Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Spreading”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Point Spread Function of ASTRO-H Soft X-Ray Telescope (SXT)

ASTRO-H (Hitomi) satellite equips two Soft X-ray Telescopes (SXTs), one of which (SXT-S) is coupled to Soft-X-ray Spectrometer (SXS) while the other (SXT-I) is coupled to Soft X-ray Imager (SXI). Although SXTs are lightweight of approximately 42 kgmodule1 and have large on-axis effective area (EA) of approximately 450 cm(exp 2) at 4.5 keV module(sub 1) by themselves, their angular resolutions are moderate approximately 1.2 arcmin in half power diameter. The amount of contamination into the SXS FOV (3.05 times 3.05 arcmin(exp 2) from nearby sources was measured in the ground-based calibration at the beamline in Institute of Space and Astronautical Science. The contamination at 4.5 keV were measured with sources distant from the SXS center by one width of the FOV in perpendicular and diagonal directions, that is, 3 and 4.5 arcmin-off, respectively. The average EA of the contamination in the four directions with the 3 and 4.5 arcmin-off were measured to be 2 and 0.6% of the on-axis EA of 412 cm (exp) for the SXS FOV, respectively. The contamination from a source distant by two FOV widths in a diagonal direction, that is, 8.6 arcmin-off was measured to be 0.1% of the on-axis at 4.5 keV. The contamination amounts were also measured at 1.5 keV and 8.0 keV which indicated that the ratio of the contamination EA to that of on-axis hardly depended on the source energy. The off-axis SXT-I images from 4.5 to 27 arcmin were acquired at intervals of -4.5 arcmin for the SXI FOV of 38 times 38 arcmin(exp 2). The image shrinked as the off-axis angle increased. Above 13.5 arcmin of off-angle, a stray appeared around the image center in the off-axis direction. As for the on-axis image, a ring-shaped stray appeared at the edge of SXI of approximately 18 arcmin distant from the image center.

Soft X-ray spectrometer↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Process Drivers, Inter-model Spread, and a Path Forward: What Do We Know About Arctic Amplification?

Over the recent decades, rapid changes have been observed in the Arctic resulting from enhanced surface warming in the Arctic relative to the rest of the globe, a phenomenon called Arctic Amplification. While surface-based amplification of Arctic warming in response to increased CO2 has been established. The driving mechanisms, relevant processes, and the relative roles of local and remote mechanisms to Arctic Amplification remain unclear. Research over the last decade has made it clear that coupling between the atmosphere, sea ice, and ocean play a key role in Arctic Amplification. This presentation summarizes recent research on the fundamental role that atmosphere-sea ice-ocean interactions and energy exchanges play in driving Arctic Amplification, how these interactions manifest as radiative climate feedbacks, and how these processes influence the differences in the projected Arctic climate change across CMIP5 and 6. We hypothesize that models that simulate larger warming do so by generating a larger local atmospheric circulation response that more effectively redistributes energy drawn from the ocean in sea ice retreat regions Arctic-wide and contributing to a larger increase in downwelling long wave radiation. This process is also fundamentally tied to the Arctic lapse rate feedback.

Patrick Charles Taylor↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Process drivers, inter-model spread, and a path forward: What do we know about Arctic Amplification?

Over the recent decades, rapid changes have been observed in the Arctic resulting from enhanced surface warming in the Arctic relative to the rest of the globe, a phenomenon called Arctic Amplification. While surface-based amplification of Arctic warming in response to increased CO2 has been established. The driving mechanisms, relevant processes, and the relative roles of local and remote mechanisms to Arctic Amplification remain unclear. Research over the last decade has made it clear that coupling between the atmosphere, sea ice, and ocean play a key role in Arctic Amplification. This presentation summarizes recent research on the fundamental role that atmosphere-sea ice-ocean interactions and energy exchanges play in driving Arctic Amplification, how these interactions manifest as radiative climate feedbacks, and how these processes influence the differences in the projected Arctic climate change across CMIP5 and 6. We hypothesize that models that simulate larger warming do so by generating a larger local atmospheric circulation response that more effectively redistributes energy drawn from the ocean in sea ice retreat regions Arctic-wide and contributing to a larger increase in downwelling long wave radiation. This process is also fundamentally tied to the Arctic lapse rate feedback.

