NASA NTRSDate not supplied
The motivation for cryogenic wind tunnels originated during the 1960s from an internationally recognized need for a high Reynolds number test capability based on experiences with preflight predictions of aerodynamic characteristics and an anticipated need in support of research and development for future aerospace vehicle systems. More specifically, the motivation for a flight (or near flight) Reynolds number ground test facility was captured in the foreword to reference 1 which states:“...AGARD held a Specialists’ Meeting in Paris on ‘Transonic Aerodynamics’ in recognition of the fact that the absence of adequate theoretical methods and wind tunnels of high enough Reynolds number had already led to costly shortcomings in the transonic performance of certain combat and transport aircraft.” Preflight prediction of flight characteristics is a necessary process for the developer of any aerospace vehicle, and introduces significant risk to the success of the vehicle. Whether the vehicle customer is commercial or governmental, the final full-scale vehicle must meet certain requirements to be certified as safe, and certain performance requirements to be economically successful. Aircraft companies strive to know the flight characteristics and performance of their vehicle with high confidence prior to flight, thus enabling optimal design trades and elimination of any costly modifications to the aircraft during and after initial flight testing. The problems of predicting flight characteristics across the full flight envelope prior to flight have been and continue to be challenging. Much has changed since the US National Transonic Facility (NTF) became operational in the 1980s, followed by the European Transonic Windtunnel (ETW) in 1990s, not the least of which has been the advancement and positive impact of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) on aircraft design and development. Today, the need for integrated CFD and ground-based high Reynolds number test and evaluation capability remains as aerodynamics will always be central to defining an aircraft directly as well as providing critical input to other disciplines. Today the economic stakes of being surprised during flight tests are higher than ever. This oral-only presentation describes the past, current, and future role of high Reynolds number aerodynamic testing in aerospace vehicle design and development. Discussion of relevant flow physics, past experiences with preflight prediction, and future needs, challenges, and opportunities is included. 1.“Facilities and Techniques for Aerodynamic Testing at Transonic Speeds and High Reynolds Number,” AGARD CP-83-71, 1971.