Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Additively Manufacturing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37

Thermophysical Properties of Nickel-Based Superalloys

The NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) electrostatic levitation (ESL) laboratory has a long history of providing materials research and thermophysical property data. The lab can measure thermophysical properties such as density, surface tension, and viscosity of liquid materials, including elements, alloys, glasses, ceramics, and oxides. Nickel-based superalloys (e.g. Inconel, Hastelloy, and Waspaloy) have many high performance applications, including turbine engines for aerospace. Superalloy parts are typically manufactured by casting and forging. These processes generate both polycrystalline and monocrystalline parts. A relatively new method of fabrication of turbine disk materials is additive manufacturing, which is typically done for aerospace parts by powder-bed methods such as selective laser melting (SLM). Accurate modeling of casting and forging, as well as additively manufacturing processes, require thermophysical properties (density, surface tension, and viscosity). The thermophysical properties of liquid nickel-based superalloys, both conventional and additively manufactured, were measured at several temperatures in both undercooled and superheated condition. Surface tension and viscosity was measured using the oscillating drop method and density and thermal expansion was measured using edge detection methods.

SanSoucie, Michael P.↗

3D Printing in Zero G Technology Demonstration Mission: Summary of On-Orbit Operations, Material Testing, and Future Work

Human space exploration to date has been limited to low Earth orbit and the moon. The International Space Station (ISS), an orbiting laboratory 200 miles above the earth, provides a unique and incredible opportunity for researchers to prove out the technologies that will enable humans to safely live and work in space for longer periods of time and venture farther into the solar system. The ability to manufacture parts in-space rather than launch them from earth represents a fundamental shift in the current risk and logistics paradigm for human spaceflight. In particularly, additive manufacturing (or 3D printing) techniques can potentially be deployed in the space environment to enhance crew safety (by providing an on-demand part replacement capability) and decrease launch mass by reducing the number of spare components that must be launched for missions where cargo resupply is not a near-term option. In September 2014, NASA launched the 3D Printing in Zero G technology demonstration mission to the ISS to explore the potential of additive manufacturing for in-space applications and demonstrate the capability to manufacture parts and tools on-orbit. The printer for this mission was designed and operated by the company Made In Space under a NASA SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) phase III contract. The overarching objectives of the 3D print mission were to use ISS as a testbed to further maturation of enhancing technologies needed for long duration human exploration missions, introduce new materials and methods to fabricate structure in space, enable cost-effective manufacturing for structures and mechanisms made in low-unit production, and enable physical components to be manufactured in space on long duration missions if necessary. The 3D print unit for fused deposition modeling (FDM) of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) was integrated into the ISS Microgravity Science Glovebox (MSG) in November 2014 and phase I printing operations took place from November through December of that year. Phase I flight operations yielded 14 unique parts (21 total specimens) that could be directly compared against ground-based prints of identical geometry manufactured using the printer prior to its launch to ISS. The 3DP unit functioned safely and produced specimens necessary to advance the understanding of the critical design and operational parameters for the FDM process as affected by the microgravity environment. From the standpoint of operations, 3DP demonstrated the ability to remove parts from the build-tray on-orbit, teleoperate the printer from the ground, perform critical maintenance functions within defined human factors limits, produce a functional tool that could be evaluated for form/fit/function, and uplink a new part file from the ground and produce it on the printer. The flight parts arrived at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama in April 2015, where they underwent months of testing in the materials and processes laboratory. Ground and flight prints completed the following phases of testing: photographic/visual inspection, mass and density evaluation, structured light scanning, XRay and CT, mechanical testing, optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and chemical analysis. This presentation will discuss the results of this testing as well as phase II operations for the printer, which took place in June and July of 2016. Lessons learned from the tech demo and their impacts on the design and development of the second generation 3D printer for ISS, the Additive Manufacturing Facility (AMF) by Made In Space will also be presented. In addition, progress in other elements of NASA's In Space Manufacturing (ISM) initiative such as the on-demand ISM utilization catalog, in-space Recycler ISS Technology Demonstration development, launch packaging recycling, in-space printable electronics, development of higher strength polymeric materials for 3D printing and Additive Construction by Mobile Emplacement (ACME) will also be addressed.

