Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33

Optimization of Post Dismantling Radwaste Management: a French Innovative Initiative - 18013

The extent and duration of French dismantling operations require the proactive management of the large volumes of radioactive waste to be generated, and that sustainable, innovation processes be engaged. This approach should associate not only the waste producers and dismantling sites operators but also organizations responsible for the safety and waste disposal. The final goal is that all constrains and requirements related to radioactive waste management are anticipated prior to the design stages. While considering those objectives, The French State has decided to give Andra, within the 'Investissements d'Avenir' program, an endowment to support innovation at all steps of radioactive waste life cycle with a special emphasis on the dismantling process. Currently, some 30 R and D projects dealing with the optimization of post dismantling radioactive waste management are underway. They aim at providing strong innovations in terms of characterization, processing, conditioning and disposal of post dismantling radioactive waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Literature Review Investigating Adsorbents for Mercury Removal from Salt Batch Feed Material

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) contains mercury that originated from decades of canyon processing where it was used as a catalyst for dissolving aluminum cladding of reactor fuel. Since the start of radioactive operations, the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) has experienced processing difficulties due to the presence of mercury-laden solids. In response to these challenges, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) has been requested by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC)/Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) personnel to perform a literature review to assess the feasibility of chemical strikes to salt waste-containing tanks at the SRS as an option to reduce mercury introduction into SWPF. The literature review should evaluate known technologies and chemistries for decreasing mercury concentration and the anticipated efficacy of each technology on various mercury species known to exist in SRS waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DEMONSTRATION OF THE NEXT-GENERATION CAUSTIC-SIDE SOLVENT EXTRACTION SOLVENT WITH 2-CM CENTRIFUGAL CONTRACTORS USING TANK 49H WASTE AND WASTE SIMULANT

