Operational and Mission Highlights A Monthly Summary of Top Achievements (March 2021)
Operational and mission highlights for March 2021 for Los Alamos National Laboratory.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Operational and mission highlights for March 2021 for Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Abstract not provided.
Monthly newsletter highlights for areas including Nuclear Security, Science, Technology, and Engineering, Mission Operations and Community Relations. Information for selected media coverage is also included.
This resource is for state, local government, and K-12 school staff managing small- and medium-sized facilities. Readers will learn to address the unique challenges of smaller energy-saving projects and make informed decisions about financing. Section 1 provides tools for obtaining the information required to prioritize potential energy upgrades. Section 2 presents financing options for energy upgrades, as well as insights that will help decision makers select the right financing model for their project and jurisdiction. Section 3 summarizes key takeaways and highlights additional resources for small- and medium-sized public facilities.
Laboratory personnel working on a years-long Confinement Vessel Disposition (CVD) Project at the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research (CMR) facility recently shipped its first vessel after closing the emptying and dispositioning portion of the project in 2020. During the 1970s and 1980s, the Laboratory conducted experiments that produced data used in computer modeling. Scientists used these models to evaluate the performance of nuclear weapons.
To mitigate the variation in demand on the electric grid, thermal energy storage (TES) is an alternative to electric batteries or installing new peaking power plants. Stakeholders and policy makers across the United States have expressed interests in promoting TES, as demonstrated by the US Department of Energy’s Grid-Interactive Efficient Buildings program and the efforts of various state legislatures. However, the cost value provided by TES are unclear. If reliable cost benefits were determined, stakeholders would have a clearer picture of the financial returns that can be gained from their investment in TES. In this report, EnergyPlus was used to perform whole-building simulations for two residential buildings in Indianapolis and Atlanta. The HVAC system in both buildings were equipped with phase change material TES. The TES tank was charged in off-peak hours and discharged in peak hours to perform load shifting. First, the economic value implied by existing time-of-use (TOU) rates offered by utility companies was analyzed via whole-building simulation. Second, existing demand reduction (DR) incentives sourced from 3 different electrical grid administrators (i.e., California, Texas, and New England region) were surveyed to determine their implied value. Lastly, the economic value implied by different types of deferred peak power plants were reviewed. The full value of TES to the entire society consists of value to the utility, OEMs, facility installers, and other stakeholders. This report focuses on the value to the utility with emphasis on the deferred capital of peak power plant. The value from the deferred capital of peak power plant is manifested to the customer in the form of demand reduction program and Time-of-Use utility rate program. In this report, an initial proxy of the value of TES is made by assuming the deferred capital cost of power plant is the full value to reduce peak demand. Three levels of financial value of TES systems were assessed. Two are currently available to some residential customers: (1) the benefit from TOU pricing alone and (2) the benefit from TOU pricing in combination with DR incentive programs. The third level was computed as the full cost of deferred capital cost of peaking power plants. This represents the potential value that could be gained by the utilities or conceivably be offered to consumers.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
To support the Laboratory’s pit mission, the Associate Laboratory Directorate for Plutonium Infrastructure on January 31, 2022, took the first step in establishing operations at TA-55 that run 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
During this effort, SparkCognition with support from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) was tasked with applying artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the reliability, efficiency, and safety of operations at a coal-fired plant. By implementing AI techniques, like machine learning (ML), it is believed that operators can leverage existing data sources to gain more insights such as advanced warning of machine degradation. With enough lead time, a reliability engineer can take action to minimize, or even avoid, impact to production. To complete this work effort, SparkCognition developed and refined an ML-based model using sensor data for a Steam Turbine unit at a host site. The models were deployed in an online, web-based solution that allows users to visualize model outputs and supporting data. The final solution, based on SparkCognition’s proprietary software platform called SparkPredict®, was shared with EPRI who completed an online evaluation of results to determine the solution’s ability to detect actionable events.
In early February 2022, Laboratory personnel successfully completed the Qualification Design Review (QDR) for the B61-12 Life Extension Program (LEP). QDR is also known as the Delta FDRAAG, short for Delta Final Design Review and Acceptance Group.
When the Laboratory’s Detonator Production team originally completed manufacturing two ALT939 DEV#1 functional cables — the first development units produced in this lot, team members quickly hit an obstacle when electrical testing for these cables failed. Team members sent the cables out for further testing, which revealed the root cause of failure involved the cables’ connectors. Although a challenging issue to resolve, the team worked together and solved the issue ahead of a stipulated deadline, with the cables completed and shipped to support system tests. The team responsible for this challenging work included members from Detonator Production, Nondestructive Testing & Evaluation, and collaborators from Sandia National Laboratories.
Abstract not provided.
Highlights are given in the following areas: Nuclear Security, Science, Technology and Engineering, Mission Operations, and, Community Relations.
Abstract not provided.