Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Programmable”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36

Dounreay Site's Interim End State-Environmental Safety Strategy - 17509

The Dounreay nuclear licensed site, located in Caithness on the north coast of Scotland, was the United Kingdom's (UK) site for Fast Reactor research and development. The Dounreay facilities are now being decommissioned and the site restored in accordance with UK Government policy to manage civil nuclear liabilities. This site closure and environmental restoration programme is to achieve levels of residual radiological and chemical contamination sufficiently low that the site will be safe for future use. This document sets out the Environmental Safety Strategy for the site remediation and closure programme, which will follow completion of facility decommissioning and demolition. The document summarises the contractual definition of the Dounreay site end states and also the associated regulatory regimes. An overview of the approach and processes for achieving the Interim End State (IES) are provided, along with consideration of how Dounreay will demonstrate that the IES has been achieved. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Strategic considerations for developing future underground research facilities - 15114

The suite of existing underground research facilities (URFs) and their various operational histories and contexts provides useful insights to consider when deciding a particular URF location and approach (generic or site-specific) for new disposal facility research programmes. Even the smallest URF represents a large capital investment and a significant ongoing operational mortgage when recognizing the typically decades-long site characterization and data collection thought necessary to support a defensible safety case or safety assessment. Thus making such investments should be approached with an understanding of the short- and long-term implications for such factors as cost, location, data quality, public acceptance, operational risk, opportunity for design optimization, etc. and with an understanding of the potential risk management issues to help ensure the URF programme achieves the intended objectives. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

German research and development for high level waste in light of the new site selection process - 15516

The German government decided 50 years ago, that radioactive waste is to be disposed of in Deep Geologic Repositories, preferably in a salt rock formation. Soon after, in 1967, research in the Asse salt mine was initiated. Since then substantial progress has been achieved in the development of the radioactive waste disposal programme in Germany. For a geologic repository for High Level Waste in salt a reference concept has been developed, which represented the radioactive waste management processes from transport of High Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel to an interim storage site, waste conditioning and repackaging for disposal, to emplacement of the waste packages. The feasibility of the reference concept has been proven by demonstration tests for all relevant equipment: a pilot conditioning plant has been built as well as the main equipment for the entire transport chain including the shaft transport and emplacement technologies for heavy loads fulfilling strict requirements for nuclear and mining safety. Also the backfilling technology has been optimised for the purposes of a repository for radioactive waste. Finally, tests have been performed to verify thermo-mechanical models for the host rock. The demonstration tests have been performed to an extent which even would allow immediate licensing of the repository and the employed equipment. The Research and Development work was completed by further optimisation of the reference concept. Construction and operation of deep geologic repositories for low and intermediate level radioactive wastes in Germany benefited from the above mentioned but also stimulated the knowledge and experience build-up for the repositories for High Level Waste. Despite the well progressed work for a deep geologic repository in salt R and D work in Germany for already a long time also considered other host rock formations. While work for crystalline rock mainly consisted of relatively small contributions to international research projects due to the limited occurrence of suitable sites in Germany, projects and developments for repositories in clay formations have had an increasing contribution to the overall Research and Development work for radioactive waste repositories in Germany. In July 2013 a new site selection act was put into force, which set the initiating conditions for the German programme on radioactive waste management. Principally, a process was initiated to search for a site for a deep geologic repository for High Level Waste independent from earlier decisions. This means that a site shall be determined without predetermination by earlier decisions. Nevertheless, to enable a sound decision for a site selection it is necessary to be able draw back on the knowledge and experience from earlier activities. Otherwise, tedious learning processes would have to be experienced again. Since efforts to open up a site selection process again grew since the late 1990's projects had been implemented timely to capture existing knowledge. The paper at hand describes the achievements of R and D activities in Germany, the change of radioactive waste management policy and the endeavours to maintain the achievements. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Life Cycle Costing in Radioactive Waste Packaging: Reducing Costs Whilst Accelerating Clean-Up - 16131

