Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “DECONTAMINATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Methodology for Volume Reduction of Radioactive Metallic Waste - 19491

A decontamination methodology for out-of-core nuclear reactor alloys is being developed to reduce the volume of low- and intermediate-level radioactive metallic wastes. For out-of-core reactor metals contamination is limited to surface oxides. For surface oxide removal a technology based on laser ablation is being explored. This paper presents work performed to identify the key parameters that affect the efficiency of removal of surface oxides from out-of-core reactor metals and alloys. This study examined carbon steel (used for coolant feeder pipes of CANDU{sup R} reactors) as a model reactor material. The morphology and thickness of oxides on a used feeder pipe vary considerably depending on its service life and the location along the pipe. Hence, oxides with different morphologies and thicknesses were first grown by corroding carbon steel coupons under different solution conditions. The oxides formed ranged from thin layers of uniformly distributed mixed Fe{sup II}/Fe{sup III} hydroxides/oxides to dual layers consisting of ferric oxide/oxyhydroxide islands with thickness up to 200 μm on top of the more uniformly distributed mixed Fe{sup II}/Fe{sup III} layer. Removal of these oxides was performed using a 1064 nm pulsed laser. Of the laser parameters tested, the pulse radiance was found to be the most important. Four radiances ranging from 5 to 200 MW/cm{sup 2} were used. At radiances higher than 100 MW/cm{sup 2}, single pulses were sufficient to remove both types of oxides, but also extensively melted the metal substrate. At lower radiances, multiple pulses were required to remove the oxides completely, but caused less damage to the metal substrate. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Evaluation of Low-cost, Full HD, CMOS Cameras for Use in the Calcine Retrieval Project - 19530

This paper describes results from radiation testing conducted on low-cost, commercial off-the-shelf, full high-definition (HD) resolution (1920 x 1080 p), complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera sensors. The purpose of the testing was to evaluate the sensors' suitability for use in the Calcine Retrieval Project by determining their image quality and life expectancy while operating in an ionizing radiation field of 20.0 Gy/h. The two camera sensors tested were the Axis FA1105 and Axis FA1125. These commercial camera sensors were designed for retail security surveillance and have no radiation-hardened (rad-hard) components. In addition to radiation testing, the sensors' field-of-view, resolution, and low-light image quality were tested at several target distances to ensure they meet project requirements. Testing was divided into two phases. During Phase 1, four FA1105 sensors and four FA1125 sensors were tested simultaneously without any shielding in radiation fields of 25.5 Gy/h and 49.3 Gy/h. In Phase 2, three FA1105 and five FA1125 sensors were shielded by 22.2 mm of lead and tested simultaneously in radiation fields of 26.8 Gy/h, 52.3 Gy/h, 143.0 Gy/h, 200.7 Gy/h, 404.6 Gy/h, and 2,317.5 Gy/h. Dose rate values were established using film dosimetry readings. Apertures in the shielding allowed for a 40-degree field of view while shielding all parts of the sensor except for directly in front of the CMOS sensor array. All testing was conducted at the Idaho Accelerator Center in Pocatello, Idaho, using a 450 keV X-ray generator. Sensor images were automatically captured at regular intervals throughout the testing for qualitative evaluation by the test team. Film dosimetry was placed near the sensors to record actual dose totals. The 450 keV setting generates X-ray radiation with an energy level close to the primary gamma energy level produced by the Cesium-137 isotope in the calcine, which is 662 keV. Results from Phase 1 indicate the sensors failed at an average cumulative dose of 226.3 Gy. For a given 20.0 Gy/h field this results in a mean time to failure (MTTF) of 11.3 hours. Recorded images from all sensors showed minimal image degradation due to radiation-induced noise. When the sensors finally failed, the failure mode was an abrupt loss of video. The image went black suggesting some other component in the sensor head besides the CMOS sensor array was responsible for the failure. During a portion of Phase 1 testing, a commercial, rad-hard camera was irradiated in the 25.5 Gy/h field along with the eight Axis FA series sensors. Image quality from the FA series sensors significantly outperformed the image quality of the rad-hard camera in radiation-induced noise tolerance, image resolution, and dynamic range. During Phase 2 testing, all sensors produced excellent images in radiation fields as high as 404.6 Gy/h. One FA1125 sensor was tested at the highest dose rate of 2,317.5 Gy/h. At this dose rate, the image was color shifted towards red and contained a significant amount radiation-induced noise. The sensor did not fail and was producing usable imagery after one hour, at which time the test was ended due to allotted beam-time at the test facility. Eighteen hours after X-rays were shut off, the sensor image returned to normal color and all eight sensors continued to operate without any visible, permanent image degradation. For Phase 2 testing, it was not possible to establish a MTTF since none of the shielded sensors failed during the allotted test time. However, given the highest cumulative dose of 4,142.1 Gy received by a shielded FA1125 sensor, a minimum life expectancy of 207 hours (8.6 days) is predicted while operating in a 20.0 Gy/h field. Test results indicate the radiation tolerance of the FA series sensor's CMOS array, along with the small form factor, full HD image quality, wide dynamic range, and Ethernet standard makes it suitable for short-term use in monitoring and visually documenting waste remediation efforts for the Calcine Retrieval Project at the INL. The sensor's low-cost of about $140 US, compared to commercial rad-hard cameras costing between $5,000 and $7,000 US each, allow them to be used as an affordable, disposable resource for many short-duration, radioactive waste remediation efforts where decontamination of an expensive, commercial rad-hard camera is undesirable or not possible. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Evolution of Stakeholder Relations at the Mound Laboratory-End of DoE's Mission to the Present - 19551