Researchers successfully demonstrated the chemistry and process equipment of the Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) flowsheet using MaxCalix for the decontamination of high level waste (HLW). The demonstration was completed using a 12-stage, 2-cm centrifugal contactor apparatus at the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). This represents the first CSSX process demonstration of the MaxCalix solvent system with Savannah River Site (SRS) HLW. Two tests lasting 24 and 27 hours processed non-radioactive simulated Tank 49H waste and actual Tank 49H HLW, respectively. Conclusions from this work include the following. The CSSX process is capable of reducing {sup 137}Cs in high level radioactive waste by a factor of more than 40,000 using five extraction, two scrub, and five strip stages. Tests demonstrated extraction and strip section stage efficiencies of greater than 93% for the Tank 49H waste test and greater than 88% for the simulant waste test. During a test with HLW, researchers processed 39 liters of Tank 49H solution and the waste raffinate had an average decontamination factor (DF) of 6.78E+04, with a maximum of 1.08E+05. A simulant waste solution ({approx}34.5 liters) with an initial Cs concentration of 83.1 mg/L was processed and had an average DF greater than 5.9E+03, with a maximum DF of greater than 6.6E+03. The difference may be attributable to differences in contactor stage efficiencies. Test results showed the solvent can be stripped of cesium and recycled for {approx}25 solvent turnovers without the occurrence of any measurable solvent degradation or negative effects from minor components. Based on the performance of the 12-stage 2-cm apparatus with the Tank 49H HLW, the projected DF for MCU with seven extraction, two scrub, and seven strip stages operating at a nominal efficiency of 90% is {approx}388,000. At 95% stage efficiency, the DF in MCU would be {approx}3.2 million. Carryover of organic solvent in aqueous streams (and aqueous in organic streams) was less than 0.1% when processing Tank 49H HLW. The entrained solvent concentration measured in the decontaminated salt solution (DSS) was as much as {approx}140 mg/L, although that value may be overstated by as much as 50% due to modifier solubility in the DSS. The entrained solvent concentration was measured in the strip effluent (SE) and the results are pending. A steady-state concentration factor (CF) of 15.9 was achieved with Tank 49H HLW. Cesium distribution ratios [D(Cs)] were measured with non-radioactive Tank 49H waste simulant and actual Tank 49H waste. Below is a comparison of D(Cs) values of ESS and 2-cm tests. Batch Extraction-Strip-Scrub (ESS) tests yielded D(Cs) values for extraction of {approx}81-88 for tests with Tank 49H waste and waste simulant. The results from the 2-cm contactor tests were in agreement with values of 58-92 for the Tank 49H HLW test and 54-83 for the simulant waste test. These values are consistent with the reference D(Cs) for extraction of {approx}60. In tests with Tank 49H waste and waste simulant, batch ESS tests measured D(Cs) values for the two scrub stages as {approx}3.5-5.0 for the first scrub stage and {approx}1.0-3.0 for the second scrub stage. In the Tank 49H test, the D(Cs) values for the 2-cm test were far from the ESS values. A D(Cs) value of 161 was measured for the first scrub stage and 10.8 for the second scrub stage. The data suggest that the scrub stage is not operating as effectively as intended. For the simulant test, a D(Cs) value of 1.9 was measured for the first scrub stage; the sample from the second scrub stage was compromised. Measurements of the pH of all stage samples for the Tank 49H test showed that the pH for extraction and scrub stages was 14 and the pH for the strip stages was {approx}7. It is expected that the pH of the second scrub stage would be {approx}12-13. Batch ESS tests measured D(Cs) values for the strip stages to be {approx}0.002-0.010. A high value in Strip No.3 of a test with simulant solution has been attributed to issues associated with the limits of detection for the analytical method. In the 2-cm contactor tests, the first four strip stages of the Tank 49H waste test and all five strip stages in the simulant waste test had higher values than the ESS tests. Only the fifth strip stage D(Cs) value of the Tank 49H waste test matched that of the ESS tests. It is speculated that the less-than-optimal performance of the strip section is caused by inefficiencies in the scrub section. Because strip is sensitive to pH, the elevated pH value in the second scrub stage may be the cause of strip performance. In spite of the D(Cs) values obtained in the scrub and strip sections, testing showed that the solvent system is robust. Average DFs for the process far exceeded targets even though the scrub and strip stages did not function optimally. Correction of the issue in the scrub and strip stages is expected to yield even higher waste DFs.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Nuclear Materials Contained in High-Activity Waste Arising from the Operations at the 'SHELTER' Facility

As a result of the nuclear accident at the Chernobyl NPP in 1986, the explosion dispeesed nuclear materials contained in the nuclear fuel of the reactor core over the destroyed facilities at Unit No. 4 and over the territory immediately adjacent to the destroyed unit. The debris was buried under the Cascade Wall. Nuclear materials at the SHELTER can be characterized as spent nuclear fuel, fresh fuel assemblies (including fuel assemblies with damaged geometry and integrity, and individual fuel elements), core fragments of the Chernobyl NPP Unit No. 4, finely-dispersed fuel (powder/dust), uranium and plutonium compounds in water solutions, and lava-like nuclear fuel-containing masses. The new safe confinement (NSC) is a facility designed to enclose the Chernobyl NPP Unit No. 4 destroyed by the accident. Construction of the NSC involves excavating operations, which are continuously monitored including for the level of radiation. The findings of such monitoring at the SHELTER site will allow us to characterize the recovered radioactive waste. When a process material categorized as high activity waste (HAW) is detected the following HLW management operations should be involved: HLW collection; HLW fragmentation (if appropriate); loading HAW into the primary package KT-0.2; loading the primary package filled with HAW into the transportation cask KTZV-0.2; and storing the cask in temporary storage facilities for high-level solid waste. The CDAS system is a system of 3He tubes for neutron coincidence counting, and is designed to measure the percentage ratio of specific nuclear materials in a 200-liter drum containing nuclear material intermixed with a matrix. The CDAS consists of panels with helium counter tubes and a polyethylene moderator. The panels are configured to allow one to position a waste-containing drum and a drum manipulator. The system operates on the ‘add a source’ basis using a small Cf-252 source to identify irregularities in the matrix during an assay. The platform with the source is placed under the measurement chamber. The platform with the source material is moved under the measurement chamber. The design allows one to move the platform with the source in and out, thus moving the drum. The CDAS system and radioactive waste containers have been built. For each drum filled with waste two individual measurements (passive/active) will be made. This paper briefly describes the work carried out to assess qualitatively and quantitatively the nuclear materials contained in high-level waste at the SHELTER facility. These efforts substantially increased nuclear safety and security at the facility.

