Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “iterative linear solution”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

638 records · Page 36
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1996

Spray Combustion Modeling with VOF and Finite-Rate Chemistry

A spray atomization and combustion model is developed based on the volume-of-fluid (VOF) transport equation with finite-rate chemistry model. The gas-liquid interface mass, momentum and energy conservation laws are modeled by continuum surface force mechanisms. A new solution method is developed such that the present VOF model can be applied for all-speed range flows. The objectives of the present study are: (1) to develop and verify the fractional volume-of-fluid (VOF) cell partitioning approach into a predictor-corrector algorithm to deal with multiphase (gas-liquid) free surface flow problems; (2) to implement the developed unified algorithm in a general purpose computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code, Finite Difference Navier-Stokes (FDNS), with droplet dynamics and finite-rate chemistry models; and (3) to demonstrate the effectiveness of the present approach by simulating benchmark problems of jet breakup/spray atomization and combustion. Modeling multiphase fluid flows poses a significant challenge because a required boundary must be applied to a transient, irregular surface that is discontinuous, and the flow regimes considered can range from incompressible to highspeed compressible flows. The flow-process modeling is further complicated by surface tension, interfacial heat and mass transfer, spray formation and turbulence, and their interactions. The major contribution of the present method is to combine the novel feature of the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method and the Eulerian/Lagrangian method into a unified algorithm for efficient noniterative, time-accurate calculations of multiphase free surface flows valid at all speeds. The proposed method reformulated the VOF equation to strongly couple two distinct phases (liquid and gas), and tracks droplets on a Lagrangian frame when spray model is required, using a unified predictor-corrector technique to account for the non-linear linkages through the convective contributions of VOF. The discontinuities within the sharp interface will be modeled as a volume force to avoid stiffness. Formations of droplets, tracking of droplet dynamics and modeling of the droplet breakup/evaporation, are handled through the same unified predictor-corrector procedure. Thus the new algorithm is non-iterative and is flexible for general geometries with arbitrarily complex topology in free surfaces. The FDNS finite-difference Navier-Stokes code is employed as the baseline of the current development. Benchmark test cases of shear coaxial LOX/H2 liquid jet with atomization/combustion and impinging jet test cases are investigated in the present work. Preliminary data comparisons show good qualitative agreement between data and the present analysis. It is indicative from these results that the present method has great potential to become a general engineering design analysis and diagnostics tool for problems involving spray combustion.

Chen, Yen-Sen↗
DOE OSTI2016

SU-G-JeP1-15: Sliding Window Prior Data Assisted Compressed Sensing for MRI Lung Tumor Tracking

Purpose: Prior Data Assisted Compressed Sensing (PDACS) is a partial k-space acquisition and reconstruction method for mobile tumour (i.e. lung) tracking using on-line MRI in radiotherapy. PDACS partially relies on prior data acquired at the beginning of dynamic scans, and is therefore susceptible to artifacts in longer duration scan due to slow drifts in MR signal. A novel sliding window strategy is presented to mitigate this effect. Methods: MRI acceleration is simulated by retrospective removal of data from the fully sampled sets. Six lung cancer patients were scanned (clinical 3T MRI) using a balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) sequence for 3 minutes at approximately 4 frames per second, for a total of 650 dynamics. PDACS acceleration is achieved by undersampling of k-space in a single pseudo-random pattern. Reconstruction iteratively minimizes the total variations while constraining the images to satisfy both the currently acquired data and the prior data in missing k-space. Our novel sliding window technique (SW-PDACS), uses a series of distinct pseudo-random under-sampling patterns of partial k-space – with the prior data drawn from a sliding window of the most recent data available. Under-sampled data, simulating 2 – 5x acceleration are reconstructed using PDACS and SW-PDACS. Three quantitative metrics: artifact power, centroid error and Dice’s coefficient are computed for comparison. Results: Quantitively metric values from all 6 patients are averaged in 3 bins, each containing approximately one minute of dynamic data. For the first minute bin, PDACS and SW-PDACS give comparable results. Progressive decline in image quality metrics in bins 2 and 3 are observed for PDACS. No decline in image quality is observed for SW-PDACS. Conclusion: The novel approach presented (SW-PDACS) is a more robust for accelerating longer duration (>1 minute) dynamic MRI scans for tracking lung tumour motion using on-line MRI in radiotherapy. B.G. Fallone is a co-founder and CEO of MagnetTx Oncology Solutions (under discussions to license Alberta bi-planar linac MR for commercialization).

