Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “variant”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Survey of Dynamic Mode Decomposition Methods

Dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) is a data-driven reduced order modeling (ROM) technique used for dynamic systems. The widely adopted algorithm was first introduced and demonstrated on fluid flow data by Schmid. In recent years, various other fields, such as nuclear engineering, have begun to adopt this method. For example, DMD has been used for estimating α-eigenvalues, as an ROM for pulsed neutron problems, for predicting isotopic composition in burnup calculations, as acceleration techniques for iterative methods, and in capturing dynamic behaviors in molten salt reactor transients. This report seeks to demonstrate the capabilities and limits of the standard DMD algorithm, and identify problem spaces where variants may be better suited. The primary variant this report considers is Multi-Resolution DMD (mrDMD). Because this serves as a survey, synthetically produced data is used in lieu of simulation results. The remainder of this report will go into detail on the DMD theory, outline the standard DMD and mrDMD algorithms, present test cases highlighting the applicability of each, and finally present a discussion on how to determine the best suited algorithm for a given problem. All calculations performed in this report are carried out using the open source DMD library, PyDMD.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Calculation Of The First Moment Of Energy Using D-T Reactivity Formalisms Under The Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution--Part II

Nuclear fusion science is an example of a scientific field with a rich history of expert involvement and scientific publications, which together, form an expert-knowledge base. One example of a nuclear fusion formalism is the utilization of published reaction rates from a variety of authors. Investigators for Deuterium- Tritium (D-T) ion fusion can choose from using frequently cited methods: the Bosch and Hal reactivity, thermonuclear reaction rates from Caughlan and Fowler, and the reactivity evaluation from Miley, Towner & Ivich which forms the basis of the Naval Research Lab (NRL) formulary. There are other choices available. Each of the reactivity formulations considered here, are based upon the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution for D-T fusion ion reactants. Numerical methods for computer codes simulating hot, energetic plasmas, include tabulations of the reactivity, and the first moment of energy. This report continues the step toward building understanding of nuclear fusion reactivity formalisms. It is part of a series of reports with the same goal, [5-10] and is the continuation of the Part I paper for defining the mathematical relationship of the first moment of D-T fusion ion kinetic energy, <$E$>, with the fusion cross-section, fusion reactivity and its derivative with ion-temperature. In Part I, three variants of the first moment <$E$> were analytically developed and explored: 1) constant cross-section, 2) a normalized first moment, and 3) a particular function of the first moment from Brysk. In Part II, attention is given to the definition of <$K$>, originally described as a ratio of moments from Brysk, and its relationship to the first moment definitions from Part I. One measure of the progress made in these documents is the identification that Brysk’s ratio of the second moment to the first moment ratio, <$K$>, does not correspond to his provided solution of the first moment of energy. Another measure of (our) progress from this work is the comparison of first moment variants. That comparison includes confirming the importance of cross sections defined in terms of energy. The analytical relationships we have developed among important physics quantities are useful tools in validation and verification (V&V). For example, we can calculate the kinetic energy as a mean or as a first moment, or as a function of the first moment. These analytically-determined values can be compared directly with numerically-determined values, supplied to the authors, representing <$E$>.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Nek5000 developments in support of industry and the NRC

This year, the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling Simulation program (NEAMS) thermal-hydraulics verification and validation (V&V) work has focused in three areas of Nek5000 V&V-driven development. First, in a close collaborative effort with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff, we have continued V&V efforts for the HYMERES-2 project using the OECD/NEA sponsored testing in the PSI PANDA facility. This year’s focus of ANL-NRC collaboration involves Nek5000 setups and validation for a range of problems relevant to and including the HYMERES-2 benchmark from PSI. The primary outcome of this year efforts is a more efficient geometry and inlet modeling simplification after a careful sensitivity study of the inlet profiles and pipe geometries. The resulting modeling choice of a short recycling/fully-developed turbulent inlet is within the experimental uncertainty estimate. This finding simplifies the next step of the cross-V&V HYMERES-2 project. In addition, the ANL team continue to provide assistance to the NRC staff in the form of Nek5000 application support in general and on the use of the HPC platforms of ALCF and INL in particular. This supports the NRC’s assessment of Nek5000 for use with the NRC Blue CRAB code suite. Second, we have implemented and tested more robust model of URANS, namely the k – τ model, a variant of the k-ω model, along with other improvements to RANS Nek5000 modeling in general. Because of its demonstrated robustness and stability, the k – τ model is the only RANS model that has been implemented in the new GPU version of the Nek5000 code, nekRS. Lastly, we report the initial implementation of Jacobian-free Newton Krylov approach to the direct Newton method for steady fluid solvers aimed at acceleration of RANS modeling and at IC improvement for LES campaigns. Also leveraging the Exascale Computing Project (ECP) ANL/CEED & SMR team’s software development effort to support NEAMS problems at large scale of the advanced computing architectures, NekRS, a GPU variant of Nek5000, built on top of kernels from libParanumal using OCCA for portability, has been successfully run on the full system of Summit (4608 nodes, 27648 GPUs).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Mechanical and Thermophysical Properties of 3D-Printed SiC before and after Neutron Irradiation – FY21