In recognition of the high up-front costs and potentially long timescales to implement the more traditional methods of encapsulating wastes, in the UK alternative approaches to help accelerate hazard reduction and reduce such costs are being deployed. When considering such the cost of alternative approaches to waste packaging strategies, it is important that the complete waste life cycle is taken into account. This paper will demonstrate that when evaluating waste packaging options, whilst individual elements (e.g. container costs) within an overall waste management programme may appear to offer a cost benefit by comparison with alternatives, the programme as a whole may not necessarily be the most cost effective solution when life cycle costs are taken into account, or when other technical issues are considered. To illustrate this point this paper will present a view of the application of LCC, utilising a number of waste packaging scenarios, to promote discussion and consideration of the benefits of undertaking a holistic assessment of the investment decision as part of an overall waste management strategy. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Progress of the Czech Republic Deep Geological Repository Program - 16255

The Czech Republic operates two NPPs with 6 pressurized water reactors. Czech state is fully responsible for the disposal of all radioactive waste including spent nuclear fuel and it provides the Radioactive Waste Repository Authority (SURAO) established in 1997. According to the RWM Policy a deep geological repository (DGR) considered to be the only feasible option for the final disposal of spent fuel. The State Policy set out important milestones for DGR development - the selection of candidate sites by 2020 and the selection of a final site by 2025. The final commissioning of a DGR is planned for 2065. The initial stages of DGR development involved the screening of geological conditions of the whole territory. Granites would provide the most suitable rock environment for DGR siting purposes. By the end of 2012 SURAO will have proposed 7 sites for the potential geological surveys and the first stage of site characterization work. Licenses for geological survey for this stage are in the force since October 2015. Main goal of RD and D programme is to support the siting programme for the selection of the candidate sites, to adapt a DGR design on suitable sites and to support the safety case. SURAO decided to enhance the extent of in-situ RD and D at a depth corresponding to that of the future DGR. In 2013 SURAO commenced the construction of the Bukov Underground Research Facility in the southern section of the Rozna uranium mine at a depth of 600 m below the surface in crystalline rock environment. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Major Achievements of the Springfields Decommissioning Program - 16512

Since the 1940's, Springfields has manufactured fuel products for the UK's nuclear power stations and for international customers. The early operations were in support of the atomic weapons program, closely followed by fuel manufacture for electricity generation via the Magnox power stations commencing in the late 1950's. In 2005, responsibility for the assets and liabilities of Springfields was transferred to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). A new company, Springfields Fuels Limited, was created to run the site, which was managed and operated by Westinghouse Electric UK Ltd on the NDA's behalf. On April 1, 2010, Westinghouse entered into an agreement with the NDA for a long-term lease of the Springfields site, which transferred responsibility for the commercial fuel manufacturing business and Springfields Fuels Limited to Westinghouse. Today, the main Springfields activities include: - Oxide fuels for Advanced Gas-cooled and Light Water Reactors, as well as intermediate fuel products, such as powders, granules and pellets, - Manufacture of Uranium Hexafluoride (now in Care and Maintenance), - Processing and recovery of Uranium residues, - Decommissioning and demolition of redundant plants and buildings. Some 120 plant buildings and support facilities have been successfully decommissioned and demolished in the period 1996 to date. These range from 1940's buildings, subsequently converted for nuclear fuel manufacture, together with some of the formerly sealed chemical agent manufacture and storage facilities. Decommissioning of the now redundant Magnox manufacturing facilities is ongoing at Springfields without compromising the other site operations. Westinghouse is managing all activities related to the whole lifecycle, planning, design, safety case, radiation protection, Post Operational Clean Out (POCO), service diversions, characterization, decommissioning all phases through to ground remediation, waste disposal and agreed end states. Decommissioning of process plants starts with the removal of the majority of radiological activity or hazard contained within the plant. This is known as Post Operational Clean Out. Once this is complete, the plant may be dismantled. Work is scoped and defined within packages (at plant or cell level) to aid control and commercial monitoring as the decommissioning is progressed. This package approach also enables clean or lightly contaminated items to be removed separately to aid potential re-cycling and minimize decontamination and waste disposal costs. Westinghouse is further optimising work package delivery by planning parallel POCO and Decommissioning work phases within plant at a cell level to systematically remove redundant plant and reduce hazard earlier, whilst optimising use of both internal and external resources to reduce total project cost. Waste and Residues from all phases are disposed of via authorized disposal routes and in accordance with our environmental authorizations. On completion of decommissioning and removal of plant and equipment the building is re-assessed radiologically, categorized and appropriate remediation work progressed to render it safe for conventional demolition. The major elements of the success achieved to date can be attributed to the following elements: - Overall programme management with extensive experience of planning, cost, and risk management. Integration of the programme within a major commercial site without compromising safety or operations. - Complete site EHS management working within a complex regulatory framework including the Nuclear Site Licenses, Environmental Authorisations and Security requirements. - Avoiding safety complacency by use of rigorous and systematic process to emphasise safety over competing goals. Including structured use of Human Performance and Corrective Action and Learning processes. - Unique safety experiences attained through complex hazard reduction across a broad range of uranium manufacturing and chemical hazard/agent facilities. - Project leadership and excellence utilizing a core site team to deploy repeatable processes and safe practices to deliver complex scope within budget and schedule. - Optimised use of internal and external resources, with extensive use of Operating Experience to drive continuous improvement and problem resolution. - Management of Contractors from initial selection, pre-qualification, tender assessment and Performance using varied contract forms across delivery phases. - Use of Westinghouse expertise for safety case, waste management, uranium recovery, health physics and design. - Implementation of a work package to ensure gated discreet manageable packages. Underpinned by package specific method statements, with appropriate hold points to maintain management and control of the works. - Continuous local safety focus via safety planning, induction, plant specific training, proactive risk assessment, and a defined approach to decoupling operating plant safety cases enabling focussed and usable documentation. This paper will provide an overview of the latest decommissioning activities achieved on the Springfields site and will focus on best practices that allowed Westinghouse to maintain the program on time and on budget. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Innovative Waste Packaging and Associated Venting/Hydrogen Management - 16594