Prater, Tracie↗

Efficient production of a high-performance dispersion strengthened, multi-principal element alloy

Additive manufacturing currently facilitates new avenues for materials discovery that have not been fully explored. In this study we reveal how additive manufacturing can be leveraged to produce dispersion strengthened (DS), multi-principal element alloys (MPEA) without the use of traditional mechanical alloying or chemical reactions. This new processing technique employed resonant acoustic mixing to coat an equiatomic NiCoCr powder with nano-scale yttrium oxides. Then, through laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), the coated powder was successfully consolidated into 99.9% dense parts. Microstructural analysis confirmed the successful incorporation and dispersion of nano-scale oxides throughout the build volume. Furthermore, high temperature mechanical testing of the DS alloys showed significant improvements in strength and ductility over the baseline NiCoCr. As a result, this recently discovered processing route opens a new alloy design and production path that is synergistic between additive manufacturing and dispersion strengthening, possibly enabling a new generation of high-performance alloys.

T.M. Smith↗

Principles of Directed Energy Deposition for Aerospace Applications

Metal Additive Manufacturing is changing how components are fabricated for rocket propulsion and aerospace applications. Many additive manufacturing technologies are evolving, and active research is being conducted across academia, industry, and government to advance processes, materials, design, post-processing and applications. While much focus has been on Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) techniques, several large-scale techniques are also rapidly evolving using directed energy deposition (DED).

Additive Manufacturing↗

Low Cost Upper Stage-Class Propulsion (LCUSP)

NASA is making space exploration more affordable and viable by developing and utilizing innovative manufacturing technologies. Technology development efforts at NASA in propulsion are committed to continuous innovation of design and manufacturing technologies for rocket engines in order to reduce the cost of NASA's journey to Mars. The Low Cost Upper Stage-Class Propulsion (LCUSP) effort will develop and utilize emerging Additive Manufacturing (AM) to significantly reduce the development time and cost for complex rocket propulsion hardware. Benefit of Additive Manufacturing (3-D Printing) Current rocket propulsion manufacturing techniques are costly and have lengthy development times. In order to fabricate rocket engines, numerous complex parts made of different materials are assembled in a way that allow the propellant to collect heat at the right places to drive the turbopump and simultaneously keep the thrust chamber from melting. The heat conditioned fuel and oxidizer come together and burn inside the combustion chamber to provide thrust. The efforts to make multiple parts precisely fit together and not leak after experiencing cryogenic temperatures on one-side and combustion temperatures on the other is quite challenging. Additive manufacturing has the potential to significantly reduce the time and cost of making rocket parts like the copper liner and Nickel-alloy jackets found in rocket combustion chambers where super-cold cryogenic propellants are heated and mixed to the extreme temperatures needed to propel rockets in space. The Selective Laser Melting (SLM) machine fuses 8,255 layers of copper powder to make a section of the chamber in 10 days. Machining an equivalent part and assembling it with welding and brazing techniques could take months to accomplish with potential failures or leaks that could require fixes. The design process is also enhanced since it does not require the 3D model to be converted to 2-D drawings. The design and fabrication process can be sped up and improved with fewer errors to be accomplished in weeks instead of months.

Vickers, John↗

TPSAS-NF1676L-31522-DND

Currently, there are limitations in launch capability regarding requisite payload volume and mass for long duration extra-terrestrial missions. In-space additive manufacturing may provide a solution to this challenge and is applicable for articles ranging from large system and subsystem architectures to small consumables and replacement articles. For small articles, additive manufacturing is becoming more feasible through advances in instrumentation and novel manufacturing strategies capable of generating complex shapes. Many approaches, however, utilize feedstock materials that, once consumed, must be replenished before additional architectures can be generated. Thus, although promising, a major challenge with additive manufacturing is the required starting materials to support on-demand article generation. This presentation describes research toward reversibly assembling materials that can revert to the starting material state for subsequent fabrication. Polyimides were synthesized with thermally reversible Diels-Alder reaction functionalities, furan or maleimide moieties. These materials were characterized utilizing typical spectroscopic, thermal, and mechanical techniques. Amine hardener-enriched epoxy microparticles were synthesized for use as a mechanically robust substrate. Integration of these technologies into a single system and application toward generation of secondary structures on a launch vehicle as a means of in-situ resource utilization will be described.

