Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “DRILLING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Laser drilling and machining enhancement using gated CW and short pulsed lasers

The present disclosure relates to a laser system for processing a material. The system may make use of a laser configured to intermittently generate a first laser pulse of a first duration and a first average power, at a spot on a surface of the material being processed, and a second laser pulse having a second duration and a second peak power. The second duration may be shorter than the first duration by a factor of at least 100, and directed at the spot. The second laser pulse is generated after the first laser pulse is generated. The first laser pulse is used to heat the spot on the surface of the material, while the second laser pulse induces a melt motion and material ejection of molten material from the melt pool.

Ly, Sonny S.↗
DOE OSTI2017

Installing Deep Groundwater Monitoring Wells in a Volcanic Dominated Rift Basin: Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico - 17594

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL, or the Laboratory) is located in northern New Mexico near the west margin of the Espanola Basin. LANL is underlain by a complex basin-fill sequence of alluvial fan deposits, volcanic tuff, basaltic and dacitic lavas, and riverine deposits. On-going environmental remediation and characterization activities have evolved to improve the performance of groundwater monitoring wells, ensuring they yield representative groundwater and core samples. Groundwater occurs as canyon-fill alluvial water, perched intermediate-depth water associated with the basalts and other local-scale perching horizons, and as a regional-scale aquifer that is the main water supply for the area. Anthropogenic contaminants are found in all three groundwater zones. The regional aquifer below LANL is nominally 1000-1400 feet below ground surface (bgs). Monitoring wells at the Laboratory, are therefore, among the deepest routinely installed in the US. Logistical challenges at LANL include steep terrain, widespread cultural sites, and threatened and endangered species habitat restrictions. Additionally, the cost of installing monitoring wells is high because of groundwater depths and the variable drilling techniques that are required to characterize and install wells in a complex geologic environment. A major challenge to the characterization approach at LANL has been to meet sample quality requirements while minimizing drilling costs. In the late 1990's threaded drill-casing was advanced by rotary drilling methods using compressed air as the only circulation fluid. This resulted in relatively low impacts to the geochemical integrity of rock and groundwater samples, but led to frequent episodes of stuck casing. Additional fluids were introduced to the air-rotary program, improving penetration rates, but also resulting in non-representative groundwater samples due to long-term impacts to the aquifer in the vicinity of the well screen. Mud-rotary drilling was incorporated into the program, but it also had significant long-term impacts on groundwater quality, and often inhibited identification of perched groundwater zones and accurate identification of the water table in the regional aquifer. Current drilling practice makes limited use of fluid additives (e.g. foam) to supplement air circulation methods in order to advance drill casing through the vadose zone. Starting about 100 feet above the water table, drill casing is advanced to the target horizon in the regional aquifer using only air and municipal water (when needed) for circulation. Additionally, the threaded drill casing couplings have been replaced with welded connections, significantly reducing the occurrence of stuck casing. Careful observations of water production and water levels during drilling, coupled with the ability to retract casing for video and geophysical logs, now allows for robust characterization of perched groundwater systems and accurate definition of the top of regional saturation. Recent advances in the drilling program include combined dual-rotary/sonic drilling to depths up to 1150 feet and dual-rotary casing advance at angles up to 25 deg. from vertical. The former allows for core collection with minimal fluid addition, thereby preserving pore water chemistry. The latter method allows for well installation into portions of the aquifer otherwise inaccessible due to constraints at the surface (e.g., cultural sites or topography). Similar to the development of drilling techniques, both well design and groundwater sampling system design have evolved throughout the program. Current well design emphasizes a minimal annulus of filter pack, maximum screen slot size based on formation sieve analyses, and thorough well development to mitigate formation damage due to drilling. To sample groundwater at multiple levels in the same well, earlier sampling systems included Westbay{sup R} multi-zone systems and dual-screen single-pump and dual-screen dual-pump systems designed in collaboration with Baski, Inc. These multi-zone sampling systems proved difficult to develop and maintain given the depth to groundwater, and most current well installations are configured with a single screen and a submersible pump. The ability to purge from a well-developed single-screen well has substantially improved the collection of representative groundwater samples. A carefully crafted groundwater characterization program in target aquifers at depths ranging from 1,000 to 1,400 feet bgs within a complex geologic setting, while also retaining the ability to collect representative core and groundwater samples, may have application at a number of sites throughout the environmental industry. Optimizing each well to meet program objectives while reducing total project costs benefits all environmental investigations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Physics-Based Limiter Redesign and Bit Performance Analysis at The Geysers

