Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ventilators”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EMU CO2 Washout Comparative Assessments for the HAB/HAP-E in Support of EVA 80

After water was reported in the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) helmet during ISS US EVA 80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. But before a mitigation strategy can be implemented, it must first be proven to be safe. Towards this aim, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to assess the effect that the absorbent material has on the concentration of carbon dioxide in the EMU helmet. Within a small, closed volume such as a helmet, some amount of the carbon dioxide produced by the suit-wearer will be re-inhaled before being cleared from the oral-nasal region. The ability of the suit to remove carbon dioxide is referred to as CO2 washout. Pathological levels of inhaled CO2 (hypercapnia) are associated with dizziness, fatigue, and headaches. The CFD model was built in ANSYS Fluent and adapted to assess CO2 washout in a variety of scenarios grouped into three categories: ventilation cases, varying metabolic rates, and varying sorbent material configurations. The presence of the sorbent material did not prove detrimental to CO2 washout in the helmet.

Moses Navarro↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of HAB Particulate Tracing in EMU Helmet in Support of Eva 80

After water was reported in the EMU helmet during ISS US EVA-80, mitigation strategies were created to attempt to arrest the motion of any droplets that enter the helmet for future Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). This included adding absorbent materials into the interior of the helmet. But before a mitigation strategy can be implemented, it must first be proven to be safe. Towards this aim, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was done tracing the paths of particulates potentially generated by the absorbent material. The objective was to characterize the risk these particulates pose for inspiration and eye irritation by tracking what percentage of particulates contact the suit-wearer’s face, eyes, or mouth. The model consisted of a human mannikin head and torso inside the EMU suit and helmet. The software used was ANSYS Fluent, with discrete phase modeling enabled to generate and track the particulates within the ventilation flow of the helmet.

Abigail Baukus↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparative Analysis for EMU Fleet Latent Loading Characterization in Support of US EVA 80 Failure

During United States Extravehicular Activity 80 (US EVA 80), water was observed in the helmet of an Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) during cabin repressurization. One of the primary mechanisms that can cause water in the helmet of an EMU is integrated performance induced sublimator carryover. The sublimator is a heat exchanger that removes heat and humidity from the ventilation loop. Water vapor is condensed from the gas and removed by slurper holes in the sublimator. Sublimator carryover is caused by the inability of the EMU sublimator to remove all of the condensed water vapor, resulting in liquid water entering the helmet. To determine if sublimator carryover was a likely cause of the US EVA 80 failure, a comparative analysis of numerous historical EVAs was conducted to calculate the total latent load (total water vapor generated by the crewmember) for numerous historical EVAs and ground tests using the Systems Improved Numerical Differencing Analyzer EMU (SINDA EMU) model. The analysis showed that US EVA 80 was associated with a comparatively high latent load when compared to other EVAs that did not present water in the helmet. Further, this analysis showed that other historical EVAs which had visible water in the helmet were also associated with higher latent loads. This analysis provides evidence that the likely cause of the US EVA 80 water in the helmet event was not the failure of an individual component, but rather sublimator carryover caused by excessive production of water vapor by the crewmember. The evidence from this analysis agrees with results from the Test, Teardown, and Evaluation (TT&E) of the EMU which did not show any failure of individual components of the EMU that would lead to water in the helmet.

Noah Andersen↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Integrated Computational Fluid Dynamics and Thermal Desktop Thermal Modeling for Assessment of the EMU in Support of ISS EVA 80

Following the reports of water accumulation in the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) helmet during the ISS US EVA-80, various efforts for mitigation and further understanding of this phenomenon have been undertaken with the goal of prevention and to ensure crew safety in future EVAs. In support of this goal, a combination of Thermal Desktop thermal modeling and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has been performed in order to characterize the performance of the EMU components, specifically those within the ventilation/cooling water loops. This modeling effort evaluates the dry/wet gas pressure drop and flow distribution through gas and liquid flow paths using CFD, as well as a two-phase flow assessment of condensation production and water separation/removal performance using an integrated Thermal Desktop model of important EMU ventilation loop components. The models assess this overall thermal-fluid performance in comparison with previous existing models, design points, and historical EVA data using their inputs.