In November 1989, the same month the Berlin Wall fell, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed the Mound Laboratory (Mound Plant or Mound site) in Ohio on the National Priorities List (NPL) due to volatile organic compound contamination in the groundwater. As a result of the Cold War ending, the United States sought to greatly reduce the nation's nuclear weapons arsenal, consolidate the US Department of Energy's (DOE) mission, and close many DOE facilities. In 1991, the City of Miamisburg learned that DOE was planning to close the Mound Laboratory. The city spent two years lobbying in Washington, DC, to keep the facility open; however, that effort was not successful. By 1993, DOE, EPA, and Ohio EPA had signed a Federal Facility Agreement that formalized EPA and Ohio EPA oversight of the DOE environmental cleanup of the Mound NPL site under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The decontamination and cleanup of the Mound site fell under two federal laws, CERCLA and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. DOE, EPA, Ohio EPA, the City of Miamisburg, and other local stakeholders all agreed that the Mound site should be cleaned up to an industrial/commercial land use standard. This would allow the site to transition into a privately owned business park. In 1994, the City of Miamisburg created the nonprofit Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corporation (MMCIC) that would own, market, and redevelop the site. The City also chartered the Mound Reuse Committee to act as an independent advisory organization, composed of representatives from the local community and business, government, education, and special interest groups. In 1994, DOE and the MMCIC entered into a lease agreement that facilitated immediate reuse of site buildings that were no longer required by DOE and did not require remediation. In 1995, DOE, EPA, and Ohio EPA developed the Mound 2000 Process to more effectively use CERCLA Removal Action authority to evaluate and remediate, as necessary, disparate areas of the Mound site. The Mound 2000 process divided the site into smaller, more manageable areas that accelerated cleanup and allowed areas to be reused more quickly. All areas of the Mound site were cleaned up to meet the EPA standard for industrial/commercial land use. The CERCLA process included opportunities for the public to review proposed cleanup strategies. Public input on cleanup and reuse included that from local citizens, businesses, Miamisburg City Council, local schools and financial institutions, Ohio EPA, Montgomery County, and the State of Ohio. In 1998, while site cleanup was still in process, DOE agreed to sell the entire Mound property to the MMCIC for $10.00. The site sales agreement accelerated reuse by allowing DOE to offer ownership of discrete land parcels to MMCIC as soon as EPA confirmed those areas met CERCLA standards for property transfer. This allowed the Mound site to become one of the first former DOE weapons sites to transition to reuse as a privately owned and operated community asset. Many other former DOE production facilities require continued federal ownership to protect the integrity of the environmental cleanup. In 2011, the MMCIC changed its name to the Mound Development Corporation (MDC) and continued to transition the site for reuse as part of the Mound Business Park. The MMCIC/MDC is a nonprofit economic development arm of the City of Miamisburg. DOE supported the economic development efforts with grants and matching funds. Individual land parcels were transferred from DOE to the MDC according to the DOE Mound Land Transfer Process. Ownership of parcels was transferred to the MDC via quitclaim deeds with no repair, replacements, or rebuild of areas. Each parcel's quitclaim deed contains the CERCLA institutional controls. To reduce the property tax burden, the Miamisburg City Council passed an ordinance that allowed the City to accept temporary ownership of specific parcels and hold ownership until the MDC could either lease or sell them. With the exception of one 23-acre parcel that includes the Operable Unit 1 area (site of former sanitary landfill), the entire site has been transferred to the MDC. Today, the former Mound Laboratory site is home to the vibrant Mound Business Park operated by the MDC. The site contains numerous buildings with active businesses and multiple areas suitable for new construction. Private companies continue cutting-edge work that carries forward the legacy of more than 50 years of DOE research, development, production, and inspiration from the former Mound Laboratory scientists, engineers, technicians, and support personnel. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Tank Closure Cesium Removal at Savannah River Site - 19604

