Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2020

Acoustic Testing of the Bell 699 Rotor on the Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR) in the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex 40- by 80- Foot Wind Tunnel in Conversion and Airplane Configuration

The Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR) provides new proprotor testing capabilities to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Department of Defense (DoD). A checkout test for the TTR with the 699 proprotor was performed in the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC) 40- by 80 Foot Wind Tunnel from 2017 to 2018. Four microphones were placed around the rotor to capture acoustic data. Revolution based acoustic data processing techniques are evaluated for appropriateness in both helicopter and airplane configurations. This paper presents the acoustic data acquired for the rotor in conversion and airplane configuration.

Shelts, Kelly↗
NASA NTRS2020

9- by 15-Foot Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Acoustic Free-Field Evaluation After Renovation Part 1: Test Report Summary Part 2: Anechoic Environment Characterization: Field Test Report

This report describes test results from an assessment of the acoustically treated 9- by 15-Foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel at the NASA Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio in June of 2019. The tests were conducted in accordance with the recently adopted international standard ISO 26101-2012 on Qualification of Free Field Test Environments. This method involves moving a microphone relative to a source and comparing the sound pressure level versus distance measurements with theoretical inverse square law spreading.

wind tunnel↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wear Test of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit 2 (AEPS ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. The ETU-2 Wear Test accumulated approximately 730 hours of operation split between the nominal 600 V/12.5 kW condition and the 300 V/6.25 kW condition previously identified as the worst-case erosion condition.

Jason D. Frieman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Characterization Test of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the detailed characterization testof the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit 2 (AEPS ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. This test campaign had two major goals: to assessthe risk of design compliance with thruster requirements and providea comparison to the previously-tested NASA Hall Effect Rocket with Magnet Shielding Technology Demonstration Units (HERMeS TDUs) from which the AEPS ETU design was derived.

AEPS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Alignment and Verification Testing of the GPS LRA Test Bed

The LRCTF (Laser Ranging Characterization and Test Facility) is a unique facility built at NASA GSFC to provide thermal-optical testing of the next generation GPS LRA (Global Positioning Satellite’s Laser Retroreflector Array) laser ranging target. The 400mm diameter target is an array consisting of 48 total internal reflection retroreflectors and has an optical cross section requirement of 100 MSM (million square meters). To verify that the array meets this requirement during on-orbit conditions, the LRCTF is equipped with a 400mm test beam, a data product output consisting of full aperture FFDPs (Far Field Diffraction Patterns) and a thermal chamber. The FFDPs are used to calculate the OCS. This paper will describe the facility design, alignment approach, and verification process.

Patricia Lyons↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Heritage to Flight; The Test Program that Brought an Inflation System Back to Life for the Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID)

Following the success of the Inflatable Reentry Vehicle Experiment-3 (IRVE-3) project, the Terrestrial Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) Orbital Reentry (THOR) project was stood up with a “built to print” Inflation System utilizing the IRVE-3 flight spares. When THOR was canceled, this Inflation System had already been tested and assembled, ready for use. Thus, when the Low Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) was spun up, the THOR system seemed like a good candidate to salvage flight ready hardware. There were, however, some key differences in the IRVE/THOR system and the LOFTID one. LOFTID’s HIAD was two times the size of IRVE for starters and would require much higher flows to accommodate inflating such an article within a specific timeframe. With new requirements and a tight schedule, the LOFTID Inflation team set to work to verify flight readiness under LOFTID conditions and eliminate the need to requalify new hardware. LOFTID, utilizing an Inflation System built primarily hardware from IRVE-3 spares, successfully flew in November of 2022. This paper will outline the mission differences, the test campaign used to prepare LOFTID’s Inflation System for flight, and some lessons learned in repurposing older hardware.

Inflation System↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Highlights of the Test of the QUiet Electric Engine (QUEEN V1) in the NASA GRC Acoustical Testing Laboratory (ATL)

This presentation for the NASA Acoustics Technical Working Group meeting highlights preliminary acoustic and thermal test results from the Quiet Electric Engine (QUEEN V1) experiment recently performed in the NASA Glenn Research Center Acoustical Testing Laboratory. The QUEEN V1 features a single Commercial-Off-the-Shelf fan with an Outlet Guide Vane. Four inlet duct acoustic liners were tested. Electronic Speed Controller (ESC) temperatures were recorded for two different cooling methods: air cooling and a cold plate.

Acoustics↗
NASA NTRS2014

Creating a Test Validated Structural Dynamic Finite Element Model of the Multi-Utility Technology Test Bed Aircraft

Small modeling errors in the finite element model will eventually induce errors in the structural flexibility and mass, thus propagating into unpredictable errors in the unsteady aerodynamics and the control law design. One of the primary objectives of Multi Utility Technology Test Bed, X-56A, aircraft is the flight demonstration of active flutter suppression, and therefore in this study, the identification of the primary and secondary modes for the structural model tuning based on the flutter analysis of X-56A. The ground vibration test validated structural dynamic finite element model of the X-56A is created in this study. The structural dynamic finite element model of the X-56A is improved using a model tuning tool. In this study, two different weight configurations of the X-56A have been improved in a single optimization run.

structural dynamic model tuning↗
NASA NTRS2020

Medical Proton Test Facilities (MPTFs) Lessons Learned on the Unique Aspects for Single Event Effects (SEE) Testing of Electronics in the 200 MeV Regime

Ever since the closure of the Indiana University Cyclotron Facility (IUCF) in 2014, there has been an increasing use of medical proton therapy facilities (MPTF) for SEE testing with protons in the 200 MeV or greater regime. This talk covers some of the unique features and considerations for utilizing MPTFs including both logistical and technical aspects. This presentation provides an overview of lessons learned for SEE testing at MPTFs.

Medical Proton Test Facilities (MPTFs)↗
NASA NTRS2014

Single Event Effects (SEE) Testing: Practical Approach to Test Plans

While standards and guidelines for performing SEE testing have existed for several decades, guidance for developing SEE test plans has not been as easy to find. In this presentation, the variety of areas that need to be considered ranging from resource issues (funds, personnel, schedule) to extremely technical challenges (particle interaction and circuit application), shall be discussed. Note: we consider the approach outlined here as a "living" document: Mission-specific constraints and new technology related issues always need to be taken into account.

Single Event Effects (SEE)↗