This report presents the mechanical and thermophysical properties of 3D-printed SiC before and after neutron irradiation that have been evaluated to assess the fuel matrix material for the Transformational Challenge Reactor (TCR). The TCR fuel form consists of an additively-manufactured silicon carbide (SiC) matrix and uranium nitride tristructural isotropic (UN TRISO) fuel particles, which is manufactured through a newly developed processing route combining binderjet 3D printing, TRISO fuel particle loading, and chemical vapor infiltration (CVI). Because the fuel matrix is a primary component of the TCR core and its response to mechanical and thermal loads during operation is one of the most influential factors on the integrity of TCR core, testing and evaluation have focused on producing mechanical and thermophysical properties data for the binderjet/CVI SiC. Baseline mechanical and thermophysical properties were measured from the disk specimens printed for different and sizes orientations, which included equibiaxial flexural failure strength, elastic constants, thermal diffusivity and conductivity, density, and the coefficient of thermal expansion. Flexural failure strength datasets showed similar Weibull distributions regardless of sample variants including different orientations. The mean failure strengths of the 3D-printed SiC variants were in the range of 280–310 MPa, which are slightly lower than that of the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) SiC. Thermophysical test results showed that specific heat and thermal expansion are not sensitive to the build direction of SiC samples, while thermal conductivity is highly dependent on the build direction and can be correlated to the anisotropic character of the 3D-printed SiC. Neutron irradiation tests were carried out on the 3D-printed 6-mm diameter SiC disk specimens. Irradiation was carried to 2.3 dpa over a temperature range of 360–880°C. No significant degradation in strength was observed in SiC after irradiations in various conditions and with different orientations. Anisotropy that had been observed in the thermal conductivity of 3D-printed SiC prior to irradiation vanished after irradiation as the irradiation defect thermal resistivity accumulated in the material. Electron microscopy of the microstructure after neutron irradiation showed distinct defect morphologies in the heterogenous material, but no evidence for irradiation-induced cracking or degradation in the microstructure was observed.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Adapting Secure MultiParty Computation to Support Machine Learning in Radio Frequency Sensor Networks

In this project we developed and validated algorithms for privacy-preserving linear regression using a new variant of Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) we call "Hybrid MPC" (hMPC). Our variant is intended to support low-power, unreliable networks of sensors with low-communication, fault-tolerant algorithms. In hMPC we do not share training data, even via secret sharing. Thus, agents are responsible for protecting their own local data. Only the machine learning (ML) model is protected with information-theoretic security guarantees against honest-but-curious agents. There are three primary advantages to this approach: (1) after setup, hMPC supports a communication-efficient matrix multiplication primitive, (2) organizations prevented by policy or technology from sharing any of their data can participate as agents in hMPC, and (3) large numbers of low-power agents can participate in hMPC. We have also created an open-source software library named "Cicada" to support hMPC applications with fault-tolerance. The fault-tolerance is important in our applications because the agents are vulnerable to failure or capture. We have demonstrated this capability at Sandia's Autonomy New Mexico laboratory through a simple machine-learning exercise with Raspberry Pi devices capturing and classifying images while flying on four drones.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Requirements Description of EvaluateFlux