Cherkas, Dmytro↗

Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) Input Coal Analyses and Off-Gass Filter (OGF) Content Analyses

A full engineering scale Fluidized Bed Steam Reformer (FBSR) system is being used at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) to stabilize acidic Low Activity Waste (LAW) known as Sodium Bearing Waste (SBW). The INTEC facility, known as the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU), underwent an Operational Readiness Review (ORR) and a Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) in March 2014. The IWTU began non-radioactive simulant processing in late 2014 and by January, 2015 ; the IWTU had processed 62,000 gallons of simulant. The facility is currently in a planned outage for inspection of the equipment and will resume processing simulated waste feed before commencing to process 900,000 gallons of radioactive SBW. The SBW acidic waste will be made into a granular FBSR product (carbonate based) for disposal in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). In the FBSR process calcined coal is used to create a CO2 fugacity to force the waste species to convert to carbonate species. The quality of the coal, which is a feed input, is important because the reactivity, moisture, and volatiles (C,H,N,O, and S) in the coal impact the reactions and control of the mineralizing process in the primary steam reforming vessel, the Denitration and Mineralizing Reformer (DMR). Too much moisture in the coal can require that additional coal be used. However since moisture in the coal is only a small fraction of the moisture from the fluidizing steam this can be self-correcting. If the coal reactivity or heating value is too low then the coal feed-rate needs to be adjusted to achieve the desired heat generation. Too little coal and autothermal heat generation in the DMR cannot be sustained and/or the carbon dioxide fugacity will be too low to create the desired carbonate mineral species. Too much coal and excess S and hydroxide species can form. Excess sulfur from coal that (1) is too rich in sulfur or (2) from overfeeding coal can promote wall scale and contribute to corrosion in process piping and materials, in excessive off-gas absorbent loading, and in undesired process emissions. The ash content of the coal is important as the ash adds to the DMR and other vessel products which affect the final waste product mass and composition. The amount and composition of the ash also affects the reaction kinetics. Thus ash content and composition contributes to the mass balance. In addition, sodium, potassium, calcium, sulfur, and maybe silica and alumina in the ash may contribute to wall-scale formation. Sodium, potassium, and alumina in the ash will be overwhelmed by the sodium, potassium, and alumina from the feed but the impact from the other ash components needs to be quantified. A maximum coal particle size is specified so the feed system does not plug and a minimum particle size is specified to prevent excess elutriation from the DMR to the Process Gas Filter (PGF). A vendor specification was used to procure the calcined coal for IWTU processing. While the vendor supplied a composite analysis for the 22 tons of coal (Appendix A), this study compares independent analyses of the coal performed at the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) and at the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Three supersacks a were sampled at three different heights within the sack in order to determine within bag variability and between bag variability of the coal. These analyses were also compared to the vendor’s composite analyses and to the coal specification. These analyses were also compared to historic data on Bestac coal analyses that had been performed at Hazen Research Inc. (HRI) between 2004-2011.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Special Analysis for the Disposal of the Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Chemical Processing Plant Low-Level Waste Stream at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada

This special analysis (SA) evaluates whether the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Idaho Chemical Processing Plant (ICPP) Low-Level waste stream is suitable for disposal by shallow land burial at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site on the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The INL ICPP Low-Level waste stream consists of debris and solidified liquids. The INL ICPP Low-Level waste stream requires an SA to resolve two unreviewed disposal questions (UDQs). The first UDQ addresses whether it is acceptable to dispose of radium-226 (226Ra) at an activity concentration that exceeds the NNSS Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) Action Level. The second UDQ evaluates the acceptability of disposing of five long-lived radionuclides without WAC action levels. Long-lived radionuclides without action levels are radionuclides not evaluated in the performance assessment.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Decommissioning of the NPP A-1 heavy water management system - 15121

The paper deals with experience and techniques in the application of decontamination technology and remotely controlled robotic devices for the decontamination and dismantling of the heavy water management system during undergoing decommissioning process of the A-1 NPP as well as treatment of arising liquid waste All of these activities are characterized by high level of radioactivity and contamination. During operation of the A-1 NPP the heavy water management system fulfilled several functions: (1) cooling of the moderator, (2) topping up of the moderator in the active zone, (3) drainage, feed and storage of heavy water, (4) capture of leaked heavy water. Closely associated with heavy water management were systems for separation and isotopic purification of heavy water (distilling station, removing organic impurities station, isotopic purification station). The NPP heavy water system is located inside the power block building in several rooms where the inner surface contamination is up to the level of 10 E4 Bq.cm{sup -2}, dose rate up to 15,0 mGy.h{sup -1} and the feeding pipeline contained liquid RAW with high tritium content. Pre-dismantling decontamination of the heavy water management system and associated systems had to be performed with the intention of improving the radiation situation, i.e. reducing contamination of internal surface and dose rates in the vicinity of the equipment. Various sophisticated procedures such as retrieval of sludge using remotely operated devices and loop chemical decontamination of internal surfaces were applied. The generated radioactive waste such as spent decontamination solutions and sludge were immediately solidified on-site into a geo-polymer matrix using a mobile conditioning facility. For dismantling and fragmentation of some devices, mobile robotic systems MT80 and MT15 were applied which had been developed, designed and constructed as general-purpose decommissioning equipment. Special tooling was developed for application with the robots, such as hydraulic shears, circular saw, reciprocating saw, circular pipe cutter and a system for quick tool-change without direct intervention of the operators. Most of the operations are remotely controlled on basis of visual information from four cameras, with consistent radiation protection of the operators. The implementation of partial decommissioning tasks in such hard and unfavorable radiation conditions (moreover accompanied by generation of specific high-content alpha radwaste) has introduced in practice several new unique decontamination and dismantling techniques and new procedures for the effective on-site processing of generated secondary radioactive waste, including sludge and sorbents. These advantageous techniques, equipment and experience will be exploited in the continuation of the A-1 NPP decommissioning process which has been organized according to distinctively licensed phases and are also being applied in the decommissioning of other NPP in Slovakia as well as abroad. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Secondary Waste Form Down-Selection Data Package—Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming Waste Form

The Hanford Site in southeast Washington State has 56 million gallons of radioactive and chemically hazardous wastes stored in 177 underground tanks (ORP 2010). The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of River Protection (ORP), through its contractors, is constructing the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) to convert the radioactive and hazardous wastes into stable glass waste forms for disposal. Within the WTP, the pretreatment facility will receive the retrieved waste from the tank farms and separate it into two treated process streams. These waste streams will be vitrified, and the resulting waste canisters will be sent to offsite (high-level waste [HLW]) and onsite (immobilized low-activity waste [ILAW]) repositories. As part of the pretreatment and ILAW processing, liquid secondary wastes will be generated that will be transferred to the Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) on the Hanford Site for further treatment. These liquid secondary wastes will be converted to stable solid waste forms that will be disposed of in the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). To support the selection of a waste form for the liquid secondary wastes from WTP, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) has initiated secondary waste form testing work at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). In anticipation of a down-selection process for a waste form for the Solidification Treatment Unit to be added to the ETF, PNNL is developing data packages to support that down-selection. The objective of the data packages is to identify, evaluate, and summarize the existing information on the four waste forms being considered for stabilizing and solidifying the liquid secondary wastes. At the Hanford Site, the FBSR process is being evaluated as a supplemental technology for treating and immobilizing Hanford LAW radioactive tank waste and for treating secondary wastes from the WTP pretreatment and LAW vitrification processes.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Development of Chlorination Process for Cladding Hull Waste and its Combination with Pyroprocessing

