Results for “Genome” — Page 37

DOE OSTI2021

Model Soil Consortium 2 (MSC-2) Bacterial Isolate Genomes

Model Soil Consortium 2 (MSC-2) bacterial isolate genome collections are derived from the soil consortium MSC-1 multi-species cultured isolate genome collections from a previously reported WA-IsoC_MSC1.1.0 collection of a naturally evolved, model soil consortia (10.25584/WAIsoCMSC1/1635272). This collection contains 8 different isolate species cultivated under variable carbon and nitrogen sources, originating from the IAREC grassland soil field site located in Prosser, WA, USA. Genomic sequencing of one or more organisms, or genomes in general, such as meta-information on genomes, genome projects, gene names of a given organism within a natural environment. The version described here is the first version.

Soil microbiome, defined community, chitin↗

DOE OSTI2024

KBase Narrative - Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 genome

Narratives for The phenotype and genotype of fermentative prokaryotes This is the Narrative for Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11. A complementary Narrative for Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 is available here. This is the Narrative for Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1. A complementary Narrative for Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 is available here. Background and Isolation This Narrative and its complementary Narrative contain assembly and annotation of two bacterial isolates that were isolated by our laboratory from the rumen of a Holstein heifer. All procedures with animals have been approved by University of California Davis’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Rumen contents were collected through a rumen fistula and strained through two layers of cheesecloth into a bottle. The bottle was sealed to exclude air and maintained at 39°C. Contents were brought to the laboratory and bubbled under O2-free CO2 within 15 min. At the laboratory, serial dilutions were made with anaerobic dilution solution for Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 and propionibacterium diluent for Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 (table S2). Aliquots (0.1 ml) of each dilution were injected into anaerobic bottle plates (1) containing 9 ml of LH medium (table S2). After incubation at 37°C for 7 days, isolated colonies were picked. Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 was picked from a bottle inoculated with a 104 dilution of rumen contents, and Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 was picked from a bottle inoculated with a 103 dilution. After initial isolation, these organisms were purified by growing on anaerobic roll tubes (2) and picking isolated colonies. We performed de novo sequencing of Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 and Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11. Aliquots of liquid culture (9 and 1.5 ml, respectively) were collected by syringe and centrifuged (21,000g for 10 min at 4°C). Cell pellets were submitted to Molecular Research LP for DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing. After resuspending pellets in 180 µl of ATL buffer (Qiagen), DNA was extracted using the MagAttract HMW DNA Kit (Qiagen). DNA was eluted in 100 µl of AE buffer (Qiagen) and then cleaned using the DNEasy PowerClean Pro Cleanup Kit (Qiagen). DNA was then sheared using the Covaris g-TUBE (Covaris). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (Pacific Biosciences) and 1500 ng of the sheared and purified DNA. The SMRTbell libraries were size-selected (>6 Kb) using a BluePippin instrument (Sage Science) and 0.75% agarose gel. Libraries were then sequenced using the PacBio Sequel II (Pacific Biosciences) platform and a 30-hour movie time. Narrative Summary In these Narratives, we filtered low-quality reads using Trimmomatic (v0.36), assembled filtered reads with SPAdes (v3.15.3), and then checked completeness and contamination of the assembled genomes with CheckM (v1.0.18). Statistics for sequencing and assembly are in table S3. Using the assembled contigs (genomes), we called genes and annotated them. Protein-coding genes were called using Prodigal (v2.6.3) (3) locally or using KBase via RASTtk (v1.073), with identical results. Genes were annotated with KO IDs using KAAS (4). They were further annotated with pfam and TIGRFAM IDs using KBase and the Annotate Domains in a Genome app. We classified putative genes for hydrogenases using HydDB. Genes for 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) were called using RASTtk (v1.073) in KBase. The contigs (genomes) were analyzed to determine whether they belonged to new species. Taxonomy was assigned using GTDB-Tk (v1.7.0) in KBase. The identity of 16S rRNA genes to other organisms was found using EzBioCloud (5). Values of digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) were found with Type (Strain) Genome Server (6). These analyses suggest that Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 and Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 represent novel species or genera. GTDB-Tk assigned Lachnospiracae sp. C1.1 to family Lachnospiraceae and genus NK4A144, which contains no type strains. It assigned Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 to Porphyromonadaceae and genus Porphyromonas_A. Values of 16S rRNA identity and dDDH with respect to type strains were low (table S4). Although more phenotypic data are needed, available evidence supports assignment of genomes to new species or genera. Related publication Hackmann TJ, Zhang B. The phenotype and genotype of fermentative prokaryotes. Sci Adv. 2023 Sep 29;9(39):eadg8687. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg8687. Epub 2023 Sep 27. PMID: 37756392; PMCID: PMC10530074.

