gauges, vi) regulators, vii) pneumatic device vents, and viii) compressor vents (e.g., distance piece vents [DPVs] and rod packing vents [RPVs]). Components were screened for the presence of leaks and venting emissions with an optical gas imaging (OGI) camera, and methane emission rates were measured using a microdilution high volume sampler. Downwind emissions were measured using an Open Path Fourier Transform Infrared (OP-FTIR) Spectrometer. Data were evaluated to assess correlation with site, equipment, time, and operational variables. Key findings and recommendations from the study include: A) Different counting methodologies can result in vastly different component counts, thus influencing total emissions calculations using Subpart W population EFs. A standard methodology should be adopted for classifying and counting components in order to minimize inconsistencies across studies and instruct stakeholders responsible for GHGI reporting. B) Results support current component subcategories listed in USEPA Subpart W, including the subdivision of connectors (flanged and “other”) and pneumatic device vents (intermittent, continuous low bleed, and continuous high bleed). C) Emission rates vary across sites and a relationship between higher emissions and compressor age was observed for some components. D) Component emission rates varied between field campaigns. The type of components contributing to overall measured emissions also varied among field campaigns. However, the emission rate variability was larger between different components (of the same category) than the variability in one component over the four field campaigns. Therefore, when calculating emission factors, it is not necessary to take repeat measurements to capture component variability. E) Measuring the emission rate of a sample for an extended period of time is not necessary to capture the average component emission rate. F) For reporting purposes, excluding liquid lines from site-wide screening may have a negligible effect on component-related emissions. However, from a site management perspective, malfunctioning components were not uncommon on liquid lines and contributed substantially to fugitive emissions at some sites. G) Population EFs, whether including or excluding liquid lines, were a conservative estimate of fugitive emissions. Leaker EFs consistently underestimated emissions at the field sites. Measurements at more sites, particularity sites in other areas of the country, need to be completed before determining the accuracy of EFs.

03 NATURAL GAS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Off-Gas Condensate and Cast Stone Analysis Results

A sample of off-gas condensate produced during a demonstration test of the direct-feed low-activity waste (DFLAW) Radioactive Waste Test Platform using waste retrieved from Hanford storage tank AP-105 waste was analyzed for major cations, anions, total cyanide, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, selected radionuclides, and selected organic compounds. The remaining off-gas condensate was concentrated through evaporation and then used to produce Cast Stone waste forms. After the solid waste forms cured for 28 days, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 1311 (EPA 1992) Toxicity Characteristic Leach Procedure (TCLP) tests were conducted on two samples. The TCLP leachates were analyzed for RCRA metals, fluoride, and total cyanide. These chemical analyses were conducted to collect data on the waste form performance and to determine if the waste form will meet the disposal requirements of the Waste Control Specialists LLC (WCS) Federal Waste Disposal Facility (FWF) in Texas (WCS 2015) and the Integrated Disposal Facility at Hanford. The radionuclide results in the off-gas condensate were used to estimate concentrations in the Cast Stone waste forms; these estimates were then compared to Class C limits (30 TAC 336.362 Appendix E). With the possible exception of U-232, all measured radionuclides were determined to be below their respective Class C limits. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used to measure most of the radionuclides. It is not possible to differentiate the isotope measured at mass 232 between U 232 and Th-232 by mass spectroscopy. Class C limit comparisons were made by assuming two maximum possible scenarios; one in which all the isotope at mass 232 occurred as Th-232, and another assigning the entire mass contribution to U-232. If the isotope at mass 232 is all Th-232 then the waste form is well below its Class C limit; however, if the isotope at mass 232 is all U-232, then the Class C limit would be exceeded by more than a factor of 8. A chemical procedure to separate uranium from thorium followed by reanalysis by ICP-MS would be required to resolve this issue. A similar issue occurs at mass 238, which could be U-238 or Pu-238; however, in this case Pu-238 can be ruled out as a contributor to the isotope measured at mass 238 for the following reasons. Pu-238 has a half-life of 87.7 years and its daughter product (U-234) has a half-life of 2.5 × 105 years and a measured concentration of < 0.002 µg/L. If significant concentrations of Pu-238 were present in this waste, then the amount of measurable U 234 would have increased over the decades of storage in the Hanford tanks. Because this was not observed, it is concluded that the isotope measured at mass 238 is all U-238. A total of 68 organic compounds were targeted for analysis in the off-gas condensate. Of these compounds, only nine were measured above their respective minimum reportable concentration. These compounds were acenaphthene, acetone, n-butyl alcohol, p,p’-DDT, methyl ethyl ketone, nitrobenzene, o nitrophenol, pyridine, and toluene. Of the detectable compounds, only acenaphthene, acetone, o nitrophenol, and pyridine were above wastewater standards (40 CFR 268.48 - Universal Treatment Standards). None of the organic compounds exceeded the non-wastewater standards (40 CFR 268.48 - Universal Treatment Standards). Analysis of the TCLP leachates from the Cast Stone waste forms indicated that none of the analytes exceeded the Universal Treatment Standard and, in general, all were well below the standards.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

2018 FEARCE Development: A Robust and Accurate Engine Modeling Software

Research and development of Fast, Easy, Accurate and Robust Continuum Engineering (FEARCE, formerly KIVA-hpFE) for turbulent reactive and multiphase flow, particularly as related to engine modeling, is relevant to the DOE Vehicle Technologies Office efforts at addressing national energy security. Less dependence on petroleum products leads to greater energy security. By Environmental Protection Agency standards, some vehicles are now reaching 42–50 mpg mark. These are conventional gasoline engines. With continued investment and research into new technical innovations, the potential exists to save more than 4 million barrels of oil per day or approximately 200 to 400 dollars million per day. This would be a significant decrease in emissions and use of petroleum and a very large stimulus to the U.S. economy.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