The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) is spending efforts to minimize the amount of radioactive wastes generated during pyro-processing. One of the major issues is management of cladding hull waste owing to its large amount (25 wt.% of fuel) and high radioactivity. Although the cladding hull waste might be classified as an intermediate-level waste according to the Korean regulation, the large amount makes it reasonable to develop a way to reduce the amount of cladding hull waste. Previously performed radioactivation analysis results revealed that selective recovery of zirconium from the cladding hull waste will produce a weak beta-decaying zirconium. As a means of selective Zr recovery, KAERI is working on a chlorination process which employs a chemical reaction between metallic zirconium and chlorine gas. The chlorination process generates zirconium tetrachloride (ZrCl{sub 4}) which sublimes at 331 deg. C leading to an easy separation from other radioactive nuclides. KAERI has started the chlorination process R and D with small quartz reactors with grams of cladding hulls, and now its work is proceeded to fundamental approaches and scale-up. In this work, the progress achieved by KAERI on the chlorination process is reviewed and a recent approach to combine the chlorination process with pyro-processing, so-called MKZP (Min Ku Zirconium Process) is introduced. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Evaluation of the predictive capability of coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical models for a heated bentonite/clay system (HE-E) in the Mont Terri Rock Laboratory

Process understanding and parameter identification using numerical methods based on experimental findings are a key aspect of the international cooperative project DECOVALEX. Comparing the predictions from numerical models against experimental results increases confidence in the site selection and site evaluation process for a radioactive waste repository in deep geological formations. In the present phase of the project, DECOVALEX-2015, eight research teams have developed and applied models for simulating an in-situ heater experiment HE-E in the Opalinus Clay in the Mont Terri Rock Laboratory in Switzerland. The modelling task was divided into two study stages, related to prediction and interpretation of the experiment. A blind prediction of the HE-E experiment was performed based on calibrated parameter values for both the Opalinus Clay, that were based on the modelling of another in-situ experiment (HE-D), and modelling of laboratory column experiments on MX80 granular bentonite and a sand/bentonite mixture .. After publication of the experimental data, additional coupling functions were analysed and considered in the different models. Moreover, parameter values were varied to interpret the measured temperature, relative humidity and pore pressure evolution. The analysis of the predictive and interpretative results reveals the current state of understanding and predictability of coupled THM behaviours associated with geologic nuclear waste disposal in clay formations.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Unique natural system modeling aspects of the H-Tank Farm at the Savannah river site - 15271

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is in the process of closing radioactive waste storage tanks at the Savannah River Site (SRS). One of the key technical documents supporting closure and regulatory decision documents is the Performance Assessment (PA). PAs within the DOE complex are performance-based, risk-informed analyses of the fate and transport of residual contaminants, in this case any residual material remaining following cleaning and closure of the tank systems. There are two active radioactive waste storage facilities at SRS, F-Tank Farm (FTF) and H-Tank Farm (HTF), which consist of 51 carbon steel waste tanks. To date, six tanks have been emptied and closed in FTF. Activities are currently in progress to support closure of the first tanks in HTF. A PA has been developed for HTF and includes modeling that takes into account the unique aspects of the natural system associated with HTF. These unique aspects include the water table elevation in relation to the tanks and the complex flow patterns of the groundwater beneath HTF. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Characterization and Remediation of the Hanford 618-10 Burial Ground Steel-pipe Vertical Pipe Units - 18238

