Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Bounds”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2020

Enabling Limited Resource-Bounded Disjunction in Scheduling

We describe three approaches to enabling a severely computationallylimited embedded scheduler to consider a smallnumber of alternative activities based on resource availability.We consider the case where the scheduler is so computationallylimited that it cannot backtrack search. The first twoapproaches precompile resource checks (called guards) thatonly enable selection of a preferred alternative activity if sufficientresources are estimated to be available to schedule theremaining activities. The third approach mimics backtrackingby invoking the scheduler multiple times with the alternativeactivities. We present an evaluation of these techniques onMars mission scenarios (called sol types) from NASA’s nextplanetary rover where these techniques are being evaluatedfor inclusion in an onboard scheduler.

Vaquero, Tiago↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Probability Bounds Analysis Applied to Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle Nonlinearity

The Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) Program Orion vehicle finite element model (FEM) was updated based on a modal test performed by Lockheed Martin. Due to nonlinearity observed in the test results, linear low force level (LL) and high force level (HL) FEMs were developed for use during various Space Launch System (SLS) flight regimes depending on expected forcing levels. Uncertainty models were derived for the combined MPCV and MPCV Stage Adaptor LL and HL Hurty/Craig-Bampton (HCB) components based on the MPCV structural test article Configuration 4 modal test-analysis correlation results. Subsequently, system-level uncertainty quantification analyses were performed using both models for various SLS flight configurations to determine the impact of the nonlinearity on important system metrics. The system metrics included both transfer functions associated with attitude control and dynamic loads associated with aerodynamic buffeting during ascent. In each case, an independent Monte Carlo (MC) analysis was performed, and no attempt was made to combine the results. The Hybrid Parametric Variation (HPV) method was used to develop the LL and HL MPCV HCB uncertainty models. The HPV method provides both parametric and non-parametric components of uncertainty. The non-parametric uncertainty accounts for the difference in model-form between the linearized analytical model and the corresponding linearized component test results in the form of mode shapes and frequencies at that force level. This linear model-form uncertainty is implemented in the HPV method using random matrix theory. However, the HPV uncertainty models developed for the linear LL and HL MPCV components do not account for the nonlinearity in the MPCV. With respect to the linearized models, this nonlinearity is also an uncertainty in model form, but in this case, it must be treated independently as an epistemic uncertainty. It represents a lack of knowledge, in contrast to an aleatory uncertainty due to the randomness of a variable. In the case of an epistemic variable, the true value is unknown, only the interval within which it lies is known. Epistemic uncertainty can be reduced with increased knowledge, while in general, aleatory uncertainty cannot. This work combines the epistemic uncertainty due to the MPCV nonlinearity with the parametric and non-parametric uncertainty within the HPV method using a second order propagation approach. The LL and HL test data is augmented with surrogate test data derived from a nonlinear MPCV representation. The impact of the MPCV nonlinearity on system response statistics is determined using a series of cumulative distribution functions in the form of a horsetail plot, or p-box. This results in an interval of probabilities for a specific response value, or an interval of response values at a specific probability.

Daniel C Kammer↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Bounds on Robustness Limitations for Unstable Aircraft Using the Bode Sensitivity Integral

This paper investigates limitations in achievable robustness of statically unstable aircraft using the Bode sensitivity integral. A previous analysis of the X-29 aircraft is studied, and details about the available bandwidth and robustness limitations are re-examined using high-fidelity linear models of the aircraft and control system. Based on these results, a modified analysis was performed on the X-59 Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator to illustrate the same type of fundamental limitations and difficulties in meeting traditional specifications on gain and phase margins.

Bode sensitivity integral↗
NASA NTRS1989

A survey on the structured singular value

The structured singular value, U, is an important linear algebra tool to study a class of matrix perturbation problems. It is useful for analyzing the robustness of stability and performance of uncertain, (nominally) linear systems. Computation of (M) is difficult, and usually, upper and lower bounds are all that can be reliably computed. Upper bounds give conservative estimates of the sizes of allowable perturbations. The maximum singular value of a matrix M is an upper bound for (M). As an upper bound, it can be improved by finding a transformations to the data (i.e. M) which do not change the structured singular value, but do reduce the maximum singular value. Typically, upper bound algorithms involve searches over sets of transformations to yield the tightest bound. Lower bound algorithms are intelligent searches for minimum-norm solutions to multivariable polynomial equations, and are based on various optimality conditions that hold at the global (and, unfortunately, some local) minima. The current methods to compute both of these types of bounds are reviewed. Theoretical justification and extensive numerical experience with the various algorithms are covered.

Packard, Andy↗