Arctic amplification↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Process drivers, inter-model spread, and a path forward: What do we know about Arctic Amplification?

Over the recent decades, rapid changes have been observed in the Arctic resulting from enhanced surface warming in the Arctic relative to the rest of the globe, a phenomenon called Arctic Amplification. While surface-based amplification of Arctic warming in response to increased CO2 has been established. The driving mechanisms, relevant processes, and the relative roles of local and remote mechanisms to Arctic Amplification remain unclear. Research over the last decade has made it clear that coupling between the atmosphere, sea ice, and ocean play a key role in Arctic Amplification. This presentation summarizes recent research on the fundamental role that atmosphere-sea ice-ocean interactions and energy exchanges play in driving Arctic Amplification, how these interactions manifest as radiative climate feedbacks, and how these processes influence the differences in the projected Arctic climate change across CMIP5 and 6. We hypothesize that models that simulate larger warming do so by generating a larger local atmospheric circulation response that more effectively redistributes energy drawn from the ocean in sea ice retreat regions Arctic-wide and contributing to a larger increase in downwelling long wave radiation. This process is also fundamentally tied to the Arctic lapse rate feedback.

Patrick C. Taylor↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Opposed Flame Spreading Along a Structured PMMA Sample in Exploration Atmosphere Under Microgravity

As part of SAFFIRE V experiments on the ISS supply spacecraft CYGNUS, flame propagation along different surface structures on a PMMA sample was investigated in opposed flow. The sample was 200 x 400 mm (length x width) with a thickness of 10 mm and contained ribs of different widths (1-10 mm), each 3 mm high, on both sides, arranged in the flow direction. The total thickness of the specimen was thus 16 mm for the ribs. For the first 360 s after ignition with a Kanthal wire, the flow velocity was 20 cm/s in the opposed direction. Then the flow velocity was reduced to 5 cm/s for a duration of 300 s before it was switched off to terminate the experiment. The experimental pressure was 761 hPa and the oxygen concentration was 26.9 vol %. These conditions correspond to atmospheric conditions envisioned for future exploration missions. It was found that the flames ignited downstream propagated forward along the rib edges surprisingly fast with up to 0.88 mm/s (1 mm rib width). Also, it was observed that the wider the rib, the slower the propagation. The widest rib (10 mm) already showed two largely independent edge flames. Unintentionally, the experiment showed how sensitive the flames are to small perturbations of the flow field, as remnants of a preceding and upstream experiment disturbed the incoming flow stratification partially.

microgravity↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Opposed flame spreading along a structured PMMA-sample in exploration atmosphere under microgravity

As part of SAFFIRE V experiments on the ISS supply spacecraft CYGNUS, flame propagation along different surface structures on a PMMA sample was investigated in opposed flow. The sample was 200 x 400 mm (length x width) with a thickness of 10 mm and contained ribs of different widths (1-10 mm), each 3 mm high, on both sides, arranged in the flow direction. The total thickness of the specimen was thus 16 mm for the ribs. For the first 360 s after ignition with a Kanthal wire, the flow velocity was 20 cm/s in the opposed direction. Then the flow velocity was reduced to 5 cm/s for a duration of 300 s before it was switched off to terminate the experiment. The experimental pressure was 761 hPa and the oxygen concentration was 26.9 vol %. These conditions correspond to atmospheric conditions envisioned for future exploration missions. It was found that the flames ignited downstream propagated forward along the rib edges surprisingly fast with up to 0.88 mm/s (1 mm rib width). Also, it was observed that the wider the rib, the slower the propagation. The widest rib (10 mm) already showed two largely independent edge flames. Unintentionally, the experiment showed how sensitive the flames are to small perturbations of the flow field, as remnants of a preceding and upstream experiment disturbed the incoming flow stratification partially.

fire safety↗