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) has developed a supplemental at-tank ion exchange capability for the removal of cesium from liquid salt waste. Building on the development of previous ion exchange initiatives and the experience of commercial nuclear plant decontamination services, and following the disaster response associated with Fukushima, the technology has matured to deploy a modular at-tank treatment system for the selective removal of cesium from bulk salt waste. If feasible, this Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) initiative would provide a supplemental treatment capability to existing and future salt processing and improve confidence in supporting the desired acceleration of waste retrieval and tank closure efforts. In addition to accelerating waste retrieval and tank closure activities, demonstration of this capability has several other benefits. Deployment of commercially available technologies with minor modification can expand Department of Energy (DOE) utilization of commercially supplied treatment processes. This 'at-tank' treatment system could be modified to evaluate and demonstrate removal of other radioactive constituents (strontium, technetium, iodine, etc.) of bulk waste. The modular aspect of this capability can allow for additional units to be delivered and deployed at SRS, as well as, provide supplemental treatment capabilities for waste treatment at other DOE sites. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 47: Decommissioning, Issues and Possibilities/Opportunities

This panel focused on decommissioning projects in the US and abroad. This interactive discussion between the audience and panelists included - 1) logistics (from cradle to grave); 2) organizational aspects of decommissioning; 3) regulatory aspects and issues; 4) definition of the back-end with regard to packages and Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC); and 5) identification and management of difficult-to-handle decontamination and demolition (D and D) waste (e.g. damaged fuel, legacy/forgotten waste inside Nuclear Power Plants, etc.). Panelist with presentations: JCNPP Lessons Learned (Manuel Ondaro del Pino)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Radiological Recovery Logistics Tool - 20161