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗
NASA NTRS2018

Real-Time Adaptive Drag Minimization Wind Tunnel Investigation of a Flexible Wing with Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap System

This paper reports the results of a recently completed real-time adaptive drag minimization wind tunnel investigation of a highly flexible wing wind tunnel model equipped with the Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Flap (VCCTEF) technology at the University of Washington Aeronautical Laboratory (UWAL). The wind tunnel investigation is funded by NASA SBIR Phase II contract with Scientific Systems Company, Inc. (SSCI) and University of Washington (UW) as a subcontractor. The wind tunnel model is a sub-scale Common Research Model (CRM) wing constructed of foam core and fiberglass skin and is aeroelastically scaled to achieve a wing tip deflection of 10% of the wing semi-span which represents a typical wing tip deflection for a modern transport such as Boeing 787. The jig-shape twist of the CRM wing is optimized using a CART3D aero-structural model to achieve the minimum induced drag for the design cruise lift coefficient of 0.5. The wing is equipped with two chord wise cambered segments for each of the six span wise flap sections for a total of 12 individual flap segments that comprise the VCCTEF system. Each of the 12 flap segments is actively controlled by an electric servo-actuator. The real-time adaptive drag optimization strategy includes an on-board aerodynamic model identification, a model excitation, and a real-time drag optimization. The on-board aerodynamic model is constructed parametrically as a function of the angle of attack and flap positions to model the lift and drag coefficients of the wing. The lift coefficient models include a linear model and a second-order model. The drag coefficient models include a quadratic model and a higher-order up to 6th-order model to accurately model the drag coefficient at high angles of attack. The onboard aerodynamic model identification includes a recursive least-squares (RLS) algorithm and a batch least-squares (BLS) algorithm designed to estimate the model parameters. The model excitation method is designed to sample the input set that comprises the angle of attack and the flap positions. Three model excitation methods are developed: random excitation method, sweep method, and iterative angle-of-attack seeking method. The real-time drag optimization includes a generic algorithm developed by SSCI and several optimization methods developed by NASA which include a second-order gradient Newton-Raphson optimization method, an iterative gradient optimization method, a pseudo-inverse optimization method, an analytical optimization method, and an iterative refinement optimization method. The first wind tunnel test entry took place in September 2017. This test revealed major hardware issues and required further redesign of the flap servo mechanisms. The second test entry took place in April 2018. However, the test was not successful due to the issues with the onboard aerodynamic model identification RLS algorithm which incorrectly identified model parameters. This test also provides an experimental comparison study between the VCCTEF and a variable camber discrete trailing edge flap (VCDTEF) without the elastomer transition mechanisms. The experimental result confirms the benefit of the VCCTEF which produces lower drag by 5% than the VCDTEF. The third and final test entry took place in June 2018 after the issues with the RLS algorithm have been identified and corrected. Additional improvements were implemented. These include the BLS algorithm, the iterative angle-of-attack seeking method, the iterative gradient optimization method, and the pseudo-inverse optimization method. The test objectives were successfully demonstrated as the real-time drag optimization identifies several optimal solutions at off-design lift coefficients. The iterative gradient optimization method is found to achieve up to 4.7% drag reduction for the off-design lift coefficient of 0.7. The pseudo-inverse optimization method which does not require the drag coefficient model is found to be quite effective in reducing drag. Up to 9.4% drag reduction for the off-design lift coefficient of 0.7 is achieved with the pseudo-inverse optimization method. The wind tunnel investigation demonstrates the potential of real-time drag optimization technology. Several new capabilities are developed that could enable future adaptive wing technologies for flexible wings equipped with drag control devices such as the VCCTEF.

Drag Optimization↗
DOE OSTI2016

Space-Dependent Wielandt Shift Methods for Multigroup Diffusion Eigenvalue Problems

