Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Multiphysics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35

Validation Data and Model Development for Fuel Assembly Response to Seismic Loads

Vibrations are inherently present in nuclear reactors, especially in cores and steam generators of pressurized water reactors (PWR). They can have significant effects on local heat transfer and wear and tear in the reactor and often set safety margins. The simulation of these multiphysics phenomena from first principles requires the coupling of several codes, which is one the most challenging tasks in modern computer simulation. Here an ambitious multiphysics multidisciplinary validation campaign is conducted. It relied on an integrated team of experimentalists and code developers to acquire benchmark and validation data for fluid-structure interaction codes. Data are focused on PWR fuel bundle behavior during seismic transients.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE Energy Frontiers Research Center for Heterogeneous Functional Materials; the “HeteroFoaM Center”

Synopsis of five year accomplishments: Devices that convert and store energy are generally made from heterogeneous constituent materials that act and interact to selectively conduct, transport, and separate mass, heat, and charge. Controlling these actions and interactions enables the technical breakthroughs that have made fuel cells, batteries, and solid state membranes, for example, essential parts of our society. In the biological sense, these materials are ‘vascular’ rather than primitive ‘cellular’ materials, in which the arrangements and configurations of the constituents (including their void phases) play essential and definitive roles in their functional capabilities. In 2009 a group of investigators, with lifetime investments of effort in the understanding of heterogeneous materials, recognized that the design of such material systems is not an optimization problem as such. Local interactions of the constituents create “emergent” properties and responses that are not part of the formal set of constituent characteristics, in much the same sense that society and culture is created by the group interactions of the people involved. The design of emergent properties is an open question in all formal science, but for energy materials the lack of this foundation science relegates development tasks to Edisonian trial and error, with anecdotal success and frequent costly failures. That group defined, for the first time, multi-scale heterogeneous functional materials with functional disordered and void phase regions as “HeteroFoaM,” and formed the first multidisciplinary research team to define and codify the foundation science of that material class. The primary goal of the HeteroFoaM Center was, and is, to create and establish the multi-scale fundamental knowledge and related methodology required for the rational and systematic multiphysics design of heterogeneous functional materials and their interfaces and surfaces for applications in energy transformation and storage. The scope of the HeteroFoaM center was focused on the discovery and development of the control science of key phenomena across multiple length scales that create functionality in heterogeneous materials and their structured interfaces, boundaries, and surfaces for applications in energy technologies. The HeteroFoaM Center defined a critical path and established an essential foundation for progress in the field of heterogeneous functional materials. Perhaps the single most important element of progress was the establishment of the capability to design, characterize, and model heterogeneous functional materials at the conformal level, i.e., for a limited set of material systems, the HeteroFoaM team defined how to control the order / disorder at the atomic level, the surfaces, and the interfaces for selected constituent morphologies, and to use multiphysical models to explain the remarkable property variations resulting from that control science for several heterogeneous material systems. For those cases we defined “meso-structures” (at various scales) where the interactive physics of constituent phases acted to create emergent properties, e.g., strongly emergent mixed conductor behavior and ionic transport. The general approach used by this EFRC is shown in Fig. 1. The HeteroFoaM Center created the genre of Heterogeneous Functional Materials with functional surfaces and interfaces (including void phases) called HeteroFoaM as a science platform to enable rational analysis and design of functional material systems by focusing on the meso-interactions that drive emergent response. The team firmly established this approach with over 180 archival publications (see “Publications” section), 7 patent applications, and over 100 invited lectures in 15 countries on this topic, enabled by building a remarkably effective and uniquely coherent research team. Indeed, our team was our principal strength; this problem eluded solution earlier because such a team was not available.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Carbon Capture Multidisciplinary Simulation Center Trilab Support Team (TST) Fall Meeting 2016 Report