Argonne is building and testing a tool, the Radiological Recovery Logistics Tool (RRLT), that can be used during the response and recovery from a radiological or nuclear incident to effectively allocate appropriate commercial and public works equipment to mitigate, remove, and contain radiological contamination. The requirements for this tool - as well as development of the resulting software - is overseen by a steering committee of stakeholders from DHS's National Urban Security Technology Laboratory (NUSTL), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). One essential requirement is for RRLT to support the efficient and appropriate allocation of resources for a radiological response. Subsequent discussions between ANL and stakeholders have solidified the nature of this support to include identification of the types of resources to be allocated. The study reported in this paper has both factored fundamental concepts and connections out of this identification process and created a Knowledge Base detailing support goals, response scenarios, and efficacy information on dozens of equipment types. In short, RRLT will dynamically apply these findings to situational conditions surrounding contamination incidents. RRLT's Domain, the model of elements, ideas and relationships with which the tool will work, draws concepts from technical reports and stakeholder vocabularies to connect response goals and scenarios to types of equipment that offer utility towards those goals in those scenarios. RRLT's Knowledge Base will contain details on dozens of equipment types and facilitate the operator's discovery and consumption of these details most pertinent to a dynamically selected subset of goals. The core of its Domain Model is based on a report authored by this team. This report [1] contains a comprehensive list of proposed equipment to accomplish various missions or scenarios that might arise after a large-scale radiological contamination incident in an urban environment or critical infrastructure. The report divides potential response and recovery efforts into five support goals: Survey and monitoring of the contaminated area; Mitigation of received dose to first responders: Decontamination (gross and final) of buildings, vehicles, roadways, parks, and other surfaces: Waste management of solid waste generated during recovery operations: and Containment of wastewater and other waste generated during the response and recovery phases. RRLT's development is driven by use cases. A use case is an intention with which a user approaches the software. Use cases are grouped into delivery increments to schedule development, testing, and presentation to stakeholders. This model partitions the system into seven increments: User Arrival and Authentication, Search and Navigation, Equipment Recommendation, Plan Management, Content Management, and Expanded Access. Once a user 15 authenticated, RRLT will present the user with a dashboard that allows them to explore or search RRLT's content. The dashboard will also include a 'Plan' panel for collecting decisions and relevant observations about an incident at hand to facilitate development of an equipment list. RRLT will offer three general modes of access to items in the knowledge base: - Keyword search for direct discovery of items, - Navigation along predetermined paths from recovery goal towards equipment types, and - Interactive guidance towards equipment types by an autonomous software agent: the Equipment Recommendation Wizard. This presentation will detail progress in the development of the RRLT and also discuss opportunities for those interested in providing feedback on its content and functionality. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Removal of Metal Oxides from Reactor Metals/Alloys by Laser Ablation

Storage of low and intermediate level radioactive waste in a deep geological repository (L and ILW DGR): - Large volumes of metallic waste = increased production of hydrogen gas. - Large fraction of the metallic wastes are out-of-core reactor components. - Carbon steel feeder pipes. - Radioactive contamination is concentrated within the surface oxides. - Removal of surface contaminants would lead to volume reduction of metallic waste that is stored in L and ILW DGR. - Current decontamination techniques generate large volumes of secondary waste. Objectives: Oxide removal from carbon steel using a ytterbium fiber laser (1064 nm) with a particular focus on identifying the key laser parameters that affect the removal efficiency. Advantages of laser ablation: Generate low volumes of waste, Flexibility of deployment, Remote operation. Grow an oxide film on carbon steel with the incorporation of cobalt. Optimize laser cleaning technology for the removal of surface oxides. Incorporate an oxide collection system for the ablated particles. Conclusions: Objective 1 - Simulated inactive oxides on carbon steel, using Co{sup 2+} as a surrogate for Co radionuclide. Objective 2 - Optimized laser parameters (200 MW/cm{sup 2}, 3 scans, 15 μm overlap); Complete removal of cobalt from surface and bulk metal with optimized cleaning settings. Objective 3 - Glass fiber media H14 HEPA filters had highest collection yield; High oxide collection yields (∼100%). Future Work: Further testing of the liquid trap will verify the efficacy of the HEPA filter and determine the amount of ablated oxides that pass through. Testing of the laser ablation system needs to be done on other reactor materials along with the incorporation of different transition metal cations. Improvements to the oxide collection system are required to improve collection yields.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 2: Hot Topics in US DOE Environmental Management