In the calculation of neutronic eigenfunctions and eigenvalues, it is often desirable to approximate the neutron transport equation by a diffusion equation that requires significantly less computational resources to solve. Even when a full transport solution is needed, the solution of the diffusion system can be used to accelerate iterative methods for calculating the transport eigenfunction and eigenvalue. The convergence rate of the basic power iteration method for eigenvalue problems is governed by the dominance ratio; realistic reactor core problems often have high dominance ratios and the power iteration method can converge slowly as a result. A common technique for accelerating the convergence of power iteration is the Wielandt shift (WS) method, which reduces the dominance ratio by 'shifting' the eigenvalue spectrum using an estimate of the desired eigenvalue. WS provides a significant speedup over power iteration if the eigenvalue estimate is close to the true eigenvalue, but it can be difficult to obtain such an estimate. In practice, the shift in the WS method can be dynamically updated in the iteration scheme, in a way that depends on the eigenvalue estimates from the most recent iterations. We present a physically-motivated Space-Dependent Wielandt Shift (SDWS) for solving multigroup diffusion eigenvalue problems. The space-dependence of the eigenvalue shift in SDWS enables a more effective acceleration of the power iteration scheme than WS at the beginning of the iteration scheme, when the current estimate of the eigenvalue is not close to the actual eigenvalue. Several variants of SDWS are discussed here, including an SDWS method that combines the strengths of SDWS (in the early iterations) with those of standard WS (in the later iterations). Numerical results from a 1-D multigroup diffusion problem demonstrate an order of magnitude speedup over power iteration and a 41% speedup over a standard WS technique. This speedup is problem-dependent and appears to be greater for 'more difficult' problems. In this summary, the term 'speedup' refers to a reduction in the number of iterations required to converge to the correct eigenvalue and eigenfunction. Because the scattering is treated fully implicitly (i.e., it is part of the left-hand side of the diffusion system and directly inverted), the computational cost of a single iteration does not vary significantly among the methods discussed in this summary. The number of iterations is therefore representative of the total computational cost for a method. We acknowledge that certain iterative solvers for linear systems (e.g., GMRES) require more computational time to converge when the system is nearly singular (i.e., when a very aggressive Wielandt shift is applied). Nonetheless, when using SDWS in the manner described in this summary, we have seen that the reduction in computational time from reducing the number of power iterations generally outweighs the extra computational time required by iterative solvers such as GMRES. (authors)

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Group Structure Optimization Using the PyGroup Code

Group constants are used as coefficients in the energy domain discretized Linear Boltzmann Equation (LBE), in which the Continuous-Energy (CE) fluxes are also integrated over energy bins and transformed into group fluxes. This procedure, based on the Multi-Group (MG) theory, is widely applied in radiation transport and diffusion simulations Careful preparation of MG cross section data, or group constants, is thus a prerequisite for success in acquiring high-fidelity LBE solutions. Generation of MG cross section data itself is a complicated multi-step task, since group constants are indispensably coupled with the solution of the LBE, i.e. the flux spectrum in the problem to be solved. Theoretically, a MG cross section library is only valid for the problem that it is built upon. Nevertheless, in practice MG cross section libraries are prepared for similar type of problems, such as thermal reactors, fast reactors, etc., to facilitate the neutronic simulations. Generally, CE point-wise cross section data set, generated by both theoretical models and experimental data, is first converted to Fine-Group (FG) libraries using a pre-defined or precalculated flux spectra, then, Broad-Group (BG) libraries are collapsed from the fine-group libraries using problem-dependent flux spectra. Proper treatments of energy and spatial self-shielding and resonance cross section are required in the CE-to-MG converting process Previously, we have developed a computer code, YGROUP, for fine-to-broad group cross section collapsing. To maintain high accuracy of the resulting BG libraries, YGROUP provides users several options on collapsing strategies and weighting schemes for group binning and evaluation of BG cross section data in users' specific problems.. An approach based on Particle Swarm Optimization was applied to automatically determine the optimal group structure. We also developed a hybrid weighting scheme to further improve BG library performance for Special Nuclear Materials (SNM) detection applications. In this work, a new computer code, PyGroup, has been developed to implement the PSO approach with an improved simulation-driven fitness function design that includes both response and forward/adjoint flux errors. Together with YGROUP, and deterministic transport code TITAN/PENMSHXP, the PyGroup code package is tested on a Dual Range Coincident Counter (DRCC) model. In this paper, we demonstrated the capability of the PyGroup code for group structure optimization using the DRCC detector model. In the future, an iteration scheme can be implemented to determine the number of broad groups based on a user-defined tolerance. we will also apply PyGroup to more complicated reactor models, and investigate physics-based fitness function designs to further reduce computational cost. (authors)

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
NASA NTRS1999

The Analysis and Design of Low Boom Configurations Using CFD and Numerical Optimization Techniques

