Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “BURNUP”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

A Review of Advanced Test Reactor Fuel and Assessment of Its Compatibility with the ZIRCEX Chlorination Process

Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) fuel has been identified as a resource for high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) production. A survey was performed on the published literature describing ATR fuel. The geometry of the fuel is complex; different parts of the fuel compact experience differing neutron flux and burnup. The literature is sparse, and access is controlled. Therefore, fundamental studies of fuel reprocessing must use a model fuel that represents the main chemical and structural features. Advanced chlorination, or chlorination with sulfur-chlorine bearing reagents is being investigated as way to separate the fuel from metal matrix alloys. A UAl x alloy will be fabricated with x = 3, 4, and 5. The potential chlorination of individual UAl x intermetallics will be assessed in the advanced chlorination process of Al-8001 and Al-6061 as well as a representative mixture. Initial studies will track the alloying elements of the Al, which are Si, Fe, Cu, Mn, Mg, Cr, Zn, and Ti, in addition to the U itself. Further studies will include fission product simulants. Because advanced chlorination solvents include sulfur, the chemistry of sulfur with major and minor constituents will also be investigated. The experimental work accompanied by neutronic calculations will allow the assessment of the feasibility of advanced chlorination to separate aluminum from uranium. If bench-scale testing appears promising, then small-scale tests in shielded facilities with irradiated cladding, lightly irradiated fuel, and spent nuclear fuel are recommended to track the complete inventory of fissile actinides, fission product impurities, and reagent solids and liquids.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Gas-Cooled High-Temperature Pebble-Bed Reactor Reference Plant Model

This report details a fully coupled neutronics thermal hydraulics reference plant model for a gas-cooled high-temperature pebble-bed reactor. The multiphysics model is developed on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Comprehensive Reactor Analysis Bundle (BlueCRAB) available on the Idaho National Laboratory high performance computer, which natively and seamlessly couples Griffin, Pronghorn, and the BISON MOOSE-based applications. Griffin provides the reactor physics capabilities including depletion to the equilibrium core, k-eigenvalue, adjoint, and transient solutions. Pronghorn solves the porous medium equations for the fluid regions and conduction in the solid regions. BISON solves thermal conduction problems for the average pebble and TRISO in the pebble-bed core thus providing the fuel and moderator spatial fields for each pebble burnup group. The neutronics feedback relies primarily on fuel and moderator temperatures. We present results for the coupled steady state equilibrium core and a protected loss of flow event. Although this model is to be considered prototypical with regard to the capabilities in BlueCRAB, its results are consistent with published work by the Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) in China and other research entities.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Principal Challenges in Toroidal Magnetic Confinement Fusion Systems

Research efforts toward a practical and economical magnetically confined fusion power source have made steady progress over the years. Today, the principal approaches to confining a hot plasma of Deuterium and Tritium ions long enough for a significant frac/on to undergo thermonuclear burn employ toroidal geometries. Such geometries are attractive because charged particles are tightly bound around the field lines, undergoing locally helical orbits as they travel along those lines. In the core regions of the plasma, the field lines have no connection to the material surfaces making up the interior of the vacuum vessel, so that plasma confinement times can be long enough for significant thermonuclear burnup via fusion reactions to take place. For good confinement, the geometry of the field lines must be such that nested field lines (which lie on nested flux surfaces) twist around the toroidal axis (a quasi-circular line that approximately lies in the center of the confined plasma) at rates that vary based on their distance from that axis. The rotational transform (or field line pitch), iota/2π , is defined as the number of poloidal transits per single toroidal transit of a field line on a toroidal flux surface.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Validation of MFUEL Metal Fuel Performance Models of SAS4A/SASSYS-1