This report presents the modeling and simulation capabilities of Argonne National Laboratory’s EvaluateFlux code [1] that is used in present reactor analysis activities. These capabilities will then be used to establish the set of EvaluateFlux verification tasks necessary to verify EvaluateFlux for usage on commercial projects. A similar approach was taken for the PERSENT, REBUS and DIF3D software packages. The EvaluateFlux program is a post-processing utility program for DIF3D, specifically DIF3D-VARIANT. As covered in [1], the EvaluateFlux program was built to allow users to obtain flux and power traverses through the domain. Its primary purpose was to facilitate foil analysis by evaluating the flux solution from DIF3D-VARIANT and combining it with foil cross section data. The outputs from EvaluateFlux are contained in four possible output files: FluxAndRegionRR.out, IsotopeMicroRR.out, LabeledRegionRR.out, and IsotopeMacroRR.out. Each file is focused on using the flux evaluate and cross section data in a different manner and all are covered in this verification process.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Verification of EvaluateFLux Utility Program

The EvaluateFlux program is a post-processing utility program for DIF3D, specifically DIF3D-VARIANT which handles Cartesian and hexagonal geometries. The EvaluateFlux program was developed to allow users to obtain flux and power traverses through the geometry domain, and its initial purpose was to facilitate foil analysis by evaluating the flux solution from DIF3D-VARIANT and combining it with foil cross section data. The EvaluateFlux program can calculate the neutron flux, as well as the reaction rates, at any user provided evaluation point. It does this by identifying the spatial mesh associated with the evaluation point and then evaluates the polynomial based neutron flux moments stored in the NHFLUX file at that point. The output of EvaluateFlux varies depending on the input setup. The maximum output includes the neutron flux and microscopic and macroscopic reaction rates at each evaluation point. The purpose of this work is to verify the outputs of EvaluateFlux. Simple models that have hand calculatable results are first defined and used to verify the EvaluateFlux outputs. More complex cases are then added where a duplicate program of EvaluateFlux that uses PrintTables outputs of the binary files is used to verify the EvaluateFlux outputs. In those complex cases, hand calculations of selected evaluation points were also displayed to confirm the software verification. For all the tests done, the hand calculations agreed well with those calculated by EvaluateFlux. For the larger complex problems, the duplicate program that can process hundreds of evaluation points was able to identify that zero points within some meshes have large errors. This aspect was attributed to the truncation error on the input provided to the duplicate program and is not a concern for the accuracy of the EvaluateFlux software.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Software Verification of VARPOW

The VARPOW program is a post-processing utility program for DIF3D, specifically DIF3DVARIANT, and it was developed to provide interface files for the thermal analysis program DASSH. The basic methodology of VARPOW is to take the neutron and gamma flux (moments) calculated by DIF3D (or GAMSOR) and combine them with the heating (coefficient) cross sections to calculate the spatial power distributions using the DIF3DVARIANT spatial basis. VARPOW can use the output from GAMSOR (both steady state neutron and gamma flux calculations) or standard DIF3D/REBUS calculations (neutron flux only). The correct approach for defining the power distribution is to use GAMSOR as its purpose was to properly compute the gamma heating throughout the modeled domain. The power densities calculated by VARPOW are broken into fuel, cladding and coolant terms for which isotope-wise categorization is needed. VARPOW has built in options the user can select for the isotope categorization or VARPOW can import a file that details the isotope categorization. VARPOW can export the solution in the polynomial basis of DIF3D-VARIANT or the monomial basis of DIF3D-VARIANT. The purpose of this work is to verify the power distribution results calculated by VARPOW from both the GAMSOR and DIF3D input options and verify that the input and output options are consistent with the manual. Hand calculation and independent numerical calculation are used for this verification work.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