The use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for the analysis of sonic booms generated by aircraft has been shown to increase the accuracy and reliability of predictions. CFD takes into account important three-dimensional and nonlinear effects that are generally neglected by modified linear theory (MLT) methods. Up to the present time, CFD methods have been primarily used for analysis or prediction. Some investigators have used CFD to impact the design of low boom configurations using trial and error methods. One investigator developed a hybrid design method using a combination of Modified Linear Theory (e.g. F-functions) and CFD to provide equivalent area due to lift driven by a numerical optimizer to redesign or modify an existing configuration to achieve a shaped sonic boom signature. A three-dimensional design methodology has not yet been developed that completely uses nonlinear methods or CFD. Constrained numerical optimization techniques have existed for some time. Many of these methods use gradients to search for the minimum of a specified objective function subject to a variety of design variable bounds, linear and nonlinear constraints. Gradient based design optimization methods require the determination of the objective function gradients with respect to each of the design variables. These optimization methods are efficient and work well if the gradients can be obtained analytically. If analytical gradients are not available, the objective gradients or derivatives with respect to the design variables must be obtained numerically. To obtain numerical gradients, say, for 10 design variables, might require anywhere from 10 to 20 objective function evaluations. Typically, 5-10 global iterations of the optimizer are required to minimize the objective function. In terms of using CFD as a design optimization tool, the numerical evaluation of gradients can require anywhere from 100 to 200 CFD computations per design for only 10 design variables. If one CFD computation requires an hour of computational time on a Cray computer, one can see that the use of constrained numerical optimization quickly becomes impractical.Hence, in order to practically couple a numerical design optimization technique with a CFD method, the CFD method must be extremely efficient with running times on the order of only minutes. The CFD Euler code developed under NASA sponsorship and referred to as MIM3D-SB for the most part fulfills these efficiency requirements. Analysis of wing- body configurations can be computed in a matter of a few minutes. The present study will concentrate on the feasibility of the use of this CFD code in conjunction with a numerical design optimization technique for the sonic boom reduction of candidate HSCT configurations. A preliminary supersonic aircraft design system has been established that utilizes the numerical design optimization code NPSOL developed at Stanford University coupled with the supersonic NUM3D-SB CFD code. Many questions still need to be answered in regard to using CFD and numerical optimizers as design tools. There are difficulties related to both the CFD codes and the numerical optimizers. Numerical optimizers can converge to a local minima rather than a global minima. This behavior is largely a function of the initial guess in the design space. The optimizer also is searching for a minimum of the function in terms of its derivative without any regard to the actual function value. Numerically (i.e. CFD) determined gradients can also generate spurious numerical local minima. In addition, for the sonic boom problem, grid fineness will also determine the accuracy of the final design solution. Design optimization methods work well on problems defined by continuous objective functions. The sonic boom signature design problem is not necessarily defined by a continuous objective function. The signature can have a variety of shapes; i.e. from N-wave to multiple shocks. The far-field or ground signature may not transition continuously from one shape to another and hence, may exhibit discontinuous behavior. This is also a source of difficulty in using design optimization methods.In the following sections, several low boom and one reference aircraft configuration will be analyzed to predict their sonic boom signature characteristics. Modifications to some of these designs will also be presented to demonstrate the feasibility of using CFD as a design tool and to demonstrate the feasibility of designing shaped sonic boom signatures. Design modifications to some configurations will be presented to demonstrate the feasibility of achieving shaped signatures with reduced levels and not necessarily to represent realistic or aerodynamically efficient design modifications. Fuselage volume or camber are used as design variables in order to have a minimal effect on the primary wing aerodynamics. The paper will also seek to demonstrate whether a hybrid or ramped signature is feasible to achieve. For the low-boom configurations, the CFD predicted signatures will be compared qualitatively to their MLT design signatures.

