Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “GUIDANCE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Electric Vehicle Charging Analytics and Reporting Tool (EV-ChART): Data Format and Preparation Guidance, Version 2.0

The Joint Office of Energy and Transportation maintains the Electric Vehicle Charging Analytics and Reporting Tool (EV-ChART), which provides a centralized hub for submitting electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure data directed by the Federal Highway Administration (23 CFR 680.112) EV-ChART will provide a streamlined data submission process and an integrated set of analytic tools, connect to other data sources, and empower data sharing and access across stakeholders, including the public. Any data shared publicly will be aggregated and anonymized to stay in accordance with 23 CFR 680. This EV-ChART Data Format and Preparation Guidance provides a comprehensive overview of the data reporting requirements as authorized under 23 CFR 680.112. The guidance is intended to be used alongside the EV-ChART Data Input Template, which defines the tabular data structure that these data submissions must follow.

ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS,MATHEMATICS AND COMPUT↗
DOE OSTI2022

Licensing, Regulations and Developing Guidance for Nuclear Technology Deployment for Embarking countries in Africa

The African region is witnessing an increased number of countries at different stages of implementing or considering the introduction of peaceful nuclear power programs to meet the demand of their rapidly growing economies as well as clean energy needs. Grid size, cost, licensing, and regulations will be some of the challenges to deploying larger power reactors. A key element of the regulatory framework will be the inclusion of nuclear security information and assurance that security is integrated into the license review process.As each country continue to implement and consider different reactor designs from several vendors, the significance of customer knowledge of licensing, Regulations, and guidance document to facilitate the deployment and operational needs for nuclear technology cannot be over-emphasized. This special session will bring together a selected panel of key stakeholders and policymakers from embarking countries in Africa to participate in a panel discussion to share their experience in the licensing, regulations, and development of guidance for power plant deployment. The session will also consider and identify potential gaps that may affect the licensing and regulatory applications for the future nuclear infrastructure. As well, the panel will promote regional networking and communication to increase capacities in readiness for the potential deployment of additional technology, such as Small Modular Reactors.

Dahunsi, Stephen↗
DOE OSTI2013

Revisions to US EPA Superfund Risk and Dose Assessment Models and Guidance - 13403

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund program's six Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) and Dose Compliance Concentration (DCC) internet based calculators for risk and dose assessment at Superfund sites are being revised to reflect better science, revisions to existing exposure scenarios and new scenarios, and changes to match up more closely with the EPA chemical regional screening level calculator. A revised version of the 1999 guidance document that provides an overview for the Superfund risk assessment process at radioactively contaminated sites, 'Radiation Risk Assessment At CERCLA Sites: Q and A', is being completed that will reflect Superfund recommended guidance and other technical documents issued over the past 13 years. EPA is also issuing a series of fact sheets in the document 'Superfund Radiation Risk Assessment: A Community Tool-kit'. This presentation would go over those changes that are expected to be finished by this spring. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Cyber-Informed Engineering Guidance—Implementing CIE in Early Systems Engineering Lifecycle Stages

Traditionally, cybersecurity is not considered in the design process. Design engineers typically focus on building safety and reliability into their products and applications. Security against malicious cyber incidents is often an afterthought, resulting in deployment of security solutions during installation or operation. Unfortunately, waiting to consider cybersecurity until later in the systems engineering lifecycle often results in less effective and more expense security. Idaho National Laboratory (INL) developed the concept of Cyber-Informed Engineering (CIE) in 2015 to provide a framework that enables cybersecurity to be built into systems beginning at the conceptual design stage. In addition to ongoing research by INL, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response has recently developed a National CIE Strategy document for incorporating CIE into the design and operation of infrastructure systems reliant on digital monitoring or controls. This paper provides a brief review of this National CIE Strategy as well as a roadmap to historical, current, and future CIE research by INL through the U.S. DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) Cybersecurity Crosscutting Technology Development Program. A near-term focus of the DOE-NE’s research and development is to extend the foundational CIE work into detailed guidance for implementation during initial systems engineering stages in nuclear digital instrumentation and control projects and to demonstrate use of the guidance in an integrated energy systems project.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Application of MARSSIM and MARSAME Guidance to Footprint Reduction Projects at a DOE Site (LA-UR-15-28730) - 16216