Christopher J. Wohl↗

Making & Breaking the Rules for DED Design

Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) is widely used to describe design activities and guidelines employed in the creation of Additively Manufactured (AM) parts. Basic design rules for widely adopted processes like Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) are relatively understood including material performance, part size constraints, self-supporting angles, overhangs, wall thicknesses, and feature resolution. Complexity is often inherent with PBF using organically inspired solutions through generative design and topology optimization software to create designs that often cannot be realized via traditional manufacturing processes. The design rules for Directed Energy Deposition (DED) are less well known, and, in some cases, the lack of understanding is likely inhibiting broader application of the various DED processes. This presentation covers key design rules for DED fusion processes and elucidates opportunities like multi-material deposition and build approaches ranging from basic features to complex large-scale parts. Complementary to the opportunistic characteristics of DfAM for DED, Manufacture for AM (MfAM) encompasses the restrictive aspects of the manufacturing lifecycle with limitations due to bead width and wall thickness, self-supporting angles, surface texture, microstructural evolution, and residual stresses. AM enabled part design must always consider the entire value chain starting with incoming feedstock (e.g. plate, wire, or powder) and progressing through the printing process, post-processing (e.g. machining, inspection), and final system assembly. Key considerations, like the tradeoffs between feature resolution and build rate, for process and part selection and economic assessments will be discussed as DED is often traded against other AM processes. After highlighting typical DED design rules, we will also show how some of those rules can be broken via use cases and part designs that span the full spectrum of DED processes with examples of various DED part designs.

Additive Manufacturing↗

Plasma Rapid Oxidation Technique for Extending Component Tenability (PROTECT)

Additive manufacturing (AM) is increasingly utilized in aerospace applications. However, post-processing is required for many applications, so intricate designs are limited. Plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) was investigated as a post-processing treatment on Ti-6-4 (or Ti-6Al-4V: Alpha-beta titanium alloy with a high specific strength and excellent corrosion resistance)additively manufactured specimens. The “Keronite Black” PEO treatment reduced the surface roughness (Ra) of test specimens by approximately 0.5 μm. This reduction in Ra compared to the as-printed sample was hypothesized to benefit corrosion and fatigue properties because increased Ra is known to negatively impact corrosion and fatigue characteristics. Up to a 101% improvement in the corrosion potential (Ɛcorr) was observed. Although fatigue characteristics varied by PEO parameters, there was no significant fatigue debit due to the PEO treatment. Additionally, no effect to adhesion characteristics was observed due to PEO treatment. It is recommended that additional studies investigate the ability of PEO treatments to improve the corrosion, fatigue, chemical compatibility, radiation hardening, particle shedding characteristics, and flammability/oxidizer compatibility of aerospace additively manufactured components.

Jennifer Williams↗

ED1: Design and Prototype of a 3D Printed Wind Tunnel Model with Integrated Force Measurement

Wind tunnel testing using conventionally manufactured force measurement systems (balances) is able to yield precise and accurate results. These balances are delicate, complex instruments. Due to the nature of this high-precision complexity, balances are expensive and time-consuming to produce. These factors can limit the design potential of the model because using conventionally manufactured balances generally means that the model is designed to accommodate balances that already exist. Ideally, engineers would be able to design a measurement system that is tailored to fit the needs of the model, rather than the other way around. The goal of this research project was to determine if it is possible to overcome these drawbacks by designing a wind tunnel model with a modifiable integrated force measurement system that leverages additive manufacturing. This was undertaken by utilizing the existing UT-63 wind tunnel balance (measurement system), integrating it with a model based on the existing AGARD-B model, and performing stress analysis to optimize the design. Due to time constraints, the result of this endeavor is currently incomplete. Continued analysis and optimization are required to have a thorough understanding of the success or failure of the attempted design. As additive manufacturing technology evolves, the ability for it to become the primary method of fabrication for sensitive measurement systems increases. This project contributes to this by providing one method for design, a framework for optimizing existing balances for additive manufacturing, and resources for performing necessary stress analysis.