The theme of this year’s meeting was “Predictivity: Now and in the Future”. After welcoming remarks, Erik Draeger gave a talk on the NNSA Labs’ history of predictive simulation and the new challenges faced by upcoming architecture changes. He described an example where the volume of analysis data produced by a set of inertial confinement fusion (ICF) simulations on the Trinity machine was too large to store or transfer, and the steps needed to reduce it to a manageable size. He also described the software re-engineering plan for LLNL’s suite of multiphysics codes and physics packages with a new push toward common components, making collaboration with teams like the CCMSC who already have experience trying to architect complex multiphysics code infrastructure on next-generation architectures all the more important. Phil Smith then gave an overview outlining the goals of the project, namely to accelerate development of new technology in the form of high efficiency carbon capture pulverized coal power generation as well as further optimize existing state of the art designs. He then presented a summary of the Center’s top-down uncertainty quantification approach, in which ultimate target predictivity informs uncertainty targets for lower-level components, and gave data on how close all the different components currently are to their targets. Most components still need an approximately two-fold reduction in uncertainty to hit the ultimate predictivity target, but the current accuracy is already rather impressive.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Advanced Reactors-Intermediate Heat Exchanger (IHX) Coupling: Theoretical Modeling and Experimental Validation

The overall goal of the research project was to model the behavior of the advanced reactorintermediate heat exchange system and to develop advanced control techniques for off-normal conditions. The specific objectives defined for the project were: 1. To develop the steady-state thermal hydraulic design of the intermediate heat exchanger (IHX); 2. To develop mathematical models to describe the advanced nuclear reactor-IHX-chemical process/power generation coupling during normal and off-normal operations, and to simulate models using multiphysics software; 3. To develop control strategies using genetic algorithm or neural network techniques and couple these techniques with the multiphysics software; 4. To validate the models experimentally The project objectives were accomplished by defining and executing four different tasks corresponding to these specific objectives. The first task involved selection of IHX candidates and developing steady state designs for those. The second task involved modeling of the transient and offnormal operation of the reactor-IHX system. The subsequent task dealt with the development of control strategies and involved algorithm development and simulation. The last task involved experimental validation of the thermal hydraulic performances of the two prototype heat exchangers designed and fabricated for the project at steady state and transient conditions to simulate the coupling of the reactor- IHX-process plant system. The experimental work utilized the two test facilities at The Ohio State University (OSU) including one existing High-Temperature Helium Test Facility (HTHF) and the newly developed high-temperature molten salt facility.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Integration of OpenMC methods into MAMMOTH and Serpent

OpenMC, a Monte Carlo particle transport simulation code focused on neutron criticality calculations, contains several methods we wish to emulate in MAMMOTH and Serpent. First, research coupling OpenMC and the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) has shown promising results. Second, the utilization of Functional Expansion Tallies (FETs) allows for a more efficient passing of multiphysics data between OpenMC and MOOSE. Both of these capabilities have been preliminarily implemented into Serpent. Results are discussed and future work recommended.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Warthog Framework Update: Depletion Capabilities

The Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy supports two simulation frameworks to provide advanced simulation techniques for analyzing nuclear reactors. Primarily at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), the fuels product line (FPL) is developing the fuel performance code BISON from Hales et al. [2016], which depends on the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework developed by Gaston et al. [2009]. Likewise, at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), in the reactor product line (RPL), PROTEUS is being developed by Lee et al. [2013] and Nek5000 by Fischer et al. [2015] based on the Simulation-based High-efficiency Advanced Reactor Prototyping (SHARP) framework from Tautges et al. [2013]. MOOSE employs a bottom-up approach to multiphysics coupling, where component codes are built upon a common framework. SHARP employs a top-down approach in which legacy component codes are connected after being separately developed. Each approach has benefits and disadvantages, but this work focuses on having the two approaches work in harmony.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Building Virtual Ecosystems: Computational Challenges for Mechanistic Modeling of Terrestrial Environments Workshop, Germantown, Maryland, March 26–27, 2014

The mission of the Climate and Environmental Sciences Division of the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) within the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Science is “to advance a robust, predictive understanding of Earth’s climate and environmental systems and to inform the development of sustainable solutions to the nation’s energy and environmental challenges.” This formidable challenge requires quantification of stocks and controls on states, fluxes, and residence times of water, carbon, and other key elements through all components of the terrestrial system. These components include vegetation, soils, the deep vadose zone, groundwater, and surface water. To achieve this level of predictive understanding, a new generation of multiscale, multiphysics models is needed for terrestrial systems—models that incorporate process couplings and feedbacks between various “pools” (i.e., vegetation, soils, subsurface aquifers, and surface waters) across wide ranges of spatial and temporal scales. To explore the potential of a new generation of multiscale, multiphysics models for revolutionizing the understanding of terrestrial ecosystem dynamics, BER held the Computational Challenges for Mechanistic Modeling of Terrestrial Environments workshop on March 26–27, 2014, in Germantown, Maryland. The workshop brought together 29 researchers with diverse expertise, including hydrologists, environmental scientists, ecologists, microbiologists, plant scientists, and computational scientists. Through a combination of invited talks, breakout sessions, and report-back discussions, workshop attendees identified challenges and research opportunities needed to develop a more seamless and continuous framework for mechanistic modeling of terrestrial environments extending from the bedrock to the atmospheric boundary layer and from single-plant systems to fields of crops to watersheds and river basins.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Carbon Capture Multidisciplinary Simulation CenterTrilab Support Team Fall Meeting 2018 Report