The fuel characterization models of SAS4A/SASSYS-1 (SAS) have recently been extended to include a new U-Pu-Zr metal fuel model, MFUEL. MFUEL is equipped with mechanistic physics based models to predict the pre-transient characterization and transient response of metal fuel, with emphasis on fuel melting, cladding failure, and the metal fuel’s impact on core reactivity. The MFUEL model will be available in the full version of SAS4A/SASSYS-1 5.7, which is scheduled to be released in June 2023. Fast reactor fuel pins that operated in EBR-II and FFTF with low smear density U-Zr and U-Pu-Zr metal fuels and irradiation resistant ferritic-martensitic cladding showed significant advantages in achieving high burnups and assuring inherent safety characteristics during anticipated transients, design basis events, and beyond design basis events. For safety analysis, a fuel performance model must be able to predict (1) Fuel pin mechanics and compositional and dimensional changes, (2) Clad failure, and (3) Fuel pin thermal resistance. Achieving these high level goals accurately is strongly related to the model performance of individual physical processes taking place within a fuel pin during its lifetime. Metal fuels typically operate above the mid-point temperature of melting during normal, as well as off-normal, conditions. At these elevated temperatures, the availability of thermal activation provides a driving force for various diffusional processes leading to complex phase transformations, micro-structure evolution, significant amounts of fuel swelling, interconnected porosity formation, excessive amounts of fission gas release, and fuel clad chemical interactions. Clad failure in fast reactors primarily occurs as a result of creep rupture augmented by clad wastage formation. The reaction is driven by thermal creep induced dislocation motion, grain boundary cavity nucleation, growth and breakup of grain boundaries. The high level complexity and limited available data requires introducing physics-based modeling approaches to gain extrapolation ability and sensitivity with respect to various conditions. The objective of this report is to perform validation of MFUEL using the experimental data for (1) Normal operation EBR-II fuel behavior, (2) Normal operation PHENIX fuel behavior, (3) HT9 Pressure tube ramp-and-hold creep rupture tests, (4) Whole Pin Furnace (WPF) creep strain, creep rupture and eutectic tests, (5) Fuel Behavior Test Apparatus (FBTA) eutectic tests, and (6) TREAT M5-7 OverPower tests up to clad failure. Section-2 includes a brief description of the MFUEL models. A detailed description of the MFUEL physics-based, semi-empirical models will be presented in the SAS V 5.7 theory manual. Section-3, 4, and 5 describes the validation effort for the pre-transient irradiation, furnace transients, and TREAT M-Series transients, respectively.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Covariance Testing Progress for ENDF/B-VIII.1β1 at ORNL [Slides]

This presentation touched on how data-induced uncertainty significantly increased for thermal 235 U-fueled systems. And how 239 Pu covariance changes are worrying. Additionally discussed is how 103 Rh is the only significant important fission product change. The Impact of ENDF/B-VIII.1β1 on burnup credit similarity assessments is similar to ENDF/B-VII.1 data.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Plutonium Basket Counter Measurement Control Q3-Q4 2023

The Plutonium Basket Counter (PBC) is a spent fuel nuclear safeguards instrument that was developed to measure spent-fuel elements from MAGNOX-type research reactors and determine their plutonium content. The instrument is designed to measure fuel elements in spent fuel cooling pools through underwater operation, but it is also able to measure radiation sources in air. The PBC determines fuel plutonium content by detecting neutrons with an array of Helium-3 detectors. The electronics make use of a JSR-15 shift register for data collection and IAEA Neutron Coincidence Counting (INCC) software for data analysis. The PBC is used to determine the 240 Pu content in spent MAGNOX fuel elements grouped into basket-like bundles, thus the instrument’s name. Reactor burnup calculations can be used in conjunction with the data from the PBC to estimate the total plutonium content in the fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Molten Salt Reactor Experiment Simulation using Shift/Griffin

