NASA NTRS2022
In 2012, a pathfinder forward pressure vessel bulkhead (FPVBH) for the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) was fabricated using aluminum (Al) alloy 2219. The demonstration article was offered as a replacement for the baseline configuration, which at that time was a multi-piece welded construction using aluminum-lithium (Al-Li) alloy 2195. In 2014, the NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) funded a Phase I effort to explore spin-forming as a manufacturing method to produce a complex-shaped, single-piece FPVBH for the crew module (CM) [1]. The primary focus of the NESC effort was to expand spin-forming technology to the fabrication of an Al-Li 2195 FPVBH. As a result, limited testing and analysis was performed on the original Al 2219 article. In this study, a sufficiently large plate of Al 2219 was not available for the fabrication of a FPVBH. Therefore, the forming blank comprised two plates (from different lots) butt welded together using a single friction stir weld. The welded forming blank was then spin formed into the FPVBH configuration and heat treated to the T62 temper. Mechanical property testing of the spin-formed 2219-T62 FPVBH revealed that the tensile properties were comparable to the Metallic Material Properties Development and Standardization (MMPDS) A-basis allowable for Al 2219-T6 wrought products. However, post-spin forming application of the standard heat treatment produced large, recrystallized grains in the material. The response varied within the two plates; one plate lot exhibited nearly complete recrystallization, while the other lot contained bands of recrystallization. Although no reduction in tensile properties was observed due to these microstructural variations, a more detailed investigation was recommended to better understand the effect of spin forming on the recrystallization mechanism and the impact on other material properties. The current study examined the microstructure and mechanical properties of the fully processed Al 2219-T62 FPVBH with emphasis on comparing differences between the two plates. Testing was limited to the cone region of the FPVBH. The two specific tasks in this study were: a) Characterization of the microstructure and mechanical properties in the two plates used in the FPVBH. b) Isolation of the impact of each step in the thermo-mechanical processing (TMP) sequence of the FPVBH on recrystallization and grain growth. Mechanical property testing sampled regions containing both large, recrystallized and small, unrecrystallized grains. Tensile strengths and elongations were equivalent in both regions and exceeded MMPDS A-basis allowables. Fracture toughness was equivalent in both regions and fracture morphology was typical of aluminum alloys. The fatigue precrack region of the fracture toughness specimens appeared more faceted in the recrystallized plate. This suggests that property testing that is more sensitive to grain size, such as fatigue crack growth rate and stress corrosion cracking, may be warranted. Alcoa reviewed the production records for the two plate lots and confirmed that composition of both plates was within the allowable range for Al 2219 and that plate processing steps were all performed within production limits. However, the Fe content was notably higher in the fully recrystallized plate, resulting in a greater volume fraction of large Fe-bearing inclusions and Al-Cu constituent particles. Alcoa did not provide details regarding plate processing variables for the two plate lots. It was surmised that deformation by hot rolling was the most accurate TMP simulation of commercial spin forming within a laboratory setting. Both hot rolling and spin forming comprise combinations of shear and compressive deformation. The through-thickness strain caused by hot rolling is symmetrical about the mid-plane, as the rollers contact both sides of the material. Shear strains are maximum at the inner and outer surfaces and trend toward zero at the mid-thickness. In contrast, spin forming utilizes a single roller on the outer surface, producing a gradient in shear stress through the thickness. Shear strains in spin-formed material are highest at the outer surface due to direct contact with the roller, and trend toward zero at the inner surface. Consequently, there will undoubtedly be some discrepancies in the mechanical response of hot-rolled and spin-formed products in the through-thickness direction. Interrupted TMP simulations were performed on remnant plate from the FPVBH forming blank in order to isolate the effects of a post-weld anneal, spin-forming deformation/thermal cycling, and solution heat treatment (SHT) on development of the recrystallized microstructures. Analysis confirmed that large, recrystallized grains formed exclusively during SHT and only after a certain deformation level was exceeded. Remnant plate from both lots that received thermal processing only did not exhibit recrystallization but exhibited fully recrystallized microstructures when processed by hot rolling. This indicates that (1) the level of deformation exceeded the critical level for recrystallization in both plates and (2) that the level of deformation during hot rolling was greater than that which accumulated during spin forming of the FPVBH. Comparison of the hot-rolled plate with the spin-formed material showed that the recrystallized grain size was larger in the FPVBH, providing further evidence that deformation levels were lower in the FPVBH. The most plausible explanation for the differing degrees of recrystallization in the two plates is particle stimulated nucleation (PSN) at the Fe-bearing inclusions and large Al-Cu constituent particles. In the plate with higher solute content, the greater volume fraction of these particles reduces the deformation level required to promote recrystallization. During spin forming the critical deformation level was likely exceeded for the higher Fe content plate resulting in a fully recrystallized microstructure. The lower Fe content plate developed a microstructure that exhibited bands of recrystallization due to the combination of a non-uniform distribution of particles and deformation. The critical deformation required for recrystallization was likely only exceeded during spin forming in regions of higher particle content. While there were differences in Fe content between these lots of Al 2219 plate, the composition of both was within defined alloy limits and Alcoa reported no anomalies during plate production. The observed differences in recrystallization after spin forming may reflect the inherent variability between these two lots of plate. The spin-forming vendor, Spincraft, reported that similar variations in recrystallized microstructures have been observed during examination of multiple spin-forming trials of a different 2xxx series aluminum alloy. Hence, tighter chemical specification limits on impurity levels in Al 2219 plate may help ensure uniform, predictable microstructures. Finally, the tensile and fracture toughness properties were not affected by the microstructural variations noted.