The TST continues to be very impressed with the quality of work presented and the rapid progress made by the CCMSC on a highly complex multiphysics problem domain. The Center is gathering increasing expertise and experience in multiple areas likely to be of broad interest to DOE and the greater HPC community, particularly in the areas of programming models and DSLs, I/O, V&V/UQ, and visualization/data analytics. This year in particular saw very impressive results in their task graph algorithms, strong and weak scaling of their overall code, and sophistication of their physics models and V/UQ analysis and approach. The team was particularly impressed with the depth of engagement and quality of discussion at the V/UQ deep dive. There are very few organizations outside of NNSA doing multiphysics simulation at this level of accuracy, efficiency, scale and sophistication and DOE would be well-advised to actively work to maintain a close collaborative relationship with this team after the completion of the PSAAP II program if at all possible.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗

DiaMonD: An Integrated Multifaceted Approach to Mathematics at the Interfaces of Data, Models, and Decisions

For many problems in computational science and engineering, the so-called forward problem—solution of the underlying mathematical model to yield output quantities of interest, given input parameters—is difficult enough for frontier complex models, which are often characterized by coupled multiphysics and possibly stochastic behavior over a wide range of length and time scales. However, we face the need to move beyond the forward problem, to address what is often the ultimate goal of CS&E: decision making. This requires us to tackle a spectrum of mathematical problems that subsume, and are thus even more difficult than, the forward problem. First, given experimental data, we wish to estimate unknown parameters characterizing a model of a natural or engineered system by solving an inverse problem. Second, we seek the optimal configuration of the system (or experiments) by solving an optimal design problem. Third, the optimal operation of the system must be determined by solving an optimal control problem. And fourth, we must quantify uncertainties as they propagate through all of the preceding problems, from data to model inference to prediction and finally to optimal design and control. Optimal mathematical methods and algorithms for such end-to-end, data-to-decisions modeling and simulation of complex problems—requiring integrated solution of forward, inverse, optimization, and UQ problems for large, multiphysics, multiscale models—entails challenges of the highest order, while also presenting great opportunities for applied mathematics research. Unfortunately, research on forward, inverse, optimization, and UQ problems has all-too-often progressed in isolation. This has led to mathematical methods that perform well when considering the forward simulation in isolation, but are prohibitive or suboptimal or unstable when combined with other methods within the framework of inversion, optimization, or UQ. The reverse is also true: general-purpose methods developed within the inversion, optimization, and UQ fields often become prohibitive when applied to complex CS&E problems since they do not exploit their structure.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

A High-Fidelity Approach for the Simulation of Flow-Induced Vibration

Flow-induced vibration (FIV) is a widespread problem in energy systems becausethey rely on fluid movement for energy conversion. Vibrating structures may be damaged as fatigue or wear occur. Given the importance of reliable components in the nuclear industry, flow-induced vibrations have long been a major concern in the safety and operation of nuclear reactors. In particular,nuclear fuel and steam generators have been known to suffer from flow-induced vibrations and related failures. Over the past five years, the Nuclear EnergyAdvanced Modeling and Simulation program has developed the integrated multiphysics code suite SHARP. The goal of developing such a tool is to perform multiphysics modeling of the components inside a reactor core, the full reactor core or portions of it, and be able to achieve that with various levelsof fidelity. This flexibility allows users to select the appropriate level of fidelity for their computational resources and design constraints.In particular SHARP contains high-fidelity single-physics codes for structural mechanics and fluid mechanics calculations: the structural mechanics implicit code Diablo and the computational fluid dynamics spectral element code Nek5000. Both codes are state-of-the-art.highly scalable (up to millions of processors in the case of Nek5000) tools that have been extensively validated. These tools form a strong basis on which to build an FIV modeling capability.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Charged Wellbore Casing Controlled Source Electromagnetics (CWC-CSEM) for Reservoir Imaging and Monitoring (Final report)