EVA 80↗
NASA NTRS2023

Human Systems Integration: Managing Risk in Anesthesia

The practice of anesthesia relies on clinicians’ ability to safely manage increasingly complex equipment. Devices such as ventilators, drug infusion pumps, and physiologic monitors use sophisticated algorithms to deliver care, but most clinicians are only trained to manage automated systems during normal operation. Few if any receive training on how to manage system failures. Although manufacturers are required to consult with human factors engineers as part of the equipment design process, most pieces of equipment are ultimately brought to market without extensive input from clinicians. Systems in the operating room can be as simple as an oxygen tank, or as complex as a multi-institutional healthcare organization. Humans are also a complex system, and play a critical role in the domains of operations, design, fabrication, maintenance, repair, and ultimately, dismantling and closeout. HSI seeks to provide a means for advocating the human side of the system. Human Systems Integration (HSI) is the cross disciplinary process used as part of the Systems Engineering process to reduce risk in systems. HSI professionals consider the human, hardware, and software elements of system design to optimize system performance and improve safety. HSI professionals work in domains of study that include training, management, human factors engineering, safety, and occupational health, among others. This article discusses the role of systems in the practice of anesthesia, and how consideration of the human during all phases of the system life cycle helps manage risks and promote a better patient outcome.

Human Factors↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Creating the Environment for Exploration Habitats

The Crew and Thermal Systems Division’s (CTSD) 20 Foot Chamber has undergone significant modifications to support NASA’s future human exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Existing chamber systems such as Vacuum/Repress, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and Fire Suppression System (FSS), were upgraded, while new systems such as Air Revitalization and Gas Distribution were added. In addition, the chamber was outfitted with crew quarters, hygiene areas, storage, and workspaces. Teams across the Johnson Space Center (JSC) worked together to overcome the logistical and operational challenges of the planned test parameters. The ultimate goal was to create an analog testbed in which a maximum of 8 human test subjects could safely live and work for at least 11 days in the same conditions (reduced pressures, Oxygen concentrations, etc.) as those expected inside a base spacecraft. This would allow researchers to study the effects of such environments on humans and to validate proposed Prebreathe Protocols to enable the safe performance of surface extravehicular activities (EVAs). Over the last eighteen months, the CTSD Systems Test Branch has performed six tests of varying lengths and atmospheres for both NASA and commercial partners. To date, researchers now have collected data on 48 test subjects in the course of 42 days and over 130 simulated EVAs. This paper will discuss the history of the 20 Foot Chamber, its long road to becoming an analog testbed for human exploration, and the capabilities that make it a unique, world class facility for NASA and commercial human exploration missions. It will provide an overview of past and future testing, and the lessons learned along the way.

Cristina Aurora Anchondo↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Effects of Mild Hypobaric Hypoxia on Response From Mild Exercise in NASA Exploration Atmosphere Tests

INTRODUCTION: The NASA Exploration Atmosphere study aims to validate a new prebreathe protocol incorporating an alternate habitat atmosphere of 56.5 kPa (8.2psia), 34% O 2 , and 66% N 2 to control and mitigate decompression sickness risk associated with spaceflight extravehicular activities. This alternate atmosphere results in a mild hypoxic environment (PIO 2 of 128 mmHg) that may influence inhabitant physiological responses to exercise. Therefore, the responses to light exercise in relation to the mild hypobaric hypoxic environment were investigated. METHODS: Eight participants (4M/4F; age=38.3±9.0 yr; weight=76.0±13.1 kg; peak aerobic capacity [VO 2 pk]= 3.1±0.7 L/min) were exposed to a mild hypobaric hypoxic environment for 11 days in NASA’s 20-foot hypobaric chamber at Johnson Space Center. Participants alternated test days between a habitat atmosphere of 56.5 kPA/34% O 2 and simulated 6-hour EVA environment, 29.6 kPa/85% O 2 . Participants completed pre-mission graded VO 2 pk tests on a LODE cycle ergometer with ParvoMedics metabolic analyzer. Submaximal aerobic tests were performed pre and during the mission (10-minutes of exercise at a workload of 40% VO 2 pk).Pre-mission, performed submaximal exercise exposed to a breathing air mixture of, 18% O 2 and balance N 2 , to simulate the mildly hypoxic environment within the 20-foot chamber. Linear mixed models (fixed effect: test day; random effects: subject, age) were performed to determine whether physiological responses (oxygen uptake [VO 2 ], carbon dioxide production [VCO 2 ], ventilation [VE], oxygen saturation [SPO 2 ], heart rate [HR], respiratory exchange ratio [RER]) to submaximal exercise performed within the 20-foot hypobaric chamber every 2 days differed from the pre-mission (18% O 2 ) testing. Results are presented as estimated marginal means with lower and upper confidence limits, with significance set to 0.05. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Seven of eight participants completed the chamber study. Mixed models for VO 2 , VCO 2 , SpO 2 , HR, and RER indicated negligible impact of the mild hypoxic chamber environment compared to pre-mission testing (all p>0.05).Results for VE indicated a minor impact of chamber environment compared to pre-mission testing (37.0 L/min [30.8, 43.2]), with increased VE at test day 10 (40.4 L/min [34.2, 46.6]; p= 0.029).The aerobic performance data collected suggests limited physiologic responses to mild exercise when performed at normobaric hypoxia and hypobaric hypoxia.