The well-attended Panel Session was chaired by Martin Schneider. The four panelists did not provide presentations. Rather the session was a discussion focusing on pressing issues facing US DOE Environmental Management (EM) sites and how the program is moving forward. The session began by momentarily reflecting on a success: the three Tank Waste Treatment Facilities will soon be coming online. These three facilities will treat as much waste in two years as was treated in the past 30 years. That is a significant milestone in progress. Also, safety enhancements at WIPP are a big success. The panelists noted that there will be challenges with the victories of the startup of the Waste Treatment Facilities. Treating tank waste is the last EM mission and will help with the relationships with the stakeholders, regulators and Congress. One of the biggest challenges will be moving back to full operation mode. Although the operation will increase productivity of reducing/managing the tank waste, it will decrease life cycle cost and lessen years of cleanup. The challenge will be having people understand that EM will be operating 24/7 and that maintenance will be key in keeping the operations. EM will be working together with the regulators to show tangible progress that will be effective and efficient. By working together, they can find opportunities/technologies for streamlining and accelerating cleanup. Recent changes to the regulatory framework between DOE-EM Los Alamos Field Office and New Mexico Environmental Department have helped cleanup in Los Alamos. Every year EM and the agencies review progress and come to agreements on the next work priorities. At Savannah River Site, the Federal Facility Agreement among EM, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed a small core team that work are shared by together in resolving issues that come up. The discussion moved on to how progress can be made by sharing lessons learned among the contractors. An example of how these learned lessons can be shared is that key representatives from projects across the EM sites participate in various forums to review/contribute to the work planned. Other opportunities can be by temporary assignments of DOE staff to gain experience and by monthly EM Headquarters report that provide the lessons learned across the EM sites. The panelists discussed how skyline changes are the best examples of tangible progress. Decontamination and Demolition (D and D) of structures are the easiest tangible progress that can be seen. Whereas tank waste cleanup is the hardest to see. Disposal of waste onsite versus offsite is another challenge, and timely discussions are necessary to get to the best value to the government.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Session 059 - Panel: Small Business Procurement and Contracting Opportunities within the US DOE Complex and USACE FUSRAP Sites (R1.7)

This panel session focused on small business procurement and contracting opportunities within the DOE Complex and USACE FUSRAP Sites. The federal government encourages prime contractors to obtain goods and services from small and disadvantaged businesses (Tier 2) and often tie these goals to contract award fee. Goods and services being considered for these procurements include decontamination and decommissioning, remediation, transportation and disposal of radioactive waste, health physics, emergency response planning and training, lab services, R and D products, waste treatment, maintenance, A/E and professional consulting. Panelists with presentations: Small Business Procurement and Contracting Opportunities within the US DOE Complex and USACE FUSRAP Program (Aaron Deckard; Subcontracting Opportunities with the DOE Primes (William Badger); Bechtel National, Inc. Small Business Opportunities (Lisa Tribuce-Leoung Tat); Small Business Procurement and Contracting Opportunities (Gina Joiner); Small Business Procurement and Contracting Opportunities - Flour (Katy Burnau); Environmental WORK, Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) (John Busse)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Filter 'Cook-Off': Filter Selection via Side-by-Side Testing at Actual Process Conditions - 20040

In 2005, the THOR steam reforming fluidized-bed reactor technology was selected by the U.S. Department of Energy for treatment of sodium-bearing waste at the INL. During the final phase of commissioning prior to radiological operations, regeneration of the high temperature filters in the process gas filter (PGF) vessel became ineffective. After approximately 50 days of testing, the differential pressure across the filters began increasing exponentially and the plant had to be shutdown. Subsequent investigation revealed that the Inconel 625 (I625) sintered metal filter media was corroding in the 550 deg. C reducing environment. A pilot plant run tested four candidate replacement filter media. The top candidate was further tested during a long-term pilot plant run to validate the selection. Data from the testing indicate the selected filters will provide reliable service throughout the life of the project, including after in-situ radiological decontamination. This paper presents the data from this effort and reinforces the value of pilot plant testing. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Optimization of the Post-Operational Phase on Two Belgian Multi-Unit Nuclear Power Plants: the Case of the Non-Fissile Irradiated Core Items - 20156