This project addresses the needs of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to develop advanced monitoring technologies and protocols to track the fate of subsurface carbon dioxide (CO2) plumes for carbon storage. Specifically, the project seeks to develop and test a unique and novel system of technologies consisting of electromagnetic data acquisition, coupled multiphysics imaging, and reservoir model enhancement to understand the migration and long-term distribution of CO2 in the subsurface. The overarching objective is to develop an integrated approach for long term monitoring of carbon storage. The two main components of the project include the methodology development and the test of the method at a field site. The methodology component consists of 1) developing the field procedure and protocol for collecting time-lapse controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) data with source electric current injected into the subsurface through wellbore casings; 2) building of background 3D electrical conductivity utilizing multiple sources of data such as supplemental surface transient EM (TEM) surveys, well-logs, and seismic structural information, for enhancing CSEM signal from reservoir depths; and 3) coupled multiphysics simulations and inversion of CSEM data constrained by production data and by structural information from seismic imaging of the reservoir and overlying formations. The testing component used the field site of Bell Creek Oil Field, which served both as a field laboratory for the method development as well as a test site to evaluate the CSEM signal strengths and the methodology developed in this research project. We have accomplished all the proposed tasks and developed the methodology as planned. These include the procedure for time-lapse CSEM data acquisition, data processing techniques, integration with 3D conductivity model building, fast reservoir simulation for history matching using machine learning, and interpreting CSEM data with coupling to the reservoir modeling. Collectively, the outcome of these tasks form a coherent workflow that can be applied to monitor dedicated carbon storage in saline reservoirs. The testing component evaluated the applicability and limitations of the method, and concluded that the method would be ideal for monitoring dedicated carbon storage sites utilizing saline reservoirs.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

FY21 Status report on the CMVB and CNWG International Collaborations

The ART-GCR Methods area includes an international collaboration work package that covers the tasks defined for the Computational Methods Validation and Benchmark (CMVB)and Civil Nuclear Energy Research and Development Working Group (CNWG) projects. This report summarizes the status of the FY21 tasks and planned FY22 DOE contributions. The CMVB Project Arrangement (PA) is not yet formally approved by all signatories, and no work has therefore been performed in FY21 at INL related to this activity. The CNWG activities inFY21 consisted of the simulation of the High Temperature Test Reactor (HTTR) Loss Of Forced Cooling (LOFC) experimental with the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) codes Griffin, BISON and RELAP-7 based on the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE).It was found that the multiphysics coupled suite is capable of simulating all the important phenomena occurring during the Depressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (DLOFC) experiments showing promising agreement with the measurements given the number of uncertainties and approximations introduced into the model.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling to Simulate a Combined Reforming Process for Syngas and Hydrogen Production

An Oxygen Transport Membrane (OTM) combined reforming technology for producing syngas and hydrogen integrates the advantages of multiple processes—steam methane reforming (SMR), autothermal reforming (ATR), an air separation unit (ASU)—into a single integrated technology. The OTM consists of a primary reforming tube, in which desulfurized natural gas is partially reformed by steam at high pressure in the presence of a metal catalyst. This process is followed in series by a ceramic OTM with a secondary reformer, in which residual methane reforms and O 2 - ions react with a portion of the CO and H 2 fuel to provide the heat to support both primary and secondary reforming. Although the OTM combined reformer technology for syngas and H 2 production has been substantially developed in the last decade, several challenges that affect the overall production efficiency and reliability are yet to be fully understood, addressed, and resolved. Therefore, developing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models that incorporate fluid dynamics, mass transport, kinetics, heat transport, and structural mechanics is critical to understanding and minimizing the probability of tube failures during the startup and operation. In this report, an exhaustive literature review was performed to survey the current state of technology for producing syngas and H 2 using either conventional or renewable energy sources. The feedstocks reviewed include natural gas and coal for the conventional technologies, whereas biomass, solar, wind, and nuclear energy for the renewable technologies. The existing industry-grade COMSOL multiphysics models of OTM were upgraded for the latest software release. In addition, they were improved to help achieve grid and solver independence and were successfully ported on the ORNL high-performance computing clusters to speed up their run times. A 42% reduction in the simulation run time was achieved. A new higher-fidelity CFD model of an OTM tube was developed in the StarCCM+ simulation platform. This new model was designed to simulate various physics using first principles, e.g., turbulent flow, heat transfer, and chemical reactions while avoiding unnecessary simplifications. The resulting predictions were qualitatively assessed and provided useful insights into the multiphysics complexity of an OTM tube.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Cross Section Generation Capability in Griffin