B Siders↗
NASA NTRS2024

Evaluation of Sex Differences in Physiologic Responses to Submaximal Cycling Under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

BACKGROUND: During Lunar missions, astronauts may live and operate in conditions where altered atmospheric pressure and oxygen concentrations may result in a mildly hypoxic environment. While the compensatory hemodynamic mechanisms ensuring adequate oxygen delivery to contracting muscles during exercise in hypoxic conditions are well-studied, less research has focused on potential sex differences in the responses to hypoxia exposure during exercise. As female astronauts make up half of the Artemis astronaut corps, understanding whether physiologic responses in a hypoxic environment differ between sexes may inform recommendations for exercising safely in exploration environments. METHODS: Fourteen subjects (7M/7F) from NASA’s Exploration Atmosphere Study performed two submaximal cycle exercise trials (10 min of exercise at 40% peak aerobic capacity [VO 2 pk]) ergometer under normobaric normoxic gas (21% O 2 ) and normobaric hypoxic (18% O 2 and balanced N 2 ) conditions in randomized order. Linear mixed models with Bonferroni post hoc corrections (fixed effects: condition, sex, VO 2 pk [covariate], body mass [BM, covariate]; random effects: subject, mission) were performed to evaluate the effect of condition and sex on physiologic responses to exercise (oxygen uptake [VO 2 ], carbon dioxide production [VCO 2 ], ventilation [VE], oxygen saturation [SpO 2 ], and heart rate [HR]). RESULTS: Males were comparable to females for age (36.6±4.7 vs 36.4±9.3 yrs; p>0.05) but had greater BM (87.3±10.9 vs 64.5±7.4 kg; p<0.001) and absolute VO2pk (3.5±0.6 vs 2.4±4.7 L/min; p<0.001). Additionally, males had higher VO2 (p=0.005), VCO2 (p=0.02), and VE (p=0.01) during exercise trials, independent of condition; however, when VO 2 pk was added as a covariate, the effect of sex was no longer significant. SpO 2 was reduced during hypoxic exercise compared to the normoxic condition (p<0.001), but neither sex nor environmental condition impacted HR. CONCLUSIONS: Though most physiologic responses to submaximal, short-duration exercise between normoxia and mild hypoxia were similar, females exhibited lower VO 2 , VCO 2 , and VE during both conditions, likely driven by lower aerobic capacity. Future research is needed to determine whether similar findings result from multiday hypobaric hypoxia experienced during missions.

N C Strock↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Short xEMU Pressure Garment Thermal Vacuum Test Results

NASA performed a thermal-vacuum test of the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) to demonstrate the performance of the government reference design in a relevant space-like environment. One of the spacesuit test articles was configurated as a Short-xEMU (SxEMU). This unmanned configuration provided an excellent test to evaluate the Exploration Portable Life Support System (xPLSS), however it posed some challenges with the Exploration Pressure Garment (xPGS) components involved due to the lack of a human wearing a Liquid Cooling and Ventilation Garment (LCVG), which significantly contributes to the thermal performance of the suit. This paper provides an overview of the pressure garment components that made up this portion of the test article, the test configuration, test results, and lessons learned from this very unique spacesuit test.