The 618-10 Burial Ground is approximately 485 feet by 470 feet and consisted of 12 trenches and 94 VPUs. It is located approximately 5 miles north of Richland, Washington in the 600 Area of the Hanford Site. The 618-10 Burial Ground received low- to high-activity waste (e.g., fission products and some plutonium-contaminated waste). Most of the waste originated at the 300 Area laboratory facilities. Lower activity radioactive material and shielded drums were disposed in trenches, while laboratory wastes with higher levels of radiation were disposed in Vertical Pipe Units (VPUs). The 618-10 Burial Ground contained approximately 94 VPUs (uncertain mix of first and second generation). There are different variants of VPUs. The first generation of VPUs was simply corrugated culverts or standard pipes, 14-in diameter and 10- to 15-ft long, buried vertically. The second generation of VPUs was 22-in diameter, 15-ft long waste receptacles constructed by welding five 55-gallon bottomless drums together end-to-end and burying them vertically, separated by approximately 10 feet on center in rows approximately 25 feet apart. A subset of the first generation VPUs consisted of the steel pipe VPUs represented by carbon-steel pipes, 10 to 24 in. in diameter with various wall thicknesses. This paper will present the remediation of the steel-pipe VPUs, which were the last of the VPUs remediated in this project. The remediation process developed for steel pipe VPUs included exposing a section of the VPU within an excavated trench, placing a mix box around the VPU, filling the mix box with grout, shearing the VPU and contents, and then removing the grout waste mixture into a waste box for disposal at the Hanford Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF). Prior the start of remedial activities extensive mock-ups were performed on surrogate steel-pipe VPUs to ensure the effectiveness of the process before introducing the hazards of radioactive VPU waste. The critical steps in the process of size reducing steel-pipe VPUs and mixing the contents with grout was successfully demonstrated. This process was completed for each steel-pipe VPU in successive lifts until the entire set of steel-pipe VPUs were mixed in grout and removed from the excavation. The remediation of the steel-pipe VPUs proved be successful in that all the VPUs were removed and transported to ERDF without a release to the local environment. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Unreviewed Disposal Question Evaluation: Disposal of the Transuranic Waste Processing Center Mixed Low-Level Waste at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada

This Unreviewed Disposal Question Evaluation (UDQE) assesses whether the Transuranic Waste Processing Center (TWPC) Mixed Low-Level Waste (MLLW) (FWORCHMLLW103, Revision 11 [TWPC 2018]) is suitable for shallow land burial (SLB) at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site (RWMS) on the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). Disposal of the TWPC MLLW waste stream meets all performance objectives of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Manual DOE M 435.1-1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual, Chapter IV, Section P (DOE 1999). The TWPC MLLW waste stream is recommended for acceptance without conditions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Immobilization in Cement of Rice Husk used as Bio-sorbent of Radionuclides Present in Radioactive Liquid Waste - 17225

The use of new techniques for the treatment of radioactive liquid wastes has been studied in the last few years by many countries. In this context, the bio-sorption has been an attractive process. In Brazil the Radioactive Waste Management Laboratory of Nuclear and Energy Research Institute (IPEN-CNEN/SP), studied some bio-masses to be used as bio-sorbents to remove radionuclides of the radioactive liquid waste stored in this institute. The rice husk is a low cost and wide available byproduct of the agriculture and its bio-sorption capacity has been proved as feasible. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate if its immobilization in a cementitious matrix will result in a waste form that meets the requirements of Brazilian regulations for final disposal of low and intermediate level waste. This work aimed at evaluating the properties of the immobilization of rice husk in a cementitious matrix. Some properties of the waste form with incorporated rice husk were evaluated, as free water, workability, setting time and mechanical strength. The results indicated that cement matrices with 5 and 10% of biomass and water/cement ratio of 0.30 and 0.35 are viable for the production of waste forms that meets the Brazilian regulations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Quantification of Raman-Interfering Polyoxoanions for Process Analysis: Comparison of Different Chemometric Models and a Demonstration on Real Hanford Waste