The Griffin code is a Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) based reactor multiphysics analysis application jointly developed by Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory. The code includes a variety of steady-state solvers for fixed-source, k-eigenvalue, adjoint, and subcritical multiplication, as well as transient solvers for point-kinetics, improved quasi-static, and spatial dynamics. The code reads multigroup cross sections in the ISOXML format generated from external deterministic or Monte Carlo cross section generation codes. The implementation of the cross section generation capability in Griffin was initiated last year by plugging in the cross section application programming interface (CSAPI) and reviewing the methodologies for treating particulate fuels. The focus this year was on improving the CSAPI integration and implementing advanced self-shielding methods for applications to advanced reactor problems with TRISO fuels. First, the process for cross section library generation was updated to accurately and rigorously produce isotopic cross section data. Second, the equivalent Dancoff factor cell method performing slowing down calculations on the fly for the resonance treatment was implemented in CSAPI to improve the accuracy of effective multigroup cross sections in the resonance energy range. Third, the iterative local spatial self-shielding method was implemented under the calculation framework of the equivalent Dancoff factor cell method to accurately deal with the double heterogeneity effect of particulate fuel. The updated CSAPI with the advanced self-shielding methods, together with the cross section libraries generated based on the improved process, were tested for pin-cell, unit-cell, and fuel assembly problems with various resonance self-shielding conditions based on very high temperature reactor, high temperature test reactor, and Empire benchmark cores, indicating that the updated CSAPI in Griffin is able to produce multigroup cross sections accurately and efficiently. We also showed that the methodology worked well for pebble bed fuel from HTR-10, but the capability still needs to be fully integrated into CSAPI. In the future, further benchmark tests will be performed for various thermal reactor core problems, including particulate fuel-based pebble bed reactors.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations to Support Efficiency Improvements in Aluminum Smelting Process

Smelting is broadly described as the extraction of a metal from its ore. In the United States, aluminum is commonly produced by smelting alumina in bauxite using the Hall-Héroult process. Optimization of equipment and processes in conventional smelting is crucial to enhancing process efficiency and productivity, is necessary for improving the techno-economic feasibility, which directly manifests as the growth of the American economy. To achieve optima, insightful data on the multiphysics phenomena that are inherent to the process must be obtained through physical investigation or high-fidelity numerical simulations. The resolution of relevant scales in time and space for smelting operations requires intensive, high-performance computing (HPC) simulations. Hostile operating conditions limit physical data acquisition to specific techniques; therefore, these data do not describe the multiscale interaction of simultaneous effects. Fortunately, in recent decades, significant advancements in computing hardware and computational methods have made the numerical resolution of such a complex process possible. In this study, a high-fidelity simulation of aluminum smelting was performed using an open-source tool, OpenFOAM, which analyzed many parameters characteristic to underlying phenomena. A multiphysics model based on the Eulerian-Eulerian multifluid approach was adopted. This model can resolve critical issues in the electrolytic smelting of aluminum, such as bubbling of carbon dioxide from the anode(s), magnetohydrodynamics from electromagnetic effects, ionic dissolution of the alumina in the electrolyte, and the evolution of thermal profiles. This study provides valuable connectivity for characteristic data that can direct the future designs of efficient smelters. A basic framework to model and simulate the smelting process using OpenFOAM is presented for user modification in keeping with process development. Of relevance to the flow field, a detailed investigation of vortices produced by bubble motion and electromagnetics is discussed, along with their impact on the evolution of thermal profiles. The predictions show small-scale vortices in the clearance between the anode and cathode caused by magnetic forces. Predictions also indicate relatively large-scale vortices in the inter-anode space resulting from carbon dioxide rising through the electrolytic flow field. The formation of vortices at the edges of anodes was shown to direct alumina charged by the feeder to the bottom of the anodes, thus preventing the entrapment of gas bubbles in the periphery of the bottom of the anode. Symmetry was observed in the location of cold spots in the electrolytic mixture in the vicinity of the feeder. Cold spots were also observed in the clearance between the anode and cathode due to the flow’s transmission of unconverted alumina to this region.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Griffin Software Development Plan