The original strategy for managing intermediate level waste (ILW) was developed in the 1980s by the UK Nuclear Industry Radioactive Waste Executive (NIREX), which is now the Radioactive Waste Management Limited (RWM), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). The strategy involved retrieving ILW, sorting and encapsulating it in cement based grout within thin walled stainless steel containers. The containers would then be transferred to a large purpose-built shielded ILW store on site, where they would be stored until the planned final deep geological disposal facility becomes available. In recognition of the high up-front costs of such a strategy, which requires remote facilities for the encapsulation and storage, and coupled with the long programme duration for the design, construction and commissioning of these facilities, waste management organisations responsible for managing the clean-up of legacy facilities within the UK have, in recent years, sought innovative solutions which could potentially both accelerate clean-up and hazard reduction on sites, and with a lower overall programme lifecycle cost. Many of the recent innovative solutions are focused around a new family of packaging designs known as robust shielded containers (RSCs). These are self-shielded containers manufactured from materials such as ductile cast iron or fabricated steel. These containers offer the potential to package wastes for disposal without encapsulation and avoid the need for a highly engineered remote handled shielded store for interim storage. The paper provides a high level overview of the generic concepts of RSCs developed by Croft and focuses on the specific challenges of wasteform evolution on waste package integrity and performance. In particular, the integrity and performance of the filtered vent system required to manage internal pressurisation and to ensure sufficient venting capacity of hydrogen and other evolved gases. The paper summarises the analysis by ARUP undertaken to substantiate the RSC integrity under detonation/deflagration explosion loadings arising from hydrogen accumulation. Analyses of the structural response of the filter assembly were undertaken for both detonation and deflagration explosion scenarios, with the loadings applied to the filter housing rim and to the filter vent cover. The paper also presents evidence of the mechanical performance of the filter medium in terms of pressure transients during deflagration events and the degree to which filtration efficiency is maintained. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Chute Silo ILW Project Berkeley - 16649