Callie Ellsworth↗

Predictive Modeling of Fast-Curing Thermosets in Nozzle-Based Extrusion

This work presents an approach to modeling the dynamic spreading and curing behavior of thermosets in nozzle-based extrusions. Thermosets cover a wide range of materials, some of which permit low-temperature processing with subsequent high-temperature and high-strength working properties. Extruding thermosets may overcome the limited working temperatures and strengths of conventional thermoplastic materials used in additive manufacturing. This project aims to produce technology for the fabrication of thermoset-based structures leveraging advances made in nozzle-based extrusion, such as fused deposition modeling (FDM), material jetting, and direct writing. Understanding the synergistic interactions between spreading and fast curing of extruded thermosetting materials will provide essential insights for applications that require accurate dimensional controls, such as additive manufacturing [1], [2] and centrifugal coating/forming [3]. Two types of thermally curing thermosets -- one being a soft silicone (Ecoflex 0050) and the other being a toughened epoxy (G/Flex) -- served as the test materials in this work to obtain models for cure kinetics and viscosity. The developed models align with extensive measurements made with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and rheology. DSC monitors the change in the heat of reaction, which reflects the rate and degree of cure at different crosslinking stages. Rheology measures the change in complex viscosity, shear moduli, yield stress, and other properties dictated by chemical composition. By combining DSC and rheological measurements, it is possible to establish a set of models profiling the cure kinetics and chemorheology without prior knowledge of chemical composition, which is usually necessary for sophisticated mechanistic modeling. In this work, we conducted both isothermal and dynamic measurements with both DSC and rheology. With the developed models, numerical simulations yielded predictions of diameter and height of droplets, along with width and height of extruded lines cured at varied temperatures. Experimental results carried out on a goniometric platform and a nozzle-based 3D printer showed agreement with the numerical simulations. Finally, this presentation will show how the models are adaptable to the planning of tool paths and designs in additive manufacturing.

Xie, Jingjin↗

A 3D Printable Alloy Designed for Extreme Environments

Multiprincipal-element alloys are an enabling class of materials owing to their impressive mechanical and oxidation-resistant properties, especially in extreme environments. Here we develop a new oxide-dispersion-strengthened NiCoCr-based alloy using a model-driven alloy design approach and laser-based additive manufacturing. This oxide-dispersion-strengthened alloy, called GRX-810, uses laser powder bed fusion to disperse nanoscale Y 2 O 3 particles throughout the microstructure without the use of resource-intensive processing steps such as mechanical or in situ alloying. We show the successful incorporation and dispersion of nanoscale oxides throughout the GRX-810 build volume via high-resolution characterization of its microstructure. The mechanical results of GRX-810 show a twofold improvement in strength, over 1,000-fold better creep performance and twofold improvement in oxidation resistance compared with the traditional polycrystalline wrought Ni-based alloys used extensively in additive manufacturing at 1,093 °C. The success of this alloy highlights how model-driven alloy designs can provide superior compositions using far fewer resources compared with the ‘trial-and-error’ methods of the past. These results showcase how future alloy development that leverages dispersion strengthening combined with additive manufacturing processing can accelerate the discovery of revolutionary materials.