The current legal framework in Belgium foresees the progressive phase out of nuclear power between October 2022 (Doel 3) and December 2025 (Doel 2). Upon its definitive shutdown, each unit of the Tihange and Doel sites will enter a Post-Operational Phase (POP) and be prepared for its Decontamination and Decommissioning (D and D). Prior to obtaining the D and D license, the Operator Electrabel is legally required to remove any non-fissile irradiated core items stored in the deactivation pools. The non-fissile irradiated core items consist essentially of control rods, poison rods and source thimbles as well as thimble plugs and foreign materials irradiated during operation: - Their significant content in highly radiant radionuclides (up to 6 TBq of Co-60 per kg of irradiated material) renders all existing operational waste management processes inadequate due to insufficient biological shielding; - Their high concentrations in long-lived radionuclides call for their disposal in a geological repository for which no final design nor waste acceptance criteria are expected prior to 2050. Uncertainties in the Belgian energy supply and security, however, require the Operator to be prepared for a partial nuclear phase out, where one or more units would benefit from lifetime extension while the remaining units would undergo decommissioning. The present paper aims at presenting how Electrabel, in partnership with Tractebel, addressed this challenge by maximizing the use of synergies within the respective sites as well as between both sites themselves, all the while accounting for site specificities. The most recent results and state of progress of the project will be detailed and the first lessons learned will be shared. The project has been split in multiple tasks and phased as follows: - An inventory phase aimed at mapping the contents, origin, composition and history of the non-fissile irradiated core items; - A pre-characterization phase based on neutron activation models; - A waste sorting phase aimed at separating waste forms for which an evacuation route exists from those for which such route does not exist; - A feasibility phase aimed at exploring all possible scenarios for the management of non-fissile irradiated core items and identifying the optimal feasible solution for each site; - A preparation phase (currently ongoing), developing further the optimal solution and ensuring that back-up solutions are available for any foreseeable change of context (licensing issue, modification in the nuclear phase-out program, etc.) and initiating early contacts with potential subcontractors for segmentation works and cask manufacturers, as well as the Belgian regulatory body and waste management agency. This phase also foresees the investigation of destructive and non-destructive radiological measurements to support the detailed characterization of the waste forms; - A realization phase (future work). (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

The HRA/Solarium Project: Feedback Based on 20 Years of Experience in Treatment of Medium Level Waste - 20185

Since the 1980's the management of the historical site of Mol has been transferred to the National Agency for Radioactive Waste and Enriched Fissile Materials (ONDRAF/NIRAS). Belgoprocess is entrusted by ONDRAF/NIRAS with the operational waste management and site remediation. One of the major challenges has been the characterization, treatment and conditioning of approximately 200 m{sup 3} of medium level waste. These waste packages were stored in poor conditions in storage vaults ('HRA') or concrete containers ('Solarium'). They have been produced in various research programs and reactor operations at the Belgian nuclear energy research centre SCK.CEN, isotope production, decontamination and dismantling operations from the 1960's up to the 1980's. Despite the limited volume, this historical waste consists of a great variation of waste characteristics and waste configurations. To tackle these liabilities, a new processing facility was built in the 1990's to allow safe transfers, handling, characterization and treatment of these packages. Also some auxiliary facilities have been built to deal with the by-products, like emptied concrete containers. The engineering of the installation, safety procedures and (characterization) methodology that has been developed generically have been proved to be successful. Nevertheless, the specific nature of some items made it necessary to organize a step-by-step treatment in distinct campaigns in which some relevant extra (safety) measures had to be taken into account. This dynamic approach made it possible to process a great variety of waste types in order to to ensure that this legacy is no longer left for subsequent generations. After about 20 years of operations, there has been a great build-up of experience and feed-back concerning the waste management of these specific waste streams. Some cases will be highlighted to specify the approach followed for treatment of e.g.: - Na/NaK containing equipment; - spent radioactive sources; - fuel element residues; - medium level waste originating from activation experiments; - radium bearing medium level waste originating from Ac-227 production research. (authors)

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Progress on TRANSCEND Theme 1: Integrated Waste Management - 20194

The management of radioactive waste includes mobilisation, processing, packaging, storage, transport and final disposal. Research in the Integrated Waste Management theme of TRANSCEND focuses on underpinning science and engineering in areas of relevance to hazard reduction and decommissioning and the objectives are to: (1) develop new materials for effluent decontamination; (2) demonstrate predictive modelling of sludge/slurry removal, underpinned by experimental data; (3) transform understanding of radiation-driven processes in nuclear waste sludges; and (4) provide underpinning studies to develop innovative processes and wasteform materials. This paper gives overviews of the 16 research projects that will be done over the next 3 years in this theme. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Adhesion Capabilities of Permanent Foaming Fixatives for Deactivation and Decommissioning Activities - 20308

