Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Envelope”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Crew Autonomy through Self-Scheduling: Guidelines for Crew Scheduling Performance Envelope and Mitigation Strategies

Future long duration exploration missions (LDEMs) bring new challenges to astronaut crews in deep space, one of which is increased communication latencies with ground stations. As a result, crews will have to behave more autonomously by self-scheduling their own operational timelines in an efficient and effective manner. To support crew autonomy, our team has spent the last few years developing Playbook, a mission planning and scheduling tool. Our research focuses on investigating scheduling performance using Playbook to inform the deployment of novel aids that streamline the timeline creation process and proposing relevant standards and guidelines for autonomous crews in LDEMs. Summarizing yearly progress of research analysis and experiment in HERA.

user experience↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Crew Autonomy Through Self-Scheduling: Guidelines for Crew Scheduling Performance Envelope and Mitigation Strategies

NASA’s future long duration exploration missions (LDEMs) will encounter increasing communication transmission delays as they move farther from Earth-based ground stations. Because crews can no longer rely on real-time support from ground planners, they will have to self-schedule their own operational timelines effectively and efficiently. To enable this, our team develops Playbook, a mission planning and scheduling tool. Our research focuses on quantifying scheduling performance using Playbook to inform the design and development of future features aimed at streamlining timeline creation. We also aim to propose standards and guidelines for autonomous crews in LDEMs. This year, we discuss preliminary results from HERA Campaign 6.

self-scheduling↗
NASA NTRS2024

Defining the Operational Envelope for Air Flows in the Miniature Arc-Jet Research Chamber (mARC II)

The second-generation 30 kW miniature Arc-jet Research Chamber (mARC II) at NASA Ames Research Center produces high enthalpy flows relevant for entry systems ground testing. The mARC II facility has recently undergone upgrades, including the installation of a new vacuum system to address the issues preventing it from maintaining underexpanded flow under test conditions. In this work, we present data obtained from an Integrated Systems Testing campaign and provide an initial assessment of arc-jet performance following the upgrades. Air is used as the working gas for the standard mARC II arc-heater configuration with two constrictor disks. Seven runs were investigated for five test conditions to assess the lowest achievable stagnation point heat fluxes for air flow rates of 0.15 or 0.25 g s −1 . The heat flux was measured using a water-cooled Gardon gauge (Ø4.76 mm, 3/16" hemispherical) at 70 mm from the nozzle exit plane. The new vacuum system produced test box pressures in the medium (fine) vacuum range (~0.03 torr, 4 Pa) prior to gas addition and successfully maintained underexpanded flow after gas addition. The upgrade yielded a ~4X reduction in heat flux relative to the previous system for the same set test conditions. We report the lowest heat fluxes measured in mARC II to date, ranging from 26 to 81 W cm −2 , for sonic flow enthalpies of 4–14 MJ kg −1 . Bulk enthalpies estimated using an energy balance method (EB 2 ) are reported for the first time using mARC II.Initial data suggests EB 2 generally estimates lower enthalpies than sonic flow methods for mARC II. Lastly, laminar axisymmetric Navier–Stokes simulations were performed using the NASA DPLR code. Numerical heat flux results show good agreement with experiments at low arc powers (3–15% difference at the minimum set arc current), but discrepancy increases with arc power (49% difference at the maximum set arc current).

Pitot tube↗
NASA NTRS2024

Defining the Operational Envelope for Air Flows in the Miniature Arc-Jet Research Chamber (mARC II)

The second-generation 30 kW miniature Arc-jet Research Chamber (mARC II) at NASA Ames Research Center produces high enthalpy flows relevant for entry systems ground testing. The mARC II facility has recently undergone upgrades, including the installation of a new vacuum system to address the issues preventing it from maintaining underexpanded flow under test conditions. In this work, we present data obtained from an Integrated Systems Testing campaign and provide an initial assessment of arc-jet performance following the upgrades. Air is used as the working gas for the standard mARC II arc-heater configuration with two constrictor disks. Seven runs were investigated for five test conditions to assess the lowest achievable stagnation point heat fluxes for air flow rates of 0.15 or 0.25 g s −1 . The heat flux was measured using a water-cooled Gardon gauge (Ø4.76 mm, 3/16" hemispherical) at 70 mm from the nozzle exit plane. The new vacuum system produced test box pressures in the medium (fine) vacuum range (~0.03 torr, 4 Pa) prior to gas addition and successfully maintained underexpanded flow after gas addition. The upgrade yielded a ~4X reduction in heat flux relative to the previous system for the same set test conditions. We report the lowest heat fluxes measured in mARC II to date, ranging from 26 to 81 W cm −2 , for sonic flow enthalpies of 4–14 MJ kg −1 . Bulk enthalpies estimated using an energy balance method (EB 2 ) are reported for the first time using mARC II.Initial data suggests EB 2 generally estimates lower enthalpies than sonic flow methods for mARC II. Lastly, laminar axisymmetric Navier–Stokes simulations were performed using the NASA DPLR code. Numerical heat flux results show good agreement with experiments at low arc powers (3–15% difference at the minimum set arc current), but discrepancy increases with arc power (49% difference at the maximum set arc current).

arc-jet↗
DOE OSTI2020

Establishing Maximal Core Excess Reactivity Envelope for TREAT Test Vehicle Insertion

The Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility is an air-cooled reactor composed of graphite-urania fuel encapsulated in zirconium alloy canisters and surrounded by ~2 ft (~61 cm) of nuclear grade graphite. The primary role of TREAT is to provide in-pile nuclear-heated safety research via transient testing [1]. The following work represents further analyses building upon previously reported work to support larger volume test vehicles within TREAT [2]. The Broad Use Specimen Transient Experiment Rig (BUSTER) provides ample versatility for numerous transient test concepts. However, future testing and experiment needs will require testing environments of different in-core footprints. The versatility of TREAT allows for the development of variegated core layouts with key limitations emplaced as operational safety temperature restrictions and available core reactivity. The focus of this current effort is to gauge core arrangements for TREAT core loadings to support centralized experimental testing of varying dimensional capacity. The total core excess reactivity (ER) was computed for different arrangements to establish comparison tables that enable ready assessment of core ER available for future experiment concepts. Test vehicle worths would then be necessary to establish available ER to support transient testing requirements and to perform reactor performance and safety calculations [3,4].

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