Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Physics - Plasma physics , Mathematics and Computing, Physics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Theoretical Review of the MFIX Fluid and Two-Fluid Models

MFIX (Multiphase Flow with Interphase eXchanges) is a general purpose code that can be used for describing the hydrodynamics, chemical reactions, and heat transfer of dense or dilute multiphase fluid flows. MFIX calculations give detailed information on pressure, temperature, composition, and velocity distributions in the defined system. This report provides an overview of MFIX’s expressions for single phase flow and continuous dispersed multiphase flow (i.e., the two-fluid model). In addition to the two fluid model (MFIX-TFM), MFIX contains a discrete element model (MFIX-DEM) and a multi-phase particle in cell model (MFIX-PIC) that are not reviewed within this document.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

SCALE Lattice Physics Code Assessments of Accident Tolerant Fuel

This report highlights accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) code assessment activities performed under Project NRCHQ- 60-17-T-0017, Lattice Physics Enhancements and Assessment. ATF covers a broad range of advanced fuel and clad designs for light water reactors (LWRs) to enhance performance under several accident conditions. Several ATF concepts are anticipated to be deployed as lead test rods (LTRs) or lead test assemblies (LTAs) within the next five years. The purpose of this work is to assess the predictive capabilities of NRC neutronics codes that underpin various licensing calculations. ATF designs use different fuel and clad materials compared to standard UO 2 fuel and zirconium-alloy claddings (hereafter UO 2 -Zry). These new materials and geometrical designs need to be assessed to quantify the impact of nuclear data uncertainties on quantities of interest (QOIs) in licensing calculations and the impact of modeling approximations which may be valid for UO 2 -Zry but not for ATF. This report outlines a systematic approach for ATF neutronics code assessment which includes sensitivity and uncertainty (S/U) analysis of nuclear data, identification of experimental benchmark and gaps for code validation, investigation of modeling approximations, and code-to-code comparisons of calculated QOIs against high-fidelity reference continuous energy (CE) Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. This report focuses on the assessment of the SCALE/Polaris lattice physics code for reactor safety analysis. Polaris lattice physics calculations generate few group (FG) cross sections for PARCS full-core calculations. (Full-core analysis, spent fuel analysis, and severe accident analysis will be performed in future work.) The selected ATF concepts for this report include Cr 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 -Cr 2 O 3 -doped UO 2 fuel, U 3 Si 2 fuel, FeCrAl cladding, SiC cladding, and Cr-coated cladding.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

COMET/ZEUS Activation Foils Report for Irradiations IER-241 and IER-261

The goal of this work was to determine the internal neutron spectrum of the COMET/ZEUS assembly using activation foils. Similar measurements were performed on the COMET assembly when it was located at the Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility (LACEF) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The present measurements were performed after the COMET assembly was moved to the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) located in the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The December 2012 COMET/ZEUS irradiation was the first in a series of experiments, and the COMET/ZEUS assembly was selected because of operational readiness and authorization to run specific targets. The August 2013 irradiation was the second in the series and involved only small changes in the configuration. This report describes the unfolding of the activation foils to determine the internal neutron spectra.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Application of Gaussian Bayes classifier to differentiate chlorine-based chemical agents

The Portable Isotopic Neutron Spectroscopy (PINS) is a commercialized system developed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to examine chemical warfare agents (CWA) non-destructively, utilizing Prompt Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis (PGNAA) techniques. The PINS system takes advantage of a high-resolution gamma-ray spectrum from a mechanically-cooled high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector. One of the difficult technical challenges is to discriminate the chlorine-based chemical agents. Especially, CN, CNB, CNS and CG have similar chemical compositions to make it hard to discriminate them with a higher confidence. Current identification algorithms for PINS systems with 252-Cf sources have been improved and updated continuously as more field data became available, and new algorithms was studied to complement the current algorithms by adopting the Gaussian Bayes classifier. These new algorithms were intended to be applied to a subset of chlorine-based chemical agents, and their main goal is discriminate CN, CNB, CNS and CG with their ratios of the chlorine neutron inelastic 1763keV peak to the chlorine thermal neutron capture 1959keV peak, which is referred to as the “Cl i/c” or “clic” ratio in this study. The Cl i/c ratios were assumed to follow Gaussian distributions with the means and the standard deviations unique to their corresponding chemical agents. The prior probabilities of these four chemical agents were optimized with a collection of field data to achieve the best performance in terms of precision or positive predictive value (PPV). Finally, their posterior probabilities as functions of the Cl i/c ratio were implemented in the current version of PINS analysis software in order to be tested with more field data.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗
DOE OSTI2020