Florida International University's Applied Research Center and the Department of Energy's Savannah River National Laboratory are examining various mechanical properties of intumescent rigid polyurethane foams in order to be used as a permanent foaming fixative. Intumescent polyurethane foams are favored more than non-intumescent polyurethane foams due to their ability to mitigate flame and smoke propagation when exposed to a fire. As a consequence, this ability, known as intumescing, will allow fire personnel ample time to arrive at a scene. Due to sites being dormant for many decades before the final decontamination stages, the likelihood of a fire remains high. Adhesion properties will ensure quality immobilization performance. The analysis consisted of evaluating tensile adhesion strengths on a variety of commercial-off-the-shelf polyurethane (PU) foams. The foams consisted of intumescent and a combination of flexible and rigid foams. The goal was to down select the rigid foams out of the group in terms of tensile adhesion performance. The ensuing analysis was to conduct shear adhesion testing on the rigid foams in an operational volume with one of the rigid foams being intumescent. This approach helped down select the intumescent rigid foam in an adhesion and operational sense. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Use of the Manuela 3D/Radiation Scanning Tool at Nuclear Facilities - 20437

Licensees, facility operators and decommissioning contractors have a need for comprehensive, accurate and precise radiological and topographical data to plan and execute safe and efficient Decontamination and Decommissioning (D and D) projects. Traditional approaches rely greatly upon labor and administratively intensive data collection methods that require considerable time and effort to glean the relevant data to plan and perform work in a radiological work area. Orano Decommissioning Services has developed and utilized at French nuclear facilities a lightweight portable scanning instrument called MANUELA (Mobile Apparatus for Nuclear Expertise Localization Assistance). Recently Orano conducted demonstrations at two United States nuclear facilities using MANUELA that may prove useful in areas of the fuel cycle including: - ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) planning during facility operations; - Scoping and site characterization during the D and D planning phase; - Remedial action support during active decommissioning work; - Radiation and modeling planning for plant modifications; - Support Final Status Survey and demonstration of 'end state' compliance for license termination. MANUELA is currently being evaluated for use during decommissioning of nuclear facilities and could aide in demonstrating compliance with end state criteria after decommissioning. Of particular interest are decommissioning projects planned for various sites across the United States. Most of these sites present unique challenges and opportunities to safely and efficiently decommission in a regulatory compliant manner. The two demonstration site's current conditions of relatively low radiation levels inside containment proved to be ideal platforms to deploy the MANUELA instrument for evaluation of the complex geometries typically found in a nuclear facility. The MANUELA instrument was able to precisely identify local hot spots of the reactor system's primary equipment and was able to simultaneously overlay the dose information onto the scanned 3D images. Using data like this, a licensee would be able to make informed technical and personnel decisions on methods to remediate, shield or properly dispose of the radioactive source term. MANUELA can be used throughout the decommissioning process to validate progress and continue to refine the work activities to optimize the efforts of the crew which reduces downtime waiting for survey results, whereas traditional survey methodology relies on a physical survey to be performed and the data transcribed onto survey maps that are only two dimensional. The traditional format tends to be inaccurate and difficult to interpret the precise location(s) of hot spots or generalized dose rates. The resultant scan also allows the user to know the exact extent of the survey versus transposing information onto a map with only a portion of the map area scanned. MANUELA also compiles all of the relevant survey data into a downloadable table format which includes the measurement identification number, time stamp, point space location on the XYZ plane, and the dose rate value. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