Hackmann, Timothy↗

DOE OSTI2024

KBase Narrative - Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 genome

Narratives for The phenotype and genotype of fermentative prokaryotes This is the Narrative for Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11. A complementary Narrative for Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 is available here. This is the Narrative for Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1. A complementary Narrative for Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 is available here. Background and Isolation This Narrative and its complementary Narrative contain assembly and annotation of two bacterial isolates that were isolated by our laboratory from the rumen of a Holstein heifer. All procedures with animals have been approved by University of California Davis’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Rumen contents were collected through a rumen fistula and strained through two layers of cheesecloth into a bottle. The bottle was sealed to exclude air and maintained at 39°C. Contents were brought to the laboratory and bubbled under O2-free CO2 within 15 min. At the laboratory, serial dilutions were made with anaerobic dilution solution for Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 and propionibacterium diluent for Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 (table S2). Aliquots (0.1 ml) of each dilution were injected into anaerobic bottle plates (1) containing 9 ml of LH medium (table S2). After incubation at 37°C for 7 days, isolated colonies were picked. Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 was picked from a bottle inoculated with a 104 dilution of rumen contents, and Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 was picked from a bottle inoculated with a 103 dilution. After initial isolation, these organisms were purified by growing on anaerobic roll tubes (2) and picking isolated colonies. We performed de novo sequencing of Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 and Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11. Aliquots of liquid culture (9 and 1.5 ml, respectively) were collected by syringe and centrifuged (21,000g for 10 min at 4°C). Cell pellets were submitted to Molecular Research LP for DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing. After resuspending pellets in 180 µl of ATL buffer (Qiagen), DNA was extracted using the MagAttract HMW DNA Kit (Qiagen). DNA was eluted in 100 µl of AE buffer (Qiagen) and then cleaned using the DNEasy PowerClean Pro Cleanup Kit (Qiagen). DNA was then sheared using the Covaris g-TUBE (Covaris). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (Pacific Biosciences) and 1500 ng of the sheared and purified DNA. The SMRTbell libraries were size-selected (>6 Kb) using a BluePippin instrument (Sage Science) and 0.75% agarose gel. Libraries were then sequenced using the PacBio Sequel II (Pacific Biosciences) platform and a 30-hour movie time. Narrative Summary In these Narratives, we filtered low-quality reads using Trimmomatic (v0.36), assembled filtered reads with SPAdes (v3.15.3), and then checked completeness and contamination of the assembled genomes with CheckM (v1.0.18). Statistics for sequencing and assembly are in table S3. Using the assembled contigs (genomes), we called genes and annotated them. Protein-coding genes were called using Prodigal (v2.6.3) (3) locally or using KBase via RASTtk (v1.073), with identical results. Genes were annotated with KO IDs using KAAS (4). They were further annotated with pfam and TIGRFAM IDs using KBase and the Annotate Domains in a Genome app. We classified putative genes for hydrogenases using HydDB. Genes for 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) were called using RASTtk (v1.073) in KBase. The contigs (genomes) were analyzed to determine whether they belonged to new species. Taxonomy was assigned using GTDB-Tk (v1.7.0) in KBase. The identity of 16S rRNA genes to other organisms was found using EzBioCloud (5). Values of digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) were found with Type (Strain) Genome Server (6). These analyses suggest that Lachnospiraceae sp. C1.1 and Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 represent novel species or genera. GTDB-Tk assigned Lachnospiracae sp. C1.1 to family Lachnospiraceae and genus NK4A144, which contains no type strains. It assigned Porphyromonadaceae sp. W3.11 to Porphyromonadaceae and genus Porphyromonas_A. Values of 16S rRNA identity and dDDH with respect to type strains were low (table S4). Although more phenotypic data are needed, available evidence supports assignment of genomes to new species or genera. Related publication Hackmann TJ, Zhang B. The phenotype and genotype of fermentative prokaryotes. Sci Adv. 2023 Sep 29;9(39):eadg8687. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg8687. Epub 2023 Sep 27. PMID: 37756392; PMCID: PMC10530074.