Magnox, a Tier 1 Site Licensed Company (SLC), is the management and operations contractor responsible for the decommissioning of twelve of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority's (NDA) nuclear sites in the UK. Aquila Nuclear Engineering is a specialist Tier 3, turnkey engineering company based in the UK, delivering mission critical engineering solutions to Europe's nuclear and nuclear medicine industries. Berkeley Nuclear Power Station, Berkeley, England started generating electricity in 1962, ceasing operation 27 years later in 1989. The Chute Silo ILW Project at this Reactor Site had been set up to retrieve irradiated control rods and charge chutes disposed of within a subterranean vault (silo). The project involved in-silo size reduction of waste in to 30-35 waste baskets. The waste basket was then to be retrieved via a pintle grab and hoist mechanism in to a Transfer Flask (through a silo and a Transfer Flask gamma gate). The Transfer Flask was then to transit along existing crane rails, out of the silo building and over the top of an Import/Export Facility. A Ductile Cast Iron Container (DCIC) was to be imported into Import/Export Facility and inspected/prepared to receipt the waste basket from the Transfer Flask. Once filled, the DCIC was then to be sealed and exported to an on-site storage facility. Due to an issue with the Magnox Tier 2 Framework holder in delivering a cost effective and viable solution for their Chute Silo ILW Retrieval Project, Magnox took the ground breaking decision to 'self-perform'. This involved dividing the larger project into several smaller packages. Two of these packages - for the shielded Transfer Flask and the Import/Export facility - were put out for competitive tendering directly to the Tier 3 Supply Chain. The work completed by the Tier 2 Company was shared with the Tier 3's, but Magnox expressly requested the Tier 2 proposals were scrutinised and that far more cost effective, robust and simpler solutions were provided for within the Tier 3 Tenders. Aquila won both work packages and delivered them with significant and demonstrable cost savings, on time and under budget. This was achieved by the collaborative arrangements between Aquila and Magnox, the methodologies of both company's project teams and the innovation and 'fitness for purpose' of Aquila's design pragmatism. The original Tier 2 Framework holder's price to Magnox for the Chute Silo ILW Project was between UK Pounds 2-3 M. Aquila delivered the equivalent scope for under UK Pounds 1 M. Aquila's original programme was maintained despite the award of additional scope and (Magnox) delays on site. Aquila came under the original target price for each discrete phase of the project. The above was achieved because of: - the collaborative arrangements between Aquila and Magnox; - the methodologies of both company's project teams; - the design features put forward by Aquila (welcomed and adopted by Magnox). In 2014 Aquila Nuclear Engineering received formal recognition of its achievements on this project by winning an NDA Supply Chain Award for 'Best example of supplier 'going the extra mile''. Points highlighted in the award were: - improved customer focus, leading to stronger relationships - encouraging challenge and innovation - continuous suggestions for improvement - UK Pounds 1 million savings and three months programme reduction.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

The DISTINCTIVE University Consortium: Transforming High Activity Materials Research in the UK - 18212

The DISTINCTIVE consortium (Decommissioning, Immobilisation and Storage Solutions for Nuclear Waste Inventories) is a partnership of 11 research universities, working to decommission and clean up the legacy of civil nuclear energy generation, sponsored by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). An important component of the research programme is to develop the skills and facilities to address key research questions, requiring the use of highly radioactive materials. Here we highlight the outcomes of four research projects in which access to state of the art research facilities for working with radioactive materials, supported by international partnerships, has advanced research in plutonium storage and immobilisation, and the disposal of spent nuclear fuels. First, we have developed a viable formulation and process for immobilisation of the UK plutonium stockpile, including commissioning of a radiological hot isostatic press and validation studies using plutonium-239. Second, we have further underpinned the interim storage of PuO{sub 2}, through understanding of water and chlorine sorption / desorption, pertinent to the historic practice of containment within, and degradation of PVC bags. Third, we have developed a novel methodology to investigate the in situ radiolysis induced dissolution of actinide oxide thin films, using synchrotron radiation, to underpin the geological disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Fourth we monitored in situ the oxidation and self-ignition mechanism of uranium carbide, a legacy fuel from the Dounreay Prototype Fast Reactor that is waiting for oxidation treatment prior to permanent storage and/or disposal. Through this programme of research, the DISTINCTIVE consortium is rebuilding the UK capability for research with transuranic materials, which, hitherto, was eroded over decades of disinvestment. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Adaptation of Commercially Available Robots for Conditioning and Packaging ILW at Sellafield - 18282