The Department of Energy (DOE)’s NEAMS focuses its efforts on the development of advanced modeling and simulation (M&S) tools for light-water reactors (LWRs) and non–LWRs (i.e., molten salt reactors, high-temperature gas reactors, microreactors, and fast reactors). In the previous fiscal year, the Multiphysics Applications Driver Technical Area funded molten salt reactor (MSR) M&S at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to generate multigroup macroscopic cross sections with Shift for a MSRE 2D lattice model in Griffin. In addition, Shift’s capability to calculate gamma dose rates from activated components in the primary exchangers in a molten salt breeder reactor was also demonstrated. In fiscal year 2023, ORNL generated multigroup macroscopic cross sections using Shift for a 3D MSRE core model. MSRE depletion calculations using Griffin were also demonstrated in this fiscal year. For the depletion calculation, one-group microscopic cross sections for the 3D MSRE core were generated using Shift, and the decay transmutation library from ORIGEN was converted to an ISOXML file, which is required as input in Griffin. Several Monte Carlo codes, such as OpenMC and Serpent, were also used to benchmark and supplement multigroup cross sections generated by Shift. Multigroup libraries were generated with 8 and 20 group structures, and the study found the 8-group structure to be more accurate when comparing Griffin results to continuous energy (CE) Monte Carlo results. The average flux from CE Shift calculations is up to ~6% higher than the CE Serpent calculations because of different values applied for the energy released per fission (κ values). The average flux in the fuel salt calculated by Griffin using cross sections generated with Shift agrees well with the reference CE Shift solution; the same is valid for the corresponding Serpent results. The maximum relative error is ~6% and ~2% compared to the CE Shift and Serpent reference solutions, respectively. Meanwhile, the average flux calculated by Griffin in the graphite moderator shows a higher difference in the thermal range when compared to both reference Monte Carlo solutions; this result suggests a need for improvement in cross section generation for the graphite moderator in the thermal range in both Monte Carlo codes. Griffin depletion calculations using cross sections from Shift and Serpent were performed and compared against ORIGEN calculations, and the nuclide densities calculated by Griffin were found to be generally in agreement with those of ORIGEN. Because a different approach was taken to calculate the energy released per fission ( κ values) in Shift and Serpent, a difference in nuclide densities from differences in the average flux was observed between Griffin using Serpent and Shift cross sections. Griffin calculations with Shift cross sections produced higher average flux in the salt than with Serpent cross sections, leading to higher consumption of 235 U and higher production of 135 Xe. For time-dependent depletion calculations, cross sections were generated with Serpent, and Griffin’s results using these cross sections were compared to CE Serpent depletion results, demonstrating good agreement. The average difference in keff between Serpent and Griffin as a function of burnup is about 155 pcm. Similarly, good agreement with small differences up to ~0.5% was also noticed in the nuclide density of 235 U and 135 Xe. More details regarding the methodologies invoked to generate the cross section to make code-to-code comparisons are discussed further in this report. User feedback on Griffin and Shift capabilities that will enhance these calculations is provided in this report for future consideration. The work performed this fiscal year can be extended further for multiphysics coupling of Griffin-Pronghorn/SAM with Mole to study precursor flow and salt chemistry.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Development of Plant Reload Optimization Framework Capabilities for Core Design and Fuel Performance Analysis

The United States (U.S.) nuclear industry faces a challenge in maintaining required levels of safety while ensuring economic competitiveness to stay in business. Safety remains a key parameter for all aspects of light water reactor (LWR) nuclear power plant (NPP) operations. Safety can become more economical by using a risk-informed ecosystem, such as the one being developed by the Risk-Informed Systems Analysis (RISA) Pathway under the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program. The LWRS Program promotes a wide range of research and development activities with the goal of maximizing both the safety and economic efficiency of NPPs through improved scientific understanding, especially given many plants are now considering second license renewals. The RISA Pathway has two main goals: (1) deploy methodologies and technologies that better represent safety margins and cost and safety factors and (2) develop advanced applications that enable cost-effective plant operation. The Plant Reload Optimization Platform development project aims to build a reactor core design tool that includes reactor safety and fuel performance analyses, and also uses artificial intelligence to support optimization of core design solutions. This report summarizes Fiscal Year 2022 (FY-22) activity in platform capability developments in RAVEN. This platform performs simulations using industry codes for core design (i.e., PARCS) and fuel performance (i.e., TRANSURANUS) which will allow expansion of the capabilities to include advanced fuel designs such as accident-tolerant fuel (ATF)s with high burnup.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