Uncertainty Propagation from Flux to α and from Time to α in Reaction History

This report documents measurement uncertainty propagation from flux to α and from time to α in gamma reaction history. Analytical formulas are derived, and on the basis of them, their discrete versions are provided to serve for current reaction history software verification, and for development of the future versions of the software. The discrete version is provided for the general case: sparse data with varying time intervals between the data points.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

2019 Lighting R&D Opportunities

BTO’s Lighting R&D Opportunities is updated annually and covers foundational R&D needs for lighting technology and lighting application understanding that will result in maximum energy savings while also optimizing for building occupant well-being and productivity.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2020

An energy-based coupling approach to nonlocal interface problems.

Nonlocal models provide accurate representations of physical phenomena ranging from fracture mechanics to complex subsurface flows, settings in which traditional partial differential equation models fail to capture effects caused by long-range forces at the microscale and mesoscale. However, the application of nonlocal models to problems involving interfaces, such as multimaterial simulations and fluid-structure interaction, is hampered by the lack of a physically consistent interface theory which is needed to support numerical developments and, among other features, reduces to classical models in the limit as the extent of nonlocal interactions vanish. In this paper, we use an energy-based approach to develop a formulation of a nonlocal interface problem which provides a physically consistent extension of the classical perfect interface formulation for partial differential equations. Numerical examples in one and two dimensions validate the proposed framework and demonstrate the scope of our theory.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
DOE OSTI2020

TRT Compton Scattering Data: Comparisons between LLNL and LANL: Pointwise

This memo is one of a pair of reports comparing Compton scattering data in the context of thermal radiation transport (TRT). This document focuses on Pointwise (PW) data while the other report focuses on Multigroup (MG) data. These complementary analyses, via PW comparisons, show if the same physics are used and if fundamental bugs are present, and, via MG comparisons, quantify macroscopic Compton effects such as mean amplification factors. No averaging of Compton data over photon energy is done for the PW comparisons, while lab-dependent numerical resolution choices become relevant for the MG comparisons. This document plots and quantifies differences in PW Compton scattering data between LANL and LLNL for four disparate temperatures on a logarithmically-spaced energy grid. PW comparisons means we use the received LLNL data as-is, without any averaging or integration over energy. In addition to LANL-to-LLNL comparisons, we investigate the impact of numerical choices on LANL PW data. For the purposes of this comparison, we neglect induced scattering.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

TRT Compton Scattering Data: Comparisons between LLNL and LANL: Multigroup

This memo is one of a pair of reports comparing Compton scattering data in the context of thermal radiation transport (TRT). This document focuses on Multigroup (MG) data while the other report focuses on Pointwise (PW) data. These complementary analyses, via PW comparisons, show if the same physics are used and if fundamental bugs are present, and, via MG comparisons, quantify macroscopic Compton effects such as mean amplification factors. No averaging of Compton data over photon energy is done for the PW comparisons, while lab-dependent numerical resolution choices become relevant for the MG comparisons. For this MG-comparison report, we make and document the numerical assumptions we use to convert LLNL PW data into MG data. This document plots and quantifies differences in Compton scattering data between MG LANL and LLNL for four disparate temperatures on a logarithmically-spaced photon-energy grid. In addition to LANL and LLNL data, we add a third and fourth independent vote from data generated by Brooks Kinch (LANL postdoc). For the purposes of these comparisons, we neglect induced scattering.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Isotopic analysis of plutonium measured with very thick absorbers and high-granularity spectra