Griffin is a MOOSE-based reactor physics application for advanced reactor multiphysics modeling and simulation. The application is developed in a consistent multiphysics environment with strong software quality assurance. Griffin inherited most of the capabilities of MAMMOTH/Rattlesnake and is adopting the capabilities from PROTEUS that are needed in the code. The toolset includes a variety of deterministic radiation transport solvers for fixed source, k-eigenvalue, ad-joint, and subcritical multiplication, as well as transient solvers for point-kinetics, improved quasi-static, and spatial dynamics. The code contains the cross-section preparation capabilities applicable to fast and thermal reactors, including TRISO-fueled reactors. Core management capabilities include core performance, fuel depletion and shuffling, equilibrium core calculation, pebble-bed reactor run-in and equilibrium core, molten-salt reactor delayed neutron precursor drift, and control rod and drum movement with cusping correction. This software development plan presents the current and future capabilities and features in Griffin for the design and analysis of non-light-water reactor systems in steady-state and transient conditions.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Continued Verification of MOOSE Structural Mechanics Tools for Modeling Core Bowing Phenomena in Fast Reactors

Under the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy’s Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program, an integrated multiphysics approach is being developed to model the core bowing phenomena important to liquid metal-cooled fast reactors. Core bowing is an important passive safety mechanism whereby increased power (which leads to temperature and flux gradients) influences the core to bow into less reactive configurations when the restraint system is properly designed. The phenomenon includes a complex interplay of radiation transport, duct temperature calculations involving fluid flow and heat transfer, and thermo-mechanical responses to the induced temperature and flux gradients. Structural material properties are also important to determining inelastic response to longer term flux gradients which cause irradiation creep and swelling. While core bowing provides a strong negative reactivity feedback when the restraint system is designed properly, it also results in additional forces between assemblies which increase the loads required to extricate them during refueling or control rod movement. Therefore, the restraint system must be designed with these tradeoffs in mind. The first stage of the work, which commenced in FY21 and continues through FY22, assesses thermo-mechanical modeling tools for producing core bowing predictions consistent with conventional tools. The Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) Tensor Mechanics and Contact Modules are employed. This status report describes work on additional thermo-mechanical benchmark verification problems with increased complexity from the examples demonstrated in FY21. Several benchmark verification examples were selected from the IAEA verification and validation report. These examples involve clusters of ducts representative of a sector of a hexagonal reactor core which bow into each other and cause contact and load pad elevations, as well as single ducts subjected to irradiation fields undergoing swelling and subsequent bowing. The MOOSE-based results were compared to both IAEA benchmark participants’ results, analytic equations as available, and NUBOW-3D, a beam model code developed by Argonne National Laboratory. In every case, the MOOSE results agreed with other simulations results, providing additional verification basis of the tools for this particular physics application.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Validation of NEAMS Tools Using MSRE Data

This report documents the benchmarks developed and performed for the tools and codes developed under the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program utilizing the MSRE experiment data. There are three focus areas explored in this work: fuel evolution, CFD, and system transient analyses. Fuel depletion is important for MSR reactor physics and fuel cycle analysis. Fuel depletion capability is currently being developed in the Griffin reactor physics code. To support this, a benchmark problem is developed using the MSRE data and an existing depletion code with flowing fuel analysis functionality (ADDER) to validate this new capability in Griffin. The ADDER calculation is compared with the TRITON-MSR results as well as the MSRE experimental data. This benchmark can be directly used to verify and validate the Griffin fuel depletion capability in future years. For CFD simulation, the MSRE CAD model is obtained from the Copenhagen Atomics and a mesh is generated for the MSRE inlet plenum. The Nek5000 code will be employed to find the flow distribution in the MSRE inlet plenum based on the mesh generated. For system analysis, a simple benchmark problem for three types of MSR system transients is developed. The SAM and SPECTRA codes are used to solve the simple problem, and the results from the two codes agree well. The SAM code is also employed to obtain the frequency response of the MSRE system at the 5 and 8 MWt power levels. The results agree well with the experiment measurements. These verification and validation efforts gives SAM users more confidence in MSR system transient simulations using SAM. Lastly, the SAM-Griffin Multiphysics coupling work is initiated. A simple one-way coupling of evaluating the precursor drift effect on the MSRE k-eff is demonstrated. This preliminary coupling work serves as the basis for future more complex Multiphysics simulation and modelling.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