The Legacy Ponds and Silos at Sellafield site contain some of the most hazardous Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) in the UK. As part of a multi-billion pound decommissioning programme, this waste will be retrieved and transported across the site for conditioning and packaging in the Box Encapsulation Plant (BEP). Current plans are to commence plant active commissioning in 2022, which will represent a major milestone in the UK nuclear decommissioning programme. Within the plant, skips of waste will be transferred from the shielded transport package into standard 3 cubic metre ILW containers. Waste from the Pile Fuel Storage Pond and First Generation Magnox Storage Pond will be immobilised in cementitious grout before being transferred to an adjacent store. Waste from the Magnox Swarf Storage Silo will not be immobilised in grout, but will be packaged, providing multi-barrier containment. During the concept design, the project team selected commercially available robots as the most viable technology for carrying out the numerous dexterous and repetitive tasks involved in characterising, conditioning and packaging the waste within the shielded 'hot' cells. Significant technical challenges had to be overcome during the design to adapt a commercially available robot for use within a high radiation / high contamination environment, where human access is not safe even for short periods of time. These challenges included: - Designing robot assemblies that could be retrofitted into the existing cell structure that was constructed as part of an earlier project but never completed; - Designing robot assemblies that could be recovered to their 'transport' position without requiring manual intervention; - Designing robot assemblies that could be remotely removed and replaced with new ones if they failed part way through the plant operational life; - Designing through-wall service and power connections that allow maintenance and recovery; - Designing control systems and human-machine interfaces that enable both manual and automated operation of the robot, whilst avoiding collisions with the in-cell cranes and other in cell furniture; - Assessing the radiation tolerance of all items. Bespoke computer simulations and full-scale development trials have been carried out, using non-active test materials, in order to demonstrate the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) required by Sellafield Limited (SL) at each stage of the project [1]. The results of these trials have been recorded in both video and written form so that they can form part of the project's Knowledge Management database. Detailed designs and specifications for the robot assemblies have been updated to incorporate the recommendations from the development trials. Procurement and manufacture of robot assemblies has already commenced to deliver two waste handling robots, two waste container lidding / swabbing robots and associated critical spares. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Generic HLW Repository In Bedded Salt In Germany: Emplacement Technologies and Repository Designs - 18288

In Germany, a new site selection act for a repository for HLW and SNF entered into force in July 2013 and was amended in spring 2017 [1]. It stipulates that the safety of repository systems for heat-generating radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel in different host rock formations be compared. This requires that generic repository concepts and adequate safety- and safety demonstration concepts for all potential host rock formations in Germany (salt, clay and crystalline rock) exist. For several decades, development of disposal concepts and safety analyses for a repository in a salt dome was prioritized while repository concepts for clay and crystalline rock have been taken into account for two decades only. So far, bedded salt formations have not been the subject of comparative investigations. Thus, in summer 2015, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) launched the R and D project KOSINA to develop repository designs and carry out safety analyses for different emplacement alternatives in a generic bedded salt formation and a generic salt pillow. KOSINA is an acronym for 'Concept development for a generic repository for heat-generating waste in bedded salt formations in Germany as well as development and testing of a safety and demonstration concept'. Together with its partners BGR, GRS, and IfG, DBE Technology GmbH has successfully carried out an almost three years lasting scientific programme, which will be concluded in April 2018. The core areas of the programme are the development of generic geologic models, including derivation of model parameters, the development of a safety and safety demonstration concept, the development of technical repository designs for four different emplacement alternatives, the analysis of geomechanical integrity, the evaluation of operational safety as well as the analysis of radiological consequences. An interim report, which compiles the basic data of the waste inventory, the repository design requirements, the data basis for geologic model developments, and the outline of a safety and safety demonstration concept, was already published in February 2016. The main achievements of the R and D project KOSINA are the development of four different repository designs, two per each generic geologic model (flat-bedded salt, salt pillow) based on thermomechanical calculations. This includes the implementation of a safety concept that provides containment of the radioactive materials with regard to the technical designs of waste packages, transport and emplacement technologies, and backfilling and sealing concepts. Furthermore, the integrity of the geologic barriers could be demonstrated for all four repository designs, and the long-term predictions showed no radiological releases during the demonstration period of one million years. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Upgrading the JET Remote Handling System - 18356

The Joint European Torus (JET) has employed advanced remote-maintenance techniques for over three decades to avoid exposing humans to a potentially hazardous environment and to develop techniques for future power-generating fusion reactors where environments will be too hazardous for any manned maintenance. As a unique application of robotics, virtual reality and operations management systems, JET's remote handling unit, now a part of RACE, has driven the state-of-the-art with each upgrade programme in its history. This conference paper presents the current capabilities of the JET remote handling system, and the future capabilities being delivered by its latest upgrade programme, which makes use of cutting edge advances. RACE (Remote Applications in Challenging Environments) aims to shape the technologies being developed for JET in such a way that they will have wider applications, such as in nuclear decommissioning. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Delivering Business Benefit to UK Decommissioning through Collaborative Innovation - Approach and Technologies - 18539