In-situ and ex-situ characterization of irradiated AM materials

This study investigates the irradiation performance of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) 316L and 316H stainless steels (SS), and their wrought counterparts. While LPBF 316L has been more studied, LPBF 316H is relatively new, with little prior data on its irradiation behavior. The research involved fabricating, preparing, irradiating, and characterizing six materials: LPBF 316L (two variants), LPBF 316H (two variants), and wrought 316L and 316H. LPBF materials were subjected to various heat treatments, including solution annealing and stress relief, and were irradiated using in-situ and ex-situ ion techniques at temperatures of 300°C and 600°C, with doses ranging from 0.2 dpa to 25 dpa. Under ex-situ irradiation with 4 MeV Ni 2+ ions at 600°C, the dislocation cell structures in LPBF316L-1 and LPBF316H-1 gradually evolved into a uniform dislocation network. At a low irradiation dose (0.2 dpa), the cell structures were still partially visible. At 2 dpa, a uniform dislocation network formed, though remnants of the original cell structure were still discernible as contrast domains. At 5 dpa and 10 dpa, even the contrast domains vanished. For irradiation at 300°C, the cell structure was still clearly visible at 0.2 dpa for LPBF316L-1. For LPBF316H-1, the dislocation cell structure was less apparent at the same dose but was still recognizable. With further increase in dose at 300°C, the dislocation cell walls were completely replaced by irradiation-induced defects and no longer visible. Void formation was observed for irradiation at 600°C. At 2 dpa, no evident voids were observed in either LPBF316L-1 or LPBF316H-1.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Investigation of novel twinning in additive body centered cubic titanium (Fiscal Year 2024 Final Report)

This report summarizes the result of a one year seedling project to investigate unusual twinning behavior in shock loaded additive Ti5552. The twinning behavior only occurs when the β phase of Ti5553 is metastable, and it appears to be a type of double twin involving two different twin variants, first a {332}⟨113⟩ twin forms before being consumed by a specific {112}⟨111⟩ twin variant to create a 20 o . This behavior has only been detected during shock loading around incipient spall damage. The twinning is investigated by performing postmortem EBSD and PED analysis of gas-gun loaded specimens and preliminary molecular dynamics simulations.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Requirements Description of VARPOW

This report presents the modeling and simulation capabilities of Argonne National Laboratory’s VARPOW code that is used in present reactor analysis activities. These capabilities will then be used to establish the set of VARPOW verification tasks necessary to verify VARPOW for usage on commercial projects. A similar approach was taken for the PERSENT, REBUS and DIF3D software packages. The VARPOW program is a post-processing utility program for DIF3D, specifically DIF3D-VARIANT. As covered in [1], the VARPOW program was built to provide input for follow-on steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis. Its primary purpose is to act as the interface between DASSH and DIF3D-VARIANT. The outputs from VARPOW are contained in three output files: Output.VARPOW, VariantMonoExponents.out, and MaterialPower.out.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Software Verification of VARPOW

The VARPOW program is a post-processing utility program for DIF3D, specifically DIF3DVARIANT, and it was developed to provide interface files for the thermal analysis program DASSH. The basic methodology of VARPOW is to take the neutron and gamma flux (moments) calculated by DIF3D (or GAMSOR) and combine them with the heating (coefficient) cross sections to calculate the spatial power distributions using the DIF3DVARIANT spatial basis. VARPOW can use the output from GAMSOR (both steady state neutron and gamma flux calculations) or standard DIF3D/REBUS calculations (neutron flux only). The correct approach for defining the power distribution is to use GAMSOR as its purpose was to properly compute the gamma heating throughout the modeled domain. The power desnities calculated by VARPOW are broken into fuel, cladding and coolant terms for which isotope-wise categorization is needed. VARPOW has built in options the user can select for the isotope categorization or VARPOW can import a file that details the isotope categorization. VARPOW can export the solution in the polynomial basis of DIF3D-VARIANT or the monomial basis of DIF3D-VARIANT. The purpose of this work is to verify the power distribution results calculated by VARPOW from both the GAMSOR and DIF3D input options and verify that the input and output options are consistent with the manual. Hand calculation and independent numerical calculation are used for this verification work.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Verification of the EvaluateFlux Utility Program

The EvaluateFlux program is a post-processing utility program for DIF3D, specifically DIF3D-VARIANT which handles Cartesian and hexagonal geometries. The EvaluateFlux program was developed to allow users to obtain flux and power traverses through the geometry domain, and its initial purpose was to facilitate foil analysis by evaluating the flux solution from DIF3D-VARIANT and combining it with foil cross section data. The EvaluateFlux program can calculate the neutron flux, as well as the reaction rates, at any user provided evaluation point. It does this by identifying the spatial mesh associated with the evaluation point and then evaluates the polynomial based neutron flux moments stored in the NHFLUX file at that point. The output of EvaluateFlux varies depending on the input setup. The maximum output includes the neutron flux and microscopic and macroscopic reaction rates at each evaluation point. The purpose of this work is to verify the outputs of EvaluateFlux. Simple models that have hand calculatable results are first defined and used to verify the EvaluateFlux outputs. More complex cases are then added where a duplicate program of EvaluateFlux that uses PrintTables outputs of the binary files is used to verify the EvaluateFlux outputs. In those complex cases, hand calculations of selected evaluation points were also displayed to confirm the software verification. For all the tests done, the hand calculations agreed well with those calculated by EvaluateFlux. For the larger complex problems, the duplicate program that can process hundreds of evaluation points was able to identify that zero points within some meshes have large errors. This aspect was attributed to the truncation error on the input provided to the duplicate program and is not a concern for the accuracy of the EvaluateFlux software.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