SATS Transient Fission Gas Release Test with Irradiated Fuel under Loss of Coolant Accident Conditions

The transient fission gas release (tFGR) during the temperature ramp associated with a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) in light-water reactors (LWRs) is likely a significant contribution to the total pressure in a fuel rod and may cause an unexpected rod burst. The lack of data related to tFGR continues to be a key gap in understanding LWR cladding burst behavior under LOCA conditions. To fully characterize this behavior, tFGR data must be collected from several different systems that can capture all relevant testing conditions. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has developed a system to measure the integral tFGR from irradiated fuel segments. This system was designed to integrate with the existing Severe Accident Test Station (SATS) and to build upon decades of experience capturing fission gas to characterize fuel behavior. The tFGR system consists of a sweep gas system to transport gases from the in-cell SATS apparatus to an out-of-cell fission gas detection system composed of a series of cold traps to capture the off-gas from the heating tests and a gamma spectrometry system to detect and measure 85 Kr. Initial system testing operations were completed during which 85 Kr collection and measurement were verified along with the ability to detect stable inert gases. A tFGR test with a high-burnup fuel specimen was successfully conducted by the in-cell SATS-tFGR system at ORNL. The posttest examination is under way, the result of which will be reported in FY24.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Establishing Isotopic Measurement Capabilities using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for the Molten Salt Reactor Campaign

Proof-of-principle H isotope ratios of aqueous aerosol systems and liquid droplets on filter paper have been measured using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) with root mean square error of prediction values down to 1.9%. Molten salt reactors (MSRs) will consist of a complex chemical and radiological system consistently producing new fission products as the reactor operates. Some of these fission products and/or their daughter species will leave the salt in the reactor off-gas. Monitoring the composition of the off-gas, as well as the salt itself, is important for monitoring reactor performance, including burnup, corrosion, and the concentration of impurities. Tritium is of concern for MSRs because it will be produced from the irradiation of key salt constituents, including Li and Be. LIBS offers an avenue for in situ salt and off-gas monitoring by firing a laser onto or into the sample stream to generate a plasma. The plasma light can be monitored to measure an elemental fingerprint of the sample. Extending this analysis to include isotopic ratios offers a critical expansion of the in situ monitoring capabilities being developed. This study demonstrates the expansion of Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s LIBS capabilities to monitor isotopes and shows how simple calibrations may provide rapid semiquantitative models.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Engineering & Microstructure Scale PIE Report on EBR-II X441A Metallic Fuel Pins for the MORPH Experiment

The objectives of this project are to increase fundamental understanding of irradiation induced metallic U-Pu-Zr fuel behavior and to obtain data needed for the development of irradiation models for metallic fuels in MARMOT. The requested metallic fuel pins are from the X441A experiment irradiated in Experimental Breeder Reactor (EBR)-II and will be provided by the PIs for the duration of the experiment. The purpose of the pins irradiated in the X441A assembly was to vary Zr composition and fuel slug diameter in order to provide data for the metallic fuel performance code “LIFEMETAL” [ANL-IFR-125]. The fuels of interest to this project are metallic fuels with several Zr compositions (in wt.%): U-19Pu-6Zr, U-19Pu-10Zr, and U-19Pu-14Zr, which were irradiated to a peak burnup of approximately 11 at.%. The cladding was the same for all three fuel pins (austenitic stainless steel D9), which allows investigation of fuel-cladding interaction (FCI) phenomena. Varying Zr content in fuel pins enables investigation of the effect of Zr on fuel restructuring and fuel-cladding compatibility. Engineering and microstructure scale PIE activities will be focused on investigation of fundamental aspect of fuel performance such as species diffusion and migration, fission product behavior, and constituent redistribution. Obtained microstructural information will be used as the basis for the development of MARMOT models of U-Pu-Zr fuel performance at the mesoscale. Experimental data obtained through this proposal will be used to provide this fundamental understanding which will serve as the foundation of the development of radiation models for U-Pu-Zr in MARMOT. It will also provide a starting point for the design of new experiments to provide data for the validation of these MARMOT models.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Development of bubble evolution model for new mechanistic transient fission gas release capability in BISON

