Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Physics - Plasma physics , Mathematics and Computing, Physics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Improvements to the New CTH Code Verification & Validation Test Suite (FY2020)

The CTH multiphysics hydrocode, which is used for a wide range of important calculations, has undertaken in recent years to overhaul its software quality and testing processes. A key part of this effort entailed building a new, robust V&V test suite made up of traditional hydrocode verification problems, such as those listed in the ASC Tri-Lab Test Suite and the Enhanced Tri-Lab Test Suite, as well as validation problems for some of CTHs most frequently used equations of state, materials models, and other key capabilities. Substantial progress towards this goal was made in FY19. In FY20, this test suite has been expanded to include verification and validation tests of the Sesame and JWL equation of state models as well as the Mader verification problem from the Tri-Lab Test Suite and the Blake verification problem - a linear elastic analog to the Hunter problem from the Enhanced Tri-Lab Test Suite. This report documents CTH performance on the new test suite problems. Verification test results are compared to analytic solutions and, for most tests, convergence results are presented. Validation test results are compared to experimental data and mesh refinement studies are included. CTH performs well overall on the new test problems. Convergence rates for the Blake and Mader problems are comparable to those for similar ASC codes. The JWL and Sesame verification tests show good agreement with analytic solutions. Likewise, CTH simulation results show good agreement with experimental validation data for the Sesame and JWL equations of state for the materials tested. Future V&V work will focus on adding tests for other key capabilities like fracture and high explosive models.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
DOE OSTI2020

Verification of the CP2020 Library

For many years, “pencil beam” (aka “broomstick”) problems have been used in Monte Carlo neutronic code verification studies . At Los Alamos, they were used to verify the changes associated with the upgrade of NJOY / MCNP to allow continuous angular distributions (instead of discrete angular distributions) from S(α,β) scattering. Recently, “pencil beam” problems have been applied to the verification of charged particle data for MCNP. Another verification test for CP2020 was to compare the continuous energy reaction cross sections generated by ACER with multigroup reaction cross sections generated by GROUPR from the same evaluation file. This method was also used in the verification of the most recent S(α,β) neutron libraries at Los Alamos .

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Modeling the Fission Meter [Slides]

This presentation includes an overview of the process, example inputs, and example results for the Fission Meter and its response.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

RAVEN regression tests' description

Regression tests for the Python RAVEN framework are found in raven/tests/framework. There is a hierarchy of folders with tests collected by similar testing. Every test is described in a special XML node (< TestInfo >) within the < Simulation > block.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

A New MCNP6 Electron-Photon Transport Validation Test: The Lockwood Energy Deposition Experiment (V.1.0)

This memo announces the availability of a new validation test for quantifying the accuracy of the MCNP6 electron-photon transport algorithm for use in energy-deposition calculations. Specifically, energy-deposition results are compared with the Lockwood energy-deposition experiment. The comparison includes energy-deposition profiles in a variety of different single-element materials including beryllium, aluminum, carbon, copper, iron, molybdenum, tantalum, and uranium for pencil beam electron sources with energies including 0.05-, 0.1-, 0.3-, 0.5, and 1-MeV and angles of incidence including normal, 30°, and 60° off-normal. The purpose of this memo is to discuss the contents of the Lockwood validation directory and to outline the procedure for generating the input files, running the tests, processing the results, and comparing results to the experimental and numerical benchmark. Each step is mostly automated by a makefile that executes the necessary perl script.

74 ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Assessment of ORIGEN Reactor Library Development for Pebble-Bed Reactors Based on the PBMR-400 Benchmark

This report provides an evaluation of present SCALE capabilities for modeling depletion of pebble-bed reactor systems, using the PBMR-400 benchmark as a test case. A specific aim of this work is to understand the system characteristics required to generate production-quality reactor data libraries for rapid depletion calculations with ORIGEN. This report includes a discussion of present SCALE capabilities for modeling doubly heterogeneous fuels, prior SCALE work modeling pebble bed–type reactors, and a detailed neutronic analysis of the PBMR-400 core for both fresh and equilibrium-composition core conditions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Upcoming MCNP6.3 ® Release: New Features and Improvements [Slides]

The latest version of the MCNP6.3 code will be done and released this year. Many new features, substantial improvements, and bugfixes have made their way into the code. Improved documentation, testing, and peripheral tools will also be delivered.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Terry Turbopump Expanded Operating Band Modeling and Simulation Efforts in Fiscal Year 2021 Extended Period of Performance (Final Report)