The Use of Long-wave Infrared Cameras for Hazardous Waste Remediation - 20457

For over fifty years, infrared cameras have been used in military applications, nondestructive testing, condition monitoring, and predictive maintenance. As infrared cameras continue to become more sophisticated and less expensive, they are providing value in an ever-increasing variety of unique applications, including hazardous waste remediation. This paper describes several instances of how infrared cameras have been used within the US Department of Defense and the US Department of Energy in support of waste remediation projects, including the author's recent use of an infrared camera in support of the Calcine Retrieval Project at the Idaho National Laboratory. Infrared cameras provide images of infrared radiation, or heat energy, which is otherwise invisible to the unaided eye. Infrared radiation is part of the electromagnetic spectrum, which includes visible light. But unlike visible light, infrared has wavelengths longer than the human eye can detect. Infrared is emitted by everything with a temperature above absolute zero (-273 deg. C, or -459 deg. F); the higher the temperature, the greater the infrared thermal radiation, or heat, that is emitted. Even objects that feel cold to us, like ice, emit thermal radiation and can be imaged by infrared cameras. These cameras are typically used to look for abnormally hot or cold spots on a component or target area under normal operating conditions. The method provides a rapid, wide-area, noncontact technique for identifying problems associated with a temperature differential. All infrared cameras can provide qualitative thermal information by displaying relative differences in temperatures within a two-dimensional image. More expensive infrared cameras can also provide quantitative information where an absolute temperature value is assigned to each pixel associated with the displayed two-dimensional image. Proper camera calibration and a solid understanding of heat transfer and thermography techniques are required when using an infrared camera to obtain quantitative information. Case studies outlined in this paper include the rapid, non-intrusive detection of hazardous decontamination solution within one-ton shipping containers at Pine Bluff Arsenal, the non-intrusive identification of residual elemental sodium within the cooling loops of the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory, process monitoring of heat exchanger melt-and-drain efforts during EBR-II decommissioning, and the remote detection of internal steel supports within calcine storage bins prior to bin penetration. For each use of thermography, the author describes a summary of the waste remediation effort, the infrared camera used, the thermal imaging technique employed, and the results obtained. The paper concludes with a discussion on common mistakes to avoid for similar applications of thermography. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Impacts of Tritium Management Approaches on Tritium Distribution and Capture Requirements for UNF Reprocessing

Four radionuclides have been identified as being sufficiently volatile in reprocessing of nuclear fuel that their gaseous release needs to be controlled to meet U.S. regulatory requirements. These radionuclides are {sup 3}H, {sup 14}C, {sup 85}Kr, and {sup 129}I. Although iodine has been the focus of a number of studies due to the high decontamination factor (DF) requirements on multiple escape pathways, it is clear from prior studies that the control of tritium will also be a significant issue for future reprocessing plants, especially if processing relatively short-cooled fuels (<10 yr post reactor discharge). Tritium contained in a used nuclear fuel (UNF) matrix will be released into the liquid and off-gas streams during fuel reprocessing. The amounts released into the process streams are a function of the type and burnup of the fuel processed, and the chemical processes employed within the reprocessing plant. Previous studies have examined the tritium capture requirements for the reprocessing facility assuming that all of the tritium is volatilized in the head-end operations; i.e., tritium pretreatment is employed and tritium is completely released from the cladding. This scenario tends to limit the release pathway to the head-end off-gas stream. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Purification of Zirconium Tetrachloride (ZrCl{sub 4}) from UNF Cladding - A Progress Report

Zirconium-based cladding materials that surround used nuclear fuel (UNF) rods represent a significant fraction of the total amount of high level waste that must be disposed of in long term geological repositories. The decontamination and/or recovery and reuse of these materials would significantly reduce the amount of high level waste associated with light water nuclear energy reactors and could provide a new source of hafnium free zirconium for the fabrication of new nuclear components. A step in a strategy to recycle zirconium from used cladding materials is the direct, high yield chlorination reaction that produces zirconium tetrachloride (ZrCl{sub 4}). The ZrCl{sub 4} so obtained is contaminated with other metal chloride species (FeCl{sub 3}, NbCl{sub 5}, NbOCl{sub 3}, SnCl{sub 4}, CsCl, SbCl{sub 5}, etc.) that originate from the alloying metals present initially as well as contaminants from oxide layers on the cladding, trace fission products, fuel residues, activation byproducts, and tritium. The suggested strategy to remove the metal chloride impurities is based on sublimation at atmospheric pressure combined with chemical treatments influencing volatility of the impurities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