xemu↗
NASA NTRS2023

Oxygenation of the Baltoscandian shelf linked to Ordovician biodiversification

Marine biodiversity increased markedly during the Ordovician Period (~487–443 million years ago). Some intervals within the Ordovician were associated with unusually rapid and prominent rises in taxonomic richness, the reasons for which remain debated. Links between increased oxygenation and biodiversifcation have been proposed, although supporting marine oxygen proxy data are limited. Here we present an expansive multi-site iodine-to-calcium (I/Ca) record from Lower–Middle Ordovician marine carbonates in Baltoscandia that provides a detailed account of the spatio-temporal development of oxygen conditions across this palaeoshelf. The data document progressive oxygenation of regional seafoor environments, with well-oxygenated waters sourced from the palaeoequatorward Iapetus Ocean and peak I/Ca values (that is, dissolved oxygen concentrations) coinciding with the most pronounced biodiversity increases and ecosystem reorganizations during this time interval. This occurred while the climate cooled, global sea level dropped and carbonate deposits became regionally dominant. The results suggest that ventilation of shelves played a critical role in regulating early Palaeozoic marine biodiversity via development of ecospace and aerobic–metabolic conditions.

Anders Lindskog↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Creating the Environment for Exploration Habitats

The Crew and Thermal Systems Division’s (CTSD) 20 Foot Chamber has undergone significant modifications to support NASA’s future human exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Existing chamber systems such as Vacuum/Repress, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and Fire Suppression System (FSS), were upgraded, while new systems such as Air Revitalization and Gas Distribution were added. In addition, the chamber was outfitted with crew quarters, hygiene areas, storage, and workspaces. Teams across the Johnson Space Center (JSC) worked together to overcome the logistical and operational challenges of the planned test parameters. The ultimate goal was to create an analog testbed in which a maximum of 8 human test subjects could safely live and work for at least 11 days in the same conditions (reduced pressures, Oxygen concentrations, etc.) as those expected inside a base spacecraft. This would allow researchers to study the effects of such environments on humans and to validate proposed Prebreathe Protocols to enable the safe performance of surface extravehicular activities (EVAs). Over the last eighteen months, the CTSD Systems Test Branch has performed six tests of varying lengths and atmospheres for both NASA and commercial partners. To date, researchers now have collected data on 48 test subjects in the course of 42 days and over 130 simulated EVAs. This paper will discuss the history of the 20 Foot Chamber, its long road to becoming an analog testbed for human exploration, and the capabilities that make it a unique, world class facility for NASA and commercial human exploration missions. It will provide an overview of past and future testing, and the lessons learned along the way.

Cristina A Anchondo↗
NASA NTRS2024

Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) Lunar Boot Chamber B Thermal Vacuum Testing Results

NASA’s Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) is the government reference next-generation spacesuit design and is engineered to protect astronauts from extreme lunar environmental temperatures. To evaluate the xEMU hardware thermal requirements, the xEMU Testing Team invented, designed, and executed a dual-suit, uncrewed thermal vacuum (TVAC) test at Johnson Space Center’s (JSC) Chamber B. This paper details the test methodology, hardware setup, and results from the xEMU lunar boots. Eleven unique thermal profiles were tested including both cold and hot environmental cases over the course of five continuous days of testing. This paper will address only the cold environment testing results. The radiative thermal environment was controlled through exposure to liquid-nitrogen shrouds on the chamber walls and through a heater cage surrounding the boots. Notably, the xEMU boots also contacted the liquid-nitrogen chilled floor inside of Chamber B, which provided a conduction pathway to simulate the thermal effects of the lunar surface. Test hardware was developed to extend the water tubing from the Liquid Cooling Ventilation Garment (LCVG) into the boots to set the internal thermal boundary nominally provided by the astronaut’s foot. Thirty-three temperature sensors were used to collect data in critical locations in the xEMU boot assembly as well as for calorimetry to determine heat flux to and from the boots. This paper will document the testing results and provide a high-level interpretation of the testing results. To conclude, this paper will address possible forward work and knowledge gaps present in lunar boot thermal performance and testing.

xEMU↗
NASA NTRS2024

Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) Chamber B Thermal Vacuum “Suit 2” Pressure Garment System Hardware and Test Design