Timothy M. Smith↗

In-Process Thermal Imaging of the Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication Process

Researchers at NASA Langley Research Center have been developing the Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication (EBF3) metal additive manufacturing process for the past 15 years. In this process, an electron beam is used as a heat source to create a small molten pool on a substrate into which wire is fed. The electron beam and wire feed assembly are translated with respect to the substrate to follow a predetermined tool path. This process is repeated in a layer-wise fashion to fabricate metal structural components. In-process imaging has been integrated into the EBF3 system using a near-infrared (NIR) camera. The images are processed to provide thermal and spatial measurements that have been incorporated into a closed-loop control system to maintain consistent thermal conditions throughout the build. Other information in the thermal images is being used to assess quality in real time by detecting flaws in prior layers of the deposit. NIR camera incorporation into the system has improved the consistency of the deposited material and provides the potential for real-time flaw detection which, ultimately, could lead to the manufacture of better, more reliable components using this additive manufacturing process.

Taminger, Karen M.↗

Principles of Directed Energy Deposition for Aerospace Applications

Metal Additive Manufacturing is changing how components are being fabricated for rocket propulsion and aerospace applications. Many additive manufacturing technologies are evolving, and active research is being conducted across academia, industry, and government to advance processes, materials, design, post-processing, and applications. While much focus has been on Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) techniques, several large-scale techniques are also rapidly evolving using directed energy deposition (DED) techniques. This lecture will provide an overview of various DED technologies, a comparison among the technologies, various materials, parameters used to deposit, and several examples of DED applications for propulsion and aerospace components.

Additive Manufacturing↗

Welding of Crack Sensitive Aluminum Alloys for Liquid Rocket Propulsion Applications

In this welding test campaign, electron beam welding (EBW) and manual gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) processes were utilized to join an additively manufactured aluminum alloy nozzle to a wrought aluminum flange. Both aluminum alloys were 6061, which in their conventional form are susceptible to solidification cracking issues. The AM nozzle utilized a novel high-performance modified version of 6061 which exhibits crack resistant properties during the AM process and during welding. When manually conducting GTAWs a filler wire with the same modified version of 6061 was utilized to weld different combinations of 6061 coupons (either modified or unmodified). Due to the grain refinement technology in the modified 6061, either as filler material or base material, there was complete elimination of weld solidification cracking. During EBW development a combination of wrought 6061 with a modified and additively manufactured 6061 was investigated. The EBWs developed exhibited no crack like defects. Each weld development program utilized non-destructive evaluation, metallography, and mechanical testing to determine the final weld acceptance. Mechanical testing involved hardness evaluation and tension testing on welded coupons. Both welding techniques were successfully developed and exhibited adequate properties for the final test articles and met all requirements of the development campaign. These welds were ultimately developed to be utilized on a set of all-aluminum liquid rocket nozzles to demonstrate additively manufactured aluminum alloys for propulsion applications. These aluminum nozzles were tested at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center’s hot fire test facility and subsequently underwent a test campaign involving a variety of chamber pressures and liquid propellant combinations. Following the hot fire test campaign each weldment was investigated for post operation performance and any defects that may have evolved during testing.

Welding↗

Influence of Thermophysical Property Variability on Thermal Predictions of Ti-6Al-4V

The additive manufacturing (AM) industry has experienced rapid growth in recent decades as industrial interest in the process has grown. Because of this, there are many groups interested in simulations of the AM process. However, the influence of thermophysical property variability on the melt pool geometry during processing of various AM alloys is unclear. The goal of my work at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) was to characterize this influence on Ti-6Al-4V during AM processing alongside developing a tool to enable equivalent studies on other AM materials. To facilitate this process, a database tool was developed to contain and organize thermophysical data previously reported by primary sources. The specific thermophysical properties of interest for this study were density, specific heat capacity, and conductivity. Thermal diffusivity was calculated using the other three properties. This data was then fit with a Gaussian distribution and then randomly sampled from using Monte Carlo random value sampling. Using the Rosenthal equation, this sample data was used to simulate the temperature field during additive manufacturing and extract the melt pool geometry. Specifically, the melt pool’s length, width, and depth. This process was repeated an arbitrary number of times, with the default being 1000. Once this information was obtained, histograms were made showing the distributions of the sizes of the melt pool’s length, width, and depth. Representative statistical metrics of the distributions were calculated (mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variance). This work found that at the simulated processing values, the melt pool’s width and depth had a 5.7% variation while the length had a 3.2% variation. Additionally, a tool was constructed to graph a thermal color map representation of the melt pool for specific, arbitrary values of density, specific heat, and conductivity. This tool allowed for more efficient plotting of individual queries of the thermophysical properties. The results that were observed in the research were that values reported in literature vary and this variance can have a significant impact on the simulation. Predictions of the melt pool’s dimensions show that length has a standard deviation of approximately 6 μm, width has a standard deviation of approximately 5 μm, and depth can vary by approximately 3 μm. Considering the mean sizes of length, width, and depth are 185 μm, 88 μm, and 44 μm respectively, such a deviation is significant. This shows that depth, for example, could be more than 10% larger or smaller than expected. This demonstrates that variability in the reported thermophysical properties are not negligible and should be expected to have an influence on the results of the laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. When simulating this process in the future, measures should be taken to account for this discrepancy and the uncertainty involved