VARI3D & PERSENT: Perturbation and Sensitivity Analysis

The nodal diffusion method is one of the most widely used approaches in modern reactor analysis. In the nodal diffusion method, a coarse multi-group set of “homogenized” parameters is constructed such that the complex geometry of a reactor core along with the energy dependence of neutron and gamma ray cross sections in a nuclear reactor are conserved in the simpler geometry. The homogenization is typically done on a fuel assembly level as is the case in the DIF3D code developed at Argonne National Laboratory. The nodal methodology is used primarily to predict fuel cycle behavior of nuclear systems of which there is a substantial amount of validation in the literature. Another use of the nodal method is to obtain reactivity coefficients and kinetics parameters for use in a safety analysis of a given nuclear reactor. While there are many ways to obtain reactivity worth and kinetics parameters, the work presented in this manuscript is unique as it provides the user with the ability to compute reactivity worths, kinetics parameters, and cross section sensitivities with a Cartesian and hexagonal geometry based transport code. This manuscript serves as a single manual for two separate codes: VARI3D and PERSENT. The VARI3D code (VARIational 3D) is based upon the classic finite difference diffusion theory solver available in DIF3D. The PERSENT code (PERturbation and SENitivity for Transport) is based upon the variational nodal method employed in DIF3D termed VARIANT. The VARIANT solver was added to DIF3D in 1995 and has seen continued development and use for the last 18 years. Because VARI3D primarily uses deprecated coding practices, rather than incorporating the perturbation and sensitivity treatments for transport within VARI3D, a new coding development was built using modern Fortran coding. The primary purpose of this manual is to describe the theory behind PERSENT (and by convenience, that of VARI3D) and discuss the input and output of PERSENT along with giving potential users an idea of how to use it. While this manuscript does describe the input and output of VARI3D, the PERSENT code is intended to be the replacement capability of VARI3D as PERSENT can generate nearly identical (if not superior) diffusion theory results. In this manuscript, the relevant aspects of generalized perturbation theory and exact perturbation theory that apply to both VARI3D and PERSENT are covered. The input and output of VARI3D is displayed by excerpting several of the example problems. Similarly, the input and output of PERSENT is displayed along with tips on how best to use the code. Note that the input and output of the inhomogeneous solver wrapped around DIF3D (DIF3D_IFS) is also discussed as it is needed to carry out some of the sensitivities in PERSENT such as reaction rate ratios. This manuscript describes several perturbation and sensitivity problems, and the results computed using PERSENT. From these sections, potential users should find that PERSENT provides not only the typical tables of numbers desired in perturbation and sensitivity analysis work, but also can visually plot the result for a more thorough understanding of the space and energy distribution (Section 5). Overall, PERSENT is observed to produce accurate reactivity worths and sensitivities for the displayed set of test problems and clearly demonstrates the need to have a transport-based sensitivity capability as evident from the thousands of percent errors observed in the 21-group hexagonal fast reactor problem (covered in Section 7). The uncertainty calculation capability is described in Section 3 and demonstrated in Section 7.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

HPC for Optimizing Process Parameters to Control Material Evolution in Seamless Induction Hardening of Wind Turbine Main Shaft Bearings

Work proposed in this project focused on understanding the effect of martensitic transformation in the steel on the potential for cracking during seamless induction hardening (SIH) as a function of process conditions to allow the process to optimally scale up. Large-scale, three-dimensional phase-field simulations of martensitic transformation were performed using MEUMAPPS-SS (Microstructure Evolution Using Massively Parallel Phase-field Simulations – Solid State) code developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The simulations were guided by location-specific thermal history generated by experimental measurements of time-temperature history generated at The Timken Company. The simulations were able to capture the morphological evolution of the martensite variants in an Fe-1.0C-1.5Cr steel based on the Nishiyama-Wasserman (NW) orientation relationship. The simulations were also able to quantify the stress-state at the interface between impinging martensite variants. The simulations indicated that the magnitude of the various stress and strain components were dependent on the sizes of the impinging plates with a reduction in these quantities with reduced plate size in agreement with experimental findings. The results obtained from the simulations will be used to guide the optimization of the alloy thermal conditions to eliminate quench cracking during SIH of bearing steels.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2025