Department of Energy regulations require that potentially contaminated items and materials being released to the public are monitored and that any residual radioactive contamination does not contribute more than 10 μSv/y (1 mrem/y). In footprint reduction and demolition projects, buildings with potential residual contamination must be carefully and systematically surveyed prior to recycling materials or releasing debris for burial in commercial landfills. Multi-agency guidance is available to assure statistically representative sampling of the items and materials, appropriate measurement quality objectives, and valid statistical approaches for release decisions. Additionally, implementing a cost-effective evaluation program for releases requires working closely with regulators and waste generators and developing a technically sound process to account for naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) in building materials. Los Alamos National Laboratory has successfully implemented the available guidance for footprint reduction projects to help divert clean, recyclable materials from landfills and limit the possibility of mistakenly disposing of NORM as low level waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Application of New CERCLA Five-Year Review Guidance at Hanford - 16403

Under CERCLA, the implementation of remedial actions established in records of decision (ROD) are required to be reviewed every five years to evaluate their effectiveness in protecting human health and the environment. Past reviews have included evaluation of actions that were not implemented under existing RODs and, therefore, not subject to the requirement. While commendable for its transparency, discussing these out-of-scope actions created confusion and elicited comments that required time and effort to resolve. The fourth CERCLA Five Year Review (FYR) at the Hanford Site embraces the EPA guidance designed to streamline the process and focuses on the specific objectives of the review. This guidance and the training materials developed jointly by multiple federal agencies including EPA, DOE, DOD, and Department of the Interior (DOI), demonstrate a focused approach to the FYR process and offer real-world examples for streamlining this important document. This paper discusses the focused approach and process changes implemented at the Hanford Site that reduced the size and complexity of the document and provided the DOE, Richland Operations Office, with an efficient, effective template for preparing subsequent reviews. One key change was a thorough evaluation of what operable units were discussed and what operable units were not discussed in the five-year review. This process resulted in a reduction of 14 operable unit discussions. Additionally, extensive referencing of previously published CERCLA documents including closure reports and periodic groundwater monitoring reports minimized the amount of analytical data tables necessary to support the discussion. The Hanford five year review made good use of technology and provided internet links to existing documents where detailed information and voluminous analytical data reside. This eliminated the use of extensive data tables and summaries. The resulting five protectiveness determinations include: 1) 'Protective' which is used when there is sufficient data to conclude that the remedy is functioning as intended; 2) 'Protective in the short term' which is used when the data and/or documentation review raises issues that could affect future protectiveness; 3) 'Will be protective' which is used when the remedy under construction is anticipated to be protective on completion; 4) 'Protectiveness deferred' which is typically used when additional information is needed; and 5) 'Not protective' which is used when risks are not under control. Reviewing only on the appropriate operable units, and supporting the analysis of remedy performance with focused data, the resulting protectiveness determinations and overall effectiveness of the document were significantly improved. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Quantitative Analysis Guidance in Safety Software Validation

Quantitative analysis in software development has been a challenging topic over the years in safety software. While qualitative processes for vigorous safety software verification and validation (V and V) have been provided through standard such as IEEE 1012, quantitative analysis for V and V tasks such as correctness, completeness or accuracy evaluation have not been formally defined. In practice, there are quantitative analyses in terms of using software metrics. Many of these software metrics are useful in analyzing the test results. Some of them are used for providing guidance in code evaluation activities e.g. numbers of line of codes not exceeding certain limits, recursive calls are not allowed, etc. However, few can be used for providing quantitative analysis guidance for the V and V tasks such as completeness evaluation. AREVA Federal Services (AFS) has provided services for many nuclear projects in US. Through compliance with IEEE 1012, AFS V and V processes have provided vigorous qualitative processes ensuring quality level of the software products used in the project meeting the required nuclear software level. In addition, quantitative analysis is developed to provide structured validation framework ensuring 'zero defect' in the software products. This paper describes some aspects of the quantitative approaches using a sample safety application. (authors)

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
NASA NTRS1964

Guidance systems.

Guidance and control requirements and systems for Mercury, Gemini and Apollo spacecraft including applicability to other missions

APOLLO PROJECT↗
NASA NTRS1965

Guidance - Basic principles

Navigation and guidance principles and requirements - component technology, gyroscope application, inertial systems, specific force receivers, and geometrical aspects

INERTIAL GUIDANCE↗
NASA NTRS2025

Hardware in the Loop Performance of Terrestrial Powered Descent Dual Quaternion Guidance With A Custom First-Order Solver

The Safe & Precise Landing Integrated Capabilities Evolution (SPLICE) program continues to push the development of advanced descent and landing technologies. This paper will focus on the improvements made to the SPLICE Dual Quaternion Guidance (DQG) algorithm, which is a critical software component for generating approach phase and hazard avoidance trajectories. The trajectory performance of SPLICE DQG will be evaluated in preparation for a terrestrial flight test that incorporates a hazard avoidance maneuver. Additionally, the implementation of a customized first order Proportional-Integral Projected Gradient solver will be reviewed, along with preliminary execution results on the SPLICE Descent and Landing Computer (DLC).

SPLICE↗