The UK's nuclear energy programme, dating from the post-war years, has left a mixed legacy to the country: numerous prototype reactors, fuel-manufacturing plants, research centres, reprocessing plants and 11 power stations. The Sellafield site in west Cumbria houses more than 200 nuclear facilities and 1,000 buildings, making it one of the world's most complex environmental decommissioning challenges. Many 'never-done-before' projects are under way, which require substantial levels of R and D and innovative engineering approaches. One of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority's (NDA) responsibilities is to ensure that the right level of R and D is carried out to enable progress on delivering the full decommissioning programme. Since 2010, NDA has been collaborating with Innovate UK, the UK government's innovation agency, to engage the supply chain and develop innovative technologies and services to support the NDA's mission and the growing international nuclear decommissioning market. The paper will provide an overview of the approach (e.g. open calls, briefing events, independent assessment, technology showcases) and the associated benefits (e.g. attracting new ideas, end-user engagement, increased supply chain collaboration). The paper also highlights selected technologies developed through the process. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Development of an Alternative Approach to Demonstrating Environmental Performance in the UK - 19354

European basic safety standards require that exposure of humans to the potentially harmful effects of ionising radiation are optimised so that they are as low as reasonably achievable, taking account of economic and societal factors. In the United Kingdom the responsibility for ensuring that exposures to humans are optimised is split between two regulatory functions. The Office of Nuclear Regulation regulates exposures to workers in all scenarios and to members of the public in the event of an accident. Environmental regulators in each of the four nations comprising the United Kingdom regulate exposures to members of the public from normal operations. Since the early 1990's, all permissions granted to nuclear sites in the UK for the discharge/disposal of radioactive waste to the environment have contained conditions requiring holders to demonstrate that they minimise the generation of radioactive waste, apply appropriate abatement and discharge/dispose of it in a way that minimises impacts on members of the public and the environment. For many years, the industry standard for providing this demonstration, which was heavily influenced by regulatory expectations and feedback, was to undertake one or a series of multi-attribute decision assessments (MADA). Wood's team of environmental specialists has been involved in undertaking such MADA studies for many years. Since the mid-2000's, our team has become increasingly aware of some of the limitations of undertaking MADA to demonstrate environmental performance for large scale new nuclear build projects and, in particular, the next generation of new nuclear power stations that are being planned and implemented in the UK. We have collaborated with the vendors of reactor technologies, the prospective/owner operators of new nuclear power stations and the developers of new facilities on existing sites to develop an alternative approach to demonstrating environmental performance. Our alternative approach comprises three main pillars which are summarised as: - Evolution - benefit from progressive improvements, operational experience and recent permitting activities. Our alternative approach uses the claim, argument, evidence approach which is commonly used for nuclear safety cases and which allows us to 'tell the story' of how environmental performance has been achieved. We have successfully deployed this approach for all new nuclear power stations proposed in the UK. - Integration - ensure that optimisation is integrated into the project programme and forms part of the 'big picture'. Our alternative approach allows environmental performance to be managed better throughout the life cycle of the project and ensures that our outputs are 'living' documents and do not 'sit on the shelf'. We have successfully demonstrated how this can be applied during rationalisation of major schemes and significant design changes on nuclear new build projects. - Opportunity - identify the best time to deliver elements of the programme. Our alternative approach aims to minimise the overall time, trouble and costs associated with demonstrating environmental performance by ensuring that decisions are made at the time when they offer greatest benefit and by minimising unnecessary rework. Our advice has helped to reduce the project costs and minimise delays associated with regulatory queries and interventions. This paper describes the journey that we have taken with our clients in developing our alternative approach to demonstrating environmental performance. We explain the UK regulatory context and explore the need for change. We present a number of case studies related to new nuclear power stations and other new facilities on existing nuclear sites that demonstrate the successful application of our alternative approach. We provide examples of how we have successfully implemented the outputs of our alternative approach into project and corporate management arrangements. Finally, we examine feedback from clients, regulators and other interested parties to propose future refinements. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

The Durability of Containers for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste - Swiss and Belgian R and D Studies - 19392

In this paper, we present a summary of the results from research and development (R and D) studies associated with the durability of steel-based disposal canisters for high-level waste (HLW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF), focusing on experimental studies carried out in support of the Swiss and Belgian disposal programmes. We present the results of laboratory studies carried out for periods of the order of ten to twenty years, and compare them with more recent observations from in situ experiments carried out at the Mont Terri and Grimsel underground laboratories. For the Belgian programme, which is currently envisaging relatively high gamma dose rates outside the steel overpack, we also show the results of studies focusing on gamma radiation at dose rates compatible with those expected in the disposal system. These studies show how, in bentonite systems, corrosion rates decrease to values lower than 1 μm year{sup -1} after an initial period. In the case of cement-based systems, corrosion rates lower than 0.1 μm year{sup -1} are typically observed, with modest effects of gamma irradiation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