This report documents the progress made under the Terry Turbine Expanded Operating Band (TTEXOB) program's modeling and simulation (MODSIM) initiative at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL ). It describes the US Federal Fiscal Year 2021 (FY21) extended period-of-performance MODSIM work completed since the closure of FY20 with due reference to the Texas A&M University (TAMU) hybrid milestone 5/6 experimental program. This work, which falls under Milestone 7 of the program, provides a counterpart to the various experiments. The overall TTEXOB program and its milestone-based approach are described in the program's Summary Plan. Details of the individual milestone test plans can be found in the corresponding detailed test plan, e.g. the Milestone 3 and 4 Detailed Test Plan. SNL MODISM is conducted alongside experiments performed at TAMU, and SNL technical staff regularly consults with TAMU on the experimental program. In FY21, MELCOR code models and capabilities were exercised in two different contexts: experimental comparisons to the TAMU ZS-1 and GS-2, and stand-alone analyses of a station black-out (SBO) scenario in a generic boiling water reactor (BWR). Code to experiment comparisons met with fair success when turbine losses were well characterized as for the ZS-1 turbine. Both deterministic and Bayesian calibration processes were used to find a recommended turbine torque multiplier for ZS-1 type turbines. This process could be repeated for GS-2 type turbines if GS-2 losses were better understood. Stand-alone generic BWR SBO calculations revealed that three different modes of self-regulating turbopump behavior may be observed depending on certain modeling parameters and choices having to do with turbine nozzles. Aspects of this predicted behavior may have been observed in TAMU GS-2 experiments.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

A Verification and Validation Approach for COMSOL Multiphysics to Support High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR)

Over the last several decades, many reactors have successfully been converted from high enriched uranium (HEU) to low enriched uranium (LEU) fuels in United States in support of its global non-proliferation objectives. Of the reactors slated for conversion, five high-performance research reactors (HPRRs) remain. The high-flux isotope reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is one of the five. Conversion of HFIR requires the qualification of a new fuel. To aid in the conversion process as well as improve safety margins, COMSOL Multiphysics was chosen to support and eventually supplement the steady-state heat-transfer code (SSHTC). In order to use COMSOL as a supplementary tool, i.e. one used for safety basis calculations, the code needs to undergo a verification and validation process. Verification and validation are important processes for the use of any software; however, physics-based solvers have a unique challenge, in that the validation is much more rigorous and its domain is only applicable to the general scope of the problem. This document details the verification and validation of COMOSL for analysis of HFIR. This report is intended for two different users: (1) current and future users of COMSOL for HFIR and (2) for individuals interested in assessing the scope of the validation of COMSOL for HFIR. This report is divided into six sections. The first of which details the process of verification and validation. Section one provides an overview of key concepts from ASME V&V 10, 20, and 40 and how these concepts are used to provide a validation of any multiphysics software. Section two covers the approach needed in order to validate multiphysics software for a given HFIR analysis. Parts three through five split up the key concepts highlighted in section two. The final section provides concluding remarks which demonstrate the scope and limitations of the validation study and how these may be expanded and improved.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

TTMA Shaped Charge Assessment: TOW 2A

A summary of a Shaped Charge Assessment (SCA) of the TOW 2A shaped charge is shown here, modeled with the LANL PAGOSA hydrocode. Early, mid, and late time images show the jet formation and velocity

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
DOE OSTI2021

Coupling of CTF and TRACE for Modeling of Transients

This report documents the improvements that have been made to the capabilities for coupling CTF to systems codes-specifically, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) TRACE code. An initial systems coupling capability had been set up previously using a nonoverlapping domain approach with the codes exchanging data at the core boundaries. The present work adds a new approach using overlapping domains, in which the system code models the core as well. A new input format has been added to allow the user to specify the physical quantities to be exchanged and their location in the system model, which gives the flexibility of applying one-way or two-way coupling between the codes using the desired data exchanges. In addition to applying thermal-hydraulics (T/H) boundary condition (BC) values obtained from TRACE, a capability was added to allow CTF to apply flow resistance feedback to TRACE to match the CTF core pressure drop. Support was added for executing parallel CTF models within the CTF-systems coupling. The system coupling capability was successfully applied to a parallel MSLB transient, demonstrating that both the one-way and two-way coupling behaved as expected and provided substantial improvements to numerical stability and routine compared to the previous nonoverlapping domain coupling. An initial capability was also developed for performing restart calculations in CTF which will be used in the future for restarting CTF-TRACE simulations at specific points in the transient simulation.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