Hackmann, Timothy↗

DOE OSTI2023

A genome-informed higher rank classification of the biotechnologically important fungal subphylum Saccharomycotina

The subphylum Saccharomycotina is a lineage in the fungal phylum Ascomycota that exhibits levels of genomic diversity similar to those of plants and animals. The Saccharomycotina consist of more than 1 200 known species currently divided into 16 families, one order, and one class. Species in this subphylum are ecologically and metabolically diverse and include important opportunistic human pathogens, as well as species important in biotechnological applications. Many traits of biotechnological interest are found in closely related species and often restricted to single phylogenetic clades. However, the biotechnological potential of most yeast species remains unexplored. Although the subphylum Saccharomycotina has much higher rates of genome sequence evolution than its sister subphylum, Pezizomycotina, it contains only one class compared to the 16 classes in Pezizomycotina. The third subphylum of Ascomycota, the Taphrinomycotina, consists of six classes and has approximately 10 times fewer species than the Saccharomycotina. These data indicate that the current classification of all these yeasts into a single class and a single order is an underappreciation of their diversity. Our previous genome-scale phylogenetic analyses showed that the Saccharomycotina contains 12 major and robustly supported phylogenetic clades; seven of these are current families (Lipomycetaceae, Trigonopsidaceae, Alloascoideaceae, Pichiaceae, Phaffomycetaceae, Saccharomycodaceae, and Saccharomycetaceae), one comprises two current families (Dipodascaceae and Trichomonascaceae), one represents the genus Sporopachydermia, and three represent lineages that differ in their translation of the CUG codon (CUG-Ala, CUG-Ser1, and CUG-Ser2). Using these analyses in combination with relative evolutionary divergence and genome content analyses, we propose an updated classification for the Saccharomycotina, including seven classes and 12 orders that can be diagnosed by genome content. This updated classification is consistent with the high levels of genomic diversity within this subphylum and is necessary to make the higher rank classification of the Saccharomycotina more comparable to that of other fungi, as well as to communicate efficiently on lineages that are not yet formally named.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2017

Genome Replication in Thermococcus kodakarensis Independent of Cdc6 and an Origin of Replication

The initiation of DNA replication is typically tightly regulated by proteins that form initiation complexes at specific sequences known as replication origins. In Archaea and Eukaryotes, Cdc6, a near-universally conserved protein binds and facilitates the origin-dependent assembly of the replicative apparatus. TK1901 encodes Cdc6 in Thermococcus kodakarensis but, as we report here, TK1901 and the presumed origin of replication can be deleted from the genome of this hyperthermophilic Archaeon without any detectable effects on growth, genetic competence or the ability to support autonomous plasmid replication. All regions of the genome were equally represented in the sequences generated by whole genome sequencing of DNA isolated from T. kodakarensis strains with or without TK1901, inconsistent with DNA initiation occurring at one or few origins, and instead suggestive of replication initiating at many sites distributed throughout the genome. We were unable to generate strains lacking the recombination factors, RadA or RadB, consistent with T. kodakarensis cells, that are oligoploid (7–19 genomes per cell), employing a recombination-based mechanism of DNA replication. Deletion of the previously presumed origin region reduced the long-term viability of cultures supporting the possibility that retaining an origin-based mechanism of DNA initiation provides a survival mechanism for stationary phase cells with only one genome.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2017