The Hanford site represents a complicated environmental remediation challenge, remaining from the production of nuclear weapons. Over 100 million gallons of liquid radioactive waste of unknown composition will be chemically processed and vitrified, but the varying chemical composition and highly radioactive nature of the waste preclude the implementation of more developed, offline technologies to determine the composition. The only practical approach to waste treatment will require the significant utilization of real-time, chemometric modeling approaches. Although chemometric approaches have been applied to the analysis of Hanford waste, the models developed were highly tank-specialized, and limited discussion was provided on how models fared with interfering signals. As the tank waste is largely composed of oxoanions, which tend to have interfering Raman spectra, the general question was posed as to what chemometric approach is best suited to accurately quantify analytes in the presence of interfering signals. This was carried out by examining the ability of classical least square (CLS), principal component regression (PCR), partial least square (PLS), and locally weighted regression (LWR) to quantify NO 3 – and CO 3 2– using their bands around 1050 cm –1 . Finally, for all samples, the PLS-based model was found to be the most efficient approach from a model building and application perspective.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

A History of Hanford Tank Waste, Implications for Waste Treatment and Disposal

More than 40 years of plutonium processing have left almost 56 million gallons of mixed radioactive waste sequestered in 177 underground tanks on the Hanford Site. Three different processing technologies were employed for plutonium purification in addition to uranium scavenging and fission product removal from the tank waste. All of these chemical processes have contributed to a complex waste stream that varies from tank to tank that presents downstream processing challenges to render the waste into a safe form for long-term storage. The current disposition pathway for Hanford tank waste is vitrification. To maximize waste loading and minimize the number of high-level waste canisters stored in a geologic repository, pretreatment of the waste is required. Both pretreatment and vitrification operations are impacted by the waste composition.

Separations, filtration, ion exchange↗

Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Plan for Vessel and Canister Decontamination - 19283

The Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) was designed to use a proprietary fluidized-bed steam reforming process to treat 3,400,000 L (898,184 gal) of radioactive sodium bearing waste (SBW). IWTU is currently in commissioning and startup phase prior to future processing of SBW. The current simulant SBW is introduced into the denitration mineralization reformer and transformed into a dry, granular product that is filtered and eventually transferred into a product canister. The intention of the facility is to process the SBW and store the product canisters in vaults to await shipping to a depository at a later date. The IWTU is a part of the Idaho Cleanup Project Core, located at the INL Site and operated by Fluor Idaho, LLC. During early operation and testing of the facility, it was observed that the original process equipment decontamination system did not possess the capability to recover from plant shutdowns that result from upset conditions or maintenance outages; thus, a need for a redesigned decontamination system was identified. This paper discusses current decontamination methods and their capabilities and areas where these methods fall short of decontaminating process equipment and product canisters. This paper discusses the design and purpose of the decontamination methods being tested and developed for implementation into the IWTU. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Impact of axial velocity and transmembrane pressure (TMP) on ARP filter performance

The Savannah River Site (SRS) is currently treating radioactive liquid waste with the Actinide Removal Process (ARP) and the Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU). Recently, the low filter flux through the ARP of approximately 5 gallons per minute has limited the rate at which radioactive liquid waste can be treated. Salt Batch 6 had a lower processing rate and required frequent filter cleaning. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) has a desire to understand the causes of the low filter flux and to increase ARP/MCU throughput. One potential method for increasing filter flux is to adjust the axial velocity and transmembrane pressure (TMP). SRR requested SRNL to conduct bench-scale filter tests to evaluate the effects of axial velocity and transmembrane pressure on crossflow filter flux. The objective of the testing was to determine whether increasing the axial velocity at the ARP could produce a significant increase in filter flux. The authors conducted the tests by preparing slurries containing 6.6 M sodium Salt Batch 6 supernate and 2.5 g MST/L, processing the slurry through a bench-scale crossflow filter unit at varying axial velocity and TMP, and measuring filter flux as a function of time.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