Siclari, Michael J.↗
DOE OSTI2024

IDAES-PSE 2.6.0 Release

The Institute for the Design of Advanced Energy Systems (IDAES) Integrated Platform is a versatile computational environment offering extensive process systems engineering (PSE) capabilities for optimizing the design and operation of complex, interacting technologies and systems. IDAES enables users to efficiently search vast, complex design spaces to discover the lowest cost solutions while supporting the full process modeling lifecycle, from conceptual design to dynamic optimization and control. The extensible, open platform empowers users to create models of novel processes and rapidly develop custom analyses, workflows, and end-user applications. IDAES-PSE 2.6.0 Release Highlights Upcoming Changes IDAES will be switching to the new Pyomo solver interface in the next release. Whilst this will hopefully be a smooth transition for most users, there are a few important changes to be aware of. The new solver interface uses a different version of the IPOPT writer (“ipopt_v2”) and thus any custom configuration options you might have set for IPOPT will not carry over and will need to be reset. By default, the new Pyomo linear presolver will be activated with ipopt_v2. Whilst are working to identify any bugs in the presolver, it is possible that some edge cases will remain. IDAES will begin deploying a new set of scaling tools and APIs over the next few releases that make use of the new solver writers. The old scaling tools and APIs will remain for backward compatibility but will begin to be deprecated. New Models, Tools and Features New Intersphinx extension automatically linking Jupyter notebook examples to project documentation New end-to-end diagnostics example demonstrated on a real problem New complementarity formulation for VLE with cubic equations of state, backward compatibility for old formulation New solver interface with presolve (ipopt_v2) in support of upcoming changes to the initialization and APIs methods, with default set to ipopt to maintain backwards compatibility; this will deprecate once all examples have been updated New forecaster and parameterized bidder methods within grid integration library Updated surrogates API and examples to support Keras 3, with backwards compatibility for older formats such as TensorFlow SavedModel (TFSM) Updated costing base dictionary to include the 2023 cost year index value Updated ProcessBlock to include information on the constructing block class Updated Flowsheet Visualizer to allow visualize() method to return value and functions Bug Fixes Fixed bug in the Modular Property Framework that would cause errors when trying to use phase-based material balances with phase equilibria. Fixed bug in Modular Properties Framework that caused errors when initializing models with non-vapor-liquid phase equilibria. Fixed typos flagged by June update to crate-ci/typos and removed DMF-related exceptions Minor corrections of units of measurement handling in power plant waste/transport costing expressions, control volume material holdup expressions, and BTX property package parameters Fixed throwing >7500 numpy deprecation warnings by replacing scalar value assignment with element extraction and item iteration calls Testing and Robustness Migrated slow tests (>10s) to integration, impacting test coverage but also yielding a nearly 30% decrease in local test runtime Pinned pint to avoid issues with older supported Python versions Pinned codecov versions to avoid tokenless upload behavior with latest version Bumped extensions to version 3.4.2 to allow pointing to non-standard install location Deprecations and Removals Python 3.8 is no longer supported. The supported Python versions are 3.9 through 3.12 The Data Management Framework (DMF) is no longer supported. Importing idaes.core.dmf will cause a deprecation warning to be displayed until the next release The SOFC Keras surrogates have been removed. The current version of the SOFC surrogate model in the examples repository is a PySMO Kriging model.

AS↗
DOE OSTI2016

A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning

Purpose: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a widely employed radiation therapy technique, showing comparable dosimetry to static beam intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with reduced monitor units and treatment time. However, the current VMAT optimization has various greedy heuristics employed for an empirical solution, which jeopardizes plan consistency and quality. The authors introduce a novel direct aperture optimization method for VMAT to overcome these limitations. Methods: The comprehensive VMAT (comVMAT) planning was formulated as an optimization problem with an L2-norm fidelity term to penalize the difference between the optimized dose and the prescribed dose, as well as an anisotropic total variation term to promote piecewise continuity in the fluence maps, preparing it for direct aperture optimization. A level set function was used to describe the aperture shapes and the difference between aperture shapes at adjacent angles was penalized to control MLC motion range. A proximal-class optimization solver was adopted to solve the large scale optimization problem, and an alternating optimization strategy was implemented to solve the fluence intensity and aperture shapes simultaneously. Single arc comVMAT plans, utilizing 180 beams with 2° angular resolution, were generated for a glioblastoma multiforme case, a lung (LNG) case, and two head and neck cases—one with three PTVs (H&N{sub 3PTV}) and one with foue PTVs (H&N{sub 4PTV})—to test the efficacy. The plans were optimized using an alternating optimization strategy. The plans were compared against the clinical VMAT (clnVMAT) plans utilizing two overlapping coplanar arcs for treatment. Results: The optimization of the comVMAT plans had converged within 600 iterations of the block minimization algorithm. comVMAT plans were able to consistently reduce the dose to all organs-at-risk (OARs) as compared to the clnVMAT plans. On average, comVMAT plans reduced the max and mean OAR dose by 6.59% and 7.45%, respectively, of the prescription dose. Reductions in max dose and mean dose were as high as 14.5 Gy in the LNG case and 15.3 Gy in the H&N{sub 3PTV} case. PTV coverages measured by D95, D98, and D99 were within 0.25% of the prescription dose. By comprehensively optimizing all beams, the comVMAT optimizer gained the freedom to allow some selected beams to deliver higher intensities, yielding a dose distribution that resembles a static beam IMRT plan with beam orientation optimization. Conclusions: The novel nongreedy VMAT approach simultaneously optimizes all beams in an arc and then directly generates deliverable apertures. The single arc VMAT approach thus fully utilizes the digital Linac’s capability in dose rate and gantry rotation speed modulation. In practice, the new single VMAT algorithm generates plans superior to existing VMAT algorithms utilizing two arcs.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