HPC for optimizing process parameters to control material evolution in seamless induction hardening of wind turbine main shaft bearings

Work proposed in this project focused on understanding the effect of martensitic transformation in the steel on the potential for cracking during seamless induction hardening (SIH) as a function of process conditions to allow the process to optimally scale up. Large-scale, three-dimensional phase-field simulations of martensitic transformation were performed using MEUMAPPS-SS (Microstructure Evolution Using Massively Parallel Phase-field Simulations – Solid State) code developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The simulations were guided by location-specific thermal history generated by experimental measurements of time-temperature history generated at The Timken Company. The simulations were able to capture the morphological evolution of the martensite variants in an Fe-1.0C-1.5Cr steel based on the Nishiyama-Wasserman (NW) orientation relationship. The simulations were also able to quantify the stress-state at the interface between impinging martensite variants. The simulations indicated that the magnitude of the various stress and strain components were dependent on the sizes of the impinging plates with a reduction in these quantities with reduced plate size in agreement with experimental findings. The results obtained from the simulations will be used to guide the optimization of the alloy thermal conditions to eliminate quench cracking during SIH of bearing steels.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Code Coverage Status of the ARC Code PERSENT

The Argonne Reactor Code (ARC) software system supports users in their fast reactor design goals by providing neutronic, thermal-hydraulic, and structural analysis capabilities. PERSENT fulfills the role of generating reactivity coefficients for a given time point of a REBUS calculation usable in a point kinetics based safety analysis capability. PERSENT also provides a sensitivity coefficient capability on eigenvalue, reactivity worth, and several other key coefficients that are used in the follow-on safety analysis. Given a co-variance matrix, PERSENT can carry out the uncertainty quantification to indicate the amount of error in the reactivity coefficients derived from the errors in the cross section measurements. With continued improvement of computational resources, many of the geometry modeling capabilities in DIF3D that were primarily used in low order schemes are not really needed anymore. Today, the diffusion and transport capabilities of DIF3D-VARIANT are primarily used in the reactor design process with some scattered usage of DIF3D-FD and DIF3D-Nodal. PERSENT is part of the ARC code system and is built around DIF3D-VARIANT and the flux solution it provides. The purpose of the present work is to identify a set of test problems for PERSENT and assess the code coverage of PERSENT for those test problems. PERSENT treats the DIF3D executable as an external executable and thus the code coverage considerations only need to focus on the PERSENT source code and only a fraction of the connected modules in the existing ARC software library. The goal is to document what parts of the existing PERSENT code are touched by the set of test problems and which are not. Because the verification work done on PERSENT was focused on the most common uses of PERSENT for fast reactor analysis, the code coverage assessment of those capabilities is the highest priority. This will ensure that nothing is being missed by the existing verification test problems that users of PERSENT rely upon. The code coverage analysis of PERSENT was performed with the Code Coverage Tool of the Intel Fortran compiler which requires modifications to the compilation of PERSENT. The detailed coverage tables are given for each submodule of PERSENT. Most of the uncovered parts/files could be easily ignored because they are either for error message and debugging output or not needed by PERSENT today. Only a few uncovered parts of PERSENT deserve extending the verification test suite.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Develop High-Throughput Workflows for Whole-Genome Sequencing and Insertion Site Screening (CRADA Final Report)

The engineering of microbes for biomanufacturing (e.g. of fuels, chemicals, materials) applications has advanced to a stage where researchers screen genetic libraries with millions of variations each for those with enhanced productivity. This screening, however, can be slow and expensive, as screening individual variants in a high-throughput yet cost-effective manner is challenging. In this project, we aimed to reduce by 3-fold costs associated with the sequencing aspects of the screening process (to determine which genetic variant is responsible for an observed change in productivity), while being able to process over 1,000 samples per batch.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