This report summarizes efforts within NEAMS to investigate the mechanisms that govern fission gas behavior in UO 2 . In particular, the focus is on understanding how fission gas behavior causes transient fission gas release and fragmentation/pulverization of high burnup structure (HBS) in UO 2 . HBS forms in the periphery of the pellet where temperatures are relatively low. Previously, MD simulations were performed to determine the reaction energies for various Xe and U defects with bubbles, as a function of Xe to vacancy ratio or, equivalently, pressure. As had been shown in FY22, it was found that the unmodified version of the Simple Integrated Fission Gas Release and Swelling (SIFGRS) model within BISON greatly over-predicted the number gas atoms per vacancy in the bubbles in the outer rim of the pellet (a ratio of > 1 million). This was due to slow grain boundary vacancy diffusivity and not accounting for the pressure-dependent reaction energy for Xe interstitials with bubbles. The application of the pressure dependent reaction energies was able to restrict Xe to vacancy ratios to 2:1, which is far more realistic than those originally obtained from SIFGRS.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

FAST-1.0: A Computer Code for Thermal-Mechanical Nuclear Fuel Analysis under Steady-state and Transients: Developed under NQA-1-2017

Fuel Analysis under Steady-state and Transients (FAST) is the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)’s computer code that calculates the steady-state and transient response of nuclear reactor fuel rods during long-term in-reactor burnup, anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs), design basis accidents (DBAs), and dry storage conditions. The code calculates the temperature, pressure, and deformation of a fuel rod as functions of time-dependent fuel rod power and coolant boundary conditions. The phenomena modeled by the code include: heat conduction through the fuel and other materials, heat transfer from the cladding-to-coolant, cladding elastic and plastic deformation, including creep, fuel-cladding mechanical interaction, fission gas release from the fuel, rod internal pressure and void volume, and cladding oxidation. The code contains necessary material and coolant properties, as well as clad-to-coolant heattransfer correlations, for normal operation through postulated accidents for today’s US-based light water reactor (LWR) fuel designs. FAST-1.0 also contains preliminary materials and models for new LWR fuel concepts, such as accident tolerant fuel (ATF), and non-LWR fuel concepts such as metallic fuels for sodium fast reactors (SFRs). FAST has been developed for use on Windows and Linux operating systems. This document describes FAST-1.0, which is the first official version of this code. This document is one of a series of documents on FAST; the other documents detail the material properties used by FAST as well as its integral assessment to experiments and commercial data.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

FAST-1.0: Integral Assessment: Developed under NQA-1-2017

An integral assessment has been performed to quantify the predictive capabilities of FAST, a thermal-mechanical nuclear fuel performance code designed to analyze fuel behavior from beginning of life to burnup levels allowed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). FAST code calculations are shown to compare satisfactorily to a preselected set of experimental data with both steady-state, anticipated operating occurrence (AOO) and design basis transient operating conditions. This document describes the assessment of FAST-1.0, which is the latest version of FAST, released February 2020.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

FAST-1.1: A Computer Code for Thermal-Mechanical Nuclear Fuel Analysis under Steady-state and Transients (Developed under NQA-1-2017)

Fuel Analysis under Steady-state and Transients (FAST) is the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)’s computer code that calculates the steady-state and transient response of nuclear reactor fuel rods during long-term in-reactor burnup, anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs), design basis accidents (DBAs), and dry storage conditions. The code calculates the temperature, pressure, and deformation of a fuel rod as functions of time-dependent fuel rod power and coolant boundary conditions. The phenomena modeled by the code include: * heat conduction through the fuel and other materials * heat transfer from the cladding-to-coolant * cladding elastic and plastic deformation, including creep * fuel-cladding mechanical interaction * fission gas release from the fuel * rod internal pressure and void volume * cladding oxidation The code contains necessary material and coolant properties, as well as clad-to-coolant heat transfer correlations, for normal operation through postulated accidents and AOOs for today’s U.S.-based light water reactor (LWR) fuel designs. FAST-1.1 also contains preliminary materials and models for new LWR fuel concepts, such as accident tolerant fuel (ATF), and non-LWR fuel concepts such as metallic fuels for sodium fast reactors (SFRs). FAST has been developed for use on Windows and Linux operating systems. This document describes FAST-1.1 and is one of a series of documents on the code; the other documents detail the material properties used by FAST as well as its integral assessment to experiments and commercial data.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