FRAM is LANL-designed software designed to extract plutonium and uranium isotopic information from gamma ray spectra. This is an important capability for NEST and STAB; however, FRAM performance has been poor when applied to field data collected in these programs. FRAM Version 5 (commercially available) was fine-tuned and validated for laboratory quality measurements but not for measurements of the high-mass and heavily shielded SNM items encountered in NEST. FRAM is untested for spectra collected with high-granularity lower resolution instruments such as the new 8-MeV Detective-X favored by STAB or the new custom electrocooled systems coming into use for NEST. FRAM Version 6.1 (unreleased) has improvements in physics capabilities, and parameter sets may be adapted that are more specific to NEST and STAB, which is what we have attempted for this assignment. Thick shielding attenuates gamma rays profoundly, especially those at low energy, making them too weak to be measured. The missing low-energy peaks force the analysis to employ only the highest-energy peaks. We adapted FRAM 6.1 for analysis of plutonium spectra obtained with very thick Pb filters (a surrogate for NEST-type configurations). New parameter sets employing only very high energy peaks were created for the analysis. High granularity and low resolution make deconvolution of the 600-keV region particularly challenging, and we have worked to optimally extract information from this region. The results shown in this paper give high confidence that we are on the right track. We used a combination of real and synthetically-modified data. Remaining work includes testing the new software and parameters against genuine data collected with Detective-X and new NEST systems, but such datasets at the moment are unavailable. It also remains to develop and test parameter sets specific to uranium and the new detectors.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Reaction History Uncertainty Propagation from Flux to α and from Time to α [Slides]

We discuss uncertainty propagation in reaction history data from underground nuclear tests. γ reaction history detectors measured flux as a function of time. After data analysis we report α as a function of time. Flux uncertainty and time uncertainty propagation into α uncertainty are discussed in detail. Discretization of the formulas is discussed.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2020

Introduction to the Monte Carlo Method [Slides]

The goal here is to introduce you to the Monte Carlo (MC) method. MC is a very powerful simulation technique. Very simple examples will be used. Potential MC users have diverse backgrounds, but you should see from the examples how the method could be applied to your field of study.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
DOE OSTI2020

Measurement Uncertainty in One-Of-A-Kind Event Data Analysis

A golden standard in science is to repeat an experiment a statistically significant number of times, recording data using the same set of detectors and the same data analysis methodology. In such case experimental error includes both the range of true values generated by repetitions of the experiment, and measurement uncertainty caused by the detector. They are independent. It is a huge and too frequently used simplification, to assume that one can measure multiple repetitions of an identical experiment, resulting in identical true experimental value. Repetitions, as similar is it is experimentally achievable, have unavoidable built-in differences resulting in a range of the true values rather than in a single value. When modern, very sensitive and well calibrated measurement systems are used, this range is not negligible, and sometimes dominates over the measurement uncertainty. Range of true values depends on built-in differences in physics of the experiment. Stochastic physical processes result typically in a broader range of true values than non-stochastic processes do. Measurement uncertainty depends on a measurement method (properties of the detector not of the experiment). Modern measurement methods, including digital ones, frequently make the measurement uncertainty very small. When data from one–of –a kind experiment are analyzed, only the measurement uncertainty is reported. It provides no information about the range of true experimental values, neither about reliability of a reported data point. Reliability of a data point is in general independent from its measurement uncertainty. However, in practice reliable measurement methods frequently have high measurement uncertainty, while low reliability methods are applied to limit measurement uncertainty. Comparison of reliable data with high measurement uncertainty to not so reliable data measured with low uncertainty is discussed – in different scenarios different data analysis methods are applicable. Methods for data analysis from an experiment repeated statistically significant number of times are very well developed. They do not require a detailed expertise in physics of an experiment, nor in the properties of the measurement system used, and meaning of the reported uncertainty is well understood in any scientific community. It all changes when data from one-of-a-kind experiment is analyzed. Analyst’s expertise is required both in the physics of the experiment and in all aspects of the measurement system, all possible malfunctions. Data users must remember that only measurement uncertainty is reported from any one-of-a-kind experiment. Theory with simulations may provide estimation of expected built-in differences in the experiment, and by this of expected range of true values for a given experiment; yet measurement uncertainty can never be used in place of the range of true experimental values.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
DOE OSTI2020

Simple Algorithms for a Physics Code Base

Project 1: Developing a container for state variables in a physics code. Project 2: Setting up near-continuous performance and usage metrics monitoring of a physics code.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
DOE OSTI2020

Integration of Kokkos into MonteRay [Slides]

Monte Carlo Neutron Transport codes are C++-based and simulate interaction of nuclear particles with materials. MonteRay is a library for accelerating Monte Carlo ray-casting tallies with GPUs. Kokkos is commonly used to write performance portable applications for HPC platforms. A goal is to implement Kokkos into the Expected Path Length file that uses Cuda as a backend. The methodology and results are summarized.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