A Systematic Evidence Based Performance Approach to Regulation of Nuclear Sites in England and Wales - 20058

The Environment Agency for England has developed a systematic evidence-based approach to pursue our strategic environmental objectives for the regulation of nuclear sites. We use an annual evidence review process to ensure effective and efficient targeting of limited resources to achieve those objectives. Over the last 8 years, we have been developing and refining this approach to ensure risk-based and value driven regulation. The approach comprises nuclear site and nuclear sector review processes known as Site Environment Review (SER) and Nuclear Environment Review (NER). This approach complements our regulation of nuclear site permit holders under the Environmental Permitting Regulations (EPR). We deliver our regulation of nuclear sites in England and Wales alongside the Office for Nuclear Regulation. The SER process involves the lead regulator for each nuclear site assessing the permit holder's environmental performance across 14 themes, set within the context of the site's main activities and associated waste disposals. Our themes include environmental leadership, resources and climate change, radioactive waste management, facility management and decommissioning, groundwater, and environmental radiological protection. We use evidence from site inspections and working within our subject matter groups to grade current and predicted future environmental performance. We are particularly interested in sustainability and the application of Best Available Techniques (BAT) to prevent the creation, and minimise the disposal, of radioactive wastes. We use risk analysis (strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities) to examine performance against our strategic environmental objectives, which are set out, in our 5-year Nuclear Delivery Plan (NDP). The output supports the targeting of our resources at each nuclear site. We consult the relevant permit holders on the SER priorities and use their feedback to refine our plans. We expect all permit holders to take account of our priorities when considering their own programmes of work, objectives and plans. The NER process brings together what we learn and achieve through regulation across the sector. It provides input to planning priorities, supported by qualitative and semi-quantitative evidence. It covers the 28 nuclear sites in England and Wales and spans the same 14 environmental themes. During the process we collate, compile and summarise evidence from the SERs and other sources such as inspection reports and evidence from our other nuclear work programmes. The output is the NER annual report. This provides a snapshot of the status of the nuclear sector and gives insights to enable us to regulate more efficiently and effectively. It also takes account of cross-cutting issues and risks such as changes in international standards, domestic policy, regulatory framework, domestic standards and guidance, learning from experience such as incidents, events and good practice, and innovation, research and development. It provides graphics that illustrate the grading of environmental performance for the nuclear sector across the fourteen environmental themes. This analysis allows benchmarking of nuclear site's environmental performance and the visualisation provides a convenient comparison of performance across themes, sites, and over time. We use this intelligence to inform our investment in training and development of our staff, and our cross-cutting engagement on strategic issues with government, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) and other corporate organisations. Adopting this approach can provide benefits with organisational reputation, stakeholder participation and ensuring value from the public investment. This paper describes the history of the SER/NER process, a selection of outputs from the process and ideas for improvement. The paper will be of interest to other regulators and organisations across the world that are interested in supporting continuous improvement. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Complexity and error potential of digital I and C - 135

Utilization of digital I and C for application in nuclear power plants led to a growing discussion on how to create methods for a probabilistic evaluation on such systems. Issues arise on the one hand due to a lack of commonly accepted models for quantitative evaluation of availability and reliability and on the other hand due to the integration of such models into the evaluation of reliability of an overall system. Nevertheless programmable and even more complex systems are implemented to satisfy growing functionality requirements. Therefore the question for a method to evaluate the reliability of systems based on software or on programmable logic became even more urgent. The approach described is based on the commonly accepted assumption that more complex designs are less reliable. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

A new international standard on cybersecurity for nuclear power plants: IEC 62645 - cybersecurity requirements - 161

This paper provides an overview of the IEC 62645, an actual standard by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) focused on the issue of requirements for computer security programmes and system development processes to prevent and/or minimize the impact of cyber attacks against computer-based I and C systems. Developed since 2009 and published end of 2014, the standard is intended to be used for changing or establishing new security programmes for I and C systems of operating and new Nuclear Power Plants (NPP). This paper also presents the key issues being considered in the new revision to IEC 62645, currently in process. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