Toward Understanding Phage:Host Interactions in the Rumen; Complete Genome Sequences of Lytic Phages Infecting Rumen Bacteria

The rumen is known to harbor dense populations of bacteriophages (phages) predicted to be capable of infecting a diverse range of rumen bacteria. While bacterial genome sequencing projects are revealing the presence of phages which can integrate their DNA into the genome of their host to form stable, lysogenic associations, little is known of the genetics of phages which utilize lytic replication. These phages infect and replicate within the host, culminating in host lysis, and the release of progeny phage particles. While lytic phages for rumen bacteria have been previously isolated, their genomes have remained largely uncharacterized. Here we report the first complete genome sequences of lytic phage isolates specifically infecting three genera of rumen bacteria: Bacteroides , Ruminococcus , and Streptococcus . All phages were classified within the viral order Caudovirales and include two phage morphotypes, representative of the Siphoviridae and Podoviridae families. The phage genomes displayed modular organization and conserved viral genes were identified which enabled further classification and determination of closest phage relatives. Co-examination of bacterial host genomes led to the identification of several genes responsible for modulating phage:host interactions, including CRISPR/ Cas elements and restriction-modification phage defense systems. These findings provide new genetic information and insights into how lytic phages may interact with bacteria of the rumen microbiome.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2018

Bacterial and Archaeal Viruses of Himalayan Hot Springs at Manikaran Modulate Host Genomes

Hot spring-associated viruses, particularly the archaeal viruses, remain under-examined compared to bacteriophages. Previous metagenomic studies of the Manikaran hot springs in India suggested an abundance of viral DNA, which prompted us to examine the virus–host (bacterial and archaeal) interactions in sediment and microbial mat samples collected from the thermal discharges. Here, we characterize the viruses (both bacterial and archaeal) from this Himalayan hot spring using both metagenomics assembly and electron microscopy. We utilized four shotgun samples from sediment (78–98°C) and two from microbial mats (50°C) to reconstruct 65 bacteriophage genomes (24–200 kb). We also identified 59 archaeal viruses that were notably abundant across the sediment samples. Whole-genome analyses of the reconstructed bacteriophage genomes revealed greater genomic conservation in sediments (65%) compared to microbial mats (49%). However, a minimal phage genome was still maintained across both sediment and microbial mats suggesting a common origin. To complement the metagenomic data, scanning-electron and helium-ion microscopy were used to reveal diverse morphotypes of Caudovirales and archaeal viruses. The genome level annotations provide further evidence for gene-level exchange between virus and host in these hot springs, and augments our knowledgebase for bacteriophages, archaeal viruses and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat cassettes, which provide a critical resource for studying viromes in extreme natural environments.

Caudovirales↗

DOE OSTI2025

Diversity of Sordariales Fungi: Identification of Seven New Species of Naviculisporaceae Through Morphological Analyses and Genome Sequencing

Thanks to next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, the diversity of fungi can now be investigated through the analysis of their genome sequences. Naviculisporaceae is a family within the Sordariales, whose diversity is not well-known, with only one genome sequence published for this family. Here, we report on the isolation and cultivation of 20 new strains of Naviculisporaceae. Their genome sequences, as well as those of the five commercially available strains, were determined, thus providing complete genome sequences for 25 new Naviculisporaceae strains. Species delimitation was conducted using a combination of (1) ITS + LSU phylogenetic analysis of the new isolates along with other known species of the family, (2) comparisons between DNA barcode sequences of the new strains with those of the known species, and (3) average genome-wide nucleotide identity calculation. We built a phylogenomic tree and studied the organization of the mating-type locus. In vitro fruiting was obtained for 16 strains, enabling the definition of seven new species, namely Pseudorhypophila gallica, Pseudorhypophila guyanensis Rhypophila alpibus, Rhypophila brasiliensis, Rhypophila camarguensis, Rhypophila reunionensis and Rhypophila thailandica, as well as two new combinations, namely Pseudorhypophila latipes and Pseudorhypophila oryzae. Eight strains for which in vitro fruiting was not obtained may belong to additional new species. These results expand the known diversity of the Naviculisporaceae and greatly enlarge the genomic data available for the family.