NASA’s Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) is the government reference next-generation space suit design and is engineered to protect astronauts from extreme lunar environmental temperatures. To evaluate the xEMU hardware thermal requirements, the xEMU Testing Team invented, designed, and executed a dual-suit, uncrewed thermal vacuum (TVAC) test at Johnson Space Center’s (JSC) Chamber B. This paper details the test hardware design and test methodology for the “Suit 2” Pressure Garment System (PGS) test article. The uncrewed “Suit 2” PGS test article consisted of a full PGS assembly with simulated Portable Life Support System (PLSS) functionality provided by test equipment, including a ventilation loop and two distinct thermal control loops. This paper will discuss in depth the test hardware design, including internal suit thermal boundary simulation, sensor quantity and placement, test support equipment rigs for gas flow, water flow, and power. Custom hardware designed to add additional penetrations to the suit or provide additional interfaces for sensors will also be discussed. This paper will also address the assembly and integration sequence for the test article. In addition to test hardware design, this paper will provide insights into the test methodology for this test article, including a discussion of thermal steady-state testing, simultaneous dual suit thermal vacuum testing, and hazard mitigation and controls.

xEMU↗
NASA NTRS2024

Short Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit Testing Setup: Evaluation Under Realistic Pressure and Thermal Conditions

The purpose of Short Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (SxEMU) thermal vacuum testing was to verify the functionality of the Design Verification Testing (DVT) prototype xEMU (SxEMU for this test) at vacuum pressures and extreme space and lunar surface temperature conditions. The SxEMU Thermal Vacuum Test was the culmination of the DVT xEMU project. This paper’s focus is on the pre-Extravehicular Activity (EVA) test setup, and general performance of the SxEMU Portable Life Support Subsystem (xPLSS), with focus on the performance of the Primary Oxygen Assembly (POA) and Secondary Oxygen Assembly (SOA), including Secondary Oxygen Regulator (SOR) takeover and the POA and SOA low-setpoint change inhibit. The initial pre-EVA test preparation included recharging the batteries and replenishing consumables, including test-system water, oxygen assemblies (with gaseous nitrogen), and the integrated thermal loops, including the Feedwater Supply Assemblies. xPLSS functionality testing included carbon dioxide (CO2) removal via the Rapid Cycle Amine swingbed system, thermal loop temperature control, and monitoring of suit ventilation loop pressure, temperature, and CO2 percentages. Testing evaluated automatic takeover of suit pressure control by the SOR after the primary oxygen supply is depleted. The Primary Oxygen Regulator and SOR low-setpoint change inhibit function prevents the crewmember from inadvertently setting the primary regulator to a low pressure setpoint during an EVA.

xPLSS↗
NASA NTRS2024

Creating the Test Environment for Exploration Habitats

The Crew and Thermal Systems Division’s (CTSD) 20 Foot Chamber has undergone significant modifications to support NASA’s future human exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Existing chamber systems such as Vacuum/Repress, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and Fire Suppression System (FSS), were upgraded, while new systems such as Air Revitalization and Gas Distribution were added. In addition, the chamber was outfitted with crew quarters, hygiene areas, storage, and workspaces. Teams across the Johnson Space Center (JSC) worked together to overcome the logistical and operational challenges of the planned test parameters. The ultimate goal was to create an analog testbed in which a maximum of eight human test subjects could safely live and work for at least 11 days in the same conditions (e.g., reduced pressures, oxygen concentrations, and so on) as those expected inside a base spacecraft. This would allow researchers to study the effects of such environments on humans and to validate proposed Prebreathe Protocols to enable the safe performance of surface extravehicular activities (EVAs). Over the last 18 months, the CTSD Systems Test Branch has performed six tests of varying lengths and atmospheres for both NASA and commercial partners. To date, researchers now have collected data on 48 test subjects in the course of 42 days and over 130 simulated EVAs. This paper will discuss the history of the 20 Foot Chamber, its long road to becoming an analog testbed for human exploration, and the capabilities that make it a unique, world class facility for NASA and commercial human exploration missions. It will provide an overview of past and future testing and the lessons learned along the way.