As part of a U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies Office funding opportunity, Geysers Power Company, LLC (GPC), an indirect subsidiary of Calpine Corporation, partnered with Sandia National Labs, EGI at the University of Utah, and Texas A&M University to demonstrate increased drilling performance at The Geysers Geothermal Field. The performance target in the drilling demonstrations is at least a 25% improvement in rates of penetration, with increased footage on bottom for each bit coupled with increased bit life and time drilling. The project leverages advances in oil and gas drilling technologies including PDC bits, along with the physics-based limiter redesign techniques championed in drilling demonstrations conducted at the Utah FORGE geothermal site. The planned drilling demonstrations are being conducted as part of an existing drilling campaign intended to enhance reservoir utilization. The wells are typically drilled to the top of the reservoir with mud and then air-drilled to total depth (TD) through fractured zones at temperatures ≥ 450°F. A major goal of the project is to assess the effectiveness of implementing mechanical specific energy (MSE) and drilling dysfunction diagnosis and remediation in these challenging environments, as well as alternate rock reduction technologies. The first demonstration well has been completed, with 15 PDC bit runs in the 17.5”, 12.25” and 8.5” sections. Initial analysis shows ROP gains in all three sections, especially in the 17.5” and 12.25” sections, compared with conventional roller cone bit runs in the demonstration well and offset wells. However, in the 8.5” hole, wear and damage to the PDC bits resulted in relatively short bit runs. Analysis is underway to take advantage of the positive results and remediate the challenges. This paper provides updates on drilling activities conducted since the Phase 1 demonstration well at GDC-36 which was drilled from November 2023-January 2024. Additional analysis of the bit performance has been conducted. Furthermore, in subsequent wells drilled by GPC, PDC bits have been used extensively, building on the gains realized at GDC-36. GPC has continued to work with bit vendors to identify designs that last longer in the harsh, air-drilled 8.5” portions of the wells. Planning for the Phase 2 demonstration at Prati-44 is ongoing.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
NASA NTRS2008

Estimating Hardness from the USDC Tool-Bit Temperature Rise

A method of real-time quantification of the hardness of a rock or similar material involves measurement of the temperature, as a function of time, of the tool bit of an ultrasonic/sonic drill corer (USDC) that is being used to drill into the material. The method is based on the idea that, other things being about equal, the rate of rise of temperature and the maximum temperature reached during drilling increase with the hardness of the drilled material. In this method, the temperature is measured by means of a thermocouple embedded in the USDC tool bit near the drilling tip. The hardness of the drilled material can then be determined through correlation of the temperature-rise-versus-time data with time-dependent temperature rises determined in finite-element simulations of, and/or experiments on, drilling at various known rates of advance or known power levels through materials of known hardness. The figure presents an example of empirical temperature-versus-time data for a particular 3.6-mm USDC bit, driven at an average power somewhat below 40 W, drilling through materials of various hardness levels. The temperature readings from within a USDC tool bit can also be used for purposes other than estimating the hardness of the drilled material. For example, they can be especially useful as feedback to control the driving power to prevent thermal damage to the drilled material, the drill bit, or both. In the case of drilling through ice, the temperature readings could be used as a guide to maintaining sufficient drive power to prevent jamming of the drill by preventing refreezing of melted ice in contact with the drill.

Bar-Cohen, Yoseph↗
DOE OSTI2019

Remote Technology to Retrieve Waste Below the 324 Building at the Hanford Site - 19622