Justin Martin↗

Windform® XT 2.0 Use as 3U CubeSat Primary Structure

CubeSats provide a platform for small-scale space research and technology demonstration at reduced complexity, cost, and development time. These advantages drove the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) to develop and launch the GPX2 3U CubeSat to explore the viability of using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) differential GPS (dGPS) in low earth orbit. To reduce manufacturing costs and increase design flexibility, the project chose additive manufactured Windform® XT 2.0 as the primary bus material rather than traditional subtractive manufactured (milled) metal. The bus is a two-part, Selective Laser Sintered, 3D-print structure consisting of a single-piece, five-walled chassis and single-walled cover. The bus was specially designed to allow the project to accommodate the payload electronics stack as well as antennas, receivers, and deployable mechanisms. By using an additive manufactured solution, LaRC was able to design in features unrealizable through traditional milling, with a lead-time of roughly two weeks. In comparison, traditional subtractive manufacturing limits geometry options due to toolpath reach and bus construction would have required multiple components for each wall. This would have resulted in a more costly, longer lead-time article with more joints, fasteners, and complexity with a commensurate increase in overall mass. A number of lessons-learned were captured during the design, analysis, and testing of the GPX2 CubeSat covering thermal and structural analysis, vibration modeling, and geometric tolerancing. Additionally, a variety of material testing and verification were performed before and during spacecraft design and integration to assure the suitability of Windform® XT 2.0 for the launch and mission environments. This article provides the highlights of designing and testing the GPX2 bus.

CubeSat↗

Electrical and Thermal Characterization of 3D Printed Thermoplastic Parts with Embedded Wires for High Current-Carrying Applications

Fabrication of parts exhibiting multi-functionality has recently been complemented by hybrid polymer extrusion additive manufacturing in combination with wire embedding technology. While much mechanical characterization has been performed on parts produced with fused deposition modeling, limited characterization has been performed when combined electrical and thermal loads are applied to 3D printed multi-material parts. As such, this work describes the design, fabrication, and testing of 3D printed thermoplastic coupons containing embedded copper wires that carried current. An automated fabrication process was used employing a hybrid additive manufacturing machine that dispensed polycarbonate thermoplastic and embedded bare copper wires. Testing included AC and DC hipot testing as well as thermal testing on as-fabricated and heat treated coupons to determine the effect of porosity in the substrate. The heat-treated parts contained reduced amounts of porosity, as corroborated through scanning electron microscopy, which led to 50 % increased breakdown strength and 30 to 40 % increased heat dissipation capabilities. The results of this research are describing a set of design protocol that can be used as a guideline for 3D printed embedded electronics to predict the electrical and thermal behavior.

Hipot testing↗

TPSAS-NF1676L-30664-DND

- NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance (OSMA) Efforts - NASA Material Genome Initiative (MGI) - Following up effort: NASA Additive Manufacturing Structural Integrity Initiative (AMSII) - In-Situ Techniques for Additive Manufacturing

Joseph N. Zalameda↗