Naviculisporaceae↗

DOE OSTI2014

Genome sequence of the Thermotoga thermarum type strain (LA 3 T ) from an African solfataric spring

Thermotoga thermarum Windberger et al. 1989 is a member to the genomically well characterized genus Thermotoga in the phylum ' Thermotogae '. T. thermarum is of interest for its origin from a continental solfataric spring vs. predominantly marine oil reservoirs of other members of the genus. The genome of strain LA3T also provides fresh data for the phylogenomic positioning of the (hyper-)thermophilic bacteria. T. thermarum strain LA3 T is the fourth sequenced genome of a type strain from the genus Thermotoga , and the sixth in the family Thermotogaceae to be formally described in a publication. Phylogenetic analyses do not reveal significant discrepancies between the current classification of the group, 16S rRNA gene data and whole-genome sequences. Nevertheless, T. thermarum significantly differs from other Thermotoga species regarding its iron-sulfur cluster synthesis, as it contains only a minimal set of the necessary proteins. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 2,039,943 bp long chromosome with its 2,015 protein-coding and 51 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2013

Genome sequence of Ensifer sp. TW10; a Tephrosia wallichii (Biyani) microsymbiont native to the Indian Thar Desert

Ensifer sp. TW10 is a novel N2 -fixing bacterium isolated from a root nodule of the perennial legume Tephrosia wallichii Graham (known locally as Biyani) found in the Great Indian (or Thar) desert, a large arid region in the northwestern part of the Indian subcontinent. Strain TW10 is a Gramnegative, rod shaped, aerobic, motile, non-spore forming, species of root nodule bacteria (RNB) that promiscuously nodulates legumes in Thar Desert alkaline soil. It is fast growing, acid-producing, and tolerates up to 2% NaCl and capable of growth at 40o C. In this report we describe for the first time the primary features of this Thar Desert soil saprophyte together with genome sequence information and annotation. The 6,802,256 bp genome has a GC content of 62% and is arranged into 57 scaffolds containing 6,470 protein-coding genes, 73 RNA genes and a single rRNA operon. This genome is one of 100 RNB genomes sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea-Root Nodule Bacteria (GEBA-RNB) project.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2013

Genome sequence of the acid-tolerant Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2230 from Karijini National Park, Australia

Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2230 is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming acid-tolerant rod isolated from acidic soil collected in 2001 from Karijini National Park, Western Australia, using Kennedia coccinea (Coral Vine) as a host. WSM2230 was initially effective in nitrogen-fixation with K. coccinea, but subsequently lost symbiotic competence. Here we describe the features of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2230, together with genome sequence information and its annotation. The 6,309,801 bp high-quality-draft genome is arranged into 33 scaffolds of 33 contigs containing 5,590 protein-coding genes and 63 RNA-only encoding genes. The genome sequence of WSM2230 failed to identify nodulation genes and provides an explanation for the observed failure of the laboratory grown strain to nodulate. The genome of this strain is one of 100 sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea-Root Nodule Bacteria (GEBA-RNB) project.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2013

Genome sequence of the acid-tolerant Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 from Karijini National Park, Australia

Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232 is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming acid-tolerant rod that was trapped in 2001 from acidic soil collected from Karijini National Park (Australia) using Gastrolobium capitatum as a host. WSM2232 was effective in nitrogen fixation with G. capitatum but subsequently lost symbiotic competence during long-term storage. Here we describe the features of Burkholderia sp. strain WSM2232, together with genome sequence information and its annotation. The 7,208,311 bp standard-draft genome is arranged into 72 scaffolds of 72 contigs containing 6,322 protein-coding genes and 61 RNAonly encoding genes. The loss of symbiotic capability can now be attributed to the loss of nodulation and nitrogen fixation genes from the genome. This rhizobial genome is one of 100 sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea-Root Nodule Bacteria (GEBA-RNB) project.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2014

Genome sequence of the mud-dwelling archaeon Methanoplanus limicola type strain (DSM 2279 T ), reclassification of Methanoplanus petrolearius as Methanolacinia petrolearia and emended descriptions of the genera Methanoplanus and Methanolacinia

Methanoplanus limicola Wildgruber et al. 1984 is a mesophilic methanogen that was isolated from a swamp composed of drilling waste near Naples, Italy, shortly after the Archaea were recognized as a separate domain of life. Methanoplanus is the type genus in the family Methanoplanaceae , a taxon that felt into disuse since modern 16S rRNA gene sequences-based taxonomy was established. Methanoplanus is now placed within the Methanomicrobiaceae , a family that is so far poorly characterized at the genome level. The only other type strain of the genus with a sequenced genome, Methanoplanus petrolearius SEBR 4847 T , turned out to be misclassified and required reclassification to Methanolacinia . Both, Methanoplanus and Methanolacinia , needed taxonomic emendations due to a significant deviation of the G+C content of their genomes from previously published (pregenome-sequence era) values. Until now genome sequences were published for only four of the 33 species with validly published names in the Methanomicrobiaceae . Here we describe the features of M. limicola , together with the improved-high-quality draft genome sequence and an notation of the type strain, M3 T . The 3,200,946 bp long chromosome (permanent draft sequence) with its 3,064 protein-coding and 65 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2021

Expanding standards in viromics: in silico evaluation of dsDNA viral genome identification, classification, and auxiliary metabolic gene curation

Viruses influence global patterns of microbial diversity and nutrient cycles. Though viral metagenomics (viromics), specifically targeting dsDNA viruses, has been critical for revealing viral roles across diverse ecosystems, its analyses differ in many ways from those used for microbes. To date, viromics benchmarking has covered read pre-processing, assembly, relative abundance, read mapping thresholds and diversity estimation, but other steps would benefit from benchmarking and standardization. Here we use in silico-generated datasets and an extensive literature survey to evaluate and highlight how dataset composition (i.e., viromes vs bulk metagenomes) and assembly fragmentation impact (i) viral contig identification tool, (ii) virus taxonomic classification, and (iii) identification and curation of auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs). The in silico benchmarking of five commonly used virus identification tools show that gene-content-based tools consistently performed well for long (≥3 kbp) contigs, while k -mer- and blast-based tools were uniquely able to detect viruses from short (≤3 kbp) contigs. Notably, however, the performance increase of k -mer- and blast-based tools for short contigs was obtained at the cost of increased false positives (sometimes up to ~5% for virome and ~75% bulk samples), particularly when eukaryotic or mobile genetic element sequences were included in the test datasets. Furthermore, for viral classification, variously sized genome fragments were assessed using gene-sharing network analytics to quantify drop-offs in taxonomic assignments, which revealed correct assignations ranging from ~95% (whole genomes) down to ~80% (3 kbp sized genome fragments). A similar trend was also observed for other viral classification tools such as VPF-class, ViPTree and VIRIDIC, suggesting that caution is warranted when classifying short genome fragments and not full genomes. Finally, we highlight how fragmented assemblies can lead to erroneous identification of AMGs and outline a best-practices workflow to curate candidate AMGs in viral genomes assembled from metagenomes. Together, these benchmarking experiments and annotation guidelines should aid researchers seeking to best detect, classify, and characterize the myriad viruses ‘hidden’ in diverse sequence datasets.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2014

