NASA NTRSDate not supplied
The NASA BioNutrients missions seek to understand the suitability of microorganisms for bioproduction during space flight. One topic of interest is the stability of microbial genomes during long-term ambient storage and subsequent rehydration and growth. To address these questions, samples from 8 species were flown to ISS for 5 years of desiccated storage at ambient temperature (Stasis Packs) and 2 species were packaged along with powdered media inside a bioreactor system to allow hydration and growth in microgravity (Production Packs). For both systems, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of the DNA extracted from the returned samples and paired ground controls will be conducted to identify changes in genome stability due to time, storage conditions and growth in space. Across the technical replicates, ground controls, 10 timepoints, and multiple experimental conditions, ~300 samples have been selected for initial analysis with WGS sequencing to 100x coverage. A flexible and resource efficient mutation calling pipeline is needed to process this large dataset and allow for comparisons between species. Many bioinformatics tools for calling Indels and Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) are designed for use with pure isolates, where true variations from the reference genome are expected to dominate the reads aligning to the location of mutation. In contrast, DNA from the Stasis Pack (SP) samples was collected directly after recovery from desiccated storage and the Production Pack (PP) samples were collected after fermentation. In this context, reads with mutations are expected to be less frequent than reads that align with the reference genome, as each sample will include multiple lines of cells. Thus, BioNutrients samples are expected to be similar to samples from cancer cell or “pooled” sequencing approaches. In preparation for the analysis of the BioNutrients samples, we have tested three mutation calling tools (GATK for Microbes, BreSeq and DiscoSNP) designed for complex samples. A challenge of validating mutation identification pipelines is a lack of “Ground Truth” datasets, especially for complex samples. To compare these three tools, we sought to identify mutations in pre-existing WGS data collected from populations of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii that were exposed to UV mutagenesis and growth in LEO as part of the Space Algae-1 mission. Here we present a summary of these tools against the analysis originally conducted using the CRISP tool. Critical metrics are compared such as runtime, the number of SNPs, the number and size of Indels, and patterns of transversion and transitions identified by each tool are reported. By sharing these benchmarking results collected in support of the BioNutrients mission, we aim to guide others seeking to identify SNVs in similarly complex microbial samples.