Cristina A Anchondo↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Ammonia-Removal Efficiency By Full-Scale Carbon-Based Trace-Contaminant Sorbent Monoliths Integrated With the Rapid-Cycle Amine (RCA) Swing Bed

Results are presented on full-scale performance testing of vacuum-regenerable, carbon based sorbent monoliths for trace-contaminant (TC) removal integrated with the Rapid-Cycle Amine (RCA) swing bed for use in the Portable Life Support System (PLSS) during Extravehicular Activities (EVAs). The current state-of-art in TC-control technology involves the use of a packed bed of acid-impregnated granular charcoal, which is difficult to regenerate. The carbon-based sorbent under development in this project can be regenerated by exposure to vacuum at room temperature. Data on cyclic sorption-desorption of ammonia, which is a major TC of concern, were collected in a simulated PLSS ventilation loop which involved the RCA placed upstream of the Trace Contaminant Control System (TCCS). Results of testing involving pressure-swing operation of the integrated TCCS/RCA system indicate ammonia-removal efficiency exceeding 80% throughout multiple sorption-desorption cycles. This paper presents an overview of the TCCS research, the favorable results obtained, and provides insight into future work needed to further the technology development.

Marek A Wójtowicz↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Trace Contaminant Control Test Bed for Evaluation of TCC Prototypes with Vacuum Regenerable and Non-Regenerable Sorbents

A new Space Suit Exploration Portable Life Support System (xPLSS) is being designed, built, integrated, and tested into the Extra-Vehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU). The Trace Contaminant Control (TCC) system is a component in the oxygen ventilation loop of xPLSS that removes contaminants generated by the crewmembers’ metabolic processes. The primary trace contaminants that must be removed include ammonia (NH3), carbon monoxide (CO), formaldehyde (CH2O), and methyl mercaptan (CH3SH). The current state-of-the-art TCC sorbent is non-regenerable activated carbon. As a non-regenerable sorbent, its use negatively impacts the logistics for future missions. Thus, an ideal solution can be a vacuum-regenerable sorbent integrated with the xPLSS CO2/H2O removal system. To test new designs and sorbents, XploSafe has constructed a recirculating test bed that mimics the environment within the xPLSS by providing concentrations of the trace contaminant analytes generated at the operating temperature, humidity, pressure, and flow rates of the xPLSS. This system can perform regeneration or desorption by exposing the sorbent to a pressure swing from 4.3 psia to <1 torr over approximately 2 minutes. Using this test system, XploSafe evaluated various TCC prototypes constructed using rapid prototyping techniques and identified a process that allows vacuum regenerative TCC designs to be quickly examined for flow, pressure drop, and performance. By using toluene as a segregate for volatile organics, this test system was evaluated using both vacuum regenerable and non-regenerable sorbents to demonstrate the operational effectiveness of these sorbents in maintaining the concentrations of the trace contaminant analytes below the 7-day Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations.

Nicholas Materer↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Creating the Test Environment for Exploration Habitats

The Crew and Thermal Systems Division’s (CTSD) 20 Foot Chamber has undergone significant modifications to support NASA’s future human exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Existing chamber systems such as Vacuum/Repress, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and Fire Suppression System (FSS), were upgraded, while new systems such as Air Revitalization and Gas Distribution were added. In addition, the chamber was outfitted with crew quarters, hygiene areas, storage, and workspaces. Teams across the Johnson Space Center (JSC) worked together to overcome the logistical and operational challenges of the planned test parameters. The ultimate goal was to create an analog testbed in which a maximum of eight human test subjects could safely live and work for at least 11 days in the same conditions (e.g., reduced pressures, oxygen concentrations, and so on) as those expected inside a base spacecraft. This would allow researchers to study the effects of such environments on humans and to validate proposed Prebreathe Protocols to enable the safe performance of surface extravehicular activities (EVAs). Over the last 18 months, the CTSD Systems Test Branch has performed six tests of varying lengths and atmospheres for both NASA and commercial partners. To date, researchers now have collected data on 48 test subjects in the course of 42 days and over 130 simulated EVAs. This paper will discuss the history of the 20 Foot Chamber, its long road to becoming an analog testbed for human exploration, and the capabilities that make it a unique, world class facility for NASA and commercial human exploration missions. It will provide an overview of past and future testing and the lessons learned along the way.

Chris Briggs↗