JGI Plant Genomics Gene Annotation Pipeline

Plant genomes vary in size and are highly complex with a high amount of repeats, genome duplication and tandem duplication. Gene encodes a wealth of information useful in studying organism and it is critical to have high quality and stable gene annotation. Thanks to advancement of sequencing technology, many plant species genomes have been sequenced and transcriptomes are also sequenced. To use these vastly large amounts of sequence data to make gene annotation or re-annotation in a timely fashion, an automatic pipeline is needed. JGI plant genomics gene annotation pipeline, called integrated gene call (IGC), is our effort toward this aim with aid of a RNA-seq transcriptome assembly pipeline. It utilizes several gene predictors based on homolog peptides and transcript ORFs. See Methods for detail. Here we present genome annotation of JGI flagship green plants produced by this pipeline plus Arabidopsis and rice except for chlamy which is done by a third party. The genome annotations of these species and others are used in our gene family build pipeline and accessible via JGI Phytozome portal whose URL and front page snapshot are shown below.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2011

JGI Genomic Single-cell Assembly Workflow

JIGSAW is a software package disigned to quality control and assemble genomic DNA sequences from single-cell bacterial and archaeal genomes. Amplification of singel-cell genomes using multiple displacement amplification technology presents challenges that magnify the amount of contaminants in the sample and produce non uniform depth of sequence coverage. these factors pose problems whan assembling the genomic data using currently availible short read assembles. The software addresses these problems by removing contaminants and normalizing the sequence read coverage prior to assemble. A hybrid assembly approach using two different open source genome assembly tools is then applied to piece together the DNA fragments. Additional reporting of QC metrics for the input sample and the genome assembly is provided for further analysis.

Trong, S.↗

DOE OSTI2025

Metagenome-assembled-genomes recovered from the Arctic drift expedition MOSAiC

The Multidisciplinary Observatory for Study of the Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition consisted of a year-long drifting survey of the Central Arctic Ocean. The ecosystems component of MOSAiC included the sampling of molecular data, with metagenomes collected from a diverse range of environments. The generation of metagenome-assembled-genomes (MAGs) from metagenomes are a starting point for genome-resolved analyses. This dataset presents a catalogue of MAGs recovered from a set of 73 samples from MOSAiC, including 2407 prokaryotic and 56 eukaryotic MAGs, as well as annotations of a near complete eukaryotic MAG using the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) annotation pipeline. The metagenomic samples are from the surface ocean, chlorophyll maximum, mesopelagic and bathypelagic, within leads and under-ice ocean, as well as melt ponds, ice ridges, and first- and second-year sea ice. This set of MAGs can be used to benchmark microbial biodiversity in the Central Arctic Ocean, compare individual strains across space and time, and to study changes in Arctic microbial communities from the winter to summer, at a genomic level.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2015

Genomic comparison of the closely-related Salmonella enterica serovars enteritidis, dublin and gallinarum

The Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis, Dublin, and Gallinarum are closely related but differ in virulence and host range. To identify the genetic elements responsible for these differences and to better understand how these serovars are evolving, we sequenced the genomes of Enteritidis strain LK5 and Dublin strain SARB12 and compared these genomes to the publicly available Enteritidis P125109, Dublin CT 02021853 and Dublin SD3246 genome sequences. We also compared the publicly available Gallinarum genome sequences from biotype Gallinarum 287/91 and Pullorum RKS5078. Using bioinformatic approaches, we identified single nucleotide polymorphisms, insertions, deletions, and differences in prophage and pseudogene content between strains belonging to the same serovar. Through our analysis we also identified several prophage cargo genes and pseudogenes that affect virulence and may contribute to a host-specific, systemic lifestyle. These results strongly argue that the Enteritidis, Dublin and Gallinarum serovars of Salmonella enterica evolve by acquiring new genes through horizontal gene transfer, followed by the formation of pseudogenes. The loss of genes necessary for a gastrointestinal lifestyle ultimately leads to a systemic lifestyle and niche exclusion in the host-specific serovars.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