SCALE Demonstration for Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Fuel Cycle Analysis

In support of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission non-light-water reactor fuel cycle demonstration project, SCALE 6.3.1 capabilities for radionuclide characterization, criticality, and shielding were demonstrated for scenarios in the sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) nuclear fuel cycle. Three postulated accident scenarios were selected for analysis in this work. As a basis for all scenarios, irradiated fuel inventories were generated using SCALE/ORIGAMI. To cover multiple SFR design choices, two different types of SFR fuel, uranium/transuranic-loaded and U-based fuels, were considered. For the first scenario, SCALE/MAVRIC was used to calculate the radiation shielding and dose rates inside and outside of the containment building due to a drop of a spent fuel assembly from the fuel-handling system during unloading inside the containment building. For the second scenario, potential critical configurations in an electrofiner were investigated through criticality calculations with SCALE/CSAS. For the third scenario, the activity of the waste salt from an electrorefiner was evaluated using SCALE/ORIGEN. The dose rate produced by the analyzed SFR assemblies is similar to that produced by a typical pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel assembly with a discharge burnup of 50 GWd/MTU, with the same cooling time of 10 days. The criticality analyses suggested that the different electrorefiner configurations have a large margin to criticality. The activity analysis of the electrofiner waste revealed that shielding and cooling may be required for the waste salt that contains transuranics and fission products produced by the electrorefiner because of the high activity of the waste salt. In general, the application of various capabilities in the SCALE code system for SFR fuel inventory generation, criticality, and shielding was successfully demonstrated for the selected scenarios in the SFR nuclear fuel cycle. Additional analyses can be performed to provide more accurate results when more details of the SFR nuclear fuel cycles are available, for example, the dimension of the electrorefiner and the salt compositions during reprocessing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Sister Rod Destructive Examinations (FY23) Appendix F: Cyclic Integrated Reversible-Bending Fatigue Tests

Spent nuclear fuel (SNF) assemblies must be shipped to other sites for processing and disposal. During shipment, the fuel is typically oriented horizontally, and the fuel rods are subject to periodic alternating loads related to the movement of the vehicle that results in alternating bending of the SNF fuel rods. The number of bending cycles is related to the length of the shipping route, with longer routes producing more cycles. Because it is well-known that cyclic loads can produce failures, even when the stress and strain imposed are below the material’s yield point, investigation of the SNF’s fatigue behavior is prudent. This report discusses the results of fatigue testing conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) using the Cyclic Integrated Reversible-Bending Fatigue Tester (CIRFT) created by the US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy for the High Burnup Spent Fuel Data Project and its sister rods. The results of the tests are compared with results obtained over the last decade using the same CIRFT for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Hypothetical Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Fuel Transport Using the Existing ES-3100

Increased industry interest in increased enrichment fuels is associated with a heightened interest in high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU)-based systems, as novel designs look to take root as alternatives to traditional LWRs. Increased enrichment with novel reactors can produce designs that, in theory and in some historical experience, are capable of operation at increased burnups, higher energy density, and other unique features compared to conventional LWRs. As part of a Department of Energy (DOE) initiative to increase the availability of HALEU fuel, initial funding sourced from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (H.R. 5376) [1] resulted in the DOE/NRC Criticality Safety for Commercial-Scale HALEU Fuel Cycle and Transportation (DNCSH) project, part of the HALEU Availability Program. The project aims to support the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in providing data for criticality safety validation of reactor designs that, while perhaps demonstrated in limited capacity, represent more exotic systems than those that regulators are accustomed to reviewing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