The Waste Technology Engineering Laboratory (324 Building) is a Category 2 Nuclear Facility at Hanford. The 324 Building Disposition Project is responsible for the removal and remedial actions under CERCLA. Additionally, there are RCRA Dangerous Waste Management Units which the CERCLA actions are presumed to satisfy. The Radiochemical Engineering Complex (REC) is a group of four hot cells (A, B, C and D Cells) with an interconnecting airlock inside of the 324 Building. Underneath the REC B-Cell are contaminated soils that have an estimated 12,793 R/Hr dose rate and remediation is under CERCLA 300-FF-2 Operable Unit. The current action consists of debris removal from the floor of B-Cell, B-Cell floor removal, and excavation of the soils beneath the floor to a depth of up to twelve feet with four Remote Excavator Arms (REA). This paper provides insight into the preparation and performance of high tolerance core drilling into a hot cell complex. Installation of the REA Through Support (REA TS) mechanism through the 4'-6' concrete shield walls is a complex series of tasks with demanding tolerances at each of four locations around the perimeter of B-Cell. The use of training mock ups was included in the completion of this work. The REA TS is two 11 inch diameter high strength steel sleeves that have expandable collars at each end allowing the interstitial space between the outside of the sleeve and inside of the core drill to be grouted to form a substantial structural connection, and a 10 inch pipe with hydraulic hoses to power the REA. There are three cores required for each REA location. The REAs themselves are customized excavator arms, mounted on support columns to be used in the excavation and transfer of the contaminated soil into storage facilities. The tasks for the installation of the REA TSs are: 1) Characterization of B-Cell Cubicles. 2) Embedded Pipe Fill. 3) Interference Removal. a. Internal Walls, b. External Walls. 4) Core Drilling. 5) Go/No-Go gauge, and video inspection. 6) Installation of REA Through Support Assembly. The 324 Building REC Hot Cells have internal, external, and embedded utilities throughout the shield walls in conflict with the REA TS locations. Some of the embedded utilities have connection points inside of the B-Cell Cubicles. There were two separate issues at the conflicted locations. The first issue was the core drill cooling water would flow along the embedded utility potentially spreading legacy chemical and radiological contamination to areas of the facility that was unwanted. The second issue was that the REA TS required a substantial structural connection to the B-Cell wall, the cored diameter is larger than the REA TS and these interstitial areas required a full grouted connection. The embedded utilities posed a hazard that if unfilled, the interstitial grout would flow into the embedded utility and destabilize the required grouted structural connection. The B-Cell Cubicles had not been opened in over 10 years. A mockup was completed to install a glovebag over the cubicle opening and then to verify functionality and port requirements. The embedded utility pipe connections in the cubicles were then opened inside a glovebag to verify the correct connection points, connection method for future embedded pipe fill material delivery system, radiological characterization, and air flow to show that the embedded utility pipes were not blocked and would not pressurize. The embedded pipe fill material and grout system was mocked up and run several times to verify methodology and functionality. The B-Cell Cubicles were then reentered and the embedded utility pipe fill was completed using a hand pump. External interferences at the core drill locations were removed using standard interference removal techniques. Internal interferences at the core drill locations were removed using a remote cutting tool that was controlled through the use of the B-Cell crane, remote cameras and remote lighting. The core drilling was mocked up two separate times, the project's purpose built 'Mock Up Facility' was core drilled to verify tolerances and methodology prior to subcontract award, the core drill subcontractor built a 'dummy wall' to train and practice on achieving the demanding tolerances, coordinated alignments between the cores, short term and long term dose shielding techniques, and contamination control techniques. A core drill template, and additional anchoring techniques were used to maximize accuracy and precision of the REA TS core drills. A 'Go/No-Go' gauge was built and installed at each of the four REA TS locations to verify that the core drill met tolerances. The core drill locations were visually inspected using a boroscope. The REA TS installation was mocked up at the projects 'Mock Up Facility' beginning with basic hazard controls, then with intermediate hazard controls, and finally with full occupational safety, industrial hygiene, and radiological controls. The REA TSs were installed and grouted into place. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
NASA NTRS2011

Rolling-Tooth Core Breakoff and Retention Mechanism

Sampling cores requires the controlled breakoff of the core at a known location with respect to the drill end. An additional problem is designing a mechanism that can be implemented at a small scale that is robust and versatile enough to be used for a variety of core samples. This design consists of a set of tubes (a drill tube and an inner tube) and a rolling element (rolling tooth). An additional tube can be used as a sample tube. The drill tube and the inner tube have longitudinal holes with the axes offset from the axis of each tube. The two eccentricities are equal. The inner tube fits inside the drill tube, and the sample tube fits inside the inner tube. While drilling, the two tubes are positioned relative to each other such that the sample tube is aligned with the drill tube axis and core. The drill tube includes teeth and flutes for cuttings removal. The inner tube includes, at the base, the rolling element implemented as a wheel on a shaft in an eccentric slot. An additional slot in the inner tube and a pin in the drill tube limit the relative motion of the two tubes. While drilling, the drill assembly rotates relative to the core and forces the rolling tooth to stay hidden in the slot along the inner tube wall. When the drilling depth has been reached, the drill bit assembly is rotated in the opposite direction, and the rolling tooth is engaged and penetrates into the core. Depending on the strength of the created core, the rolling tooth can score, lock the inner tube relative to the core, start the eccentric motion of the inner tube, and break the core. The tooth and the relative position of the two tubes can act as a core catcher or core-retention mechanism as well. The design was made to fit the core and hole parameters produced by an existing bit; the parts were fabricated and a series of demonstration tests were performed. This invention is potentially applicable to sample return and in situ missions to planets such as Mars and Venus, to moons such as Titan and Europa, and to comets. It is also applicable to terrestrial applications like forensic sampling and geological sampling in the field.

Badescu, Mircea↗